Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:15:38 + (UTC), James wrote: > > >EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--exclude gentoo-sources @dev-java " > NOw this is strange. Today it only wants to delete a few packages: > > All selected packages: =dev-lang/vala-0.26.2 =dev-java/junit-4.11 > =dev-java/jmock-1.1.0-r2 =dev-java

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 15/03/2015 02:25, James wrote: > Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > >>> I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that >>> it will updated but not depclean out those packages. > >> A set can be simply a list of packages in a file in /etc/portage/sets. > > > Ok so I

[gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-17 Thread James
Bruce Schultz gmail.com> writes: >>> emerge --depclean -p case (1) > >EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--exclude gentoo-sources @dev-java " NOw this is strange. Today it only wants to delete a few packages: All selected packages: =dev-lang/vala-0.26.2 =dev-java/junit-4.11 =dev-java/jmock-1.1.0-r2 =de

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-15 Thread Neil Bothwick
On 15 March 2015 00:25:40 GMT+00:00, James wrote: > Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > > > > I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that > > > it will updated but not depclean out those packages. > > > A set can be simply a list of packages in a file in > /etc/portag

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-15 Thread Bruce Schultz
On 15 March 2015 10:25:40 AM AEST, James wrote: >Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > >> > I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that >> > it will updated but not depclean out those packages. > >> A set can be simply a list of packages in a file in >/etc/portage/sets.

[gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-14 Thread James
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that > > it will updated but not depclean out those packages. > A set can be simply a list of packages in a file in /etc/portage/sets. Ok so I created this file (644): /etc/portage/sets/dev-j

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:03:26 + (UTC), James wrote: > > Why not simply create a set containing all the ebuilds you are > > experimenting with? > > I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that > it will updated but not depclean out those packages. > > Gotta quick example?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-14 Thread Mick
On Saturday 14 Mar 2015 23:03:26 James wrote: > Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > > Today, I have many many ugly and hacked java projects > > > on my "munge" system. I have spend countless hours hacking > > > at java; so I do not wish for any dev-java codes to be removed > > > by --depclean

[gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?

2015-03-14 Thread James
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > Today, I have many many ugly and hacked java projects > > on my "munge" system. I have spend countless hours hacking > > at java; so I do not wish for any dev-java codes to be removed > > by --depclean, but the others can be cleaned up. > Why not simply