Hi Michael:
As promised here is a start of a proposal to tame MapLayer.
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/MapContext+Refactor
One of the ideas that occurred to me was to remove the methods you require for
JMapPane; and ask JMapPane to wrap up MapLayers and decorate them with
informati
2010/6/5 Andrea Aime :
> Michael Bedward ha scritto:
>> I agree with the points that Justin has made. The codebase is a much
>> bigger hurdle for prospective developers than the Java version and I
>> think it's extremely important to be mindful of what our users'
>> constraints are. There's not muc
Contacting sydney revolutionary cell; secret feature collection proposal
communication dispatch code name "Bring Back FeatureResults".
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/FeatureCollection+revolution
Jody
On 05/06/2010, at 7:42 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> On 5 June 2010 19:25, Andrea A
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I am fine for the revolution; should however talk with Justin who put
> a lot of thought into the revolution and has a proposal outlining the
> marching orders for the feature collection plot.
Yeah, I was more sharing a sentiment than suggesting we do it right
now... as
I am fine for the revolution; should however talk with Justin who put a lot of
thought into the revolution and has a proposal outlining the marching orders
for the feature collection plot.
I would support the revolution in order to get feature collection separate from
java.util.Colleciton; if y
On 5 June 2010 19:25, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> /me really hates feature collections being writable. Would be +1 making
> them read only right now
I'm with you comrade. Shall we plot revolution for 2.7 ? If we got
the docs and examples re-jigged on trunk we might get away with it
because 2.7 offe
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> Hi Jody,
>
>> There are a large number of other "Collection" methods; are there any more
>> candidates
>> for removal? A couple weeks ago I mentioned the add/remove listener methods
>> as
>> something that is just not implemented.
>
> Yes, following your "prepared
Hi Jody,
> There are a large number of other "Collection" methods; are there any more
> candidates
> for removal? A couple weeks ago I mentioned the add/remove listener methods as
> something that is just not implemented.
Yes, following your "prepared statement" analogy for FeatureCollection
it
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Workspace issues also cuts the other way; when I am handed a machine at work
> it comes with Java 6 installed. And I have to go out of my way (and now
> further out of my way) in order to find a Java 5 SDK to compile geotools
> against.
>
> Truth be told I just run Ja
Workspace issues also cuts the other way; when I am handed a machine at work it
comes with Java 6 installed. And I have to go out of my way (and now further
out of my way) in order to find a Java 5 SDK to compile geotools against.
Truth be told I just run Java 6 now at work; and get yelled at by
On 5 June 2010 16:39, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Michale, you're the users list master, if you feel like asking, just
> go ahead :-p
>
Phooey - I've never mastered anything :-) But I will ask them...
Michael
--
ThinkGeek and
11 matches
Mail list logo
