> In contrast, Google have a very strict policy, and expect the rest of the
> Internet to spend a lot of time and money chasing their latest capricious
> changes. This is a full-time job, and unsurprisingly, many people running
mail
> services on the side have better things to do than try and
On 28/07/2019 11:01, Mark Carroll wrote:
On 28 Jul 2019, Bernard Peek wrote:
I've used Gmail for years but I'm happy to use something else. My main
reason for choosing Gmail back then was its spam filtering. What
alternatives can match that today?
I would second the idea of putting gmx.com
Which is why I am not on the get_iplayer forum. It's too much like hard work to
raise a genuine issue without accidentally breaching one or more of his nit
picking rules.
--
Owen Smith
Cambridge, UK
> On 28 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Peter Corlett wrote:
>
> Compare this to the get_iplayer
>
Please see below ...
On 28/07/2019 14:29, Mark Carroll wrote:
On 28 Jul 2019, RS wrote:
One thing that seems to be being suggested is that I should use my own
domain name for email. My own experience of doing that has been that I
get swamped with spam.
I do this. This isn't the place for an
On 28 Jul 2019, RS wrote:
> On 28/07/2019 11:01, Mark Carroll wrote:
>>
>> Standards violations or similar daft decisions by big players are a
>> common issue in IT,
>
> Pious comments about standards violation are not much help unless we can
> identify what the standards are and how they are
On 28/07/2019 11:01, Mark Carroll wrote:
On 28 Jul 2019, Bernard Peek wrote:
I've used Gmail for years but I'm happy to use something else. My main
reason for choosing Gmail back then was its spam filtering. What
alternatives can match that today?
I would second the idea of putting gmx.com at
hello
I just fell victim of this. Too many bounces from Gmail.
No idea why.
SMTP to detailed out in RFC-821
May have to switch back to running my own mail server.
Google is the new evil empire.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 6:14 AM Steven Carr wrote:
>
> Anyone else getting kicked from the list?
On 28/07/2019 11:01, Mark Carroll wrote:
Standards violations or similar daft decisions by big players are a
common issue in IT,
Pious comments about standards violation are not much help unless we can
identify what the standards are and how they are being violated.
My (very limited)
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 01:35:39AM +0100, Peter S Kirk wrote:
[...]
> It started impacting Youtube a few months ago - all BBC Comedy, Docu, Drama
> third party uploads being deleted and replaced with Pay To View.
It may be worth noting that many of those videos are only blocked for UK IP
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 09:21:26AM +0100, Colin Law wrote:
[...]
> This is the only list I use that has this shown this issue.
Then you are lucky. I'm on *loads* of mailing lists, and several of them have
had GMail users complaining of missing list posts and being unsubscribed. The
common factor
On 28 Jul 2019, Bernard Peek wrote:
> I've used Gmail for years but I'm happy to use something else. My main
> reason for choosing Gmail back then was its spam filtering. What
> alternatives can match that today?
I would second the idea of putting gmx.com at least on the "to be
considered" list
I've used Gmail for years but I'm happy to use something else. My main
reason for choosing Gmail back then was its spam filtering. What
alternatives can match that today?
-Original Message-
From: get_iplayer On Behalf Of
Peter Corlett
Sent: 28 July 2019 09:54
To:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 08:32:36PM -0300, david whelan wrote:
> Does anyone know of any free email providers that are suitably
> standards-compliant?
You generally get what you pay for, and that applies in spades when you demand
"free".
However, ProtonMail is a freemium service which has a good
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 at 13:03, Roger Bell_West wrote:
>
> In order to participate reliably in Internet email, you'll need a
> standards-compliant platform - which gmail isn't. It's fine if you
> only ever exchange mail with other walled-garden users, but talking to
> the wider world is a bit more
On 2019-07-28 00:36, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
I'm getting an message regarding excessive bounces too without me
posting to the group!
Why the "!"? "Excessive bounces" means that the mail-list server is
regularly failing to send messages TO you, which it will try to do
with every message someone
I use gmx.com for this list and have had no problems. They're free but I don't
know about their compliances.
Clive
On 28 Jul 2019, 00:36, at 00:36, Kevin McCarthy
wrote:
>I'm getting an message regarding excessive bounces too without me
>posting to the group!
>No idea why, I've been a member
16 matches
Mail list logo
