/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Francesco Carbone
PhD student
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology
UCL, London
fra.carbone...@ucl.ac.uk
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org
sa_surface_tension= 0.0054
; Temperature coupling
tcoupl= v-rescale
tc_grps = System
tau_t = 0.1
ref_t = 310
; Velocity generation
gen_vel= yes
ld_seed= -1
thank you for the help.
cheers
Francesco
--
Francesco Carbone
PhD
Hi,
just try to disable OpenMP threads, unsetting OMP_NUM_THREADS environment
variable
Francesco
2013/8/1 akk5r ak...@virginia.edu
Hi All,
I am trying to run a membrane protein simulation on Gromacs 4.6 using the
Charmm 36 force field parameters.
I found the following parameters
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, at 03:41 PM, Richard Broadbent wrote:
On 12/07/13 13:26, Francesco wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working with a 200K atoms system (protein + explicit water) and
after a while using a cpu cluster I had to switch to a gpu cluster.
I read both Acceleration and parallelization
END LOG
thank you for your help
cheers,
Fra
--
Francesco Carbone
PhD student
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology
UCL, London
fra.carbone...@ucl.ac.uk
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please
the simulations are still running, they should end tomorrow afternoon.
Fra
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, at 06:26 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
What does gmxcheck have to say about your output files?
On Jul 23, 2013 12:17 PM, Francesco frac...@myopera.com wrote:
Hi all,
This morning the gpu cluster
5d03h42:15
(ns/day)(hour/ns)
Performance:9.7012.474
END STATISTICS
thank you very much for the help.
cheers,
Fra
--
Francesco Carbone
PhD student
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology
UCL, London
fra.carbone...@ucl.ac.uk
--
gmx
or closed cavitiies) and outputs informations.
I successfully used these two software to characterize tunnels and cavities
in a MD simulation.
Francesco
2013/6/19 aixintiankong aixintiank...@126.com
Dear,
In the MD, I find that when the ligand keep in the active site , the
channel
Is it a known issue or I did something wrong?
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests
Hi to everybody,
Bharat, maybe i didn't follow exactly the wole tale, but is it possible you
are running xmgrace without the -nxy option?
You are probably visualizing the data related the 1st replica several times!
Francesco
2013/5/24 Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
On Fri, May 24, 2013
/normal that with the increase of the ns
(always splitted in 2ns and extended) the running time is bigger?
thank you
Fra
--
Francesco Carbone
PhD student
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology
UCL, London
fra.carbone...@ucl.ac.uk
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
in the last 4.
Fra
On Mon, 13 May 2013, at 11:53 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 5/13/13 6:41 AM, Francesco wrote:
Good morning all,
This morning I checked the output of a 8ns (4 x 2ns) of simulation and I
noticed a strange behaviour:
The fist two simulations (each 2ns) ended up correctly
the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Francesco Carbone
Hi Andrew,
maybe it is true on single processor simulations.
It is false for sure when we talk about multicpu simulations because in
this case each cpu has
comunicate with each other and the implementations of this step makes a
huge difference between
the different codes.
Francesco
2013/5/11
yes.
you can use g_energy to plot what you need (T, density or whatever) and
decide if it is acceptable or not.
In the latter case you simply have to extend your run (see
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Extending_Simulations)
cheers
Francesco
On Tue, 7 May 2013, at 06:58 PM, Za
--disable-float for double precision and --enable-mpi if you need mpi
remember that fftw and gromacs must have the same precision.
hope this helps you
cheers
Francesco
On Fri, 3 May 2013, at 09:39 AM, Souilem Safa wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I m aiming to install gromacs 4.5.5 package in in linux
before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Francesco
frac...@myopera.com
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Francesco
frac...@myopera.com
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting
using as x the frame
number.
This could, at least, permitting to visualize the plot with xmgrace without
postprocessing
the .xvg
Francesco
2013/4/16 Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
On Apr 15, 2013 6:27 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 4/15/13 12:23 PM, Steven Neumann
This is what I meant,
in particular it is a problem when I want to analyze
the data regarding the exchange probability.
Francesco
2013/4/4 João Henriques joao.henriques.32...@gmail.com
So let me see if I understood what Francesco said correctly. Restarting a
REMD job after hitting the cluster
if your -append option is activated (the default is yes),
maybe Demux.pl reads the exchanging from the .log taking into account the
time in the
log and so you don't need to do anything.
But I don't know how Demux.pl works :(
Francesco
2013/4/4 João Henriques joao.henriques.32...@gmail.com
), leave the
chain id and use pdb2gmx
with the option -chainsep ter. The result is supposed to be a topology
where your chain are grouped in
a single molecule,making possible to create the bridge, and at the same
time you keep the chain name
for future analysis.
Francesco
2013/3/19 shahid nayeem
are not useful
for carrying
out MD because they lack parameters. In any case are good for analysis!
Francesco
2013/3/19 shahid nayeem msnay...@gmail.com
Thanks Francesco.
But my problem is exactly opposite. I do have a .top file containing
both chain linked by disulfide bridge. I ran
is present in .xtc file. CYS2 is present .rtp file of G43a1
forcefeild probably to form interchain disulfide bond reading from
specbond.dat. Am I right in generating such half disulfide bond
topology.
shahid
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:10 PM, francesco oteri
francesco.ot...@gmail.com wrote
attempts
and probabilities are not stored so in each .log the data restart from 0
like
a new simulation.
Have I done something wrong or is it a known (except to me) issue?
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please
Hi Chris,
I don't know if thngs changed in gromacs 4.6.x, but I succesfully did what
you are triying to do setting the two variable GMXLIB and GMXDATA at the
same time.
Francesco
2013/3/5 Christopher Neale chris.ne...@mail.utoronto.ca
Hello,
I have downloaded the charmm36.ff directory
Thank you Mark and Justin,
do you have any reference where this kind of clustering is explained?
I mean, since i need a parameter representing the difference between two
frames
to build the matrix, what is the parameter I can use starting from the
dihedrals?
Francesco
2013/1/22 Mark Abraham
Thank you,
but I don't see how performing cluster analysis with g_angle
Francesco
2013/1/21 Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
On 1/21/13 1:54 PM, francesco oteri wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I am trying to run dihedral space clustering with g_dih,
but I found that it gives me a lot of error
file.
Francesco
2012/12/26 Kieu Thu Nguyen kieuthu2...@gmail.com
Dear All,
Are there any method that can convert CHARMM PSF files to Gromacs topology
files ?
Thank for any help !
Best regards,
KT
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman
potential
whose parameters can directly derived by the armonic form. Morse potential
doesn't allow the bond breaking but the overall effect is very close!
I have to admit I never used but only read about Morse potential so I
cannot do practic advices!
Francesco
2012/12/17 Justin Lemkul jalem
. If
the distance is stable around
the equilibrium value you can say that the interaction is still present
Francesco
2012/12/16 fatemeh ramezani fr_...@yahoo.com
hi
thanks for your attention,
all itp files are in OPLSAA forcefield folder that I attached it for you.
Fatemeh Ramezani
Hi fatemeh,
I am looking for prameters like yours, where have you took the parameters
for gold and gold-aminoacid inteaction?
Francesco
2012/12/16 Peter C. Lai p...@uab.edu
Where is the .itp file for the system?
On 2012-12-15 01:40:27PM -0800, fatemeh ramezani wrote:
hi
I'm
Hi Kavya,
Can you better describe your system?
As Mark suggested, could you supply some number?
Francesco
2012/12/12 Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Kavyashree M hmkv...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear users,
I was calculating solvent accessible surface
Tanks to all for your advices,
I am going to check all the different aspect you suggested and I will
report the results as soon as possible.
Francesco
2012/12/11 Tsjerk Wassenaar tsje...@gmail.com
Hi,
Visualization is the key. If you check the structure right after genbox,
you should
), the problem has to be in the
bulk water!
Francesco
2012/12/10 Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
On 12/10/12 3:48 PM, francesco oteri wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I am facing a very tricky problem in building a stable topology.
In particular I am trying to use MARTINI force-field and I noticed
.
Francesco
2012/12/10 Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
On 12/10/12 5:15 PM, francesco oteri wrote:
Actually, since I copied and pasted the mail, there is an imprecision.
When
I use 20nm as box side lenght I don't get
any error, everything goes fine.
I actually tested different size between
For Justin,
I need this water for one simple reason: less then 20nm doesn't workAs
I said before
2012/12/10 francesco oteri francesco.ot...@gmail.com
Hi Mark,
you are right respect the -vdwd 0.4: In MARTINI tutorials they suggest to
use 0.21. Since I still got errors with this procedure
hi,it would be nice knowing the errors.
Francesco
2012/11/22, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com:
Dear Gmx Users,
Is it possible to convert topology produced by Gmx and convert it ont
the psf file? I used Justin script but when I load pdb and psf in VMD
then there are some errors.
Would
assigned to bond
part. The script provided here:
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/script_library/scripts/top2psf/top2psf.pl
works much better.
Steven
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:50 PM, francesco oteri
francesco.ot...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,it would be nice knowing the errors.
Francesco
)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read
http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users
/Mailing_Lists
--
Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests
Hi Tuba,
I guess you have to create an index for each peptide and then
extracting covariance matrix on each peptide using the new indexes.
Francesco
2012/11/6 Tuba Kilinc tkil...@gmail.com
hi all,
i would like to apply PCA (principal component analysis) for my peptides
that i simulated. i
://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct200876v
Francesco
2012/10/10 XAvier Periole x.peri...@rug.nl
Nope, but on other softwares.
On Oct 10, 2012, at 2:50 PM, rama david wrote:
Thank you for your reply,
Are these Cg can be used in Gromacs.
Thank you in advance.
With best wishes and regards,
Rama david
Hi,
as far as I know, freezing just set velocities to 0 so you gain nothing
freezing atoms.
By the way, have you tried docking? It takes into account multiple
conformation and
orientation of the peptide and, depending upon the implemented algorithm,
also
protein sidechain orientation.
Francesco
2012/10/4 rama david ramadavidgr...@gmail.com
Hi francesco,
Thank you For reply.
I did docking but the result are not so impressive.
What does it mean not so impressive? I mean, do you have experimental
data
and the comparison with docking doesn't agree with experiments? Have you
generated
Francesco
2012/10/2 R.Vidya Rajendran (10PHD013) vidya2...@vit.ac.in
Dear Friends,
Gromacs script such as g_cluster takes lot of time to complete in a
single machine. Is their any way to give this job to a cluster machine
like mdrun. Since mdrun is MPI enabled so I can easily execute it on
cluster
Hi,
because g_saltbr calculates the data regarding any charge-charge
interaction ( neg neg, neg pos, pos pos).
Small problem: every atoms (C,H,S,P...) has a charge so the outputs
contains the distances among al the
n*(n-1)/2 atom couples
Francesco
2012/9/21 Albert mailmd2...@gmail.com
!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
Hi,
could you try to use the Morse potential for this bond.
As far as I know, the parameters can be directly obatined forml the armonic
potential expression.
Francesco
2012/9/21 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
On 21/09/2012 11:35 AM, Rajiv Gandhi wrote:
Dear all gromacs users
by g_saltbr as part of a putative interaction.
Francesco
2012/9/21 Albert mailmd2...@gmail.com
On 09/21/2012 10:48 AM, francesco oteri wrote:
Hi,
because g_saltbr calculates the data regarding any charge-charge
interaction ( neg neg, neg pos, pos pos).
Small problem: every atoms (C,H,S,P...) has
/pipermail/gmx-developers/2012-March/005714.html
?
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
make install-mdrun
2012/7/19 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au:
On 19/07/2012 12:32 AM, francesco oteri wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I am trying to run a replica exchange simulation using the files you find
in http://dl.dropbox.com /u/40545409/gmx_mailinglist/inputs.tgz
The 4 replicas have
replicas, I need to run 1cpu/replica.
Has someone any idea of the probem?
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support
Dear gromacs developers,
is there any plan to make the CMAP correction avalaible for Free Energy
Calculations?
Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support
Hi Christopher,
you can try to use the program gmx_rescue, by Marc Baaden to recovery your
trajectory.
Below there is the adderess:
http://baaden.free.fr/soft/compchem.html
Francesco
2012/6/9 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
On 9/06/2012 7:27 AM, Christopher Neale wrote:
Dear Users
function used, the only help I found is the gromacs
source code. There are functions to read/write topology, frames, odb/gro
file and so on
Francesco
2012/6/4 Peter C. Lai p...@uab.edu
On 2012-06-04 05:23:10PM -0400, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
On 6/4/12 5:16 PM, Shay Teaching
saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www
reference I can find where the conversion is easly explained?
Thank you,
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting
Hi Dariush,
I've checked but it seems there no parameters for my detergent.
Actully there are parameters for the polar head and the lipidic tail, so it
is worth trying to merge them
to have the correct representation!
Francesco
2012/5/21 Dariush Mohammadyani d.mohammady...@gmail.com
Have you
You are right Peter
2012/5/21 Peter C. Lai p...@uab.edu
This approach still requires the system to be parameterized as a single
moleculetype, doesn't it?
On 2012-05-20 04:42:26PM +0200, francesco oteri wrote:
Hi,
if you are able to define atom couples able to mantein the structure
you impose a bond between the two atoms having as eauilibrium distance
0.6nm and
force strenght 1000J.
Function 6 doesn't implie the generation of angles and dihedrals so it is
the right choice
to impose distance restraints
Francesco
2012/5/20 R.S.K.Vijayan biovija...@gmail.com
Many thanks
Dear gromacs users,
does someone of you know whether parameters for the detergent
dodecyl-beta-maltoside
are avalaible in MARTINI forcefield?
Thank you in advance,
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
as functiontype 2 other as
functiontype 3,
so there is not an unique bondedtypes definition covering both the
definition.
Did I any mistake or actually there is a problem in the script?
Francesco
2012/5/18 Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
On 18/05/2012 2:52 AM, francesco oteri wrote
Dear gromacs users,
I think I solved the problem.
I converted armonic angle potentials in the Urey-Bradley potentials using
0 as constant for the
1-3 bond potential.
Is it right in your opinion?
Francesco
2012/5/16 francesco oteri francesco.ot...@gmail.com
Dear gromacs users,
I am trying
--
Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use
multiple periodic function
(funtion 9), is it?
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests
potential between
atom 1 and 3 present Urey-Bradley as a bond with same strenght and force
value?
Francesco
grompp10.log
Description: Binary data
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org
for
each .tpr file) but still I observe the same performance slowdown.
I guess the free energy impairs the efficient force calculation, but I dont
understand why.
Can someone explain me the two observations?
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org
the tempaerature fixed around a value and the same for
pressure, so
I guess any combination v-rescale, NHC, Langevin versus PR or MTTK is, in
priciple, right.
Maybe convergence speed changes, but in this case banchmark are quite
useful very welcolme!
best,
Francesco
best
Albert
--
gmx-users
2012/5/3 Dommert Florian domm...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:48 +0200, francesco oteri wrote:
Hello,
2012/5/3 Dommert Florian domm...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 07:32 +0200, Albert wrote:
hello:
I wondering
Hi Justin,
I have
free-energy = no
in my .mdp file, but I still see this value in g_energy.
It should be absent or always 1 while the values by g_energy are close to 1
but still fluctuating along the trajectory.
So, can you explain me how the value is used by gromacs?
Francesco
2012
. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
-fit
2012/5/3 Albert mailmd2...@gmail.com
On 05/03/2012 05:12 PM, francesco oteri wrote:
In particular, look at the option -sep
thank you for kind reply. but how to superimposed the left snapshot with
the first one?
thanks again for helps
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users
Hi James,
usually people run a minimization using distance restrain on the two atoms
in order to
make them closer.
Then the obtained cnfiguration is used to recalculate the topology.
Francesco
2012/4/28 James Starlight jmsstarli...@gmail.com
Dear Gromacs Users!
I have a model of my protein
Hi James,
usually I insert by hand a bond in the topology file between the two
atoms and then I minimize.
This bond doesn't cause the generataion of angles and dihedrals, butit
is enough to make the atom closer.
Francesco
Il 28/04/2012 16:08, James Starlight ha scritto:
.. and the main
Hi Ignacio,
actually .cpt contains velocities and, to extract a .gro containing them,
you can try to use editconf.
Francesco
Il giorno 23 aprile 2012 16:45, Ignacio Fernández Galván
jel...@yahoo.comha scritto:
--- On Mon, 23/4/12, Alex Marshall amars...@uwo.ca wrote:
I'm pretty sure .cpt
.mdp:init_lambda=1.00
Thank you for help
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
.
Francesco
Il giorno 19 aprile 2012 08:32, Anirban Ghosh reach.anirban.gh...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Hi ALL,
When running a membrane protein (say GPCR) in a lipid bilayer (say POPC or
DPPC etc.) which according to your experience is the most suited
force-field in GROMACS that best retains the 7TM
Hi,
You have to had LJ parameters in ffnonbonded.itp file in the subfolder
relative to your force-field
Francesco
Il giorno 16 aprile 2012 11:08, Kamalesh Roy roy.kamales...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
CAn any one siggest me how can I run simulation a protein containing Fe
atom,
I have changed
Hi Marc,
actually I am running NVT REMD so particle density is more or less
constant along differet replicas.
Is there any way to test which term takes more to be carried out?
Francesco
Il 13/04/2012 18:02, Mark Abraham ha scritto:
On 14/04/2012 1:46 AM, francesco oteri wrote:
Dear
/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx
the work easier!
Francesco
Il giorno 13 aprile 2012 11:38, francesco oteri
francesco.ot...@gmail.comha scritto:
Hi Lara,
the simplest way is using vmd.
Briefly,
1) load the pdb file in vmd.
2) create a representation using a string like: same residue as within
3. of protein.
where
6.32679738562
7.21887045416
8.1979219038
9.45466733702
10.9115133233
12.5899111781
15.0987095693
19.5630970337
Of course this problem impacts on overall performances.
My questions are:
1) Is the progressive imbalance expected?
2) Is there any way to alleviate the problem?
Francesco
--
gmx-users
Dear Acoot,
the error, I guess, is you assumed the histidines are positive while I
think they are neutral.
Since the His protonation state is hard to identify at ph7, Hystidines
are usually neutral.
Francesco
Il 07/04/2012 09:42, Acoot Brett ha scritto:
Dear All,
I have a protein
or only in the NVT?
Thanks in advance, Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests
I understand,
I am planning to run REMD between 300 and 600 K, so I think it is better
equlibrating in NVT ensemble because at high temperature
water evaporates, is it?
Francesco
Il giorno 23 marzo 2012 10:53, Kukol, Andreas a.ku...@herts.ac.uk ha
scritto:
Hi Francesco,
It should be the same
OK,
but for some AMBER dihedral the same goal has been obtained using an X for
i and l atoms,
like:
X FE SS X 9 0.000.0 4
Why the same approach wasn't used for OPLSAA?
Il giorno 21 marzo 2012 11:35, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu ha
scritto:
francesco
, and I noticed that these bonds are no
more present
and only right bonds are present.
So, I am wondering why the fake bonds are inserted in topol.top and how
grompp detectes
these bonds.
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
signal them.
If the phenomena is not yet known, I can give you the data I used to
generate the .top and .tpr.
Francesco
Il giorno 21 marzo 2012 16:18, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au ha
scritto:
On 22/03/2012 1:46 AM, francesco oteri wrote:
Dear gromacs user,
I noted a strange behavior
Il 16/03/2012 01:38, Mark Abraham ha scritto:
On 16/03/2012 6:02 AM, Francesco Oteri wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I am trying to simulate a protein (containing FeS cluster and a
complex metal active site) using virtual site.
I've to face a problem with LINCS. In particular, if I constrain only
with virtual site without
all-bonds options.
Thank you,
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests
Hi Andrew,
at http://manual.gromacs.org/online/mdp_opt.html#nl the manual says:
Without walls or with only one wall the system size is infinite in the
z direction. Therefore pressure coupling or Ewald summation methods can
not be used. These disadvantages do not apply when two walls are used
Actually I solved the problem,
I did a mistake in the bond conversion. Actually I found the right formula:
k_gromacs = k_charmm**418.4**2
rising form the conversion from angstrom to nanometer
-- Messaggio inoltrato --
Da: francesco oteri francesco.ot...@gmail.com
Date: 08
the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive
Hi,
I agree it could be very useful. You can insert the bond hand-coding it in
the topology, but you need also to generate angle and dihedral.
This is very boring and error prone.
Francesco
Il giorno 08 marzo 2012 12:32, Ehud Schreiber schr...@compugen.co.il ha
scritto:
Hi
to contain the complete path of the
molfile vmd directory.
In my case, for example: VMD_PLUGIN_PATH=/apps/vmd/1.9/**lib/vmd
/plugins/LINUXAMD64/**molfile
Francesco
Il giorno 08 marzo 2012 17:40, a a pat...@hotmail.com ha scritto:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I learnt that we can use mdcrd from AMBER
always the same
result.
The files I have used to run the minimization can be downloaded from
http://160.80.35.105/download/vsite.tgz
Has anyone of you any idea?
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
= /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7f6e4ef8f000)
libz.so.1 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7f6e4ed77000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f6e50de2000)
If you miss this library, try to instrall again gromacs including this
library
Francesco
Il 07/02/2012 20:04
Hi Ignacio,
You can solve the problem creating an index file through make_ndx. In
such a file you need a group called ACX. Then use the index.ndx in
grompp.
Francesco
2012/2/6, Ignacio Fernández Galván jel...@yahoo.com:
Hi all,
I have a system with a molecule called ACX plus water (molecules
. but I am not able to mantain the simulation stability.
I am wondering whether exists a tool to dissect the energetic contributions
( including bonded parameters ) permitting me to identify the problem
giving rise the crash.
Francesco
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo