Bertram Scharpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Yes, sorry, I gave up. Today I happend to retry it and I'm
> happy to discover: it works.
Well no harm done...
Now you get to ponder why... hehe.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Harry wrote:
>> If I do not define ScriptAlias at all then cgi works under
>> $public_html but cgi under $htdocs is just displayed as a file.
Hans-Werner answered:
> Sorry, my fault. A ScriptAlias alone isn't likely to work, if I read
> this correctly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> OK, I assume we are talking about Apache web server here. If that's the
> case I would suppose you are missing the following in your "httpd.conf":
> -
>
> Options ExecCGI
> SetHandler cgi-script
>
Thanks, I seem to have gotten that functionality some other way
be
OK, I assume we are talking about Apache web server here. If that's the
case I would suppose you are missing the following in your "httpd.conf":
-
Options ExecCGI
SetHandler cgi-script
-
The whole documentation about "mod_userdir" which enables "per-user web
directories: can be found at:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 07. Jun 2006, 18:31:46 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Bertram Scharpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 07. Jun 2006, 06:29:26 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> I'm getting suexec errors in apache error_log. According to all
> >> documentation on the subject
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:32:17 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What you're experiencing seems to be just a missing ScriptAlias. RTFM
> > about calling CGIs...
>
> What I've found is that if I set ScriptAlias to
> /var/www/localhost/cgi-bin/
Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What you're experiencing seems to be just a missing ScriptAlias. RTFM
> about calling CGIs...
This is a single user machine so security from users is only a problem
from me blundering around... That was why I wanted to keep
experimentation at $publi
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 03:37:01 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Justin R Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:51:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> A few people have mentioned not having used Suexec making me
> >> wonder if there is some other way to al
Justin R Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:51:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> A few people have mentioned not having used Suexec making me wonder if
>> there is some other way to allow myuser to run cgi?
>
> I usually run apache as apache:web with the use
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:51:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A few people have mentioned not having used Suexec making me wonder if
> there is some other way to allow myuser to run cgi?
I usually run apache as apache:web with the user creating the web stuff
in the web group.
Justin
--
"Jason A. Booth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have never used suexec, but I would think it better to
> chown root:apache /usr/sbin/suexec2
> or whatever group needs it as apposed to making it world executable
I thought it might be a nasty security problem too and asked about it
on the apache
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bertram Scharpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 07. Jun 2006, 06:29:26 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> I'm getting suexec errors in apache error_log. According to all
> >> documentation on the subject .. sue
Bertram Scharpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 07. Jun 2006, 06:29:26 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> I'm getting suexec errors in apache error_log. According to all
>> documentation on the subject .. suexec is supposed to log to:
>>/var/log/apache2/suexec_log
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
