On 16/10/12 14:39, Andrea Aime wrote:
Ben, I have two worries about the backport:
- the patch is core and non trivial (and only managed to have a cursory
look at it)
- release is next week
Can we land it one day after the release so that it gets some exposure
for at least one month on the
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au wrote:
I pushed this change to 8.x (and the unit test to GeoServer 2.2.x) earlier
today. If you are sure you would be more comfortable holding this change
until the week of 29 October (my next opportunity to work
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au wrote:
I pushed this change to 8.x (and the unit test to GeoServer 2.2.x)
earlier today. If you are sure you would be more
On 16/10/12 16:06, Andrea Aime wrote:
Btw, this is imho also in violation of
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+77+-+Time+boxed+release+model
In my view this is a grey area. The policy explicitly allows new minor
core functionality (e.g. new output format. This change seemed to me
quite
On 16/10/12 15:45, Andrea Aime wrote:
Bah, keep it there, but I'm wondering what's the point of asking if you
can't even wait a few hours for the mailing
list to respond before committing...
Transparency.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au wrote:
On 16/10/12 16:06, Andrea Aime wrote:
Btw, this is imho also in violation of
On 16/10/12 16:58, Andrea Aime wrote:
A new output format is fully pluggable, needs no changes in core
modules, it's a mere extra.
Your change refactors existing classes instead.
Thanks for the clarification.
Just to be clear, I'm not opposed to the backport, I'm just worried
about its
Ivan
Michael
Hello,
I'm seeing the test error below when building the master branch (mac
osx 10.6.8, java 1.6.0_29). Hudson seems to be happy so perhaps it's
just me - but since the error mentions Envelope I wondered if this was
connected to the work that Jody has been doing recently ?
Michael
Running
Sorry, I think that was a false alarm. I thought I was on master but
was actually on a branch where with the the jsr-275 dependency
replaced by jscience (GEOT-4290). I just did a build on master and it
was fine.
Michael
On 17 October 2012 12:15, Michael Bedward michael.bedw...@gmail.com wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo
