http://www.polity.co.uk/book.asp?ref=9780745682051
Description
Climate change seems to be an insurmountable problem. Political solutions
have so far had little impact. Some scientists are now advocating the
so-called ‘Plan B’, a more direct way of reducing the rate of future
warming by
*Hi Folks,*
*As many on this list know, the IPCC WG3 recently published a report on
mitigation
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/geoengineering/IFGXhtJQs0Y/DgJtt6iqc78J in
which the use of the marine environment was largely omitted. I've sent in a
brief petition to the principles and I
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/phoenix-energy-signs-agreement-to-build-californias-first-forest-biomass-gasification-plant-near-lake-tahoe-255482281.html
Phoenix Energy Signs Agreement to Build California's First Forest Biomass
Gasification Plant near Lake Tahoe
SAN FRANCISCO, April
Here is a link that shows a very useful Canadian approach to attributing
warming without the use of numerical models. It eliminates the possibility
of the present warming being caused by natural fluctuation. Also attached
is an op-ed piece based on the Climate Dynamics paper. There are competent,
-- Forwarded message --
From: i...@climate-engineering.eu i...@climate-engineering.eu
Date: 29 Apr 2014 13:53
Subject: Climate Engineering News Review for 18th week of 2014
To: andrew.lock...@gmail.com
Cc:
[image: tl_files/newsletter/NewsletterBalken.jpg]
Dear Climate
http://geoengineeringourclimate.com/2014/04/29/this-is-gods-stuff-were-messing-with-geoengineering-as-a-religious-issue/
Geoengineering Our Climate?
A Working Paper Series on the Ethics, Politics and Governance of Climate
Engineering
‘This is God’s Stuff We’re Messing With’: Geoengineering as a
I'm sure we all values Tim's opinions greatly, but $18 does seem a bit
steep.
Meanwhile you can read this for free:
The fragile and rapidly changing Arctic is home to large reservoirs of
methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Photo: NASA Earth Observatory.
Tim Kruger's review is only one page, so can be read in the ReadCube
preview. http://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1038/508457a
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Andrew Lockley
andrew.lock...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v508/n7497/pdf/508457a.pdf
Climate science:
I have just been skimming through the IPCC AR5 appendix on bioenergy and I
see helpful estimates of technical bioenergy potential for land but don't
see any estimates of technical potential for marine bioenergy -- are there
any good papers on that topic?
Fred
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan,
Greg et.al.,
Your points are, as usual, highly supportable from a number of different
angles. The recent coordination of the IMO and the CBD responses to OIF
does appear to be the beginning of an intergovernmental governance matrix
focused upon the use of the marine environment for global
Michael, list et al
I support what you are advocating, but want to urge replacement below
of your 3 usages of “Marine BECCS” with “Marine BECCS and marine biochar”.
This based on the societal benefit of returning the marine biomass macro and
micronutrients from where they have been
Michael,Good points. I'll go farther.The vast scale of the oceans and relatively low-energy transport allows us to be less space-efficient than terrestrial systems. This means we do not need mono-cultures. We can have "forests" instead of "farms." Ocean Forests can be "restorative" development in
12 matches
Mail list logo
