On 12/11/2016 10:49 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 12/11/2016 02:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wr
# Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> (11 Dec 2016)
# Dead upstream, no maintainer and it hasn't been bumped
# since 2013. Masking for removal in 30 days (wrt bug #489878)
sys-power/powerman
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
please stop speculating and throwing flamebaits
here and there. We have more than enough already.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 12/04/2016 05:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 +
> Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 +
>>> Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org&
On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 +
> Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100
>>> Patrice Clement <monsie...@gentoo.org
that bumping and fixing an ebuild at
the same time can be considered an atomic change since it's effectively
a _new_ ebuild
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
t for a start
>> would
>> be appropriate.
>
> Hardware is not the problem. Lack of software is.
>
Have you considered using openQA[1] like openSUSE[2] and Fedora[3] do
instead of reinventing the wheel?
[1] http://open.qa/
[2] https://openqa.opensuse.org/
[3] https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
Hi,
Alex and I have no time to take care of this package so if any of you
wants to help please feel free to add yourself to metadata and start
fixing things ;) There are a few outstanding bugs and a pending version
bump from a few days ago.
Thanks
--
markos
On 11/04/2015 05:37 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 11:34 AM, lejonet wrote:
>> Hi gentoo-dev,
>>
>> I recently had a bout with sudo and sssd, and found that the problem was that
>> sudo wasn't sssd aware and the reason we don't have a USE-flag for that is
ion on the timeline.
>
> +1
>
> You said it better than I could have.
>
> Ulrich
>
yeah, +1 on that too. I am not too bothered with the name to be honest.
However, using 'ChangeLog' for git logs sounds like something most of us
and users are familiar with already so that should work.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
/bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540540
> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525674
>
fwiw, it sounds good to me
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 10/06/2015 10:29 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 19:39:42 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/06/2015 06:58 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:32:07 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>&
On 10/06/2015 06:58 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:32:07 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following packages currently use the 'audit' local useflag
>>
>> ~$ qgrep -N -s -l -e "^IUSE.*audit" | sed &q
urt as most of our users already know that
> Gentoo developers don't care about them at all.
>
can we please calm down once again?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
>
i might not understand 100% what you are trying to say but why not add
gnu_andrew to the java mail alias on pecker? how is metadata.xml going
to solve this problem?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
se that does seem to be something
portage-internal specific in the way it handles changes in {,R}DEPEND
without revbumps. Where is this thing documented in the first place?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
is selected when filing a bug?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 03/04/2015 02:56 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:57:40PM +0200, Markos Chandras wrote:
One that that I miss though is the git (+ssh) links for rw access
to the repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a
repository for rw access. Is there a way
) links for rw access to the
repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a repository for
rw access. Is there a way to generate such urls on the web interface?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
=Allrequestee_type-4=short_desc=archives.gentoo.org%3A%20FILL%20IN%20HEREversion=n%2Fa
Excellent! Looks great. Thank you very much for your hard work
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU6ajjAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCOIsQAMFtaWzc8sJxx3a3wXtuoUvL
Z5FM6z3Hnc/oCRI3Bm/vwv/jD+i6V7eZsEeqhmrWqvA6WZiP0piBslfHStrvIM1M
NLaY4ifkYkTr/P9ob8ACxGm2KzdJLaMHavfPvdgyI5LvJP6e8yCDARs6CortaYlh
7OtoP9rTRqo7s
really improve the quality of our lists and people wanting to
start a flame will see that this is no longer the place to do so.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU5aVfAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCNZYQAJ5iu0JKGWsPoEMXwTfSiHNy
UmCiEn11Hoh2Y+1HO1s9MW0PHuTsIY
to do and turned into a bunch of mean people pointing
fingers at each other?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU5dmAAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCNwQP/3pffbifLk24zHVDh7nlHOxv
2dqggYIro4SxmhaRI2/2gRa/ozdwsu6JjH0+f5taMThvX5OAiJWmQL8u53A/RlO
itself. if the kernel
lacks support for seccomp, daemons generally should fallback at
runtime. if they don't, people should file bugs to get them
fixed. -mike
Yes please
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU5mvTAAoJEPqDWhW0r
else do you expect him to
know he did something wrong? I am a bit worried QA is taking such
actions without communicating that with the developer. If you don't
let people know they do mistakes, it's likely they will do them again.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/16/15 13:53, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 02/16/2015 12:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
I too believe that if you are reverting someone's commit you
should at least drop him an email to let him know. How else do
you expect him to know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/15/15 01:55, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 02/14/2015 06:38 PM, Christopher Head wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:49:56 +0200 Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
You don't have to participate to the discussions in the mailing
lists
.
Talk to me if interested...
Best, Andreas
If you write a small item we can add it to the next GMN to reach a
wider audience. I see we already have a vmware entry at
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs/Vmware_developer
which is nice :)
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
a month or so is
better than nothing
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU36bkAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCbHgP/RrqhwyRFUxjBZhRnCRhRWeR
o/FEX/JMSY3zXMfeJE47O3InqMewfxcREZxEI50W4g0mJGKy/Z+fOXbyo9efWRBE
jNOZoRDh3ZXOIQL6lO7beQpJTzC7l2uI9
. If that's not clear, or causes
confusing, perhaps it would be best to document the use flags in a
better way and deal with it.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU0UaIXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
the normal procedure
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUujN7XxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMjQx
RjEwRUQ0QjgxREVCRjE5AAoJEB8Q7UuB3r8ZWegH/jaswVnHB14ozVO54TWwiThf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2014)
# Homepage returns 404 which probably suggests upstream has vanished.
# Superseded by app-text/dos2unix. Bug #533222
app-misc/fixdos
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478764
I suppose it makes sense to drop old glibc ebuilds.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUlx7ZXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/17/2014 09:43 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 10/17/14 14:55, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2014 01:00 AM, Patrick McLean wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:25:53 -0400 Anthony G. Basile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2014 01:00 AM, Patrick McLean wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:25:53 -0400 Anthony G. Basile
bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/06/14 13:13, Markos Chandras wrote: Let's face it, this is
not a job just anyone can do. I asked a few people
now on?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUMs2tXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMjQx
RjEwRUQ0QjgxREVCRjE5AAoJEB8Q7UuB3r8ZFwkH/0lpV0/ph88gKCOJznflrtgN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/11/2014 07:30 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 21:21:24 +0100 Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 09/10/2014 03:01 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
+1; to summarize my thoughts: Herds misrepresent manpower.
true and false
to get more people on board if you don't make it
known where help is actually needed?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUELLEXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMjQx
.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUCsLeXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMjQx
RjEwRUQ0QjgxREVCRjE5AAoJEB8Q7UuB3r8ZQR8H/22hdfZfk1TZiR2bxR5pPEwW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/06/2014 09:16 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:42 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Oldschool python broke on the new CVS box, fixed now.
Hi Robin,
Ok thanks. Is there a way to generate some stats for August so we
can put them
for two weeks. Is
there a problem? Maybe you turned them off during the migration but
never turned them back on? Is there another problem? Is there a way to
get some stats for August so I can use them for the upcoming GMN?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (02 Sep 2014)
# MSN service terminated.
# You can still use your MSN account in net-im/skype
# or switch to an open protocol instead
# Masked for removal in 30 days
net-im/kmess
net-im/amsn
x11-themes/amsn-skins
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP
that they are doing it wrong.
Sigh.
Can you please troll somewhere else?
(picking random email to reply)
can we please move this off-list?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-needed.txt
We already maintain such a list (along with instructions how to get
involved) here
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/maintainer-needed.xml
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 06/29/2014 03:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Hi Markos,
I was wondering why docker 1.0.0 wasn't seeming to get updated on my
boxes recently, despite me commiting the update to the cvs tree, and
Tianon noticed that it was masked at the moment:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (03
On 06/29/2014 09:12 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker
but I most likely did it because I was asked to mask =lxc-1.0.0 by
the virtualization team (and Diego
On 06/29/2014 10:03 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker
but I most likely did it because I was asked
On 06/29/2014 10:23 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 29 June 2014 17:03:52 Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking
On 06/02/2014 02:03 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 23:07:55 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
Perhaps it makes more sense to disband the herd and put all packages
except the ones you use up for grabs?
I suppose
/20130917-summary.txt
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJTixXHXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMjQx
RjEwRUQ0QjgxREVCRjE5AAoJEB8Q7UuB3r8ZpzgH
On 06/01/2014 01:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking
stabilizing
On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Indeed. I only use a subset of the dev-tools packages so those that I
don't use will be unmaintained in practice. I will add something to the
Staffing Needs wiki page
will add something to the
Staffing Needs wiki page but feel free to join the herd if you have any
interest in these packages.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
sessions to always try to
upstream their patches. If you think a maintainer deviated from upstream
for no good reason, well, I would like to think this is an exception
instead of common practice.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
in the tree in x11-misc/, libfm too etc)
Maybe it's possible to merge obconf and obconf-qt with a new 'qt' use
flag. The less duplication we do, the less time we will need to spend
maintaining the packages.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 05/10/2014 07:31 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 13:50 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 10 May 2014 04:34, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/09/2014 09:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2014 16:15:58 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I
a special case and we need our
own pc files?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 05/09/2014 09:08 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 09 May 2014 20:57:29 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
I was wondering, is there a good reason we keep our own pkgconfig
files instead of communicating that to upstream and resolve that
properly?
Yes, when your instead
because reverse deps are affected. But really, if
there is no other alternative, we shouldn't be treating this as a
special case. We patch upstream packages all the time after all
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 01/26/2014 01:57 AM, Chris Reffett wrote:
On 01/25/2014 12:22 PM, Andrew Hamilton wrote:
On 1/25/2014 9:24 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 11/10/2013 06:12 AM, Johann Schmitz wrote:
- gpg control packet
I already have too many packages to take care of but my company
is using nagion
reasons...?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 01/25/2014 01:09 PM, Chris Reffett wrote:
On 01/25/2014 05:12 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 01/23/2014 04:48 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:36:06 Chris Reffett
creff...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2014 11:28 AM
.
The handbook has not been updated for a good number of years therefore I
am moving bits from it to devmanual whenever I have the time.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
).
(picking a random email from the thread)
ping again. 3 months later, the list of bugs remain the same. Shall we
consider dropping it to maintainer-needed?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
There is no profiles.desc documentation in devmanual
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/profiles/profiles.desc/index.html
Discussing this in gentoo-dev makes no sense. Whoever wants the
profiles.desc to be part of the devmanual document, please submit a patch.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP
the g.o frontpage.)
I haven't noticed there was a http://overlays.gentoo.org webpage.
Looks awesome :)
Thank you for the post-mortem analysis and for restoring the data
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
the squashfs. And unlike some types of unionfs,
it doesn't come with extra runtime slowdown.
What do you think?
+1 I like the idea
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
them to maintainer-needed
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
/
Fine by me. We will drop the rest to m-n
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 01/09/2014 08:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 09 December 2013 16:32:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
Is pam team still active? I wonder about this as, recently, we
with the
developers that cause them. I read the entire thread and I still don't
think there is an agreement on who broke the tree and why. Would a
private discussion be better before going publicly with accusations?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU
tell
me if what you said is clear to everyone. It certainly isn't to the
person who caused the problem so what I am saying is that maybe it's
better first to communicate the problem with him before starting a
public heated discussion.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
in
committing today...
What's wrong?
Thanks,
Alon
Hi Alon,
its not only you. Seems something is broken on infra side or its the pre-
christmas present, the git migration.
Greetings
maybe worth opening a bug (assuming there is no one already) or talk to
#gentoo-infra?
--
Regards,
Markos
.
Plus I don't recall that it be tree-cleaned in this thread, just to
change the default in the install manual to one that is being developed.
Can we please stop this derailed part of this thread? Please do not let
Peter render another thread useless.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
it
fixing some bugs :/
What do you think?
If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say, then I agree we should move
away from it.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
warning telling the user to migrate || die.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
filesystem (I
assume Debian also builds and installs in sandbox first?)? In this case
we will not have to touch openrc (or the ebuild) at all.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
time to call for maintainers or we should consider
merging this herd with another one (base?) to avoid unattended bugs for
a long time.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
is interested in helping out to add himself to metadata given no
coordination has happened so far.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
a decision on
it./p/longdescription
/project
I think this is unnecessary. Infra requested all new projects to be in
the Wiki so I don't think that you are supposed to add a proj/en page
anymore just so you can redirect it to the Wiki
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
with proxy-maintainers to bring this package up
to date.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=net-analyzer%2Fnagios
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
for this purpose but they just didn't have
the time to deploy it properly or something.
Not everyone can afford paid solutions when it comes to contributing to
free software
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (02 Nov 2013)
# On behalf of Treecleaners
# Upstream started a complete rewrite of the package
# meaning that existing bugs will not be fixed by future
# version bumps of the existing code.
# It is unclear when
open bugs and upstream will never fix them and there is no
maintainer to patch the code to fix it properly.
So per treecleaner policy the package will be removed.
Or have you just volunteered to become maintainer and fix the bugs?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 11/02/2013 07:12 PM, yac wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 17:57:34 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/02/2013 05:55 PM, yac wrote:
Hi,
I don't think that upstream deciding to rewrite a package is good
enough reason to tree clean the package. Have you done this
with eg
interest.
It is very mature position to propose enhancement and then - hides, do
not you think?
Sorry if i am saying harsh words, just talking how it looks like from
side view.
No need to escallate this further. People can form their own opinions on
the subject.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
here please. I think we proved that the Gentoo dev
community as a whole is not hostile to user community overlays/projects.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 10/21/2013 02:32 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:41:02 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
No I never meant broken depgraphs. Well for broken deps, repoman does
not let you commit. If you use --force to workaround broken deps,
well, then you get what you
crazy. The affected
packages can slowly be fixed. It's not like they are totally broken
but it's more like of another way to tell you that a few QA problems
exist and that it would be nice to fix them whenever you find some time.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http
long descriptions and other
non-fatal warnings that a few devs may ignore.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSY8FOXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
* not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any
dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games
On 10/20/2013 02:45 PM, hasufell wrote:
- gpg control packet
After doing some tests we will probably apply this patch from bug 483304.
probably? Then this does not belong to the announcement list if no
final decisions have been made yet
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
will end up maintainer-needed, so first comes first served :)
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
* not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from
any
that thread. Your e-mail basically
requests the games@ team opinion. Again, if you didn't want others to
comment on this, you shouldn't have CC'd gentoo-dev.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 10/20/2013 05:04 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote
. It'd be nice to be able to contribute something
worthwhile to Gentoo, even if it's just one package (for now).
Hi Daniel,
That's fine. Please contact the proxy-maintainers[1] team to discuss
this further.
[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSXaVwXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzNTVDNDczOUYzRjJEMTRGNDRGMzU2RkMw
OUJGNEY1NEMyQkE3RjNDAAoJEAm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
leaders/members and remove them from the projects
1 - 100 of 753 matches
Mail list logo
