On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 00:50 +, Steve Long wrote:
> Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
> > So I just think something has to be changed e.g. making paludis an
> > official gentoo project and mentioning it in the docs, but keep portage
> > as the default pm.
> > If portage can't get improved, then people hav
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:41:50 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list and it's doing my
> head in. Is there anyone else who feels the same, strongly enough to
> risk his ire?
If you think Ciaran is trolling, just ignore him. Be part of the
s
On 16/03/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
> We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism, but
> your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as such.
>
IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list and it's doing my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
> Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
>> We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism, but
>> your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as such.
>>
> IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:41:50
+:
> Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
>> We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism,
>> but your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as
>> such.
>>
Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
> We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism, but
> your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as such.
>
IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list and it's doing my head in.
Is there anyone else who feels the same, st
Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
> So I just think something has to be changed e.g. making paludis an
> official gentoo project and mentioning it in the docs, but keep portage
> as the default pm.
> If portage can't get improved, then people have to get informed that
> there is a better alternative, because
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:42:17 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My understanding was that the portage team can't move forward with a
> new version until EAPI0 is done?
They can't move forward with changes that break ebuild compatibility
until EAPI-0 is documented and EAPI-1 can start t
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:42:17 + Steve Long
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >> * Portage.
> > Portage is being incrementally improved.
> My understanding was that the portage team can't move forward with a
> new version until EAPI0 is done?
Entirely u
Alec Warner wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> * Portage.
> Portage is being incrementally improved.
My understanding was that the portage team can't move forward with a new
version until EAPI0 is done?
> I also think either you are ignoring the changes or you are just unaware
> of things that the
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:30:01 + Steve Long
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Which, even if it were true, is besides the point if doing so
> > prevents any development from getting done. And just how much
> > development gets done on the forums?
> >
> No development gets d
On 15/03/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
No development gets done on here either. Discussion does. Development
happens when people aren't getting drawn into long flames about the distro
they use, which only clog up peoples' inboxes. Are you suggesting a dev
forum on forums.gentoo.org
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Which, even if it were true, is besides the point if doing so prevents
> any development from getting done. And just how much development gets
> done on the forums?
>
No development gets done on here either. Discussion does. Development
happens when people aren't getting d
Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote:
> I'm not sure that differs much from the meaning I interpreted from
> Ciaran's point.
I read antarus' point as: without a happy dev community you won't achieve a
quality distro.
Ciaran seems to be saying you can, and *then* everyone will be happy. That
sounds like A
George Prowse wrote:
> Caleb Cushing wrote:
>> How about the speed of search's? the speed of resolving dependancy's?
>> how about the speed that it takes to calculate a dependancy listing
>> after you've already done it once? portage is SLOW.
> So speed...
>
Re: speed of searches, try qsearch from
15 matches
Mail list logo
