Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-03 Thread maxim wexler
--- Manuel McLure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:56, maxim wexler > wrote: > > Did emerge -C cups and emerge lprng now every > attempt > > at using lpr results in > > > > Get_local_host: hostname 'sarawak' bad > > > > What do they mean bad? When I run hostname, > "s

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-02 Thread Manuel McLure
On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:56, maxim wexler wrote: > Did emerge -C cups and emerge lprng now every attempt > at using lpr results in > > Get_local_host: hostname 'sarawak' bad > > What do they mean bad? When I run hostname, "sarawak" > appears. I think this happens if /etc/hosts and /etc/conf

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-02 Thread maxim wexler
Perhaps you > should try lprng > instead of CUPS as your print spooler - it may be a > better option for > what you're trying to do. Did emerge -C cups and emerge lprng now every attempt at using lpr results in Get_local_host: hostname 'sarawak' bad What do they mean bad? When I run hostname,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-01 Thread Nick Rout
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:50:46 -0800 (PST) maxim wexler wrote: > sarawak heathen # /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel 34 > heathen error_log 1 error_log > ERROR: Unable to open parallel port device file > "/usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel": Text file busy > sarawak heathen # looks like it could be a pe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-01 Thread Manuel McLure
maxim wexler wrote: What I would try is to set up another printer queue, using "Raw Printer" - this makes cups get out of the way as much as it can (even more than -l would do.) Not sure, but if you mean sarawak heathen # cat cups_error > /dev/lp0 then the result is as before: some noise

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-01 Thread maxim wexler
> > What I would try is to set up another printer queue, > using "Raw Printer" > - this makes cups get out of the way as much as it > can (even more than > -l would do.) Not sure, but if you mean sarawak heathen # cat cups_error > /dev/lp0 then the result is as before: some noise followed by

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-01 Thread maxim wexler
> > You could try running /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel > from a console to see > what happens (as the same user as cups is running > under!) There's no parallel man page and parallel --help is very terse but I made the following stab(left the 'options' field blank): sarawak heathen # /usr/li

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-01 Thread Manuel McLure
maxim wexler wrote: Nice try. But no change: the printer makes some noise, loads a sheet of paper then the trouble light starts blinking. Except now the error_log is not updating itself! FWIW, the printer does work from winXP. I think part of the problem may be the fact that it's trying to pri

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-01 Thread maxim wexler
> > got to start looking. I wouldn't be suprised if > it's a permission problem > > like Mick says. > > No look closer, that is NOT what it says!! > > It says "PID 5869 stopped with status 3!" PID 5869 > is foomatic-rip (see two lines above, not quoted > above, but in maxim's message) > > "Sta

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-01 Thread maxim wexler
--- Bo �rsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 18:09, maxim wexler > wrote: > > sarawak heathen # unix2dos env-lp-test | lpr -l > > unix2dos: converting file env-lp-test to DOS > format > > ... > > lpr: error - stdin is empty, so no job has been > sent. > > If

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-02-01 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 18:09, maxim wexler wrote: > sarawak heathen # unix2dos env-lp-test | lpr -l > unix2dos: converting file env-lp-test to DOS format > ... > lpr: error - stdin is empty, so no job has been sent. If you look at the man page of unix2dos you find these examples: Get input f

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-01-31 Thread Nick Rout
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:36:04 +0100 Harm Geerts wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2006 23:00, maxim wexler wrote: > > I [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] Started backend > > /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel (PID 5870) for job 23. > > E [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] PID 5869 stopped with > > status 3! > > I [3

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-01-31 Thread maxim wexler
--- Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > maxim wexler wrote: > > [snip...] > > I [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] Job 23 queued on > > 'deskjet' by 'root'. > > Why are you running it as root? That was a test page run from localhost631 which requires that I be root. Here's the command-line try, this

[gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-01-30 Thread Harm Geerts
On Monday 30 January 2006 23:00, maxim wexler wrote: > I [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] Started backend > /usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel (PID 5870) for job 23. > E [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] PID 5869 stopped with > status 3! > I [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] Hint: Try setting the > LogLevel to "debu

[gentoo-user] Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-01-30 Thread Mick
maxim wexler wrote: [snip...] > I [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] Job 23 queued on > 'deskjet' by 'root'. Why are you running it as root? > I [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] Started filter > /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstops (PID 5868) for job 23. > I [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] Started filter > /usr/lib/c