On 11/05/13 08:25, Joseph wrote:
My computer time reported by asterisk server or php database is 6hr ahead.
Why?
My desktop clock is correct, and command line "date" reporting local
time as well.
My /etc/conf.d/hwclock
clock="local"
clock_hctosys="YES"
clock_systohc="YES"
Should I set clock="UT
On 05/10/13 23:00, Manuel McLure wrote:
For PHP you need to set the date.timezone variable in the php.ini file
- that should fix things. For asterisk I have no clue.
When I set in: /etc/conf.d/hwclock
clock="UTC"
my server php and asterisk reporting correct clock setting by on my desktop
For PHP you need to set the date.timezone variable in the php.ini file -
that should fix things. For asterisk I have no clue.
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Joseph wrote:
> On 05/10/13 23:25, Joseph wrote:
>
>> My computer time reported by asterisk server or php database is 6hr ahead.
>> Why
On 05/10/13 23:25, Joseph wrote:
My computer time reported by asterisk server or php database is 6hr ahead.
Why?
My desktop clock is correct, and command line "date" reporting local time as
well.
My /etc/conf.d/hwclock
clock="local"
clock_hctosys="YES"
clock_systohc="YES"
Should I set clock="U
My computer time reported by asterisk server or php database is 6hr ahead.
Why?
My desktop clock is correct, and command line "date" reporting local time as
well.
My /etc/conf.d/hwclock
clock="local"
clock_hctosys="YES"
clock_systohc="YES"
Should I set clock="UTC"?
I'm running Windows via Virt
On 05/10/2013 12:09 PM, Dale wrote:
> My only issue right now is that I can't get the
> memtest thing to work
Maybe I can help you with that one, but it would be easier if you
start that new thread first.
On Friday 10 May 2013 17:28:32 Walter Dnes wrote:
> While I'm on the general topic of setting up the disk, I notice that
> fdisk startup output includes..
>
> > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
> > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>
> Since I'll be usi
On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:33:10 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> So, how was the switch? Uneventful? The more I read, and once I
> learned you could still use a monolithic config file, the less this
> looks like a big deal...
STILL use a monolithic config file? GRUB2 has to use a monolithic config
file, u
On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:22:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I used to use cfdisk, but switched to fdisk because cfdisk's partition
> > alignment wasn't good on large drives. That's not a problem with
> > cgdisk.
>
> That was why I had to use cgdisk. The drive is large. I think cfdisk
> spit out a err
On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:54:13 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Why anyone would choose to use the ultra-kludged DOS partition tables
> > when GPT is so much more elegant is beyond me, unless they have old
> > hardware that can't read a GPT disk.
>
> Familiarity, I suppose. I've used the same lay
Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:25 -0500
> schrieb Dale :
>
> [...]
>> I'm glad you posted this. I thought maybe I had hit a time warp or
>> something. Since he posted it twice, I guess he still doesn't like
it. :/
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>
> Hey now, let's give him a chance :)
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-05-10 7:09 AM, Dale wrote:
>> I'm with ya Alan. Update tho. I use LVM. I use grub2 since a week or
>> so ago. That's a lot for me.
>
> So, how was the switch? Uneventful? The more I read, and once I
> learned you could still use a monolithic config file, the less th
On 05/10/2013 02:04 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> OK, I'm getting serious with the install on my new machine, so here
> come the questions. "lspci -v" shows the onboard GPU as...
>
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen
> Core processor Graphics Controller (r
OK, I'm getting serious with the install on my new machine, so here
come the questions. "lspci -v" shows the onboard GPU as...
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen
Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsyste
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:12:05AM -0700, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Thanks to those who responded for the suggestions.
>
> I didn't think I sent this same message a second time. If I did, it was
> accidental.
>
> Using equery and other portage commands may be better than looking directly
> at /
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:25 -0500
> schrieb Dale :
>
> [...]
>> I'm glad you posted this. I thought maybe I had hit a time warp or
>> something. Since he posted it twice, I guess he still doesn't like it. :/
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>
> He
While I'm on the general topic of setting up the disk, I notice that
fdisk startup output includes..
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Since I'll be using ext2 for the 250 meg / and ext4 for the biggie
/home partitio
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>On 10/05/2013 12:00, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to
>deal
>>> with a GPT disk.
>>>
>>> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:00:50AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
> That's not quite how I read it, but... gdisk has an option to completely
> erase both GPT and DOS partition tables.
I erased the GPT table.
> Why anyone would choose to use the ultra-kludged DOS partition tables
> when GPT is so m
Am 10.05.2013 04:59, schrieb Thomas Mueller:
> Having package data in /var/db/pkg// carries the
> nuisance factor that finding a package involves a fishing expedition through
> many possible categories.
>
> I am spoiled by having /var/db/pkg/ in NetBSD pkgsrc and
> FreeBSD ports, though FreeBSD
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:44:54AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to
> deal with a GPT disk.
>
> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some
> remnants of that are left around confusing fdisk. He wants the
> remnants
Hello Andrea,
Thank you so much for your time. I missed the part about log^2 in the
documentation.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
On 5/10/13, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On May 10, 2013 5:23 PM, "Andrea Conti" wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> > server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
>>
>> Ouch! mi
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> >
> Where do we find gdisk (in portage)?
This app which would be helpful to you, demonstrated:
mingdao@server ~ $ e-file gdisk
* sys-apps/gdisk
Available Versions: 0.6.13 0.6.4_p2-r0 0.5.1-r0 0.6.14
Matched Files:
Am Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:25 -0500
schrieb Dale :
[...]
> I'm glad you posted this. I thought maybe I had hit a time warp or
> something. Since he posted it twice, I guess he still doesn't like it. :/
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
Hey now, let's give him a chance :) . He's trying something new and i
On 2013-05-10 7:09 AM, Dale wrote:
I'm with ya Alan. Update tho. I use LVM. I use grub2 since a week or
so ago. That's a lot for me.
So, how was the switch? Uneventful? The more I read, and once I learned
you could still use a monolithic config file, the less this looks like a
big deal.
On 2013-05-10 6:00 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal
with a GPT disk.
He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some remnants
of that are left around confusin
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 07:10:19 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> Well, when I bought my 3Tb drive, I had to use GPT. Yea, I had to
>> figure it out but it ain't the end of the world. I think I used cgdisk
>> since I usually use cfdisk. They are a lot alike is one reason I used
>> it.
On May 10, 2013 5:23 PM, "Andrea Conti" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
>
> Ouch! minpoll and maxpoll should be specified as the log2 of the actual
> value, i.e. 6 and 10. Those are the defaults anyway.
>
> > disable auth
> > broadcastclient
> > se
On Fri, 10 May 2013 07:10:19 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Well, when I bought my 3Tb drive, I had to use GPT. Yea, I had to
> figure it out but it ain't the end of the world. I think I used cgdisk
> since I usually use cfdisk. They are a lot alike is one reason I used
> it. If I ever replace a drive,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 06:09:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>>> I myself still use fdisk whenever I can. I know I should change, I
>>> know it would be good, but I'm an old fart and mostly can't be
>>> arsed :-)
>
>> I'm with ya Alan. Update tho. I use LVM. I use grub2 since a week
2013/5/10 Thanasis :
> Where do we find gdisk (in portage)?
It's sys-apps/gptfdisk. Took a bit of time finding the package when I
first deployed a Gentoo server some time ago (:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 14:36:38 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> Where do we find gdisk (in portage)?
sys-apps/gptfdisk
It contains GPT versions of fdisk, cfdisk and sfdisk.
--
Neil Bothwick
If at first you don't suceed, try the switch marked "Power"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 10 May 2013 06:09:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I myself still use fdisk whenever I can. I know I should change, I
> > know it would be good, but I'm an old fart and mostly can't be
> > arsed :-)
> I'm with ya Alan. Update tho. I use LVM. I use grub2 since a week or
> so ago. That's a lot
on 05/10/2013 11:47 AM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:52:05 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>
>>> I've repartitioned it 3 or 4 times, but it still comes up with that
>>> error when I fire up fdisk. Is it a problem, and if so, can I dd a
>>> few sectors to remove what
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 10/05/2013 12:00, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal
>>> with a GPT disk.
>>>
>>> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some rem
On Fri, 10 May 2013 12:55:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I myself still use fdisk whenever I can. I know I should change, I know
> it would be good, but I'm an old fart and mostly can't be arsed :-)
I'm older (and probably fartier) than you but still welcomed GPT and
gdisk with open arms :P
-
On 10/05/2013 12:00, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal
>> with a GPT disk.
>>
>> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some remnants
>> of that are left ar
On 2013-05-10 03:11, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util
>> fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.
>
> I've repartitioned it 3 or 4 times, but it still comes up with that
> error when I fire up fdisk. Is it a problem, and if so, can I
Hello,
> server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
Ouch! minpoll and maxpoll should be specified as the log2 of the actual
value, i.e. 6 and 10. Those are the defaults anyway.
> disable auth
> broadcastclient
> server ntp.server.com prefer
This looks fine to me; although configu
On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal
> with a GPT disk.
>
> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some remnants
> of that are left around confusing fdisk. He wants the remnants to go
On 10/05/2013 10:47, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:52:05 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>
>>> I've repartitioned it 3 or 4 times, but it still comes up with that
>>> error when I fire up fdisk. Is it a problem, and if so, can I dd a
>>> few sectors to remove whatever it's compla
On Fri, 10 May 2013 02:59:55 + (UTC), Thomas Mueller wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm posting this as you don't appear to bother with
reading replies - or do you expect us to CC them to you personally?
> Having package data in /var/db/pkg// carries
> the nuisance factor that finding a package invo
On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:52:05 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> > I've repartitioned it 3 or 4 times, but it still comes up with that
> > error when I fire up fdisk. Is it a problem, and if so, can I dd a
> > few sectors to remove whatever it's complaining about?
> >
>
> fdisk does not suppor
Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 May 2013 02:59:55 + (UTC)
> schrieb "Thomas Mueller" :
>
>> Having package data in /var/db/pkg// carries
the nuisance factor that finding a package involves a fishing expedition
through many possible categories.
>>
>> I am spoiled by having /var/db/pkg/ in NetBSD
Thanks to those who responded for the suggestions.
I didn't think I sent this same message a second time. If I did, it was
accidental.
Using equery and other portage commands may be better than looking directly at
/var/db/pkg//, sort of like the new pkgng in FreeBSD
which is taking over from
Am 10.05.2013 03:11, schrieb Walter Dnes:
> I'm using the 20130207 install iso. This is to enable me to get a
> *REALLY* predictable NIC name, namely eth0, but I digress. The 2
> warnings I get are...
>
> 1)
>> WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util
>> fdisk doesn
Hello,
so i have reinstall the qt packages, run python-updater, perl-cleaner and
install calibre with USE="bash-autocompletion" emerge calibre and now is
running. Okay i have seen there is update availible to version 0.9.30, i
hope this run then without mistakes.
Thanks all for help. Have nic
Am Fri, 10 May 2013 02:59:55 + (UTC)
schrieb "Thomas Mueller" :
> Having package data in /var/db/pkg// carries the
> nuisance factor that finding a package involves a fishing expedition through
> many possible categories.
>
> I am spoiled by having /var/db/pkg/ in NetBSD pkgsrc and
> FreeB
48 matches
Mail list logo