On 19 January 2007 23:46, Vlad Dogaru wrote:
On 1/19/07, b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Buy a couple spare RAM modules. Surely I agree with your will to build a
minimalistic system, this will help anyway and it's a nice experience,
but RAM is quite cheap and is the magic elisir that allows
Uwe Thiem wrote:
This is odd.My main workstation also has 384MB of ram. I run a full KDE
session and do not experience any slow down. Right now, I have open: 9
konqueror windows (not tabs), kmail, kmahjongg, konsole with 3 sessions,
noatun, kcalc. My background is a 1024x768 photo which
On 1/20/07, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 January 2007 23:46, Vlad Dogaru wrote:
On 1/19/07, b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Buy a couple spare RAM modules. Surely I agree with your will to build a
minimalistic system, this will help anyway and it's a nice experience,
but RAM is
Luke Ravitch wrote:
On 2007-01-19 09:45, Vlad Dogaru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am especially looking for a browser to substitute Firefox (it's great, but
quite a memory hog). I like links, what with its graphical capabilities, but
it lacks tabs and that's a major downside in my vision. I've
On Saturday 20 January 2007 19:32, Avaricen wrote:
Of course, Conkeror is still Firefox underneath, so that won't help
with it being a memory hog.
You mean Konqueror.
Err.. obviously not. Konqueror isn't based on Firefox...
http://conkeror.mozdev.org/
--
Bo Andresen
pgpU3M3RpE3zj.pgp
On Saturday 20 January 2007 12:32, Avaricen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Suggestions for a minimalistic system':
Luke Ravitch wrote:
On 2007-01-19 09:45, Vlad Dogaru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am especially looking for a browser to substitute Firefox.
I've tried
On Saturday 20 January 2007 19:32, Avaricen wrote:
You mean Konqueror.
No. See
http://conkeror.mozdev.org
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Saturday 20 January 2007 19:32, Avaricen wrote:
You mean Konqueror.
No. See
http://conkeror.mozdev.org
:O I thought you were referring to the KDE app. ;) My apologies.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Saturday 20 January 2007 19:32, Avaricen wrote:
Of course, Conkeror is still Firefox underneath, so that won't help
with it being a memory hog.
You mean Konqueror.
Err.. obviously not. Konqueror isn't based on Firefox...
On 1/20/07, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One good thing (among others) of using a real desktop environment is that all
apps share the vast majority of libraries which are loaded into memory just
once. When you mix environments or use an eclectic collection of unrelated
apps, they all draw
On Saturday 20 January 2007 18:23, Vlad Dogaru wrote:
On 1/20/07, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One good thing (among others) of using a real desktop environment is that
all apps share the vast majority of libraries which are loaded into
memory just once. When you mix environments or
On 20 January 2007 20:23, Vlad Dogaru wrote:
On 1/20/07, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One good thing (among others) of using a real desktop environment is that
all apps share the vast majority of libraries which are loaded into
memory just once. When you mix environments or use an
Hello,
I am recently growing fed up with strongly graphical applications causing my
(admittedly quite old) computer to slow down to a crawl. I like the concept
of Ratpoison and am thinking of switching to it, but could use a few tips
for making the big change.
I am especially looking for a
Vlad Dogaru wrote:
I like links, what with its graphical capabilities,
but
it lacks tabs and that's a major downside in my vision. I've tried Conkeror
for Firefox, but it's too Emacs-centric (vim person here) and also disables
tabs (or maybe it's me -- I couldn't get them to work).
Try
Vlad Dogaru ha scritto:
Hello,
I am recently growing fed up with strongly graphical applications
causing my (admittedly quite old) computer to slow down to a crawl. I
like the concept of Ratpoison and am thinking of switching to it, but
could use a few tips for making the big change.
Buy a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PaulNM wrote:
I've never tried Ratpoison, but on my lower-power systems I use xfce,
which isn't too bad. If I want to really minimize resource usage I go
with Windowmaker.
I did. It's screen for X. All windows will maximize. It's really geeky :D
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:40:21 +
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Buy a couple spare RAM modules. Surely I agree with your will to build a
minimalistic system, this will help anyway and it's a nice experience,
but RAM is quite cheap and is the magic elisir that allows outdated
machines
On 2007-01-19 09:45, Vlad Dogaru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am especially looking for a browser to substitute Firefox (it's great, but
quite a memory hog). I like links, what with its graphical capabilities, but
it lacks tabs and that's a major downside in my vision. I've tried Conkeror
for
On 1/19/07, b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad Dogaru ha scritto:
Hello,
I am recently growing fed up with strongly graphical applications
causing my (admittedly quite old) computer to slow down to a crawl. I
like the concept of Ratpoison and am thinking of switching to it, but
could use
Vlad Dogaru ha scritto:
I have 384 megs of RAM and no imediate possibility of buying more. I
realise it is arguably sufficient for many lightweight applications,
but, as I mentioned, it is becoming increasingly frustrating, even with
the real power of Gentoo and Fluxbox (the two have
20 matches
Mail list logo
