t
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 3:03:59 PM
Subject: Re: Delay of release
On 27 Jan 2007, at 19:59, Adam Fedor wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Guenther Noack wrote:
>
>>
>> Speaking of GNUstep bugfix releases, what happened to the release of
>> version 1.
On 27 Jan 2007, at 19:59, Adam Fedor wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Guenther Noack wrote:
Speaking of GNUstep bugfix releases, what happened to the release of
version 1.13.1, that fixes the buffer overflow issue I reported (
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18366)? I've seen that the st
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Guenther Noack wrote:
Speaking of GNUstep bugfix releases, what happened to the release of
version 1.13.1, that fixes the buffer overflow issue I reported (
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18366)? I've seen that the stable
branch
is tagged 1.13.1 now, but there's
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:02:21AM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> I agree with that, but the fact is that we haven't done that in the
> past, so if we are going to start we need a policy decision that
> bugfixes are to be backported from trunk to the stable branch [...]
This soun
On Jan 23, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Nicola Pero wrote:
Ok ... thanks. I suppose for gnustep-make I can do all the steps
up to tagging
the release, then you or Gregory will send out announces and manage
the release
publishing ?
Sure, that's fine.
But since 1.13.0 we have dropped the library su
> Here's the procedure for actually making a release:
>
> http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/GNUstep_release_procedure
>
Ok ... thanks. I suppose for gnustep-make I can do all the steps up to tagging
the release, then you or Gregory will send out announces and manage the release
publishing ?
I'd
On 23 Jan 2007, at 10:56, Matt Rice wrote:
so it would be good if we could get
these added now, (even if the code to use them is omitted from
the release due to instability or whatever) :D
Not to mention the move of NSAffineTransform out of gui and in to
base to match Apple ... which mean
On 2007-01-23 02:30:26 -0800 Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 23 Jan 2007, at 10:22, Matt Rice wrote:
On 2007-01-22 04:34:00 -0800 Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregory John Casamento schrieb:
My sincerest apologies on the recent delay of the release. I
ha
On 23 Jan 2007, at 10:22, Matt Rice wrote:
On 2007-01-22 04:34:00 -0800 Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregory John Casamento schrieb:
My sincerest apologies on the recent delay of the release. I
have been working on correcting a few bugs prior to the release
and other events ha
On 2007-01-22 04:34:00 -0800 Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregory John Casamento schrieb:
My sincerest apologies on the recent delay of the release. I have
been
working on correcting a few bugs prior to the release and other
events have
delayed me as well.
The release should be
Here's the procedure for actually making a release:
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/GNUstep_release_procedure
here's the policy for version numbering and when to make a release
(applies more to libraries, though):
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/GNUstep_release_policy
On Jan 22, 2007,
Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GNUstep Developers
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 7:34:00 AM
Subject: Re: Delay of release
Gregory John Casamento schrieb:
> My sincerest apologies on the recent delay of the release. I have bee
I want to make a gnustep-make release. It would be 1.14.0.
What is the current workflow to do that ?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, January 22, 2007 8:15 am
To: GNUstep Developers
Subject: Delay of release
All,
My sincerest
Gregory John Casamento schrieb:
> My sincerest apologies on the recent delay of the release. I have been
> working on correcting a few bugs prior to the release and other events have
> delayed me as well.
>
> The release should be made in either Monday or Tuesday.
>
> Thanks for your patience
14 matches
Mail list logo
