i set up quotas on our main server...a few days ago i realized that i
needed to increase the number of files that a user could havei changed
the one quota that all the user accounts are set from hoping that the
quotas would change.and they didn'ti need to know how to replicate
the
Is it perhaps a low memory situation?
What is the memory/free memory?
Can you tell what processes are running and the memory they are taking?
One of my clients has an old mail server / name server / dhcp server
/ gateway that is REALLY acting up. This is a RedHat 6.0 machine
running kernel
Derek Martin said:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
HTTP adds nothing more than convenience to the command-line
challenged. It's slow and bulky.
HUH? The HTTP protocol is neither! It's a very small, lightwieght
protocol. What are you talking about?
This can
At 12:46 PM 2/28/2001, Brian Chabot wrote:
hrm i had something like this once...when i first started.i can't
remember what i did tho.a reboot comes to mind
:-)
~kurth
One of my clients has an old mail server / name server / dhcp server
/ gateway that is REALLY acting up. This
Okay, okay. FTP is officially dead. It was shot earlier this morning for
incompetance. It died a miserable death and is now buried next to friends
Archie, Veronica, and Gopher. FTP is survived by
a younger brother, SSH;
a brother-in-law, NFS,
a sister, HTTP,
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Kurth Bemis wrote:
hrm i had something like this once...when i first started.i can't
remember what i did tho.a reboot comes to mind
Already did. Had to use the candy red button.
Brian
---
|
There can be any number of possibilities, none of which are good. I
have seen similar events happening when a drive is about to fail. I
might also expect the mother board or one of its components. I would
prepare a new machine ASAP.
Brian Chabot wrote:
One of my clients has an old mail
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Andrew G. Bacchi wrote:
There can be any number of possibilities, none of which are good. I
have seen similar events happening when a drive is about to fail. I
might also expect the mother board or one of its components. I would
prepare a new machine ASAP.
I got a
Today, DaveN gleaned this insight:
Just to way in on the silliness side...
I prefer ZModem
ZModem is great!
=8^)
--
All your base are belong to us!
Somebody set us up the bomb!
--
Derek Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Brian Chabot wrote:
I can not telnet to any port or ssh from the LAN. I managed to talnet
(I know... cleartext passwords. I didn't set this up) from outside and
no matter what command I give it I get:
bash: fork: Resource temperarily unavailable
Unless I'm mistaken,
Brian Chabot wrote:
I managed to kill the forking process (identd) by disabling it in
inetd.conf and HUP'ing inetd immediately after reboot.
[snip]
I could be wrong, but I think identd is usually a standalone process -
not fired off from inetd. At least, I think this is the default on a RH
Today, Ken D'Ambrosio gleaned this insight:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Brian Chabot wrote:
I can not telnet to any port or ssh from the LAN. I managed to talnet
(I know... cleartext passwords. I didn't set this up) from outside and
no matter what command I give it I get:
bash: fork:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Cole Tuininga wrote:
Brian Chabot wrote:
I managed to kill the forking process (identd) by disabling it in
inetd.conf and HUP'ing inetd immediately after reboot.
[snip]
I could be wrong, but I think identd is usually a standalone process -
not fired off from
Just had a thought - how about we have awards presented at the
LUG meetings for longest running/best/whatever thread, and for
the most colorful comeback, during the past meeting cycle...? ;-)
[...hiding under desk in anticipation of return fire...]
D. Roberts
First, make sure the disks aren't full. Then make sure the swap is mounted.
My first inclination is to suspect a disk error - especially if you have IDE
disks.
Also, try rebooting. I suspect something in the kernel is *really* confused.
After that, you can scan the logs to find out what caused
An earlier message indicated that identd may be at fault - usually, that's only
started because something (usually a remote mail agent) is trying to verify that
a user is on that system. So either someone from you system sent out a bunch of
spam, or your system is about to (or is) undergo a spam
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:17:03 EST
Derek Martin said:
Today, Kenneth E. Lussier gleaned this insight:
I am certainly not going to try and claim that FTP is secure. I'm not
going to claim to like it. What I am saying is that FTP has it's place.
I don't really disagree with
I am certainly not going to try and claim that FTP is secure. I'm not
going to claim to like it. What I am saying is that FTP has it's place.
There are sites that run completely open FTP sites where cleartext
usernames and passwords are not a problem. Anonymous access is essential
to the way most
Today, Kenneth E. Lussier gleaned this insight:
Oh, yeah, and not that this is relevant really, but:
country. I find 4Mbit token ring to be out-dated and useless. I find
[snip]
be old and crufty. However, all of the above mentioned old and out-dated
technologies have their place in a very
Bill Freeman said:
. Also, since
I proprosed regular incremental backups that were all increments from
the last full backup, rather than just changes from the last
incremental, the full backup would have to fail to keep me from
getting back to fairly recent.
Remember also to test those
second problem solved, but this first one is still there. There is no dhcp
in /etc/init.d. instead the tarball put in dhcpd which is what the link
in my rc2.d directory is pointing to. Where should I go from here?
Thanks,
Derek
At 12:46 AM 2/28/01, you wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. For anonymous file retrieval where security isn't a concern,
ftp is by far the easiest, most flexible, and most efficient protocol around.
Is this really true? With the extra PORT connection I would have
thought FTP was
In a message dated: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:23:41 EST
Benjamin Scott said:
Travan TR5 is an ideal solution for the small business with between 10 and
30 GB of data to backup. Drives are cheap, tapes are cheap, and it is easy to
use. However, they are slow to write, slower to read, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, I think a lot of this is moot. Using cleartext FTP for
authenticated access over the public 'net is a really unnecessary risk these
days.
Tod said in his original post:
: Without the requirement for windows clients I'd just use scp and
: rsync. Oh,
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:23:22 EST
Jeffry Smith said:
3. FTP over SSH - use SSH for the base connection, then run FTP through it.
Oh, don't forget sftp :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
but I'm really actively waiting for
Just to way in on the silliness side...
I prefer ZModem
DaveN
- Original Message -
From: Jeffry Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: GNHLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: Why FTP must die in two words
Derek Martin said:
On Wed, 28 Feb
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
HTTP adds nothing more than convenience to the command-line
challenged. It's slow and bulky.
HUH? The HTTP protocol is neither! It's a very small, lightwieght
protocol. What are you talking about?
This can easily be demonstrated by
Paul Lussier said:
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:29:59 EST
Jeffry Smith said:
Oh, don't forget sftp :)
Yep, comes with SSH, as I recall. Thanks for reminding me.
No, it doesn't unfortunately, but it's easy enough to find on freshmeat.
Also, sftp doesn't solve the anonftp
Paul Lussier said:
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:23:22 EST
Jeffry Smith said:
3. FTP over SSH - use SSH for the base connection, then run FTP through it.
Oh, don't forget sftp :)
Yep, comes with SSH, as I recall. Thanks for reminding me.
jeff
Today, Kenneth E. Lussier gleaned this insight:
I am certainly not going to try and claim that FTP is secure. I'm not
going to claim to like it. What I am saying is that FTP has it's place.
I don't really disagree with that, but I don't really agree either.
EVERYTHING that ftp provides can
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 10:32:25AM -0500, Derek Doucette wrote:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/dhcp.prerm: /etc/init.d/dhcp: No such file or directory
dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/prerm:
Benjamin Scott writes:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Bill Freeman wrote:
The network only has about 70GB of disk total.
Unfortunately, that is sufficiently large that you are getting into the
realm of expensive.
Having priced media at CompUSA last night, I'm comming around.
If those
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:29:59 EST
Jeffry Smith said:
Oh, don't forget sftp :)
Yep, comes with SSH, as I recall. Thanks for reminding me.
No, it doesn't unfortunately, but it's easy enough to find on freshmeat.
Also, sftp doesn't solve the anonftp access scenario :)
--
Just getting into this line (boy, leave the list alone for a night, and miss a
lot), but I'll give my thoughts on this:
Remember, unlike Windows, Unix is composed of many small programs doing one
thing well, chained together. FTP is not in and of itself a bad protocol,
it's the security
Derek Martin said:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
HTTP adds nothing more than convenience to the command-line
challenged. It's slow and bulky.
HUH? The HTTP protocol is neither! It's a very small, lightwieght
protocol. What are you talking about?
This can
If anyone's interested in getting together tonight for an informal session
(just so we don't get another I showed up and no one was there), I'll be
there tonight, dinner at ~6pm, discussions starting then until whenever.
Martha's Exchange. If enough people send me indications they want to be
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:33:35PM -0500, Peter Cavender wrote:
Is there a daemon I can run besides ftp which has clients which run on
Windows and Macs to allow password protected access for uploading?
Why not samba for Win, and netatalk for Macs?
Sure, for a LAN. Are saying to do this
One of my clients has an old mail server / name server / dhcp server
/ gateway that is REALLY acting up. This is a RedHat 6.0 machine
running kernel 2.2.5-15.
I moved the mail responsibility to a new box, and now the old one is not
responding to much of anything.
I can not telnet to any port
38 matches
Mail list logo
