Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:04:47 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Apr 19, 2016 6:28 PM, "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: > > yeah we need to buy him a drink or something really. i'd say make him a > > dev but i'm not sure i'd inflict that punishment on anyone :P > > +1 make him a

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 19 Apr 2016 04:02, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 4/19/16 1:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i waited until the known bugs died down. i don't have access to a > > tinderbox system myself. > > you didn't notice that coreutils and systemd/udev/eudev broke? i had pushed the coreutils issue

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On Apr 19, 2016 6:28 PM, "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: > yeah we need to buy him a drink or something really. i'd say make him a > dev but i'm not sure i'd inflict that punishment on anyone :P +1 make him a dev. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 4/19/16 8:07 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: >>> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike >>> Frysinger: On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike > > Frysinger: > > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > So why on earth are we applying a

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 4/19/16 1:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i waited until the known bugs died down. i don't have access to a > tinderbox system myself. you didn't notice that coreutils and systemd/udev/eudev broke? anyhow, i don't think this whole affair is as bad as i first did, its an easy fix to pkgs.

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 19 Apr 2016 08:15, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger: > > > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > > So why on

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger: > > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > So why on earth are we applying a random

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger: > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream is not > > > using > > > > not everyone uses glibc, and glibc *is*

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger: > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream is not > > using > > not everyone uses glibc, and glibc *is* moving in this > direction.  Gentoo > is simply

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream is not > using not everyone uses glibc, and glibc *is* moving in this direction. Gentoo is simply accelerating the change ... otherwise glibc will take longer to do the actual migration.

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 04/16/2016 09:23 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > I very strongly suggest bumping the glibc ebuild, removing the patch in > the bump, and masking the broken version. Then asking people to test the > patched version to smoke out failures, and in a few months we can > consider re-enabling this

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 04/16/2016 09:23 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: >I very strongly suggest bumping the glibc ebuild, removing the patch in the bump, and masking the broken version. Then asking people to test the patched version to smoke out failures, and in a few months we can consider re-enabling this tomfoolery.

[gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

As of commit ed047cf2c607277629c20bf1a88d727a7f9bb79e we have sys-libs/glibc-2.23 in ~arch. This breaks *lots* of stuff. For example coreutils was broken [1]. According to the tracker bug [2] most of the breakage was introduced in a gentoo-specific patch. On the upstream mailinglist [3] people