It's actually Earthlink DSL.
On Tue, June 19, 2007 11:17 pm, Ben Scott said:
On 6/19/07, John Abreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My DSL modem has a static internal IP address, and transparently
handles the external dynamic address.
If it's Verizon DSL (and likely some other brands, too), you
Another reason MV is good :)
No PPPoE :) You can connect your PC direct or via a broadband router,
both work equally well.
I recently moved and switched to Verizon DSL from Comcast cable.
Verizon UPS'd me some filters a DSL modem with an ethernet and a USB
connection.
The modem can do PPPoE and
I said I'd post this, which was mentioned at the LUG meeting Wednesday
night. Here y'all go!
http://oddones.org/gnhlug/meeting_goodies/10_27_2004/
Sorry I didn't get it online yesterday; I was closing on a house. :-)
--Drew Van Zandt
___
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 09:51, Drew Van Zandt wrote:
I said I'd post this, which was mentioned at the LUG meeting Wednesday
night. Here y'all go!
http://oddones.org/gnhlug/meeting_goodies/10_27_2004/
Thanks. The web site now has a link to that.
Sorry I didn't get it online yesterday; I was
I've already moved as many boxes in the past 24 hours as the Geek
model chassis is rated for - now I'm doing some nice easy programming
and web stuff while I recover.
--Drew
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I recently moved and switched to Verizon DSL from Comcast cable.
Verizon UPS'd me some filters a DSL modem with an ethernet and a USB
connection.
The modem can do PPPoE and provides a DHCP address of 192.168.1.x to
your connection so you don't need to do it on your side.
I put the PPPoE
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, at 5:22pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They [GWI] ARE very picky about where you are, though. They can only pull
it off becouse they're hooking up to their own equipment, which means they
arent simply reselling Verizon..
[momentary delurk]
I've heard rumor that CLECs who
Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've heard rumor that CLECs who are leasing copper pair from ILECs like
Verizon are going to be squeezed out of the market because the FCC/PUC/etc
is changing the rules to no longer require ILECs to offer fair access to
their infrastructure.
I just wish I could get DSL and I don't care who it is from.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Charron
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:23 PM
To: Travis Roy
Cc: Fred; gnhlug-discuss
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL
Aye, they have
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 17:06, K. Hergenrother wrote:
^^
I'm currently using att.net for my ISP over dialup through Comcast
digital phone service. To keep the story short, it looks like the
least expensive high speed service I can get is to
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 17:52, Dan Jenkins wrote:
Travis Roy wrote:
I'm voting for Nader, so I could care less :)
I'd vote for Thomas Jefferson or Abraham Lincoln (respectively, first
Democrat President and first Republican). I'm less happy with the
current crop. In any event, this has
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, couldn't resist...
sarcasm
Thanks for continuing to discuss this inappropiate for this list
topic. Excellent judgement there. I myself am a better person for
hearing you extoll your political viewpoints on this Linux list.
/sarcasm
--kevin
--
GnuPG ID:
On my Comcast Cablemodem I am getting 3200 downlink speed, double T1
rates. I would strongly suggest going cablemodem unless you don't mind
slow connections to the Internet. :-)
Verizon is slowly starting to roll out 3meg service, I'm already on MV's
upgrade list. I'm only 700ft from the CO so I
On Oct 19, 2004, at 10:27, Fred wrote:
There are alternatives for DSL providers, such as Conversant --
unfortunately, not all of them service the residential customers.
Conversant itself will only service businesses the last time I checked.
So shop around.
If I could get residential DSL I'd get
I have Speakeasy. They're great, and the sales guy actually sounded
RELIEVED when I said I ran Linux. They're pricey, though... do check
out the Speakeasy offers through Slashdot (Slashdot Broadband) though
- 8 static IP's. Generally available in Merrimack and Nashua, at
least near the CO's.
Thanks for all the advice and political comments. I
did not expect such a long thread.
I am not going with Comcast cable because I have issues
with them with their TV service. If I did not live in a forest, I would
use satellite TV. It also would cost about $15/mo. more than
DSL.
It
I always would like to point out GWI internet. At least in Nashua,
and I believe Manchester, they are offering DSL at up to *8* meg in, 1
meg out, for like 49 a month residential, 160 buisness.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:21:33 -0400, Travis Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Verizon is slowly starting
8 meg! that's crazy..
I do know that MV doesn't care how many computers you have connected,
but GWI seems to limit you to two mac addresses.
I'm atually sending them an email now.. 8meg service! DAMN
I always would like to point out GWI internet. At least in Nashua,
and I believe Manchester,
Aye, they have additional charges for additional puters. But that
doesnt mean you cant have several others BEHIND a NAT, which is the
case of most of us..
They ARE very picky about where you are, though. They can only pull
it off becouse they're hooking up to their own equipment, which
From: Randy Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/17 Sun PM 10:06:35 EDT
Has anyone any experience with Verizon DSL?
Overall, I'm very happy with it. I get great speed .
So would you quote the speed that you get, please?
thanks
paulc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Randy Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/17 Sun PM 10:06:35 EDT
Has anyone any experience with Verizon DSL?
Overall, I'm very happy with it. I get great speed .
So would you quote the speed that you get, please?
Somebody elses speed isn't going to help you
Someone really should do a human interest story on MV at some point.
Even though (boo! hiss! Well, no...) they use BSD, they really are an
interesting success story. I've used them on and off since I moved to
NH going on 13 years ago, now, and they've always been there. [For
several
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
Speaking in favor of MV: They've done really well by us. Jess has been
a customer of theirs since she was 13 and got tired of the AOL her
parents
bought for her, and they've been wonderful about providing everything we
could ask for - static IP, multiple IPs, great
Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Someone really should do a human interest story on MV at some point.
Even though (boo! hiss! Well, no...) they use BSD, they really are an
interesting success story. I've used them on and off since I moved to
NH going on 13 years ago, now, and they've always been
MV's site is up now for me, but I've been experiencing DNS problems
at several clients this morning. This may have nothing to do
with MV, because it is affecting some non-MV clients of mine too.
My employer's IT staff sent out a msg saying that
Level3 had announced a major North American
MV's site is up now for me, but I've been experiencing DNS problems at
several clients this morning. This may have nothing to do with MV,
because it is affecting some non-MV clients of mine too. In any event...
Level3 has been having all kinds of issues since last night.
---
Level3 states that
My employer's IT staff sent out a msg saying that
Level3 had announced a major North American outage
after we'd been suffering DNS troubles all morning.
Of course, the Level3 site carefully reveals nothing
about outages, past or present...
They would need more space then archive.org to list all
On Oct 18, 2004, at 12:22, Michael ODonnell wrote:
Level3 had announced a major North American outage
after we'd been suffering DNS troubles all morning.
Of course, the Level3 site carefully reveals nothing
about outages, past or present...
Looks like it's still ongoing - a backbone impairment.
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 14:00, Bill McGonigle wrote:
Looks like it's still ongoing - a backbone impairment. [insert ob.
democrats joke here]
I thought we had already established that we should leave political
commentaries off this list?
--
Now I need a pint and a half hour of bzflag.
-Eric on
We did. All the liberals kept getting mad at being picked on...
duck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cole Tuininga
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:53 PM
To: GNHLUG List
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 14:00, Bill
Cole Tuininga wrote:
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 14:00, Bill McGonigle wrote:
Looks like it's still ongoing - a backbone impairment. [insert ob.
democrats joke here]
I thought we had already established that we should leave political
commentaries off this list?
I thought people on this list could
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 16:52, Travis Roy wrote:
I thought people on this list could have a sense of humor.
My general view is that they do have a sense of humor. However, with
something that's such a polarizing issue, and in particular one that not
only is completely unrelated to the purpose of
I'm voting for Nader, so I could care less :)
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 16:52, Travis Roy wrote:
I thought people on this list could have a sense of humor.
My general view is that they do have a sense of humor. However, with
something that's such a polarizing issue, and in particular one that not
Travis Roy wrote:
I'm voting for Nader, so I could care less :)
I'd vote for Thomas Jefferson or Abraham Lincoln (respectively, first
Democrat President and first Republican). I'm less happy with the
current crop. In any event, this has *nothing* to do with Linux or
computers. So... last post!
K. Hergenrother wrote:
I'm currently using att.net for my ISP over dialup through Comcast
digital phone service. To keep the story short, it looks like the least
expensive high speed service I can get is to switch to a Verizon bundle
of local, long distance, and DSL. Reading their literature
Has anyone any experience with Verizon DSL?
I use it with Debian as my gateway and firewall (Woody, the current stable
release). Overall, I'm very happy with it. I get great speed (not many
people using it in my town) and have had no hassles with Verizon.
Verizon's setup software
I'm currently using att.net for my ISP over dialup through Comcast
digital phone service. To keep the story short, it looks like the least
expensive high speed service I can get is to switch to a Verizon bundle
of local, long distance, and DSL. Reading their literature they look
like a
And the NE network is setup in this abysmal bridged/routed mode which allows
infected machines to essentially DDoS their entire DSL network.
-Original Message-
Note that their sales/support/customer-service is still absolutely
horrible. Indeed, simply finding a salesdroid that knows
38 matches
Mail list logo
