Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum -c

On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:02:53 +, Mick wrote: > Guido, the above message shows that the md5sum command was NOT > performed on the iso hash file, but on a bunch of .png files. Actually, he did md5sum -c on the iso file, not the checksum file. Those png file references come from data in the ISO

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Sat, March 15, 2014 13:11, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:46:40 Guido Budack wrote: >> strange... > > Guido, I don't know if this is a quirk of your mail client, but it makes > difficult to follow the conversation in a thread. > > It helps if you do not trim out all of the message that

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:46:40 Guido Budack wrote: > strange... Guido, I don't know if this is a quirk of your mail client, but it makes difficult to follow the conversation in a thread. It helps if you do not trim out all of the message that you are replying to. Some of us have no means of

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso >> e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc >> livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso >> >> Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. > > Since this thread seems to have taken on a life of its own, and > be

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On 15/03/14 11:46, Guido Budack wrote: > strange... > I have 12 threads about the same thing from you in my inbox. Stop it. Stay in the one thread you created any properly reply to the messages. If your mail client can't do threads, get a new mail client. Threads exist for a reason. I don't wan

Re:[gentoo-user] MD5SUM

strange...

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Fri, 14 March 2014, at 12:41 pm, Guido Budack wrote: > … a couple of recently downloaded files (f.e. Ubunto Studio, some smaller > files I need for web-development etc pp) and the hashes are correct. (md5 as > is sha...). … > > However is it interesting that I downloaded the files now 2 t

Re:[gentoo-user] md5sum -c

Hello Mick, I already deleted all files from the local system and will repeat the download (like mentioned in a former post) the whole procedure of downloading, hashing and integrity check later, in 2 weeks when I am back in Europe and under excellent conditions. I will report... Yes its true,

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Sat, 15 March 2014, at 11:16 am, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:06:22 Stroller wrote: >> On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco > wrote: is the published MD5-hash still valid? >>> >>> $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso >>> e86da868be423283ec167725390fae

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:06:22 Stroller wrote: > On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco wrote: > >> is the published MD5-hash still valid? > > > > $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > > e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > > > > Yes, th

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco wrote: > >> is the published MD5-hash still valid? > > $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > > Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. Since this thread see

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum -c

On Friday 14 Mar 2014 06:34:25 Guido Budack wrote: > Here the result with option-c: > > md5sum -c livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > md5sum: DVD-hybrid-amd64-blue.png: No such file or directory > DVD-hybrid-amd64-blue.png: FAILED open or read > md5sum: DVD-hybrid-amd64-purple.png: No such file

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Friday 14 Mar 2014 13:15:38 Guido Budack wrote: > Hello Mick, > > Yes, I know that, I am aware of it... > you don't deal here with some script-kid but with somebody who is observing > the IT-development of the past 25 years with highest attention... However, > the hashes of about 5 other files

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 21:15:38 +0800, Guido Budack wrote: > you don't deal here with some script-kid but with somebody who is > observing the IT-development of the past 25 years with highest > attention... How is anyone supposed to know your level of experience when you don't let on? You haven't p

Re:[gentoo-user] MD5SUM

Hello Mick, Yes, I know that, I am aware of it... you don't deal here with some script-kid but with somebody who is observing the IT-development of the past 25 years with highest attention... However, the hashes of about 5 other files I downloaded (and as I said some bigger ones too) are correct

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

On Friday 14 Mar 2014 12:41:22 Guido Budack wrote: > So far are the mentioned 'hardware-faults' totally abstruse and further not > topic related comments unwanted. If your memory is faulty, or your PSU is playing up you could find that the hash calculated is wrong. It only takes on bit to flip t

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum -c

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:34:25 +0800, Guido Budack wrote: > Here the result with option-c: > md5sum -c livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > md5sum: DVD-hybrid-amd64-blue.png: No such file or directory > DVD-hybrid-amd64-blue.png: FAILED open or read [snip] > md5sum: WARNING: 15504459 lines are im

Re:[gentoo-user] MD5SUM

md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso cd8d0d5f04a3a29d56a8b1d2a83eea04 livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso file-size is the same as you mentioned... I'm quite astonished And now, any suggestion?

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

Tnx

Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM

> is the published MD5-hash still valid? $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. > Further, how big is the resulting file exactly? $ du -b livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum mismatch, upgrade from torrent, fsck

Thufir wrote: > I suppose I'll have to re-download the iso if the md5sum doesn't match > (which it doesn't per UbuntuHashes#9.04>)? The problem is that the iso is corrupted? > Do the md5sums match? If they do you downloaded the cd fine. If not, redownloa

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Stroller wrote: > > Of course, this does not detect a succesful, but somehow corrupted, > > copy > > (which should be exceptionally rare, anyway). > > Well perhaps I'm just being paranoid today. > But how do I know that a successful, but somehow corrupted, copy has >

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

On 26 Feb 2008, at 19:51, Stroller wrote: Thanks. I think this has been suggested before for my backups - IIRC it has a useful --ignore-path or --exclude-path command which can insure you all the users' Documents & Settings, without the useless temp & "Temporary Internet Files". rsync

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

On 24 Feb 2008, at 19:46, Christopher Copeland wrote: On 24 Feb 2008, at 06:06, Stroller wrote: So my question is: Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to be sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them have become damaged during transfer? I'm thinking

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

On 24 Feb 2008, at 11:46, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: On Sunday 24 February 2008, Stroller wrote: I've done this loads in the past, and never been aware of any file corruption, but I guess I'm just paranoid today. Perhaps I shouldn't use the -v flags during my copy - it's reassuring to see the files

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

On 24 Feb 2008, at 06:06, Stroller wrote: So my question is: Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to be sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them have become damaged during transfer? I'm thinking of something like md5sum for directories. I use rsy

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

Hi! === On Sunday 24 February 2008, you wrote: === ... > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:06:10 +, Stroller wrote: > > > Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to > > > be sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them have > > > become damaged during transfer? I

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

Am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 schrieb cabbage: > diff can use for binary files ? If you just want to know "different or not", sure. Bye... Dirk signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

diff can use for binary files ? On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:06:10 +, Stroller wrote: > > > Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to be > > sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them ha

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:06:10 +, Stroller wrote: > Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to be > sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them have become > damaged during transfer? I'm thinking of something like md5sum for > directories. Diff? diff -r

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum for directories?

On Sunday 24 February 2008, Stroller wrote: > I've done this loads in the past, and never been aware of any file > corruption, but I guess I'm just paranoid today. Perhaps I shouldn't > use the -v flags during my copy - it's reassuring to see the files > being copied, but what if I overlooked a bu

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum error

glumtail wrote: HI: install-x86-universal-2005.0.iso is ok stage3-authon-xp-2005.0.tar.bz2 and other stages (but not x86) is ok too If the iso md5 checks then everything on it should be okay. You could be having problems with the cd drive or cd media though. If you have cdrtools then you c

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum error

HI: install-x86-universal-2005.0.iso is ok stage3-authon-xp-2005.0.tar.bz2 and other stages (but not x86) is ok too I have downloaded stage3-x86-2005.0.tar.bz2 from several servers but has the same problem. 2005/8/8, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:17:25 +0800, glumta

Re: [gentoo-user] md5sum error

On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:17:25 +0800, glumtail wrote: > stage3-x86-2005.0.tar.bz2: FAILED > md5sum: WARNING: 1 of 1 computed checksum did NOT match > > install-x86-universal-2005.0.iso was downloaded via BitTorrent from > gentoo.org > > Any suggestion? Thanks! Download it again. md5sum is tell