On 13 May 2012, at 06:57, Paul Colquhoun wrote:
…
You can set LESSIGNORE='*.htm*'. This environment variable is used by
the lesspipe command, which is invoked by less and filters the input
file before giving it to less itself.
…
I have here now:
$ env | grep -i less
On Sat, 12 May 2012 11:41:33 -0400
Norman Invasion invasivenor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 May 2012 11:05, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Norman Invasion writes:
On 11 May 2012 21:40, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Finally, I found something. It's Dolphin!
[...]
Canek Peláez Valdés writes:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org
wrote:
I'm using the new udev with a separate /usr partition.
How do you create your initramfs? The new udev (= 182, I believe)
requires the use of an initramfs if you have a separated /usr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10.05.2012 13:47, Dale wrote:
Hi,
There was a thread a while back that talked about flash. Well, I
let mine upgrade and now it crashes, badly. I unmerged adobe-flash
then tried lightspark and gnash. Neither of those work on sites I
tried,
Alex Schuster wrote:
Not with mine :) Maybe I'll give dracut a try. It seems to be a nice
utility, and I was about to try it, but then I read about Dale's problems
and decided to stay with genkernel for a while.
Wonko
I'm not sure but I think the reason I was having so much
Hello,
On Sat, 12 May 2012, Mick wrote:
Is this 193 Load_Cycle_Count an issue only on the green drives?
AFAIK it was a firmware bug on some models.
I have a very old Compaq laptop here that shows:
# smartctl -A /dev/sda | egrep Power_On|Load_Cycle
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0012 055 055
Hello,
On Sat, 12 May 2012, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:20:57PM -0400, Norman Invasion wrote:
On 9 May 2012 04:47, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As some know, I'm planning to buy me a LARGE hard drive to put all my
videos on, eventually. The prices are
Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10.05.2012 13:47, Dale wrote:
Hi,
There was a thread a while back that talked about flash. Well, I
let mine upgrade and now it crashes, badly. I unmerged adobe-flash
then tried lightspark and gnash. Neither
120513 Alex Schuster wrote:
I'm using the new udev with a separate /usr partition ...
after an unclean shutdown
-- reading files in /proc/pid/ was not a good idea --
/usr wants to be fsck'ed. But it is already mounted at that stage.
Maybe I should just enlarge my root partition and move /usr
Philip Webb writes:
120513 Alex Schuster wrote:
I'm using the new udev with a separate /usr partition ...
after an unclean shutdown
-- reading files in /proc/pid/ was not a good idea --
/usr wants to be fsck'ed. But it is already mounted at that stage.
Maybe I should just enlarge my
Hi,
I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile during a
world update. I reverted back to 4.8, but now certain applications
complain about .49 missing. revdep-rebuild isn't able to detect
breakages and neither revdep-rebuild -L libicui18n.so.49 solved the
problem.
How do I solve
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:32:38PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2012 17:42:34 ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope not. HTML5 runs like crap here. I think it may need a faster dl
speed than I've got. If everything does migrate I might have to upgrade my
internet speed.
Have you
On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:58:51 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile during a
world update.
Same here, but the problems seem fixed now and I unmasked 49-r1 a week or
so ago.
--
Neil Bothwick
Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:11:55 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
# copy data over
rsync -ax /usr /tmp/bindroot/
It would be wise to remount /usr read-only before doing this.
No need for downtime except for the reboot, I guess I cannot
unmount /usr otherwise.
You could drop to single user mode to
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2012, 20:58:51 schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan:
Hi,
I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile during a
world update. I reverted back to 4.8, but now certain applications
complain about .49 missing. revdep-rebuild isn't able to detect
breakages and neither
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/13/2012 06:05 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:58:51 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile
during a world update.
Same here, but the problems seem fixed now and I
Neil Bothwick writes:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:11:55 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
# copy data over
rsync -ax /usr /tmp/bindroot/
It would be wise to remount /usr read-only before doing this.
Yes, as written a few lines above what you quoted :)
No need for downtime except for the
On Sun, 13 May 2012 19:27:07 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
It would be wise to remount /usr read-only before doing this.
Yes, as written a few lines above what you quoted :)
:P
--
Neil Bothwick
Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
[1] .avi files are notorious for this shit. It's what happens when you
are Microsoft and you release any old crappy format without consulting
the other experts out there (who will always outnumber you)
Which better
I have a usb3 docking station which is showing some behavior I don't
understand:
#hdparm -t /dev/sdc
/dev/sdc:
Timing buffered disk reads: 266 MB in 3.00 seconds = 88.59 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 268 MB in 3.01 seconds = 89.05 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 266 MB in 3.01
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2012, 13:28:45 schrieb walt:
I have a usb3 docking station which is showing some behavior I don't
understand:
#hdparm -t /dev/sdc
/dev/sdc:
Timing buffered disk reads: 266 MB in 3.00 seconds = 88.59 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 268 MB in 3.01 seconds =
On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:12:04 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
[1] .avi files are notorious for this shit. It's what happens when
you are Microsoft and you release any old crappy format without
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:28 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a usb3 docking station which is showing some behavior I don't
understand:
#hdparm -t /dev/sdc
/dev/sdc:
Timing buffered disk reads: 266 MB in 3.00 seconds = 88.59 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 268 MB in 3.01
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:12:04 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
[1] .avi files are notorious for this shit. It's what happens
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:01:07 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:12:04 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Alan McKinnon
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:01:07 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:12:04 -0400
Michael Mol
On Sunday 13 May 2012 16:29:53 ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:32:38PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2012 17:42:34 ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope not. HTML5 runs like crap here. I think it may need a faster dl
speed than I've got. If everything does migrate I
On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:03:59 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:01:07 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Alan McKinnon
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:03:59 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:01:07 -0400
Michael Mol
regrettably no. at this point make (correctly) assumes that mounts.o
should have been built, but it didn't.
sorry for my delayed replay, I've tried I lot of possibilities, needless
to say without success.
thanks
michael
--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:44:31AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
regrettably no. at this point make (correctly) assumes that mounts.o
should have been built, but it didn't.
sorry for my delayed replay, I've tried I lot of
31 matches
Mail list logo
