On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> if it's just used by catalyst to pre-seed world then indeed pms
> doesn't have anything to do with it, but if it's meant to be some set
> that profiles add to 'world' set dynamically, then interoperability is
> probably desired
>
I'd sugg
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:39:40 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 15 Oct 2015 19:01, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:34:22 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > - should the packages list be in a new packages.default, or
> > > should we create a new set to hold it, or should we just go
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:15:42 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Zac Medico
> wrote:
> > On 10/15/2015 02:51 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> >
> >> The only change in moving it to @profile is the warning.
> >
> > What's the point of getting rid of the warning if the p
On 10/15/15 6:00 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
.
The last time I checked, @system was not used for stage1. Catalyst used
package.build instead. Has that changed?
Sorry, yes it is. I forgot how that file was interpreted. I was
thinking when I wrote my previous emails that it contained a list of
packag
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 02:51 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
>> The only change in moving it to @profile is the warning.
>
> What's the point of getting rid of the warning if the package is going
> to get pulled back in on the next @world update? Either w
On 10/15/2015 02:51 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 10/15/15 5:20 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 02:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>> so if iputils is in @profile, and i do:
>> emerge -C iputils
>> i don't get the ugly warning about it being in @system, but if i do:
>> emerge @wo
On 10/15/15 5:20 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/15/2015 02:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
so if iputils is in @profile, and i do:
emerge -C iputils
i don't get the ugly warning about it being in @system, but if i do:
emerge @world
iputils comes back. i think that's OK actually since
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 02:03 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> Given the goals, having catalyst seed /var/lib/portage/world seems
>>> pretty reasonable to me.
>>
>> Then the question becomes how. Does it
On 10/15/2015 02:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 15 Oct 2015 12:15, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 08:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> background:
>>> everyone wants @system to be slim, but most people want the initial stage
>>> tarball that we release and you install Gentoo from to not be co
On 10/15/2015 02:03 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> Given the goals, having catalyst seed /var/lib/portage/world seems
>> pretty reasonable to me.
>
> Then the question becomes how. Does it diff @profile between the two
> profiles and put the extra
On 15 Oct 2015 12:15, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 08:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > background:
> > everyone wants @system to be slim, but most people want the initial stage
> > tarball that we release and you install Gentoo from to not be completely
> > sparse. we've got a bug for this to
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> Given the goals, having catalyst seed /var/lib/portage/world seems
> pretty reasonable to me.
Then the question becomes how. Does it diff @profile between the two
profiles and put the extra stuff in @selected? Or, does the profile
just contai
On 10/15/2015 01:45 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> What's probably desired is to create a stage3 profile which adds
>> whatever extra stuff you want to @system, and to use the stage3 profile
>> for to build stage3. After the stage3 is built, catalys
On 10/15/2015 01:29 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 10/15/15 4:14 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 01:06 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>>> On 10/15/15 3:15 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
In portage, @world = @profile + @selected + @system, which means that
@profile is protected from depclea
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> What's probably desired is to create a stage3 profile which adds
> whatever extra stuff you want to @system, and to use the stage3 profile
> for to build stage3. After the stage3 is built, catalyst could set some
> other profile if we don't want
On 10/15/15 4:14 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/15/2015 01:06 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 10/15/15 3:15 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
In portage, @world = @profile + @selected + @system, which means that
@profile is protected from depclean since it's a part of @world.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show
On 10/15/2015 01:06 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 10/15/15 3:15 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>
>> In portage, @world = @profile + @selected + @system, which means that
>> @profile is protected from depclean since it's a part of @world.
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532224
>
> I t
On 10/15/2015 12:29 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 15/10/15 03:15 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 08:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> background: everyone wants @system to be slim, but most people
>>> want the initial stage tarball that we release and you install
>>> Gentoo from to not be
On 10/15/15 3:15 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
In portage, @world = @profile + @selected + @system, which means that
@profile is protected from depclean since it's a part of @world.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532224
I thought so but wasn't sure and was about to test. Both @system an
For some reason I didn't receive the original email from Mike. I'll
answer via Rich's email. Hopefully I won't be misinterpreting anything.
On 10/15/15 1:43 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
items to sort out:
- should the list of packages be in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/10/15 03:15 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 08:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> background: everyone wants @system to be slim, but most people
>> want the initial stage tarball that we release and you install
>> Gentoo from to not be compl
On 10/15/2015 08:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> background:
> everyone wants @system to be slim, but most people want the initial stage
> tarball that we release and you install Gentoo from to not be completely
> sparse. we've got a bug for this topic:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/393445
>
> items t
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> items to sort out:
> - should the list of packages be in catalyst or profile-stacked content
> -> imo it should be entirely in the profile
++
This would be really nice to combine with mix-ins so that instead of
special cases we could ju
On 15 Oct 2015 19:01, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:34:22 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > - should the packages list be in a new packages.default, or should we
> > create a new set to hold it, or should we just go with @profile ?
> > -> @profile has the advantage of already existin
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:34:22 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> background:
> everyone wants @system to be slim, but most people want the initial
> stage tarball that we release and you install Gentoo from to not be
> completely sparse. we've got a bug for this topic:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/393445
background:
everyone wants @system to be slim, but most people want the initial stage
tarball that we release and you install Gentoo from to not be completely
sparse. we've got a bug for this topic:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/393445
items to sort out:
- should the list of packages be in catalyst or
26 matches
Mail list logo