On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier wrote:
> I expect Unicode to supercede ASCII about the same time IPv6 supercedes
> IPv4. Actually, to make the transition go smoothly, they will probably
> implement both simultaneously.
>
> I expect to pushing up daisies long before either happen.
Like I said
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 13:01:32 PST
"Karl J. Runge" said:
>Sorry, I wasn't clear. Just a nit: I only meant 'export FOO=bar' is
>bash specific. Some people work only on Linux where sh -> bash, but in
>a heterogeneous environment it could make a difference... (no sh wars pls).
Ohh
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >That's not as portable as what Derek wrote.
>
> That may be so, but unless you're outside the US, or non-English
> speaking, how much would that matter? I've always had LANG=C, and
> I've never needed to change anything.
Sorry
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> This really *shouldn't* be much of a problem, as there are already
> well-established routines for decoding Unicode, through which applications
> should feed their input at such time as that becomes appropriate. Note
> the emphasis on "shouldn't" above
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Scott said:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > The problem is that Red Hat, and probably other vendors, have changed the
> > default locale.
>
> Expect this problem to get worse as more and more of the three billion or
> so
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:43:46 EST
Benjamin Scott said:
>On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
>> The problem is that Red Hat, and probably other vendors, have changed the
>> default locale.
>
> Expect this problem to get worse as more and more of the three billion or
>so no
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 12:43:32 PST
"Karl J. Runge" said:
>That's not as portable as what Derek wrote.
That may be so, but unless you're outside the US, or non-English
speaking, how much would that matter? I've always had LANG=C, and
I've never needed to change anything.
Can y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Lussier said:
> Couldn't you just:
>
> export LANG=C
Yes, but there may be reasons not to do that. If you're
English-speaking and live in the US (which, granted, is most of us)
then this works fine for you, since that's basically the be
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Derek D. Martin" said:
>
> >LANG=en_US
> >LC_COLLATE=C
> >export LANG LC_COLLATE
>
> Couldn't you just:
>
> export LANG=C
That's not as portable as what Derek wrote.
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> The problem is that Red Hat, and probably other vendors, have changed the
> default locale.
Expect this problem to get worse as more and more of the three billion or
so non-English-speaking people in the world begin using computers.
Personally, I
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:19:21 EST
"Derek D. Martin" said:
>LANG=en_US
>LC_COLLATE=C
>export LANG LC_COLLATE
Couldn't you just:
export LANG=C
?
--
Seeya,
Paul
God Bless America!
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it rig
James Manning wrote:
>
> [Rodent of Unusual Size]
> > Anyone else seen this? Or have a suggestion on how to proceed?
>
> sounds like the LANG/LC/etc settings issues. iirc, LC_SORT=C
> LANG=C, or something like that. I forget :)
*@&#*(&@!!! LANG="en_US", LC_COLLATE=(not set). Changing
to LC
Rodent of Unusual Size said:
> Something seems *really* whacked out with bash wildcards.
> Firstly they aren't being listed in case-sensitive lexical
> order (A B C a b c) they way they should be, and secondly
> ranges are *really* screwed up:
Welcome to the new default behavior of posixly-corre
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:12:44 EST
Rodent of Unusual Size said:
>Something seems *really* whacked out with bash wildcards.
Did you check your LANG setting? Make sure it's 'C'.
--
Seeya,
Paul
God Bless America!
If you're not having fu
Something seems *really* whacked out with bash wildcards.
Firstly they aren't being listed in case-sensitive lexical
order (A B C a b c) they way they should be, and secondly
ranges are *really* screwed up:
% cd /tmp
% mkdir test
% cd test
% touch A B C a b c
% /bin/ls -1
a
A
b
B
c
C
% /bin/ls -1
15 matches
Mail list logo
