Re: [gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 08/28/2016 07:28 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: >> B. Backport just the changes needed for chromium to older ffmpeg > > Any chance of it being included upstream or would it be a downstream > carry for a long time?

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-08-28 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2016-08-28 23:59 UTC. Removals: kde-apps/kde-wallpapers 20160828-16:16 johu2ffcd3a kde-plasma/kactivities-workspace 20160825-20:36 johuecf50a8 Additions: app-vim

Re: [gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

On 08/28/2016 07:28 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > See for context. > > chromium-54 is currently hard masked; it'd soon enter ~arch, and then > stable in ~6 weeks. ffmpeg-3.0.1 is currently hard masked. > > These are the options I see for how to

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

Ok all, here is what openrc-0.22 is going to do in terms of setting the host name. If /etc/hostname exists, the first word of that file will be used as the host name. Otherwise, if the value is set in /etc/conf.d/hostname it will be used. Otherwise, OpenRC will not touch the hostname. One

[gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

See for context. chromium-54 is currently hard masked; it'd soon enter ~arch, and then stable in ~6 weeks. ffmpeg-3.0.1 is currently hard masked. These are the options I see for how to proceed. Feel free to share further alternatives. A. Prepare

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > (and what abuse? it did exactly what it was supposed to do quite nicely, > until it stopped doing that. Now you need to track state and hope you > don't have race conditions ... ) > You were tracking state before; in

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/28/2016 04:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:34:20 +0200 > Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> On 08/28/2016 08:30 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > * no

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:34:20 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 08/28/2016 08:30 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >>> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Then tools forgot to properly update mtab because hurr why u no symlink > to /proc/mounts (oh wait, /proc/self/mounts ) > > So everyone migrated to /etc/mtab as a symlink (even OpenRC, because > everyone does it) > I

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/28/2016 08:30 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that >>> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far as I can tell >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/27/2016 11:30 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that >>> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far as I can tell >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/27/2016 11:48 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:30:09 -0700 > Daniel Campbell wrote: > >> On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 28/08/16 07:30, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that >>> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far as I can tell >> It's

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:30:09 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > > On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that > >> systemd uses, which is true but not

Re: [gentoo-dev] base-system needs developers who care

On 08/25/2016 01:01 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:17:58 + > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > >> Over the years, the base-system package herd has grown in size. Today >> it comprises 320 packages, of which 61 of those have more than one >> maintainer. The

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that >> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far as I can tell > > It's a de facto standard. Being different for the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 15:26 +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: > This package is now up for grabs: > net-irc/rbot I've added this package to the ruby project, but a more dedicated maintainer would still be welcome. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part