Re: [Geotools-devel] Formal Nomination: Formal Nomin ation: Christian Müller

2009-05-20 Thread Justin Deoliveira
+1 Christian Müller wrote: > Yes, I would like to act as PMC member. I have only overseen to answer this > mail, sorry. > > > > > Jody Garnett writes: > >> I would like to formally nominate Christian for a position on the >> GeoTools Project Management Committee: >> >> Christian is an es

Re: [Geotools-devel] xml GetPropertyExecutor logging too verbose

2009-05-20 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Justin Deoliveira wrote: > So Ben already added the guard to avoid the actual conversion, we > probably just need to add the same guard for logging a missed conversion? That was ElementEncodeExecutor. See my other email. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Aus

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2499) GetFeatureTypeImpl.getFormatOption returns a shared static map

2009-05-20 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
GetFeatureTypeImpl.getFormatOption returns a shared static map -- Key: GEOT-2499 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2499 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Component

Re: [Geotools-devel] xml GetPropertyExecutor logging too verbose

2009-05-20 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Gabriel, I had a similar problem in ElementEncodeExecutor.visit(), where inappropriate conversion was being applied to ComplexAttribute, in that case causing failure, not just an ugly log message. The problem is that the converter support was written with simple features in mind. To fix the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Formal Nomination: Formal Nomin ation: Christian Müller

2009-05-20 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
+1. Kind regards, Ben. Christian Müller wrote: > Yes, I would like to act as PMC member. I have only overseen to answer this > mail, sorry. > > > > > Jody Garnett writes: > >> I would like to formally nominate Christian for a position on the >> GeoTools Project Management Committee: >>

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2498) Problem processing Capabilities with Invalid Contact Information

2009-05-20 Thread Jody Garnett (JIRA)
Problem processing Capabilities with Invalid Contact Information Key: GEOT-2498 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2498 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Compo

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] XSD schema resolver problem with two tests in one JVM: stale cache?

2009-05-20 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Justin, I have fixed this problem. The root cause is a piece of rather nasty xml-commons-resolver default behaviour, which I am reporting here as a warning to anyone else who might be using its OASIS Catalog support. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2497 "The problem is that xml-commons-res

Re: [Geotools-devel] Formal Nomination: Formal Nomin ation: Christian Müller

2009-05-20 Thread Simone Giannecchini
+1 --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Owner - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob:+39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://simboss.blogspot

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2497) XSD schema resolver problem with two tests in one JVM: stale cache?

2009-05-20 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies (JIRA)
XSD schema resolver problem with two tests in one JVM: stale cache? --- Key: GEOT-2497 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2497 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug

[Geotools-devel] A quick followup...

2009-05-20 Thread Jody Garnett
A quick follow up from this mornings breakout IRC session Logs: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2009/05/20/Breakout+IRC+Meeting Blog for News item: - http://docs.codehaus.org/pages/viewrecentblogposts.action?key=GEOTOOLS (this has been submitted to planet.osgeo.org) Web: - http:

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2496) ArcSDE Large Object Support

2009-05-20 Thread Mark Leslie (JIRA)
ArcSDE Large Object Support --- Key: GEOT-2496 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2496 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: data arcsde Affects Versions: 2.5.5 Environment: WinXP

Re: [Geotools-devel] xml GetPropertyExecutor logging too verbose

2009-05-20 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Yeah, this is something i have gone back and forth on, removing this logging statement. I have found it to be useful however when debugging. So Ben already added the guard to avoid the actual conversion, we probably just need to add the same guard for logging a missed conversion? Alternatives w

[Geotools-devel] xml GetPropertyExecutor logging too verbose

2009-05-20 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Hi, Working with an app-schema configuration on trunk works but the log gets full of messages comming from GetPropertyExectutor, line 83: LOGGER.fine("Could not convert " + parent + " to " + binding.getType().getName()); the messages look like the one bellow and are log

Re: [Geotools-devel] Formal Nomination: Formal Nomin ation: Christian Müller

2009-05-20 Thread Ian Turton
+1 Ian -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web depl

Re: [Geotools-devel] Formal Nomination: Formal Nomin ation: Christian Müller

2009-05-20 Thread Jody Garnett
My + 1 was implicit in your nomination On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> >> Yes, I would like to act as PMC member. I have only overseen to answer >> this mail, sorry. > > +1 here > > Cheers > Andrea > --

Re: [Geotools-devel] Integration of Feature-Pregeneralizd module into geoserver

2009-05-20 Thread Jody Garnett
I think you mean the other list? On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Christian Müller wrote: > > I finshed the geoserver tutorial for the feature-pregeneralizd module. > http://docs.geoserver.org/1.7.x/user/tutorials/feature-pregeneralized/featur > e-pregeneralized_tutorial.html > (at the moment of

Re: [Geotools-devel] Formal Nomination: Formal Nomin ation: Christian Müller

2009-05-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Christian Müller ha scritto: > Yes, I would like to act as PMC member. I have only overseen to answer this > mail, sorry. +1 here Cheers Andrea -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new s

Re: [Geotools-devel] Formal Nomination: Formal Nomin ation: Christian Müller

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Müller
Yes, I would like to act as PMC member. I have only overseen to answer this mail, sorry. Jody Garnett writes: > I would like to formally nominate Christian for a position on the > GeoTools Project Management Committee: > > Christian is an established module maintainer; and offers an exam

[Geotools-devel] Integration of Feature-Pregeneralizd module into geoserver

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Müller
I finshed the geoserver tutorial for the feature-pregeneralizd module. http://docs.geoserver.org/1.7.x/user/tutorials/feature-pregeneralized/featur e-pregeneralized_tutorial.html (at the moment of writing this email, it is not up to date, but it is already commited) For testing the tutorial, t

Re: [Geotools-devel] ArcSDE large objects

2009-05-20 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Hi Mark, thanks for the findings and the patch. Please be so kind of opening a jira issue for it and attach the patch there, I'll be glad to review and apply. Regarding the docs, thanks for reminding me too, they got out of date. Specifically, we're no longer supporting versions prior to ArcSD

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules being moved

2009-05-20 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Right, I'm willing to maintain it, and think that the first step towards a properly maintained module is to accept reality and move it to unsupported until it can safely be told it earned it's starts (as per the module matrix page) Gabriel Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> A

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (jjtree-javacc)

2009-05-20 Thread Mauricio Pazos
On Monday 18 May 2009 11:14:49 Mauricio Pazos wrote: > > In the main module it's used by an old text expression > > parser that is marked as deprecated (ExpressionBuilder). > > I'd say, let's just remove it and in the few places > > where it's used, let's just build filters by code > > (cql cannot

Re: [Geotools-devel] module organization; response to geotoolkit; etc...

2009-05-20 Thread Jody Garnett
> Afaik it was. I asked maintainers that stepped up to update > the pom files, someone already did. > I did not see any reason for a holdup since no module was > claimed by developers in conflict with each other. Indeed - yeah community spirit :-) >> I feel that after this clean up is done it wil

Re: [Geotools-devel] module organization; response to geotoolkit; etc...

2009-05-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Just a quick thanks to Andrea organizing[1] us through the reassigning > of module ownership. Andrea I have this evening and next free in order > to start working on that plan. I was trying to determine if the web > page or recent emails represented the final breakdown.

Re: [Geotools-devel] geoapi milestone release

2009-05-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Evening everyone: > > I see some work happening over on the geoapi project (getting read for > an OGC meeting by the looks of it). I am hoping to cut a milestone > release of GeoAPI 2.3; and switch trunk over to use that rather than > SNAPSHOT. > > Is moving back to a f

[Geotools-devel] module organization; response to geotoolkit; etc...

2009-05-20 Thread Jody Garnett
Just a quick thanks to Andrea organizing[1] us through the reassigning of module ownership. Andrea I have this evening and next free in order to start working on that plan. I was trying to determine if the web page or recent emails represented the final breakdown. I feel that after this clean up i

[Geotools-devel] geoapi milestone release

2009-05-20 Thread Jody Garnett
Evening everyone: I see some work happening over on the geoapi project (getting read for an OGC meeting by the looks of it). I am hoping to cut a milestone release of GeoAPI 2.3; and switch trunk over to use that rather than SNAPSHOT. Is moving back to a fixed milestone release okay with everyone

Re: [Geotools-devel] ArcSDE large objects

2009-05-20 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Mark; Can you open up a Jira issue and attach your patch to that? We find it a bit easier to keep track of changes. Jody On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Mark Leslie wrote: > Greetings, > I've been working with the ArcSDE plugin over the last few weeks and I found > the large character objec

[Geotools-devel] ArcSDE large objects

2009-05-20 Thread Mark Leslie
Greetings, I've been working with the ArcSDE plugin over the last few weeks and I found the large character objects weren't being supported properly. Since the ArcSDE api doesn't return them on SeRow.getObject() calls (it returns null for all large objects) they were being reported as strings