On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:45 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
> Is there a way to have default config lines that emerge updates won't touch?
>
I'd be interested in hearing about alternatives, but I switched to
cfg-update from dispatch-conf and such because it does automatic 3-way
merging. It is pretty go
Is there a way to have default config lines that emerge updates won't touch?
For instance, my /etc/ssh/sshd_config differs from the default in some
places. I know this and upstream shows me the same diffs in that file
over and over again. But maybe upstream will add a new option - I'd
like to see
Alan McKinnon [15-01-16 08:52]:
> On 16/01/2015 06:15, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > again the emerge oracle has spoken to one to its lowest servants and so
> > said:
> >
> >
> >
> > Diffing databases (17943 -> 17944 packages)
> > [N] >> net-print/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr (~*
Am Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:15:03 +0100
schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Hi,
>
> again the emerge oracle has spoken to one to its lowest servants and so said:
>
>
>
> Diffing databases (17943 -> 17944 packages)
> [N] >> net-print/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr (~*1.4.4): Epson Inkjet Printer
> Driver
On 16/01/2015 06:15, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> again the emerge oracle has spoken to one to its lowest servants and so said:
>
>
>
> Diffing databases (17943 -> 17944 packages)
> [N] >> net-print/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr (~*1.4.4): Epson Inkjet Printer
> Driver (ESC/P-R)
> * Ti
Hi,
again the emerge oracle has spoken to one to its lowest servants and so said:
Diffing databases (17943 -> 17944 packages)
[N] >> net-print/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr (~*1.4.4): Epson Inkjet Printer
Driver (ESC/P-R)
* Time statistics:
219 seconds for syncing
95 seconds for eix-upd
On 06-Dec-14 18:25, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
If 3.4.1 gets removed, I will have to run python-updater and
compile all against 3.3. But why? 3.4.1 is stable, so why
does Portage want to remove it???
Check out this thread from a day or two ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/2791
On 12/06/2014 12:18 PM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi Gentoo-users,
>
> I just updated my box (iirc, there was something python-related)
> but depite of having python 3.4 active, emerge wants to remove it:
>
> # eselect python list
> Available Python interpreters:
> [1] python2.7
> [2] python3.3
> [
Hi Gentoo-users,
I just updated my box (iirc, there was something python-related)
but depite of having python 3.4 active, emerge wants to remove it:
# eselect python list
Available Python interpreters:
[1] python2.7
[2] python3.3
[3] python3.4 *
# emerge --pretend --depclean
Calcula
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:53 PM, wrote:
> > Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
> >> > Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
> >> > media-gfx/sav2p and I cannot find anything on google nor in th
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
> Hi. In my recent upda
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:06 PM, wrote:
> Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
>> >>> Hi. In my recent update of this morning
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
> >>> Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
> >>> media-gfx/sav
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
> >> Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
> >> media-gfx/sav2p and I cannot find anything on google nor in the bgo.
> >> Here is
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:53 PM, wrote:
> Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
>> > Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
>> > media-gfx/sav2p and I cannot find anything on google nor in the bgo.
>> > Here is what the log says:
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
> > Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
> > media-gfx/sav2p and I cannot find anything on google nor in the bgo.
> > Here is what the log says:
> >
> > configure: WARNING: cannot find inttype:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
>>> Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
>>> media-gfx/sav2p and I cannot find anything on google n
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
>> Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
>> media-gfx/sav2p and I cannot find anything on google nor in the bgo.
>> Here is what the log says:
>>
>> configure: WAR
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, wrote:
> Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
> media-gfx/sav2p and I cannot find anything on google nor in the bgo.
> Here is what the log says:
>
> configure: WARNING: cannot find inttype: sizeof(inttype)==16
> checking size of
Hi. In my recent update of this morning I found that I cannot emerge
media-gfx/sav2p and I cannot find anything on google nor in the bgo.
Here is what the log says:
configure: WARNING: cannot find inttype: sizeof(inttype)==16
checking size of char *... (cached) 8
checking size of void *... 8
c
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Jacques Montier wrote:
>
>
> 2014-10-26 19:47 GMT+01:00 Alexander Kapshuk :
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Jacques Montier
>> wrote:
>> > [ebuild rR ~] media-gfx/hugin-2014.0.0-r1 USE="python -debug -lapack
>> > -sift" LINGUAS="fr -cs -da -de -en_GB -
2014-10-26 19:47 GMT+01:00 Alexander Kapshuk :
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Jacques Montier
> wrote:
> > [ebuild rR ~] media-gfx/hugin-2014.0.0-r1 USE="python -debug -lapack
> > -sift" LINGUAS="fr -cs -da -de -en_GB -es -eu -fi -hu -it -ja -nl -pl
> -pt_BR
> > -ro -ru -sk -sv -zh_CN -zh
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Jacques Montier wrote:
> [ebuild rR ~] media-gfx/hugin-2014.0.0-r1 USE="python -debug -lapack
> -sift" LINGUAS="fr -cs -da -de -en_GB -es -eu -fi -hu -it -ja -nl -pl -pt_BR
> -ro -ru -sk -sv -zh_CN -zh_TW" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7 (-python3_2)
> -python3
2014-10-26 17:43 GMT+01:00 Daniel Frey :
> On 26/10/2014 8:58 AM, Jacques Montier wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Since few, when i run emerge -auvDN world, i get hugin to re-emerge again
>> and again (with "r" to force re-install)...
>>
>> [ebuild rR ~] media-gfx/hugin-2014.0.0-r1 USE="python -d
On 26/10/2014 8:58 AM, Jacques Montier wrote:
Hello all,
Since few, when i run emerge -auvDN world, i get hugin to re-emerge
again and again (with "r" to force re-install)...
[ebuild rR ~] media-gfx/hugin-2014.0.0-r1 USE="python -debug
-lapack -sift" LINGUAS="fr -cs -da -de -en_GB -es -e
Hello all,
Since few, when i run emerge -auvDN world, i get hugin to re-emerge again
and again (with "r" to force re-install)...
[ebuild rR ~] media-gfx/hugin-2014.0.0-r1 USE="python -debug -lapack
-sift" LINGUAS="fr -cs -da -de -en_GB -es -eu -fi -hu -it -ja -nl -pl
-pt_BR -ro -ru -sk -sv -z
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen
>> wrote:
>>> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> For some reason xfce-power-
On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
install needs but
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
>>> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so.
>>>
On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
>> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so.
>>
> Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 12:39 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>
>> Replacing brightness with power in XFCE_PLUGINS, followed by running
>> 'emerge -avuND @world', still tried to downgrade the package in
>> question.
>>
>> I then ran 'emerge -avuND '>x
On 09/16/2014 12:39 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
> Replacing brightness with power in XFCE_PLUGINS, followed by running
> 'emerge -avuND @world', still tried to downgrade the package in
> question.
>
> I then ran 'emerge -avuND '>xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1'
> which suggested adding '=
On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so.
>
Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to satisfy
XFCE_PLUGINS=battery/brightness.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 16/09/2014 17:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
>> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
>> dependency.
>>
>> grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-m
On 16/09/2014 17:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
> dependency.
>
> grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager /etc/portage/package.*
> /etc/portage/package.accept_ke
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 11:51 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
>> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
>> dependency.
>>
>> [ebuild UD ] xfce-ex
On 09/16/2014 11:51 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
> dependency.
>
> [ebuild UD ] xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 [1.3.1]
> USE="policykit udisks%*
Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
dependency.
grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager /etc/portage/package.*
/etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:=xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1 ~x86
As I ra
On 21/08/14 22:24, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 21/08/2014 12:07, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am building some VM's using scripts and want to run "emerge
>> --config
>> mariadb" automaticly. However it asks for a new root password (entered
>> twice) as part of the process - I was going to ma
On 21/08/2014 12:07, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
Hi,
I am building some VM's using scripts and want to run "emerge --config
mariadb" automaticly. However it asks for a new root password (entered
twice) as part of the process - I was going to make an expect script to
enter the password for me .
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> Hi,
> I am building some VM's using scripts and want to run "emerge --config
> mariadb" automaticly. However it asks for a new root password (entered
> twice) as part of the process - I was going to make an expect script to
> enter
Hi,
I am building some VM's using scripts and want to run "emerge --config
mariadb" automaticly. However it asks for a new root password (entered
twice) as part of the process - I was going to make an expect script to
enter the password for me ... but I thought someone might know a better
On Sunday, August 10, 2014 02:33:40 AM Christopher Kurtis Koeber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am attempting to emerge xorg-server and sys-devel/llvm-3.3-r3 is pulled in
> as a dependency.
>
> So, when I emerge llvm it fails.
>
> Here is some relevant output:
>
> emerge --info =sys-devel/llvm-3.3-r3::g
Am 10.08.2014 um 08:33 schrieb Christopher Kurtis Koeber:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am attempting to emerge xorg-server and sys-devel/llvm-3.3-r3 is
> pulled in as a dependency.
>
> So, when I emerge llvm it fails.
>
> Here is some relevant output:
>
> *emerge --info =sys-devel/llvm-3.3-r3::gentoo*:
>
> Pas
Hello,
I am attempting to emerge xorg-server and sys-devel/llvm-3.3-r3 is pulled in
as a dependency.
So, when I emerge llvm it fails.
Here is some relevant output:
emerge --info =sys-devel/llvm-3.3-r3::gentoo:
Pastebin: http://pastebin.com/qF92DXSY
End Section of Build Log:
Pastebin:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> I'm not sure if multiple partitions can share the same cache device
> partition but more or less that's it: Initialize bcache, then attach your
> backing devices, then add those bcache devices to your btrfs.
Ah, if you are stuck with one bcache
Rich Freeman schrieb:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>> I don't see where you could lose the volume management features. You just
>> add device on top of the bcache device after you initialized the raw
>> device with a bcache superblock and attached it. The rest works the s
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> I don't see where you could lose the volume management features. You just
> add device on top of the bcache device after you initialized the raw device
> with a bcache superblock and attached it. The rest works the same, just that
> you use bcac
Rich Freeman schrieb:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>> And while we are at it, I'd also like to mention bcache. Tho, conversion
>> is not straight forward. However, I'm going to try that soon for my
>> spinning rust btrfs.
>
> I contemplated that, but I'd really like to s
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> And while we are at it, I'd also like to mention bcache. Tho, conversion is
> not straight forward. However, I'm going to try that soon for my spinning
> rust btrfs.
I contemplated that, but I'd really like to see btrfs support
something more n
Peter Humphrey schrieb:
> On Friday 20 June 2014 19:48:14 Kai Krakow wrote:
>> microcai schrieb:
>> > rsync is doing bunch of 4k ramdon IO when updateing portage tree,
>> > that will kill SSDs with much higher Write Amplification Factror.
>> >
>> > I have a 2year old SSDs that have reported Wr
Rich Freeman schrieb:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
>>
>> I found that fstrim can't work on f2fs file systems. I don't know whether
>> discard works yet.
>
> Fstrim is to be preferred over discard in general. However, I suspect
> neither is needed for something li
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> I found that fstrim can't work on f2fs file systems. I don't know whether
> discard works yet.
Fstrim is to be preferred over discard in general. However, I suspect
neither is needed for something like f2fs. Being log-based it doesn't
On Friday 20 June 2014 19:48:14 Kai Krakow wrote:
> microcai schrieb:
> > rsync is doing bunch of 4k ramdon IO when updateing portage tree,
> > that will kill SSDs with much higher Write Amplification Factror.
> >
> > I have a 2year old SSDs that have reported Write Amplification Factor
> > of 2
2014-06-21 1:48 GMT+08:00 Kai Krakow :
> microcai schrieb:
>
>> rsync is doing bunch of 4k ramdon IO when updateing portage tree,
>> that will kill SSDs with much higher Write Amplification Factror.
>>
>>
>> I have a 2year old SSDs that have reported Write Amplification Factor
>> of 26. I think t
microcai schrieb:
> rsync is doing bunch of 4k ramdon IO when updateing portage tree,
> that will kill SSDs with much higher Write Amplification Factror.
>
>
> I have a 2year old SSDs that have reported Write Amplification Factor
> of 26. I think the only reason is that I put portage tree on t
Hello Microcal,
I use tmpfs heavily as I have an SSD.
Here are some information that can help you :
tank woody # mount -v | grep tmpfs
devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs
(rw,relatime,size=8050440k,nr_inodes=2012610,mode=755)
tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=1610408k,mode=755
On 19/06/2014 12:56, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:40:08 +0800, Amankwah wrote:
Maybe the only solution is that move the portage tree to HDD??
Or tmpfs if you rarely reboot or have a fast enough connection to your
preferred
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:40:08 +0800, Amankwah wrote:
>
>> Maybe the only solution is that move the portage tree to HDD??
>
> Or tmpfs if you rarely reboot or have a fast enough connection to your
> preferred portage mirror.
There has been a p
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:40:08 +0800, Amankwah wrote:
> Maybe the only solution is that move the portage tree to HDD??
Or tmpfs if you rarely reboot or have a fast enough connection to your
preferred portage mirror.
--
Neil Bothwick
The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:36:59AM +0800, microcai wrote:
> rsync is doing bunch of 4k ramdon IO when updateing portage tree,
> that will kill SSDs with much higher Write Amplification Factror.
>
>
> I have a 2year old SSDs that have reported Write Amplification Factor
> of 26. I think the only
rsync is doing bunch of 4k ramdon IO when updateing portage tree,
that will kill SSDs with much higher Write Amplification Factror.
I have a 2year old SSDs that have reported Write Amplification Factor
of 26. I think the only reason is that I put portage tree on this SSD
to speed it up.
what is
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:33:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm an old fart, set in my ways, I found something long ago that works
> for me with unsufficient pain to provoke a change.
I clearly have a lower pain threshold than you :(
> So I ain't changin' :-)
Good thing it's an option then ;-)
On 10/06/2014 20:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:06:19 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>>> What's not to like? Do you like a long emerge list aborting as soon as
>>> you turn your back because of a missing patch file in a minor package?
>>
>> Yes, exactly. For two reasons:
>>
>> 1.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:06:19 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > What's not to like? Do you like a long emerge list aborting as soon as
> > you turn your back because of a missing patch file in a minor package?
>
> Yes, exactly. For two reasons:
>
> 1. In the vast majority of cases, there's somethin
On 10/06/2014 16:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:35:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> I know about --keep-going, I don't like it much.
>
> What's not to like? Do you like a long emerge list aborting as soon as
> you turn your back because of a missing patch file in a minor pac
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:35:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I know about --keep-going, I don't like it much.
What's not to like? Do you like a long emerge list aborting as soon as
you turn your back because of a missing patch file in a minor package?
--
Neil Bothwick
How is it that we put man
On 10/06/2014 12:36, thegeezer wrote:
>> +1 to just letting portage work with world.
>> >
>> > What I have found useful when trying to do what Alan is attempting, is
>> > to select a chunk of packages at a time (like say all of kde, then a
>> > bunch of daemons). If I get a block, drop it and try t
On 06/09/2014 10:01 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 09/06/2014 21:15, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014, 13:28:03 schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>> Hi, Gentoo!
>>>
>>> The latest episode of my months long update saga.
>>>
>> [snip]
>>> This all seems crazy. Keeping Gentoo up to date sho
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:04:30 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > You are making it artificially complicated by doing it piecewise.
> > Whenever you try to update only part of your tree, emerge cannot do
> > changes anywhere else, which means that other stuff can block your
> > intended changes.
>
>
Hi Alan,
first of all, which portage version are you using? Even if you are otherwise
always running a stable system, in this case it might be useful to update
portage (only) to ~arch. The errors that you are seeing are in an area of the
dependency resolver that people are actively working on
Hi, Andreas.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:15:48PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014, 13:28:03 schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> > Hi, Gentoo!
> > The latest episode of my months long update saga.
> [snip]
> > This all seems crazy. Keeping Gentoo up to date shouldn't be this
> >
On 09/06/2014 21:15, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014, 13:28:03 schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>> Hi, Gentoo!
>>
>> The latest episode of my months long update saga.
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> This all seems crazy. Keeping Gentoo up to date shouldn't be this
>> difficult.
>
> You are making it
Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014, 13:28:03 schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> Hi, Gentoo!
>
> The latest episode of my months long update saga.
>
[snip]
>
> This all seems crazy. Keeping Gentoo up to date shouldn't be this
> difficult.
You are making it artificially complicated by doing it piecewise. Whenever y
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:28:03 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> emerge -p --color y util-linux | less -F
>
> , and get the following on my screen:
>
> [ebuild U ] sys-apps/util-linux-2.24.1-r2 [2.22.2]
> USE="bash-completion%* pam%* python%* -caps% -cytune% -fdformat%
> -tty-helpers%" PY
Hi, Gentoo!
The latest episode of my months long update saga.
I do
emerge -p --color y util-linux | less -F
, and get the following on my screen:
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/util-linux-2.24.1-r2 [2.22.2]
USE="bash-completion%* pam%* python%* -caps% -cytune% -fdformat% -tty-helpers%"
PY
On 10/04/2014 15:26, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 4/10/2014 7:21 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Everything else in that list is routine except maybe pciutils and gpm.
>> Add them to world manually if you use those apps
>
> Thanks Alan/Tom...
>
> Hmmm... what is pciutils used for? From a little googling, i
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hmmm... what is pciutils used for? From a little googling, it seems like it
> is a tool that I would manually have to use, not something required by the
> system itself for anything that happens automatically (ie, at boot time)?
>
It provides th
On 4/10/2014 7:21 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Everything else in that list is routine except maybe pciutils and gpm.
Add them to world manually if you use those apps
Thanks Alan/Tom...
Hmmm... what is pciutils used for? From a little googling, it seems like
it is a tool that I would manually ha
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:51:39 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> seems alright except virtual/init
That is a virtual that is no longer used, it is thus safe to remove.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG
On 10/04/2014 13:16, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I rarely do this (I know, I should do it periodically at least), so I'd
> like someone to check these...
>
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>
> dev-python/python-exec
> selected: 1.1 1.2
>protected: none
>
On Apr 10, 2014 4:48 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I rarely do this (I know, I should do it periodically at least), so I'd
like someone to check these...
>
> >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>
> dev-python/python-exec
> selected: 1.1 1.2
>protected: none
Hi all,
I rarely do this (I know, I should do it periodically at least), so I'd
like someone to check these...
>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
dev-python/python-exec
selected: 1.1 1.2
protected: none
omitted: none
perl-core/ExtUtils-Command
select
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:38:06 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I've tried
>
> emerge -uv1 `equery -q d P`
>
> or emerge -uv1 `qdepends -q -Q P`
>
> but both commands (equery and qdepends) generate a list with the
> version attached like
>app-editors/kile-2.1.3
> which emerge doesn't like (
2014-02-20 13:38 GMT+01:00 Helmut Jarausch :
> Hi,
>
> I have a very simple question. How to emerge (update) all packages which
> depend on some
> given package P.
>
> I've tried
>
> emerge -uv1 `equery -q d P`
>
> or emerge -uv1 `qdepends -q -Q P`
>
> but both commands (equery and qdepends) gener
Hi,
I have a very simple question. How to emerge (update) all packages
which depend on some
given package P.
I've tried
emerge -uv1 `equery -q d P`
or emerge -uv1 `qdepends -q -Q P`
but both commands (equery and qdepends) generate a list with the
version attached like
app-editors/kil
on 02/01/2014 12:47 AM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
>
> I think it would, I used to have a general gentoo-sources plus specific
> versions in world before it was possible to use sets to stop older
> kernels being depcleaned. If you have the above line plus an unversioned
> atom, I think you
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:47:31 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:41:09 +0200, Thanasis wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > Of course if all 3.10 kernels are removed from the tree then this will
> > > pull in a wrong kernel, but I *think* that's valid world file
> > > syntax...
> > >
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:41:09 +0200, Thanasis wrote:
> > >
> > Of course if all 3.10 kernels are removed from the tree then this will
> > pull in a wrong kernel, but I *think* that's valid world file
> > syntax...
> >
>
> I don't know if what you're suggesting would work, yet if you notic
on 01/31/2014 06:35 PM Khumba wrote the following:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:29:21 +0200
> Thanasis wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
>> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
>> the latest gentoo-sources?
>>
>> Current
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:35:22 -0800
Khumba wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:29:21 +0200
> Thanasis wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
> > 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
> > the latest gentoo-sources?
> >
> > C
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:29:21 +0200
Thanasis wrote:
> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
> the latest gentoo-sources?
>
> Currently, that would be version 3.10.28.
> I know I can specify it
On 28/01/2014 22:04, Thanasis wrote:
> on 01/28/2014 09:36 PM Andrew Tselischev wrote the following:
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Thanasis wrote:
>>> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
>>> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in par
On 28/01/2014 22:04, Thanasis wrote:
> on 01/28/2014 09:36 PM Andrew Tselischev wrote the following:
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Thanasis wrote:
>>> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
>>> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in par
On 28/01/2014 22:04, Thanasis wrote:
> on 01/28/2014 09:36 PM Andrew Tselischev wrote the following:
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Thanasis wrote:
>>> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
>>> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in par
on 01/28/2014 09:36 PM Andrew Tselischev wrote the following:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Thanasis wrote:
>> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
>> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
>> the latest gentoo-sources?
>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Thanasis wrote:
> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
> the latest gentoo-sources?
>
> Currently, that would be version 3.10.28.
> I know I can specif
Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
the latest gentoo-sources?
Currently, that would be version 3.10.28.
I know I can specify it like so,
emerge =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.10.28
but then it w
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500
Andrew Penhorwood wrote:
> * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> * emake failed
> *
> * Call stack:
> * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_compile
> * environment, line 2823: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compil
501 - 600 of 3114 matches
Mail list logo
