On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:12:02AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cygwin as a tools environment on win32 is fine. The mozilla project uses a
> similar setup
> and it works nicely. Tor mentions a couple of others.
Please don't spread misinformation. Mozilla switched to MSYS from cygwin
for Fire
Testing list posting
-Yosh
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:19:13AM -0500, jbaker wrote:
> Was wondering if it would be OK if I added an enhancement request on
> bugzilla for a PF_OPTION control in gimp-python that is the equivalent
> of SF_OPTION... ?
Seems reasonable to me. Request with patch to implement it is even
better (t
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:21:52AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> We have no "offcial" mentors yet, but for Pippin for GEGL, Udi for
> UFRaw, Yosh and me (I am not even sure if Yosh would pick it), for
> gimp-python.
Yeah, I'm cool with mentoring.
-Yosh
___
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:27:36PM -0800, Al Niessner wrote:
>
> Dang! I tried pdb.gimp-quit() like in script-fu and it, of course, did
> not work. I then browsed http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/index.html
> looking for a quit or some type of control over gimp and did not see
> anything.
Not su
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:25:17PM +1000, Campbell Barton wrote:
> was looking at the gimps python API, svn - gimp-pdb.c:311
>
> GimpParam *
> pygimp_param_from_tuple(PyObject *args, const GimpParamDef *ptype, int
> nparams)
> {
> PyObject *tuple, *item, *r, *g, *b, *x, *y, *w, *h;
> Gi
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:29:15PM +, Daniel Pisano wrote:
> Hence my motivation to speak out in this thread. And I have no more to
> say about this matter, since all that I could do, I have done.
I haven't read all the postings in this thread yet, as this week is busy
for me, but I have to sa
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:42:03AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Well, you're somewhat right. But other projects do not seem to have a problem
> finding developers. Inkscape has them. Subversion has many of them. While
> the "hackerdom" level of the open source people has decreased somewhat, we
>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:00:42AM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Though, Inkscape I think seems to have succeeded better than both GIMP
> and Krita (attatching new and prettier script version)
Yeah, but not by much. The point being, pretty much all free software
projects could use more contribu
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 07:36:52PM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> GIMP is a widely used piece of software, if one compares to other pieces
> of FLOSS, there are often many more contributors at other, similar
> projects. Doesn't anyone find that strange?
I don't believe this is true. Can you back
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:35:03AM +0100, Claus Cyrny wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > I don't think however that the gfig plug-in has
> > anything to do with this.
> It does insofar, as it binds unnecessary develop-
> er resources. I have been using the Gimp now for
> sev
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:24:48AM +0200, Omar wrote:
> Omar a ?crit :
> >Alexandre Prokoudine a ?crit :
> >>On 10/20/06, gg wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> >>>
> all other toolkits that have tear-off menus
> >>>
> >>>'still interested to know what "all t
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:36:09PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 13:07 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> > So another idea is to persuade Shawn to move everything gimp.org to
> > another server (perhaps somewhere in gnome.org/RedHat's colo to take
> > advantage of their
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:03:48AM +0200, Alex Fernandez wrote:
> >i cannot give any kind of
> >logical reason for it and probably you should do the right thing and
> >trash this suggestion of mine.
>
> Yes, it is the usual email pollution.
You're guilty of the same. Looking at the archives, you
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:10:54PM +0200, Zephyr wrote:
> Hello,
> I wanted to compile My Very Own GIMP From CVS (TM) and play with the
> code, explore it etc. As it should be just my playground, I don't want
> to install it system-wide and possibly endanger my stable GIMP 2.2.10
> installed from R
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 02:58:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >> By the way, I thought the batch mode only understood scheme, so it
> would make the whole thing even more complicated.
> >
> > One line of scheme to call your python script won
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> >Just write a pygimp script normally, and call it via gimp's batch mode.
> >
> >-Yosh
>
> I would prefer another solution, since I have some processing to do in
> the external script and possibly a bunch of data to transfer back and
>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
> occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
> xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
> the ui?
> I need
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:43:12AM +0100, Kleistereimer wrote:
> how to use gimp_path_get_points from a python plugin?
>
>
> here some samplecode:
>
> def somefunc(image):
>
> floatarray = []
> for i in range(100):
> floatarray.append(0.0)
>
> closed = 0
> count = 0
>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:36:41PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:30:03PM +, John Cupitt wrote:
> > > > Of course, OpenDocument document structure (ZIP archive with multiply
> > > >
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:30:03PM +, John Cupitt wrote:
> > Of course, OpenDocument document structure (ZIP archive with multiply
> > files inside) could be followed.
>
> Yes, this sounds much more sensible.
As a concept, yes. Actually using ZIP is a stupid decision, and I wonder
what the ra
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Axel Wernicke wrote:
>
> Am 11.02.2006 um 15:14 schrieb Scott:
> >I am sure I will eventually fix GIMP or come up with a work around, at
> >which point I will forward the info on for your consumption.
>
> so, may be we should kick this issue to GIMP-dev a
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:45:56AM +1100, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
> >On 12/21/05, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>example images of too much cleaveage for a mailing list kthx. there are
> >>women on this list too
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This is just
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:28:49PM +0200, lode leroy wrote:
> When installing Python from Python-2.4.1.msi,
> the headers are not in C:/Python24/include/python24
> but in C:/Python24/include.
Well, this is fixed differently in 2.3.4. I'm assuming you're using
something older and neglected to chang
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:56:12AM -0500, Lance Dockins wrote:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> >And if you ask, please describe your problems in detail. I
> >have left my crystal ball at home today so I really can't figure out
> >what "some missing key libraries at the end of the build" are.
> >
> I was
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:34:28PM -0400, woc wrote:
> On 8/24/05, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the python bindings are disted with GIMP, though not on Windows.
> > This will change with GIMP 2.4 though.
> >
> > If you care about Window
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:49:50PM -0400, woc wrote:
> On 8/24/05, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can use Perl or Python to write a file format plugin. Script-fu is a
> > nonstarter, there's no way to register a load/save handler from a script
> &g
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:58:35PM -0400, woc wrote:
> On 8/24/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perl probably has similar limitations, to a certain extent. Perl
> > handles text best -- binary data, it's best at simply passing... I
> > believe the term is ad verbatim or something.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:20:29PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Andrei Simion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>>You are deleting the images, aren't you?
> >>
> >>No, in all tutorials I read they return the image to be saved at the
> >>end of the
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:02:54AM +0200, lode leroy wrote:
> >> the autodetection of python on MSYS is not too good:
> >> the "\"es need to be replaced with "/"es, so I added this to
> >
> >Where did it screw up? You sure you are using a CVS snapshot with all
> >the relevant changes? The ChangeLog
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:40:37PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
> On 6/28/05, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Changing stuff outside of gimp should be considered last resort.
> >
> > > which is still not perfect: I modified python.m4
lude "ft2build.h"
> +
> #include
> #include
Your libwmf library is too old. Upgrade.
> the autodetection of python on MSYS is not too good:
> the "\"es need to be replaced with "/"es, so I added this to
Where did it screw up? You sure you are using a CV
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:30:02PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> Some symbols (including save_d) are missing in the latest update of
> aalib
Yes, the debian maintainer made a bogus change:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315606
Downgrade aalib for now.
-Yosh
___
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:48:33AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Sunday 19 June 2005 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I need to compile the list of things that bother me about the
> > GTK+ file chooser and submit it to bugzilla someday. I know I'm
> > not the only one being bothered with it's d
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> mentor someone on the shapes tool, we need a mentor for the plug-in
> system. There is a related resource distribution project for gDesklets
> in the bounties already - some coordination might be possible.
I can do that. Anyone doing
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh a ?crit :
> >There are also persistent parasites that can be attached to the app.
> >This is how the png plugin stores its default settings currently. They
> >are backed by /parasiterc
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:18:21AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> Jay Cox a ?crit :
> >On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:41 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> >> - Work on a framework to make plug-in settings saveable across
> >>sessions (this might be done now, is it?)
> >
> >Persistent parasites can
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:57:49PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
> >Andrei Simion wrote:
> >
> >
> At gimp.org they don't have downloads for 2.2. If you say it works,
> this is good. But why they don't say the same on the web site.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>If you'
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:35:42PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:11:26PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Sven Neumann wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >&
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:11:26PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >GIMP 1.2 is not any longer supported (for quite a while already). Your
> >best bet is to update to GIMP 2.2. That will also give you the benefit
> >that you don't any longer need to run an X
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 03:07:01AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 27.02.2005, at 02:50, Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >We should do -I$(top_builddir)/app. This avoids needing to care about
> >how deep the directory is, in case the directory is moved elsewhere.
>
> But that&
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:53:37AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 27.02.2005, at 01:14, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >We would probably have to add this to all Makefile.am in the app
> >subdirs then?!
>
> Only to those containing sources which refer to automatically
> generated headers, about 3 or 4.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 12:44:47AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 26.02.2005, at 23:44, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >What's wrong with $(top_builddir)?
>
> Ho hum. That's a relative path as well, so instead of
> -I.. that would be -I$(top_builddir)/app which gets
> expanded to -I../../app . We could
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:56:16AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 27.02.2005, at 01:19, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >>just curious, is it expected that configuration of a GIMP
> >>build will fail if configure cannot find a C++ compiler?
>
> >That question would better be asked on the autoconf list.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:51:00AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
>
> >> Would you mind to explain what sort of problems that would be? If we
> >
> > mozilla ./file
> >
> > => file not acesssible (permission denied, other user, inaccessibl
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:49:43PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 18:36:29 +0100
>
>Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> There could be plenty of other reasons why, of course. But it isn't
>> FUD for
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 03:34:04PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After a false start, the GIMP Splash Contest is now officially
> open!
>
> The contest runs until next Sunday, Midnight. Splash screens
> should be the same size as jimmac's logo and have a pale band
> across the bottom ro
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:04:04PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:37:00PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > > If you want to do the work of changing all the places that things
> > > have been said now, be my gues
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:37:00PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:01:20PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > > In case you hadn't noticed, we're due a release next week. How
> > > soon is soon?
> &g
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:01:20PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
> > The news was fixed last night. The contest will be worked on soon.
>
> In case you hadn't noticed, we're due a release next week. How
> soon is soon?
Today.
> &
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If this could be done today, that would be a great solution
> > (imho).
>
> I wouldn't wait for this to happen if I was you. The news system
> hasn't been resurrected for several
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:11:54PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 12.11.2004, at 18:51, Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >>You can, but not using the typical APIs. This is pretty important
> >>for database stuff
>
> >Whose use case is very different than GIMP&
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:22PM +0530, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
> Manish Singh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Daniel, Sven, gimp-developer
> >On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:08:17PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> >...
> >t's a whole bunch of contort
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:08:17PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 12.11.2004, at 15:51, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >That allows you to stuff more RAM into your box but you can still only
> >give up to 4GB to a single process simply because you cannot handle
> >more than 4GB in a 32bit address space.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:12:46PM -0700, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> thanks Sven and Carol for your answers... I'll get back to you with more
> details about the GUI, as i'm working on an art project at the moment,
> but to answer some immediate queries:
>
> - I'm using Photoshop 7.0 - stra
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:08:23PM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
> struct _GPConfig
> {
> guint32 version;
> guint32 tile_width;
> guint32 tile_height;
> gint32 shm_ID;
> gdouble gamma;
> gint8install_cmap;
> gint8show_tool_tips;
> gint32 min_colors;
> gint32 gd
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 06:15:03PM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote:
>
> While starting each plugin as a separate process has it's advantages, gdb
> interaction is certainly not one of them.
>
> For example, right now I bring the plugin dialog up, then look up in the
> process list for it, and attach
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:28:07PM -0300, Rodrigo Severo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm having problems compiling Gimp 2.0.1 on my Conectiva Linux 9 machine.
>
> The error is:
>
> if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../app
> -I/usr/local/gtk+/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/glib/include/g
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:18:02PM +1000, Owen wrote:
> I just built 2.1.0 with --enable-python but there was no python on the menus.
>
> So I went and built 2.0.1 --enable-python and configure failed because I didn't have
> pygtk
>
> Installed that and rebuilt both. Python now shows in the men
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:19:20PM -0400, Christopher Curtis wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >snipped out: the fact that clueless Robin completely missed the point that
> >there was plenty of refactoring done into GPL libraries, quite independent
> >
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 09:11:49PM +0200, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> > But it's pretty
> > clear that you never bother to do any research before posting.
>
>
>
> > You must
> > have some weird sort of logic goes on in
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:44:51AM -0700, Robin Rowe wrote:
> Dave,
>
> > It seems like you're limiting refactoring to code re-use via
> > extraction to libraries.
>
> No, I'm using the same definition that Mat refers to:
>
> "Refactoring is a disciplined technique for restructuring an existing
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just sent a mail to a gimp.org alias, and it bounced with the
> following problem:
The gimp.org postmaster address is a much more appropriate place for this
sort of thing than the developer list. Next time, use the pr
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:27:04AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:48:59PM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So what would be a good way for perl to support both named and positional
> > stuff?
>
> It simply shouldn't. It s
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 06:53:28PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> >> Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, something has to generate those coords, and something has to update
> > the UI before painting is finished.
> >
> > I was asking m
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:52:29PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> >Helps for what? If libpdb is not our PDB redesign, what is it then?
>
> What is it? Rock?
>
> I may be misunderstanding what it is, but I understood that libpdb was an
> extra
> layer between the existi
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > > What requirements would the new PDB have?
> >
> > There's a number of iss
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:22:23PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:19:09PM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While on that subject, I'm wondering what a good way of representing
> > named parameters in scheme and perl would be.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:20:14PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > - Do a 2.2 release in about three months.
> >
> > I think that's unrealistically short at this stage. There are people
> > who have said that they want to do some concrete and long-s
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 05:57:04PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
>
> > If it's important to you, you'll do the 10 mins of research and critical
> > thinking needed.
>
> Apparantly you could research this a whole lot faster than I can, which
> isn't surprising since you work with gimp development almo
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 03:32:08PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Manish Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 2:48 PM
>
>
>
> > FWIW, the suggestion was ill-researched. (foo image=bar) is s
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
> > A PDB revamp is planned.
>
> How far along is the planning? I have heard of Rock's libpdb,
> which I believe he wants to finish for 2.2, but I hadn't heard
> any c
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 10:01:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One of the ideas that I believe Sven raised on irc, was that there
> should be a minimal and trivial interface to the PDB that is not
> based on any particular language but just consists of:
>
> gimp_foo -bar 3 -baz yellow
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:39:23AM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
> It is utterly ridiculous that simply because I voiced concerns about and
> would like for the ability to have gimp scripts execute properly from the
> command line under Windows that you accuse me of "making the GIMP suck".
> The sugges
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:55:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Great. Now, when you say it I remember Sven mentioning it in the past.
> But I guess that this new interface is not exported yet to any of
> the language bindings? Is that correct? Any plans when this API
> will become active?
It
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 01:34:02AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:58:25AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> > > For scheme we could do something like this:
> > >
> > > (
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:58:25AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:50:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:56:36AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > > [stuff deleted
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:50:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:56:36AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> [stuff deleted]
> >
> > The only thing that struck me as missing was the work involved with
> > porting the plug-ins to the new API, but Rapha?l already poin
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:21:04PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> > I'll add something on the wiki as soon as my Gimp.app
> > source forge project gets accepted and I can put in a
> > link to it.
> >
> hmm, do we need to add the upload
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:11:02PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 14 Mar 2004 02:50:09 +0100
>
>Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Fink and Darwinports are simply not options for mainline OS X
>> users. Mac users w
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:14:30PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alan Horkan wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
> > > it is going to be a tough act to follow robin rowe and cinepaint.
> >
> > I know you are funny sometimes but we all know Robin reads this list and
> > such
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:15AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Oh sure, out of all the bindings, perl comes closest by far to full
> > coverage. But iirc it doesn't wrap libgimpcolor, libgimpma
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:35:04AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 07:35:08PM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > currently, and go beyond that with a full gtk and gimp binding. The
> > same should be done for python (I have plans to d
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 05:43:00PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Meanwhile I've profiled gnumeric while waiting for the scrollwheel
> action to catch up and indeed it seems that the scrolling causes a lot
> of activity both in GTK and the X server with the activity in the X
> server being mostly bli
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 04:14:10PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> Simons agruments, however, smell a lot of "standard gimp extension
> language", because his goal is to have one language that is always pat
> of gimp, which would effectively be a standard. I don't think that's a
> bad idea at all
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 02:08:47AM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> > > scrolling, currently there doesn't seem to be ANY way to assign ANY keys
> > > at all to scrolling http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 ]
> >
> > I might be wrong but shouldn't you be able to specify keys for
> > scrol
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 11:46:35PM -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> The 1.3.2 of the sample plug-in (gimp-plugin-template) uses some
> features that are deprecated in the latest CVS version of the GIMP. It
> is also missing an argument to one function call. The attached patch
> allows t
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:51:17PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:24:15AM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the bulk of the code in gimp that causes warnings is stuff like:
>
> > void foo (void **p);
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:13:19AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > other parts, and I already had enough with C guts) and is small, it
> > > just fits in place with the old code instead of more deep changes.
>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> [restricting this to gimp-devel, since this is purely technical stuff]
>
> GSR - FR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-19 at 1524.44 +0100):
> > > [technical discussion :)]
> > > I think I already explained why
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:41:46AM +0100, David Odin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as you may know, the files libgimp/gimpmisc.[ch] have been split into
> libgimp/gimppixelfetcher.[ch] and libgimp/gimpregioniterator.[ch]. Can
> you do the necessary changes to keep cvs history for these files? This
> i
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:43:09PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David G??mez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've scanned some jpeg images with a 24bit depth. Some of them are old
> > photographies in black&white that show 'bands' when are displayed on
> > a 16 bit depth display. After
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 09:20:56PM +0100, Hans Breuer wrote:
> Am 27.12.2003 um 09:39 schrieb Manish Singh:
> >I just checked in an POSIX shm tile transport implementation. I'd like
> >someone on OS X to test it, since I'm not 100% sure how POSIX
> >compliant OS X
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:58:33PM +0100, Branko Collin wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2003, at 21:47, Rapha?l Quinet wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:18:11 +0100, "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On 30 Dec 2003, at 9:48, Rapha?l Quinet wrote:
>
> >>> I think that the goal was to move to
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 06:59:57PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Porting GTK2 to Quartz could bring some improvements but it isn't a
> prerequisite for a good user experience of The GIMP on Mac OS X. The
> one thing that is a lot more important at the moment is to fix bug
> #102058:
>
> http://bu
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> >What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and
> >compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for
> >historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wan
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:35:09AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> >>The point is that as it is, gegl is not a standalone project.
> >But it *is* a standalone project. That's been the
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Not at all. GTK+ lived in the GIMP source tree until it was
> capable of being a standalone project. Afterwards, its main
> developers were gimp developers. Unfortunately, several of them
> followed the path which GTK+ has become to go
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:24:54PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2003 18:36, Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> > > Since it talks specifically about GIMP python,
> > > which me, by chan
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
