On 12/20/2017 04:14:54 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
this drives me crazy.
I have built a new kernel 4.14.7 with the same config as 4.14.6,
I have rebuild all kernel modules,
the file /etc/conf.d/modules lists my extra modules and hasn't
changed.
(I'm using openrc, but systemd is
Hi,
this drives me crazy.
I have built a new kernel 4.14.7 with the same config as 4.14.6,
I have rebuild all kernel modules,
the file /etc/conf.d/modules lists my extra modules and hasn't changed.
(I'm using openrc, but systemd is installed, as well)
Now, booting 4.14.6, all my modules get
Hi,
David Relson a écrit :
CONFIG_SCSI_DMA=y
Isn't that an option which considers all disks to be SATA ?
Not sure, but you might check that.
Sincerely,
Jil
David Relson schrieb:
Greetings!
I've recently updated from kernel 2.6.20 to 2.6.24 a little used
machine. The new kernel is working quite well. However hdparm isn't
happy.
Running either hdparm -d0 /dev/hda or hdparm -d1 /dev/hda gives a
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
Greetings!
I've recently updated from kernel 2.6.20 to 2.6.24 a little used
machine. The new kernel is working quite well. However hdparm isn't
happy.
Running either hdparm -d0 /dev/hda or hdparm -d1 /dev/hda gives a
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted error. Using the same
config
I updated from 2.6.22-gentoo-r9 to 2.6.23-gentoo-r3, and now
nvidia-drivers-1.0-7185 won't build. I use the older drivers because I
have a Riva TNT2. When I change the /usr/src/linux link to the old
kernel source, the package builds just fine, so I'm thinking that
something is broken with my new
On Thursday 06 December 2007, Randy Barlow wrote:
I updated from 2.6.22-gentoo-r9 to 2.6.23-gentoo-r3, and now
nvidia-drivers-1.0-7185 won't build. I use the older drivers because I
have a Riva TNT2. When I change the /usr/src/linux link to the old
kernel source, the package builds just
Mick wrote:
Read your error again. It tells you to run make oldconfig to fix it.
However, if you check my earlier message posted today about Make errors with
new kernel... you'll see that I have not been able to emerge any drivers
with the new kernel. I suspect a bug.
If you pay
Randy Barlow wrote:
I updated from 2.6.22-gentoo-r9 to 2.6.23-gentoo-r3, and now
nvidia-drivers-1.0-7185 won't build. I use the older drivers because I
have a Riva TNT2. When I change the /usr/src/linux link to the old
kernel source, the package builds just fine, so I'm thinking that
Ian Lee wrote:
according to the nvidia site version 71.86.01 is the lastest TNT2
drivers have tried these they are in the portage tree
Thanks for the heads up! I had from a while ago blocked versions newer
than 1.0.7185 because it used to be that they wouldn't work with my
card. Apparently
Many thanks for you suggestion. I tried a boot with no fall back, but
nothing added neither to boot.log nor to dmesg. I am sure to target
the right kernel image with no typo into grub.conf . This new kernel
is a =xen-sources-2.6.16.49, and I configured it making an oldconfig
based on current
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 11:36 +0200, Galevsky wrote:
Many thanks for you suggestion. I tried a boot with no fall back, but
nothing added neither to boot.log nor to dmesg. I am sure to target
the right kernel image with no typo into grub.conf . This new kernel
is a =xen-sources-2.6.16.49, and I
2007/7/5, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 11:36 +0200, Galevsky wrote:
Many thanks for you suggestion. I tried a boot with no fall back, but
nothing added neither to boot.log nor to dmesg. I am sure to target
the right kernel image with no typo into grub.conf . This
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:40:20 +0200
Galevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/7/5, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 11:36 +0200, Galevsky wrote:
Many thanks for you suggestion. I tried a boot with no fall back,
but nothing added neither to boot.log nor to dmesg. I am
I recently discovered 'savefallback' in grub which I did not know about.
I'll assume you're using that but again, I haven't seen your grub.conf.
Dan Farrell made an intresting point about boot log and showconsole, but
I assumed you were already using that. But I still don't that will help
you
2007/7/5, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:40:20 +0200
Galevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/7/5, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 11:36 +0200, Galevsky wrote:
Many thanks for you suggestion. I tried a boot with no fall back,
but nothing
Sorry, I was building again my kernel image to confirm that It was not
a stupid mistake.
2007/7/6, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I recently discovered 'savefallback' in grub which I did not know about.
I'll assume you're using that but again, I haven't seen your grub.conf.
Dan Farrell made
Galevsky wrote:
Thank you Dan, but I did it before, and boot.log remains empty. In
fact, the new kernel boot turns on like grub couldn't find the kernel
image
SNIP
and my grub.conf:
### START (grub.conf)
sd-4421 boot # cat /boot/grub/grub.conf
# Customized boot procedure
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 00:44 +0200, Galevsky wrote:
and my grub.conf:
### START (grub.conf)
sd-4421 boot # cat /boot/grub/grub.conf
# Customized boot procedure
default 0
timeout 1
#fallback 1 2
title Gentoo Linux 2.6.16-gentoo_xen_dom0
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xen
Hi ML,
I need your help to find the right way.
I am running a
Linux sd-4421 2.6.20-gentoo-r8 #1 SMP Sat Jun 16 19:27:48 CEST 2007
i686 VIA Esther processor 2000MHz CentaurHauls GNU/Linux
remote box. This kernel was compiled on my own. It is good. But I need
a xen box now. So I emerged the
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 21:54 +0200, Galevsky wrote:
... the matter is Grub falls back to previous 2.6.20 kernel. So I have
no log at all about what went wrong during the dom0_2.6.18 boot.
Any idea to know what went wrong ?
Fall back is usually useless in the sense that if grub finds your
Hi All,
I see these two messages in dmesg and I am not sure what they're about:
intel_rng: FWH not detected
hda: 39070080 sectors (20003 MB) w/1740KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/636hda:
hw_config=600d, UDMA(100)
What's the hw_config part?
--
Regards,
Mick
pgpixq5sDfv1l.pgp
Description: PGP
Mick wrote:
hda: 39070080 sectors (20003 MB) w/1740KiB Cache,
CHS=16383/255/636hda: hw_config=600d, UDMA(100)
What's the hw_config part?
It just means that the hardware configuration is good.
Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
Benno
--
Cetere mi opinias ke ne ĉio tradukenda estas.
--
[EMAIL
Lol
On 4/18/07, Benno Schulenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mick wrote:
hda: 39070080 sectors (20003 MB) w/1740KiB Cache,
CHS=16383/255/636hda: hw_config=600d, UDMA(100)
What's the hw_config part?
It just means that the hardware configuration is good.
Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
Benno
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dan Cowsill wrote:
Lol
ROFL!
Why did I choose THIS moment (1) to understand the joke?
Sincerely,
Buanzo
(1): After a good stout beer. Sorry, after TWO good stout beers.
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad
On Wednesday 18 April 2007, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Mick wrote:
hda: 39070080 sectors (20003 MB) w/1740KiB Cache,
CHS=16383/255/636hda: hw_config=600d, UDMA(100)
What's the hw_config part?
It just means that the hardware configuration is good.
Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
Benno
--
On Thursday 13 of October 2005 01:29, Iain Buchanan wrote:
Do you have a hyperthreaded CPU? There are some problems with virtual
CPU's and 2.6.13. A few patches exist, but they're not in 2.6.13.x yet
afaik.
No, it's AthlonXP 2600+.
I have similar problems with my Dell Inspiron 9100 P4 3GHz
Hello!
After upgrading to new stable kernel 2.6.13-r3 i spotted that system is much
less responsible, first it runs on little memory, it uses only about 25% of
ram for application and disc cache only, next periodically there is some
massive memory allocation, it uses whole left memory and
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:48 +0200, Michal Kurgan wrote:
Hello!
After upgrading to new stable kernel 2.6.13-r3 i spotted that system is much
less responsible
[snip]
Also system is much less responsible, even in text editors cursor move is
slow. Bringing back minimized windows also took much
gentuxx wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Fish wrote:
gentuxx wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I went to do my routine emerge -Duptv world and it came back with
devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3. I'm not sure whether
PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/10/06 Thu PM 10:39:55 EDT
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] New kernel and udev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I went to do my routine emerge -Duptv world and it came back with
devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3
Richard Fish wrote:
Looking through /sbin/rc, gentoo will disable udev if any of the
following are true:
1. RC_DEVICES is set to devfs.
2. The kernel command line contains noudev.
3. The kernel version is less than 2.6.0.
4. /sbin/udev does not exist or is not an executable file
5. The file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I went to do my routine emerge -Duptv world and it came back with
devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3. I'm not sure whether I'm
using udev now or not. I remember compiling into the kernel last time
I did a kernel compile. Naturally,
Read this article
http://lwn.net/Articles/149479/
On 10/7/05, gentuxx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I went to do my routine emerge -Duptv world and it came back with
devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3. I'm not sure whether I'm
using
read this udev guide too:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/udev-guide.xml
On 10/7/05, gentuxx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I went to do my routine emerge -Duptv world and it came back with
devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3. I'm not sure
gentuxx wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I went to do my routine emerge -Duptv world and it came back with
devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3. I'm not sure whether I'm
using udev now or not. I remember compiling into the kernel last time
I did a kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Fish wrote:
gentuxx wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I went to do my routine emerge -Duptv world and it came back with
devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3. I'm not sure whether I'm
using udev now
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I took gentoo-sources and patched it with some realtime-preempt
patches. After building the kernel I now get this message:
flash linux # make modules_install
ln: when making multiple links, last argument must be a directory
make: *** [_modinst_] Error 1
flash
Hi,
I've started having trouble with MythTV. I built a new kernel to
add 1394 support and put a 1394 card in the system. Now MythTV's log
file complains about /dev/v4l/video0 not existing, but it does:
dragonfly ~ # ls -al /dev/v4l/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 160 Jun 14 16:19 .
Le jeudi 19 mai 2005 à 13:41 +0200, Yann GARNIER a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I installed gentoo for the first time a month ago on my laptop no prob at
all.
The thing is I'd like to be able to boot on a new kernel (actually I use the
2.6.11r5)
Each time I emerge --update --deep world I see
40 matches
Mail list logo
