Hi,
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 18:48 -0400, carol irvin wrote:
> I have one technical question about this list. Do I also need to send
> this reply to the list or does replying to anyone send it
> automatically to the list?
There's no magic going on. Your answer goes to the recipients that your
mail
Sven,
I have an idea for something which might be fun to do as a group and
educational as well. Each person (who wanted to participate) would take an
art step phase further using GIMP until we had a completed art work. For
example, let's say you'd start it using a brush. Then maybe I'd go into
On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:06:09 Sven Neumann wrote:
> We are listening to our users. That's why we have this mailing-
> list and actually read about the problems and needs of our
> users.
Round of applause, that sentiment. (-:
Now I need to organise my own life better so I can make space
to
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:12 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> Wether or no GIMP is planning to develop in ways that will provide
> non-destructive editing and full support for raw and 16+ bit is something
> that is really relevant and the views of users need to be sought.
Yes, GEGL will bri
On Saturday 29 September 2007 07:46:37 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-29-07 02:00]:
> > On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -
On Saturday 29 September 2007 07:46:37 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-29-07 02:00]:
> > On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -
* gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-29-07 02:00]:
> On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
> > On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
> > > > While the absence of a recognised skill tran
On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
> On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
> > > While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no skin
> > > similar to PS) is a serious o
On Saturday 29 September 2007 01:51:59 carol irvin wrote:
> I am switching myself to open source programs whenever I
> can to save money. It is no more complex than that.
Hi Carol!
Um, I convert people to OpenOffice who basically don't give a
hoot about the $$$. They adopt it because:
* They
On Friday 28 September 2007, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
> > While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e.
> > no skin similar to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the
> > ability of multiple individuals to collaborate in a s
On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
> > While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no skin
> > similar to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the ability of multiple
> > individuals to collaborat
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
> While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no skin
> similar
> to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the ability of multiple individuals
> to collaborate in a supply chain comprising multiple organisations it is fa
-- Forwarded message --
From: carol irvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 28, 2007 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP vs Photoshop UI
To: gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This makes total sense to me. If you work for ad agencies, for example,
everyone will want to
On Friday 28 September 2007 06:20:05 gimp_user wrote:
> On Friday 28 September 2007 04:04:03 gimp_user wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
> > > --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> > >
On Friday 28 September 2007 04:04:03 gimp_user wrote:
> On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
> > --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> > > transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool tha
* gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-28-07 07:20]:
[...]
> It means providing tools for non-destructive editing to enable more
> than one individual and organisation to contribute to the creation,
> manipulation, selection, cataloguing, distribution and promotion of
> images.
Though you object
On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
> --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> > transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
> > ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
>
>
On Friday 28 September 2007 01:00:45 George Farris wrote:
> If you can provide hard data that backs this up with numbers
Unfortunately, this is the Real World(tm), & rejection can be
as simple as "it looks too different."
However, I would be interested in hard numbers too.
Cheers; Leon
_
--- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
> ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
FUD your conclusion is only valid for yourself and not others so your
On 9/27/07, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> > transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
> > ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
>
> I would disagree
Greg wrote:
> --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
>> transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
>> ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
>>
>
> I would disagree with this. I use bot
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Greg wrote:
> --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> > transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
> > ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
>
> I would disagree
--- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
> ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
I would disagree with this. I use both PS and GIMP and thanks to PH I
23 matches
Mail list logo
