Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2: New From Visible (julien)

2009-01-28 Thread Alchemie foto\grafiche
I understand better. What is visible is really a flattenned stack of the visible layers (with an eye in the Layer dialog). Not exactly flattened but merged Flatten will a remove the alpha channel, replacing any transparent area with the background color The question is the interest of this

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2: New From Visible

2009-01-26 Thread Alexia Death
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:15 AM, julien jm.h...@wanadoo.fr wrote: What is visible? Using GIMP's terminology it is projection --- flattened stack of layers. Sorry, I am not accustomed to developer terminology. visible is related to a flattened stack of layers? I don't understand that. Is

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2: New From Visible

2009-01-26 Thread julien
Thank you, I understand better. What is visible is really a flattenned stack of the visible layers (with an eye in the Layer dialog). New From Visible works the same as Merge Visible Layers, excepted that it creates a new layer, not always at top of the layer stack, but, in some cases, just

[Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2: New From Visible

2009-01-25 Thread julien
Hi, I am not a developer, only a docwriter. I browsed the Web, read the thread in the archive of this list: I couldn't find answer to my questions about Layer/New From Visible. The help pop-up tells Create a new layer from what is visible in this image. What is visible? I can imagine a canvas

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2: New From Visible

2009-01-25 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:05 PM, julien wrote: I am not a developer, only a docwriter. I browsed the Web, read the thread in the archive of this list: I couldn't find answer to my questions about Layer/New From Visible. The help pop-up tells Create a new layer from what is visible in this

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2: New From Visible

2009-01-25 Thread julien
What is visible? Using GIMP's terminology it is projection --- flattened stack of layers. Sorry, I am not accustomed to developer terminology. visible is related to a flattened stack of layers? I don't understand that. Is visible referring to the visible part of an image, as when the canvas

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-04 Thread Roman Joost
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:50:27PM -0500, Daryl Lee wrote: On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 18:22, Niklas Mattisson wrote: Hey again, ... * src/toolbox/tool-*.xml should change the line Tool Call to something else. This is not correct english and I can't seem to find good translation for the words

[Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Roman Joost
We're going to make a first release of the gimp-help-2. I want to inform the authors, to have a look over their written content and make sure, that the release will not include major spelling or grammar errors. The freeze of the sources will be on next wednesday the 11th.

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
tis 2004-02-03 klockan 11.02 skrev Roman Joost: We're going to make a first release of the gimp-help-2. I want to inform the authors, to have a look over their written content and make sure, that the release will not include major spelling or grammar errors. The freeze of the sources will

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hey again, Actually I have a few other things to remind everyone. * in src/toolbox/menu.xml the section about GIMP Online is still not translated that much. Not as far as I can see at least. That is translated and updated after I did the move of the object. * src/toolbox/tool-*.xml should

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hi, After discussions on IRC I made the desition to make a bugreport about the problems with Tool Call for the docs. The report is located at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133353 Also I talked to Sven and the others and according to Sven the word freeze is perhaps not well chosen.

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Daryl Lee
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 18:22, Niklas Mattisson wrote: Hey again, ... * src/toolbox/tool-*.xml should change the line Tool Call to something else. This is not correct english and I can't seem to find good translation for the words either. Has anyone considered Tool Menu Navigation? It's a bit

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-14 Thread Roman Joost
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:32:21AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I looked at http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/UseCatalog.html#d0e3162 and it seems for me, that we don't need a DTD declaration on top of gimp.xml if the catalog file is present and the

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I looked at http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/UseCatalog.html#d0e3162 and it seems for me, that we don't need a DTD declaration on top of gimp.xml if the catalog file is present and the corresponding environment variable is set. I tried to build the

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-12 Thread raymond ostertag
Le dim 11/01/2004 à 12:05, Roman Joost a écrit : But I am connected and the URL seems correct ... I think, thats because of --nonet parameter. --nonet is part of the makefile.am itself, so maybe it's not a good idea to suppress it ? It's finally a new xsltproc like mentionned Daniel and the

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-12 Thread Roman Joost
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:23:30PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, The DTDs are absolutely necessary in order to process the files. You cannot expect things to work if the DTDs are missing. Also you shouldn't use the DTDs from the network but have them installed at your computer. You will

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-11 Thread raymond ostertag
Le sam 10/01/2004 à 01:10, Roman Joost a écrit : On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:06:50PM +0100, raymond ostertag wrote: Le lun 05/01/2004 ?? 00:49, Roman Joost a ??crit : A new cvs update should bring you all the changes. I hope, that the anonymous gnome cvs servers are now in sync with the other

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, raymond ostertag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Make process begin with : cd ../html/C /usr/bin/xsltproc --xinclude --nonet ../../stylesheets/plainhtml.xsl ../../src/gimp.xml Attempt to load network entity http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd ../../src/gimp.xml:6:

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Too old version of xsltproc. I don't think that's the problem (see my other mail) but let's assume it would be the problem... What makes you think it's a version problem and what would be the minimum xsltproc version that people need in order to build

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-11 Thread Daniel Egger
On Jan 11, 2004, at 3:23 pm, Sven Neumann wrote: The DTDs are absolutely necessary in order to process the files. No, they are not. They are needed for some advanced DOM validation but one can very well process whole books without it. http://sven.gimp.org/build-xml-catalog-for-debian.sh Thanks,

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread David Neary
Hi all, Roman Joost wrote: On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:06:50PM +0100, raymond ostertag wrote: What is the statut now ? Since christmas I only have a few html files with only xinclude in it. A new cvs update should bring you all the changes. I hope, that the anonymous gnome cvs servers are

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread Daniel Egger
On Jan 10, 2004, at 1:45 pm, David Neary wrote: I hope these kinds of comments aren't out of place. I have noticed that commits to gimp-help-2 are fairly infrequent, and tend to affect lots of files. It is better all round if there are more frequent commits, each one making a distinct change.

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread David Neary
Daniel Egger wrote: It is better all round if there are more frequent commits, each one making a distinct change. IMHO your given rule of a thumb is not completely correct because the granule of a commit should not be the smallest possible change in a single file but the smallest possible

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, raymond ostertag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le lun 05/01/2004 00:49, Roman Joost a crit : a) Screenshots should be made with the standard GNOME theme and a generic font (like Bitstream Sans). Standard GNOME theme is ? I don't remember but on my Mandrake the standard is Galaxy

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread Daniel Egger
On Jan 10, 2004, at 4:38 pm, David Neary wrote: It kind of does - it's not changeset oriented in the way that BK or Arch are, but checking in several files at once is possible, and cvs2svn manages to make changesets out of commits that happen with the same comment, at the same time, by the same

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-09 Thread raymond ostertag
Le lun 05/01/2004 à 00:49, Roman Joost a écrit : 2. I customised the purposed StructureOfTheDocumentation[1] a bit. It should now be implementable by the doc writers. The main thing is, that the depth is on section 3 at maximum (see the table on the top of the proposal). I wouldn't go

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-09 Thread raymond ostertag
Le lun 05/01/2004 à 00:49, Roman Joost a écrit : 1. The problem, that the whole content is mixed up after the generation is now fixed. The problem was, that only the dtd in gimp.xml was wrong. It seems, that this was my fault and i'm sorry for that. I had a bit of time to add some

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-09 Thread raymond ostertag
Le lun 05/01/2004 à 00:49, Roman Joost a écrit : a) Screenshots should be made with the standard GNOME theme and a generic font (like Bitstream Sans). Standard GNOME theme is ? I don't remember but on my Mandrake the standard is Galaxy ?? b) If we make some compositing images, we

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-09 Thread Roman Joost
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:10:46PM +0100, raymond ostertag wrote: Le lun 05/01/2004 ?? 00:49, Roman Joost a ??crit : a) Screenshots should be made with the standard GNOME theme and a generic font (like Bitstream Sans). Standard GNOME theme is ? I don't remember but on my Mandrake the

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-09 Thread Roman Joost
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:06:50PM +0100, raymond ostertag wrote: Le lun 05/01/2004 ?? 00:49, Roman Joost a ??crit : 1. The problem, that the whole content is mixed up after the generation is now fixed. The problem was, that only the dtd in gimp.xml was wrong. It seems, that this was

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-05 Thread Daniel Egger
On Jan 5, 2004, at 12:49 am, Roman Joost wrote: 3. I made the corresponding changes to the toolbox XML files and the stylesheets and added three new options: a) The processor includes the titles up to section3. b) The processor chunks the documents up to section3 (Before, all the tools are

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 - TODOs and ideas

2003-12-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Don, den 18.12.2003 schrieb Roman Joost um 16:10: Huh? Probably it's just me being dense... Heh - no. I shouldn't write mails during a lecture ... The existing XML files are renamed to the name of the help ids in $GIMP/app/widgets/gimphelp-ids.h, eg: airbrush.xml is now:

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status

2003-12-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Don, den 18.12.2003 schrieb Roman Joost um 15:53: Hm.. i didn't had any memory problems with XInclude. If the encoding was wrong, the xsltproc throw an error and nothing more ... I still do, but only under Mac OSX. More annoying with XInclude is that xsltproc cannot be taught to really load

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status

2003-12-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am Don, den 18.12.2003 schrieb Roman Joost um 15:53: Hm.. i didn't had any memory problems with XInclude. If the encoding was wrong, the xsltproc throw an error and nothing more ... I still do, but only under Mac OSX. More annoying with

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status

2003-12-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Fre, den 19.12.2003 schrieb Sven Neumann um 19:55: I am pretty sure it loads the DTD from disk if you provide it an XML catalog file that shows it where the DTD is found. This file is usually called /etc/xml/catalog. See http://xmlsoft.org/catalog.html I have this catalog file and xsltproc

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status

2003-12-19 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 13:21, Daniel Egger wrote: Am Fre, den 19.12.2003 schrieb Sven Neumann um 19:55: I am pretty sure it loads the DTD from disk if you provide it an XML catalog file that shows it where the DTD is found. This file is usually called /etc/xml/catalog. See

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 - TODOs and ideas

2003-12-18 Thread Roman Joost
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:44:16AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote: Am Mit, den 17.12.2003 schrieb Roman Joost um 21:30: 1. Renaming of the current XML files, that the corresponding help ids: app/widgets/gimphelp-ids.h. This is mostly done by me. I'll check the changes in as soon as

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 - TODOs and ideas

2003-12-17 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Mit, den 17.12.2003 schrieb Roman Joost um 21:30: 1. Renaming of the current XML files, that the corresponding help ids: app/widgets/gimphelp-ids.h. This is mostly done by me. I'll check the changes in as soon as possible. Huh? Probably it's just me being dense... 2. Adding XML

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status

2003-12-11 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Mit, den 10.12.2003 schrieb Roman Joost um 22:55: With Raymonds help i'm now be able to build the help with UTF-8 encoded XML files, which are xincluded in the gimp.xml file. Cool. Incidently I've also been working on this and my Mac really has troubles when trying to compile such files

[Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status

2003-12-10 Thread Roman Joost
This mail is only a tiny status mail of the current progress on gimp-help-2. With Raymonds help i'm now be able to build the help with UTF-8 encoded XML files, which are xincluded in the gimp.xml file. All of the entities are gone and i can replace the last files with the correct unicode

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 updated

2003-12-04 Thread Roman Joost
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:38:00PM +0100, Raymond Ostertag wrote: On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:18:15 +0100 Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you call uncommented ? Do you mean not translated ? No, sorry for the bad description. I mean commented code which were of course

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 updated

2003-12-04 Thread Raymond Ostertag
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:46:36 +0100 Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No no - wrong way *G The text was translated into frensh but was commented. Maybe i use the wrong word for comment something, eg: !-- para lang=foobar/para -- ...maybe its from patching the source.. i dunno OK.

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 updated

2003-12-03 Thread Raymond Ostertag
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:18:15 +0100 Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you call uncommented ? Do you mean not translated ? No, sorry for the bad description. I mean commented code which were of course translated. hum, still difficult to understand... It's text in french that don't

[Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 updated

2003-11-28 Thread Roman Joost
Well, well, the source directory is completely updated and i suggest, that you create a new gimp-help-2 sandbox first. I added the frensh translation to the files and had to add my previous changes (see document structure) most of the modules, because the file structure of the frensh translations

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status and suggestions

2003-11-25 Thread Roman Joost
So, one step ahead to finish the gimp-help-2 move into the new source structure, which finishes the source tree move and add the frensh translation and content from Julien and Raymond. Before i type in my last cvs commit i want to verify one exception of my proposal: the image directory. I want

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status and suggestions

2003-11-24 Thread Daniel Egger
On Nov 24, 2003, at 12:02 am, Roman Joost wrote: I tried it with some docs and it rocks. Unfortunately, i'm running into trouble with the german umlauts. Do you've a solution for keeping the umlauts ? We'll switch to UTF-8 which should solve this problem, unless I'm misunderstanding the issue, of

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status and suggestions

2003-11-23 Thread Daniel Egger
On Nov 22, 2003, at 3:11 pm, Roman Joost wrote: I moved the stylesheets directory into the source root. I will change it in the next days, after Daniel will give me the ok. No one has declined the new structure purposal, so i think, that everyone on gimp-help-2 gave this implicit OK to change it?

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status and suggestions

2003-11-23 Thread Roman Joost
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 08:19:38PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote: Go! :=) Yay! Regarding xinclude: I've a few ideas I'll try the next few hours. It seems like a really worthwhile feature to me so let's check how portable/stable it is... I tried it with some docs and it rocks. Unfortunately,

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status and suggestions

2003-11-22 Thread Roman Joost
So i revamped the purposal and it looks now like this: ./ ./src ./src/filters ./src/filters/blur ./src/images ./src/images/glossary ./src/images/tool-options ./src/images/toolbox ./src/images/toolbox/de ./src/images/toolbox/fr ./src/images/toolbox/se ./src/legal ./src/toolbox ./stylesheets

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status and suggestions

2003-11-16 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Son, den 16.11.2003 schrieb Roman Joost um 00:46: This is the actual structure. I made a find ./ -type d in the gimp-help-2 and removed the CVS directorys: Agreed. Howver since a few persons are not too happy with the all-languages-concurrently approach I'd like to hear their opinion first.

[Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 status and suggestions

2003-11-15 Thread Roman Joost
After the frensh translation made the way into my gimp-help-2 sandbox, Sven and Brix are pointed me to the current directory structure of the module. In my current point of view, the current help/C directory is obsolete and should be replaced with a newer structure. This is the actual structure.

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-30 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Mit, 2003-08-27 um 11.33 schrieb Sven Neumann: Any help page could then refer to the freetype plug-in by using link xmlns:ft=http://freetype.gimp.org/help; ft:href=top / As you can see, the namespace prefix is irrelevant, we can choose ft: here to keep the notation short. Of course if

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-28 Thread Roman Joost
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Let's call each help-tree, either installed by gimp-help or by a plug-in, a help domain. The problem I see is that the current proposal doesn't define a way to link between help domains. While for example the freetype plug-in might

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Raphal Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem with this solution is that it will prevent the help system from ever working in a standard browser. Right, that's the point that I dislike as well. It would be nice if the help pages could be readable online. It should however not be too

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This approach also covers 3rd party plug-ins since they can tell the gimp where their help tree is. The help browser has access to this path and can simply open the gimp-help.xml file from that given help path. I thought about this some more

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-20 Thread Michael Natterer
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 00.47 schrieb Michael Natterer: Is this a solution everybody can live with or did I miss something obvious? If it sounds reasonable, we should go ahead, it's not even an awful lot of work (the coding part, not writing the help

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-19 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:08:14 +0200, Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18 Aug 2003, at 20:25, Raphaël Quinet wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:12:06 +0200, Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll setup up some pages for the module, but where can i upload these pages? [...] I

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-19 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:35:33 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I care about is how the generated HTML files in different languages will be structured since the helpbrowser will have to choose the appropriate files based on the users locale and it will probably have to know how

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:48, Raphaël Quinet wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:35:33 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I care about is how the generated HTML files in different languages will be structured since the helpbrowser will have to choose the appropriate files based

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Die, 2003-08-19 um 11.52 schrieb Sven Neumann: The current helpbrowser does it that way. But, no, it isn't necessary and that's why I wanted to see it discussed. Since Daniel obviously refuses to do that, Do not lay words in my mouth! I won't be able to do work on the implementation.

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Die, 2003-08-19 um 09.48 schrieb Raphaël Quinet: following message in the corresponding language: This page has not been translated yet to your language. The English version is included below. If you want to help other GIMP users, please consider submitting a translated version of this

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 13:35, Daniel Egger wrote: I also don't want to work on it any longer unless Daniel changes his ^ This is what you wanted to say, nothing else. Really sad... Yes, it is sad. But please read your own mails again. First you claimed that

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-19 Thread Simon . Budig
Daniel Egger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Am Die, 2003-08-19 um 11.52 schrieb Sven Neumann: The current helpbrowser does it that way. But, no, it isn't necessary and that's why I wanted to see it discussed. Since Daniel obviously refuses to do that, Do not lay words in my mouth! I

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 00.47 schrieb Michael Natterer: Is this a solution everybody can live with or did I miss something obvious? If it sounds reasonable, we should go ahead, it's not even an awful lot of work (the coding part, not writing the help pages :) Clean, (relatively) simple, I like

[Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I think we should discuss how to proceed with the help system for gimp2. I saw that Roman started to work on a german translation and of course I am happy about this since it means that something happens. However I think that it doesn't make much sense to blindly work on the help pages until

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Roman Joost
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 06:38:06PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Translation of the help pages is another subject that should be discussed beforehand. I don't think the current approach of translating the XML source in place will scale well when the number of translations increases. There are

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 19:15, Roman Joost wrote: Maybe you mean, writing the translation to *.po files? I saw this, during the work on a new setup of a zope server. We used Plone and they translated all these english stuff into other languages using *.po files. I don't know which will be

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Roman Joost
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:40:14PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: I don't really care. I just wanted to be sure that you considered using these tools. If you dislike them and decided to go for a different solution, I'm fine with that. I think, that Daniel Egger and Mel Boyce setup the newer

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:12:06 +0200, Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll setup up some pages for the module, but where can i upload these pages? A good way to update the status of the docs is an account, where i can sync my help and the help docs on the server. If it isn't possible to

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Branko Collin
On 18 Aug 2003, at 20:25, Raphaël Quinet wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:12:06 +0200, Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll setup up some pages for the module, but where can i upload these pages? A good way to update the status of the docs is an account, where i can sync my help and the

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Mon, 2003-08-18 um 18.38 schrieb Sven Neumann: I think we should discuss how to proceed with the help system for gimp2. At the moment we're at full speed towards some usable content both in English and German. Roman is doing a fantastic job in translating and filling the gaps and Dave

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 20:12, Roman Joost wrote: I think, that Daniel Egger and Mel Boyce setup the newer gimp-help-2 module. For this reason, i think that Daniel know exactly what he is doing, to get a good documentation done. I am sure that Daniel knows what he is doing but I am afraid

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 23:50, Daniel Egger wrote: At the moment we're at full speed towards some usable content both in English and German. Roman is doing a fantastic job in translating and filling the gaps and Dave greatly helped drawing some attention. From looking at the CVS module I

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 00:52, Daniel Egger wrote: I though you had a plan? Since I couldn't convince you to render DocBook directly as yelp does it sounded pretty much like you would know how to realise your mapping idea. I'd be more than happy to discuss any additional infrastructure you

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Die, 2003-08-19 um 00.44 schrieb Sven Neumann: From looking at the CVS module I didn't have the impression that the file structure is prepared for i18n. If you decided to keep all translations of a topic together in the same file that's fine, but shouldn't the C directory be completely

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 02:03, Daniel Egger wrote: The helpbrowser will have to know about this I can't see a reason why, unless you want to mix languages, but even then one can point to a different directory, so... I think I explained the reasoning in my last mail. Oh well, let me do

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Die, 2003-08-19 um 01.35 schrieb Sven Neumann: I have a plan but I felt it's up to you to provide a sample XML mapping file and some sample help pages for us to play with. Let's discuss this XML mapping, I'm still clueless... What I care about is how the generated HTML files in different

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-18 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Die, 2003-08-19 um 02.31 schrieb Sven Neumann: I think I explained the reasoning in my last mail. Oh well, let me do it again then... This does *not* make sense. The helpbrowser will have to choose the language based on the users locale, it thus needs to know how the files are organized