Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desktop" and cannot be told to not
use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
install it. But I really like kmail as my mail client, so I give it a
last
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> Hello list,
> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
> kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desktop" and cannot be told to not
> use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
> install it.
Am Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 schrieb Christian Apeltauer:
> Hello list,
> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
> kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desktop" and cannot be told to not
> use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
> install it
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
>> Hello list,
>> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
>> kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desktop" and cannot be told to not
>> use it. But I do not
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> >> Hello list,
> >> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
> >> kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desk
On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that k
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> >> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >>> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> Hello lis
On Feb 10, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
>>
>> OK, after reading several articles from the given starting point, I now
>> understand why semantic-desktop wastes so much cpu, memory, and storage
>> (really, if you organize your da
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
> IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another
> desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years).
It's so mandatory it takes a whole mouse click to turn it off :(
--
Neil Bothwick
Old hitchhikers
On 11 Feb 2010, at 01:14, Roy Wright wrote:
...
because to 'organize it properly' you would need a huge directory
tree plus
symlinks plus explaining notes to even simulate a small token of
the stuff
'semantic desktop' can do for you..
Haven't had a problem organizing my data in 25 years .
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> >> OK, after reading several articles from the given starting point, I now
> >> understand why semantic-desktop wastes so much cpu, memo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
> On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another
> > desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years).
>
> yeah good luck with that. Bec
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Seriously guys, you start sounding like luddites. Is new, must be bad.
>
> Correction, is fat, bloated, and slow, must be bad. I wonder if
> Microsoft's anti-linux strategy is to have its agents infiltrate the
> linux developer community, a
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
>
> > On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another
> > > desktop manager (even after being
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
> >
> > > On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> > > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010,
On Thursday 11 February 2010 16:32:02 Dale wrote:
> Can you nice the thing too? That would work. I set emerge to 5 and I
> can't even tell that emerge is running most of the time. There may be
> times when I can but it is rare.
>
> I just don't get this thing that indexing is a resource hog.
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> > On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 16:32:02 Dale wrote:
Can you nice the thing too? That would work. I set emerge to 5 and I
can't even tell that emerge is running most of the time. There may be
times when I can but it is rare.
Am Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +
schrieb Neil Bothwick :
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
>
> > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find
> > another desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7
> > years).
>
> It's so mandatory it takes
On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> Am Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +
>
> schrieb Neil Bothwick :
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
> > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find
> > > another desktop manager (even after being my p
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dn
On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> > On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
> >> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> >>> On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thu
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:43:36 +0100, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> If you do not want a piece of software, why should you install it?
> Installing and not using it instead of not installing it at all, is the
> wrong way and (to my opinion) it is defintely not the Gentoo way.
Clearly it is not optio
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.prop
On Friday 12 February 2010 01:49:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> > Am Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +
> >
> > schrieb Neil Bothwick :
> > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
> > > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a v
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> You have been corrected on this point so many times I now think you
> are just a stupid ass.
>
> It is not slow.
>
> You are the only one saying that. People who do use Nepomuk say that
> it is not slow and does not hog resources (i
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
You have been corrected on this point so many times I now think you
are just a stupid ass.
It is not slow.
You are the only one saying that. People who do use N
On Samstag 13 Februar 2010, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
>
> > You have been corrected on this point so many times I now think you
> > are just a stupid ass.
> >
> > It is not slow.
> >
> > You are the only one saying that. People who do use
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Samstag 13 Februar 2010, Walter Dnes wrote:
#except that dsbus is not a KDE application. Just grep to portage tree for
apps that use dbus.
The result might be a bit shocking.
Btw, do you have a car? But certainly you driv
On 13 Feb 2010, at 15:42, Dale wrote:
...
Btw, do you have a car? But certainly you drive stick.
Unsyncronized. Because
everything else is 'bloat'. ...
P. S. I also drive a stick. I don't like the repair rates or costs
on automatic transmissions.
Except your manual gearbox probably ha
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 13 Feb 2010, at 15:42, Dale wrote:
...
Btw, do you have a car? But certainly you drive stick.
Unsyncronized. Because
everything else is 'bloat'. ...
P. S. I also drive a stick. I don't like the repair rates or costs
on
On Saturday 13 February 2010 14:07:05 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > I agree with the concept that people who don't want KDE dependancies,
> >
> > e.g. dbus, shouldn't use KDE apps. Therefore, I avoid amarok, kaffeine,
> > kplayer, etc. What got me started in this thread was the fact that what
On Sonntag 14 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 13 February 2010 14:07:05 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > I agree with the concept that people who don't want KDE dependancies,
> > >
> > > e.g. dbus, shouldn't use KDE apps. Therefore, I avoid amarok,
> > > kaffeine, kplayer, etc
On Sunday 14 February 2010 13:02:48 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > I highly recommend drivers to gain the skill of driving a vehicle
> > crash-style without a clutch. Comes in useful sometimes.
> >
> >
> >
> > :-)
>
> the point was not stick but unsyncronized ;)
I know. I just felt like tossin
On Sunday 14 February 2010 12:40:59 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 14 February 2010 13:02:48 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > I highly recommend drivers to gain the skill of driving a vehicle
> > > crash-style without a clutch. Comes in useful sometimes.
> > >
> > > :-)
> >
> > the point was not
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 01:21:22 Mick wrote:
> However, the point has been well made by many. KDE4 is not KDE3.x and
> with KDE4 you get the full enchilada because that's what the developers
> have produced. Since I do not have the ability (or time) to fork KDE4
> into my own flavour I wil
On Mittwoch 17 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 14 February 2010 12:40:59 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 February 2010 13:02:48 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > > I highly recommend drivers to gain the skill of driving a vehicle
> > > > crash-style without a clutch. Comes in useful som
On 17 February 2010 00:12, Volker Armin Hemmann
> you want dependency nightmare?
>
> openoffice depends on libwpd
> libwpd depends on libgsf
> libgsf pulls gconf in.
>
> I don't need wordperfect, I don't want gnome. No way to get rid of that crap.
I know. :-(
> Even basic libs are pulling in to
- Original Message
> From: Mick
> I also happen to own a couple of old PCs which I try to keep lean and I don't
> mind the odd double declutching to change gears. Now, I understand the
> development philosophy of KDE4 since this was very well explained, but that
> does not stop me wi
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> openoffice depends on libwpd
> libwpd depends on libgsf
> libgsf pulls gconf in.
Hm. I actually have OO (non-binary version) installed althoughI dislike
bloat... However, I don't have gconf installed (USE: -gnome, globally in
make.conf). I run stable so that, of cour
On Mittwoch 17 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> openoffice depends on libwpd
> >> libwpd depends on libgsf
> >> libgsf pulls gconf in.
> >
> > Hm. I actually have OO (non-binary version) installed al
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
openoffice depends on libwpd
libwpd depends on libgsf
libgsf pulls gconf in.
Hm. I actually have OO (non-binary version) installed althoughI dislike
bloat... However, I don't have gconf ins
Dale wrote:
> What did you use in place of k3b? Is it a GUI or command line?
cdrecord. I also have installed, but I haven't used it yet, XFburn...
Best regards
Peter K
44 matches
Mail list logo
