On 11/30/21 1:56 PM, Laurence Perkins wrote:
So the old inconsistency was a super-bad kind of inconsistency.
The interfaces got named based on the order in which the devices
were discovered. Which, on a lot of systems, meant that every boot
was essentially rolling the dice on a race
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 3:56 PM Laurence Perkins wrote:
>
> If you only have one interface though and tweak your hardware regularly then
> you'll probably be happier to put it back to the old naming scheme because
> with only one device it should always be eth0.
>
I'm not sure if other network
it should always be eth0.
LMP
-Original Message-
From: Grant Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2021 12:34 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Switching from eudev to udev, disaster.
On 11/30/21 12:58 PM, Dale wrote:
> What I noticed in dmesg is that it takes the
On 11/30/21 12:58 PM, Dale wrote:
What I noticed in dmesg is that it takes the old name, eth0 for
example, and then renames it to the new name.
I don't know if it's the /kernel/ that does the renaming, or not based
on the kernel parameter, or if it's something else very early in the
boot
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 11/28/21 9:50 AM, Jack wrote:
>> The network name switch ... is not directly due to eudev vs. udev,
>> but to the "new" ... switch to consistent naming ... so your network
>> is probably something like enp20s2, reflecting which slot your
>> network card is physically in.
>
On 11/28/21 9:50 AM, Jack wrote:
The network name switch ... is not directly due to eudev vs. udev,
but to the "new" ... switch to consistent naming ... so your network
is probably something like enp20s2, reflecting which slot your network
card is physically in.
Except I've had multiple
>> -Original Message-
>> From: tastytea
>> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 9:00 PM
>> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Switching from eudev to udev, disaster.
>>
>> On 2021-11-29 22:47-0600 Dale wrote:
>
On 2021-11-29 23:19-0600 Dale wrote:
> Matt Connell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 22:47 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> Now if I can figure out how to reset the list of /dev/sd* names
> >> that are lurking about and inconsistent, that would be like
> >> striking gold. Every time I hook up my
On 30/11/2021 04:47, Dale wrote:
Now if I can figure out how to reset the list of /dev/sd* names that are
lurking about and inconsistent, that would be like striking gold. Every
time I hook up my external drive, it gets a different sd* name. It does
the same on the SD cards from my trail
Matt Connell wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 22:47 -0600, Dale wrote:
>> Now if I can figure out how to reset the list of /dev/sd* names that
>> are lurking about and inconsistent, that would be like striking
>> gold. Every time I hook up my external drive, it gets a different
>> sd* name. It
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 22:47 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Now if I can figure out how to reset the list of /dev/sd* names that
> are lurking about and inconsistent, that would be like striking
> gold. Every time I hook up my external drive, it gets a different
> sd* name. It does the same on the SD cards
On 2021-11-29 22:47-0600 Dale wrote:
> Now if I can figure out how to reset the list of /dev/sd* names that
> are lurking about and inconsistent, that would be like striking gold.
> Every time I hook up my external drive, it gets a different sd*
> name. It does the same on the SD cards from my
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 11:02:17 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> I'm not completely opposed to switching to the new name method. Your
>> info about it being in dmesg is helpful. Now I know where that name is
>> exactly. ;-) Do I just rename my current net.eth* files to the new way
On 2021-11-28 11:50-0500 Jack wrote:
> This switch is NOT bringing in systemd. It is just switching which
> package is now providing udev as extracted from systemd. The news
> item actually gives a bit more detail.
>
> The network name switch (which I had thought was mentioned in the new
>
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 11:02:17 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I'm not completely opposed to switching to the new name method. Your
> info about it being in dmesg is helpful. Now I know where that name is
> exactly. ;-) Do I just rename my current net.eth* files to the new way
> and it works or do I need
Jack wrote:
>
> I'd suggest checking the wiki for network setup, but it's still down,
> and (of course) I can't currently find the URL for the status page.
> General searching for "consistent network naming" or "persistent
> network naming" is also likely to find some helpful pages (among the
>
I'd suggest checking the wiki for network setup, but it's still down,
and (of course) I can't currently find the URL for the status page.
General searching for "consistent network naming" or "persistent network
naming" is also likely to find some helpful pages (among the not so
helpful...)
Jack wrote:
> This switch is NOT bringing in systemd. It is just switching which
> package is now providing udev as extracted from systemd. The news item
> actually gives a bit more detail.
>
> The network name switch (which I had thought was mentioned in the new
> item, but apparently is not, so
This switch is NOT bringing in systemd. It is just switching which
package is now providing udev as extracted from systemd. The news item
actually gives a bit more detail.
The network name switch (which I had thought was mentioned in the new
item, but apparently is not, so I don't remember
Alexandru N. Barloiu wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 10:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>
>
> Boot with udev and do either ifconfig -a or ip addr show and look for
> them. If they are not there, just load the modules e1000e or the other
> one r8whatever it was. Should autoload, but who knows why they are
On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 10:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
Boot with udev and do either ifconfig -a or ip addr show and look for
them. If they are not there, just load the modules e1000e or the other
one r8whatever it was. Should autoload, but who knows why they are not.
Use dmesg. Not that hard to debug.
Howdy all,
First, if anyone is planning to switch a remote machine, you may want to
delay that.
As some, most, know eudev is being removed. I can't say how much I
dislike that but it seems to be happening despite some are saying it is
still being maintained upstream. During my weekly update
22 matches
Mail list logo
