Hi all!
Here is a snaphshot of my current desktop environment:
http://tosh.dyndns.biz/~fprosper/snapshot.png
I'm running fluxbox 0.9.10 and kde3.3 on a gentoo 2.6.8.1 kernel system, and
using current portage xfs daemon at default runlevel.
It seems to me that fonts aren't rendered very well, e
Fabrizio Prosperi wrote:
Hi all!
Here is a snaphshot of my current desktop environment:
http://tosh.dyndns.biz/~fprosper/snapshot.png
I'm running fluxbox 0.9.10 and kde3.3 on a gentoo 2.6.8.1 kernel system, and
using current portage xfs daemon at default runlevel.
It seems to me that fonts aren't
Thank U Holly, I've a few questions then:
1) what do u mean with *real* fonts? I've this fonts
under /usr/share/fonts ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/share/fonts $ ls
100dpi TTF corefonts freefont misc ttf-bitstream-vera
75dpi Type1 defaultlfp-fix ms-truetype
> I like artwiz-fonts but apart from that I'm using them because they are the
> only fonts which seem good renderered to me, the point about firefox that
> seems strange to me is that even the menu' and toolbars fonts (which are not
> configurable) are bad-rendered, maybe it's really a problem of g
What do u mean, James... that as long as I don't have any gnome package
installed I can't make my fonts better?
And if so, is there a way to have the gnome-settings-daemon installed with the
minimum number of gnome packages installed?
Or better, is there some equivalent daemon for kde?
I've ru
Hi,
Fabrizio Prosperi wrote:
Here is a snaphshot of my current desktop environment:
http://tosh.dyndns.biz/~fprosper/snapshot.png
I'm running fluxbox 0.9.10 and kde3.3 on a gentoo 2.6.8.1 kernel system, and
using current portage xfs daemon at default runlevel.
It seems to me that fonts aren't ren
> What do u mean, James... that as long as I don't have any gnome package
> installed I can't make my fonts better?
Not quite -- it's just a whole heck of a lot easier to deal with if
you've got bits of Gnome installed so you can easily configure your
GTK apps to look prettier than they do by defa
Fabrizio Prosperi wrote:
Thank U Holly, I've a few questions then:
1) what do u mean with *real* fonts? I've this fonts
under /usr/share/fonts ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/share/fonts $ ls
100dpi TTF corefonts freefont misc ttf-bitstream-vera
75dpi Type1 defaultlf
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:54:21 +0100, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabrizio Prosperi wrote:
> > Thank U Holly, I've a few questions then:
> >
> > 1) what do u mean with *real* fonts? I've this fonts
> > under /usr/share/fonts ...
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/share/fonts $ ls
> > 100dp
Mark Knecht wrote:
In my case I have some fonts on the system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mark]$ ls /usr/share/fonts/
bitmap-fonts bitstream-vera default fonts.cache-1 openoffice
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mark]$ ls /usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera
fonts.cache-1 VeraBI.ttf VeraMoBd.ttf VeraMoIt.ttf VeraSeB
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:54:21 +0100, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fabrizio Prosperi wrote:
Thank U Holly, I've a few questions then:
1) what do u mean with *real* fonts? I've this fonts
under /usr/share/fonts ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/share/fonts $ ls
100dpi TTF
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 23:31:47 +0100, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:54:21 +0100, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Fabrizio Prosperi wrote:
> >>>Thank U Holly, I've a few questions then:
> >>>
> >>>1) what do u mean with *real* fon
Holly Bostick wrote:
So if you say that you want webpages generally to be displayed in
sans-serif style, and then you choose Arial to be the sans serif font,
your web pages will display in Arial. If you have also chosen Times New
Roman as your serif font, you still won't see any Times New Roman-
Daniel Drake wrote:
Holly Bostick wrote:
So if you say that you want webpages generally to be displayed in
sans-serif style, and then you choose Arial to be the sans serif font,
your web pages will display in Arial. If you have also chosen Times
New Roman as your serif font, you still won't see
Well, guys, thank U all for the help. I've followed all your suggestions by
now and surely learnt something more; by now gnome-settings-daemon is
running, gtk-chtheme has been *theming* but still my fonts look ugly...maybe
less ugly than before...maybe my eyes haven't been upgraded yet (!)
I sh
James Hiscock wrote:
I've got a GTK Styles and Fonts applet in my KDE Control Center, but
I'm not sure what package I installed to get it (if any - might be
standard in the current KDE releases)... that should do what you want
it to do, I think... No need for a daemon for KDE, AFAIK.
This is bec
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 20:00 -0600, Kathy Wills wrote:
> >I've got a GTK Styles and Fonts applet in my KDE Control Center, but
> >I'm not sure what package I installed to get it (if any - might be
> >standard in the current KDE releases)... that should do what you want
> >it to do, I think... No nee
>> This is because of the gtk-qt-engines package.
>
>How can one install this separately using emerge?
Duh, I see it's pretty common to add the letter s to the emerge build (emerge
gtk-qt-engine in this case).
Chris
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo
