Hi,
I was just wondering how the ongoing DataStore issue is going to
affect page rank since PageRank is going to be affected by the sites
speed.
I put as much as possible into memcache for my site but my site's
speed has dropped from being faster than 70% of sites to being faster
than 50% of site
Pagerank is *not* affected by site speed.
Google serps are generated under consideration of more than 200
factors and one of them is pagerank and another one is site speed.
Matt Cutts said that site speed has a tiny weight for the serps and
you rankings will only drop if your site is *really* slow
It seems a great demo, and it's useful for someone who is interested
in making chat functionality. Could you share your code for our
reference?
Thanks in advance.
On Jun 9, 9:49 pm, Yotam wrote:
> http://thoughtspager.appspot.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hey, I had an idea about optimizing for logged in users and wanted
input from others how they do it.
First of all, my first priority when developing a web site is not to
optimize resource usage. My #1 priority is to experienced latency (for
the visitor) of the site as low as possible.
It's very c
Hi Blixt,
This is a common strategy if you're storing only a small amount of data. In
fact, several App-Engine-Friendly session libraries already support "Cookie
Only" sessions, including Beaker and gaeutilities.
-Nick Johnson
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Blixt wrote:
> Hey, I had an idea
This seems to be a very regular occurrence; (seemingly) every time we
add a new index, we need to post on this group to get it working. I
can only assume someone is working on this problem?
In the meantime, can anyone help us with the new indexes on app
'steprep-demo'?
Thanks,
j
--
You received
I have a record in my datastore which cannot be deleted or changed
either programmatically or via the admin console. I discovered the
object when it was always returned first in a query sorting by a
datetime field. Upon closer inspection I realized that the datetime
field of the object always sho
I download GAE 1.3.3, GWT 2.0.3 and successfully run the example of
GWT.
Just like to know whether GWT Map can run on App Engine.
Thanks
--Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to googl
Hi,
I've been trying to use django nonrel on google appspot server
So far I always got "ImproperlyConfigured: 'djangoappengine.db' isn't
an available database backend." error
I have include djangoappengine inside my settings.py
Please anyone help me to solve this
Thanks,
Uung
--
You received t
We seem to be getting very long delays, and frankly do not know if it
is at our end or at the google end. Somehow (8657ms 19786cpu_ms
18328api_cpu_ms) this just seems too long.
Any ideas?
#
1.
06-09 11:11PM 24.243 /com.raas.Main/ermdataservice 200 8657ms
19786cpu_ms 18328api_cpu_ms 0kb
I see some entities which names starting with '__unapplied_write__'
prefix. How they appear and what should i do with them?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.c
Same here for me, can't add new cron jobs...
On 9 Jun., 21:40, vivpuri wrote:
> I am getting HTTP500s on Admin console and App. Anyone else facing
> similar issues?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, se
An index in my app is stuck in pre-building and the app has not even
queued the index in the last day:
Building
Queued: 0 Running: 0 Completed: 0 Total: 0
I have tried to delete the index, but it states that no such index
exists. Any suggestions?
--
You received this message because you are su
On 9 Juni, 21:40, vivpuri wrote:
> I am getting HTTP500s on Admin console and App. Anyone else facing
> similar issues?
Hi, Yes we have problems as well. I cannot deploy a new version, I get
stuck at uploading index definitions and get a 500 Internal Server
error.
I also cannot open the Datastor
I have the same problem (tried yesterday and today) for a new app,
where I try to add new cron jobs. Is this still related to the
datastore problems?
Regards,
Thomas
On 25 Mai, 03:12, Ryan wrote:
> I'm also getting 500 errors trying to deploy a new version.
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> On May 24, 6:56
Yes you can use it..these are client side libraries so no need to worry
about dependecy on Google App Engine.
i have used it and it works great.
Thanks,
Ravi.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Michael W wrote:
> I download GAE 1.3.3, GWT 2.0.3 and successfully run the example of
> GWT.
>
> Just
Hi,
my datastore is full of __unapplied_write__ entities of different
kinds.
Any ideas?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group,
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/unappliedwrites.html
On 10 June 2010 18:29, dflorey wrote:
> Hi,
> my datastore is full of __unapplied_write__ entities of different
> kinds.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/unappliedwrites.html
http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2010/06/datastore-outage-and-unapplied-writes.html
On 10 June 2010 09:49, Dmitriy T. <403...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see some entities which names starting with '__unapplied_write__'
> prefix. How they ap
There should be a better place for me to post this as it is a comment
on the recent downtime notification, which is actually a different
google group.
(1) The recent downtime announcement said:
> We want to stress that these unapplied
> writes do not impact the transactional consistency of applic
Thank you. It helps. Also i get email from GAE team with same link on
Unapplied Writes FAQ.
On Jun 10, 9:39 pm, Barry Hunter wrote:
> http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/unappliedwrites.html
>
> http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2010/06/datastore-outage-and-unap...
>
> On 10 June 2010 09:49, Dm
I just checked your account with this email address you're using. You should
have been manually enabled.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:26 PM, johnl wrote:
> Thanks Ikai. I did as you suggested yesterday, but still getting the
> same message about validation.
>
> It's pretty much stopping me from usi
What's your application ID?
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Prawyn wrote:
> Hi,
> I have 17 unwanted indexes in my application.
> They are in building state. I am not able to vacuum them.
> Please help me to remove these 17 indexes
> Thanks,
> Prawyn.
>
> --
> You received this message because
I had a similar issue few days back. Eventually got rid of that entity using
remote shell.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Ikai L (Google) wrote:
> What is your application ID, and which entity is being stuck?
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Daniel wrote:
>
>> I have a record in my data
" But it could also happen nothing too because google detects that
your site
runs on their service "
This can't really happen, for reasons described here :
http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2010/06/datastore-latency.html
happy coding:-)
On Jun 10, 12:45 pm, Flips wrote:
> Pagerank is *not* affected
On Jun 9, 2:12 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> No, that's not necessary. Keys are (of course) indexed, so no re-putting is
> required. re-putting your data is only necessary when you want to move from
> an unindexed property to an indexed one, or to add a new indexed property.
I'm not sure I
Doesn't seem like a bad idea. It's not quite as simple, though.
I think it may be possible to push a new version of an application to get
indexes built ahead of when you need them, as all versions use the same
datastore.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Jason C wrote:
> Confirmed they are buil
They look to have been built. The index building processes have been running
with some delay. We're working on it.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Jason C wrote:
> This seems to be a very regular occurrence; (seemingly) every time we
> add a new index, we need to post on this group to get it wo
On Jun 10, 1:25 am, Jaroslav Záruba wrote:
> I would go with identical key and single insert, no need to delete.
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:32 PM, alf wrote:
> > Whats is better in term of performance
>
> > insert a new entity or recycle a entity previously inserted
>
> > thx
I say a system ca
Hello all, I'd like your opinions on the reality of App Engine
scalability. I'm not so concerned about the the high end, since I'm
nowhere near creating a substantial amount of traffic. In fact, I'm
just starting out at the bottom, and that seems to be a problem with
the system. Today I looked at m
Hi,
On Jun 10, 9:58 am, Uung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to use django nonrel on google appspot server
> So far I always got "ImproperlyConfigured: 'djangoappengine.db' isn't
> an available database backend." error
> I have include djangoappengine inside my settings.py
> Please anyone help
Seen practical names filterchain just passing on more like AI then
ruled based selfupdating probabilities admintting new chances
blacklisted where material improved easy
informatic argument: levenstein comparing content so doublets even
looking good still blacklist
since same same repeating alterna
Confirmed they are built. Thx.
Perhaps a good thing to add to the System Status page (http://
code.google.com/status/appengine) would be the time to get a new index
through the wait queue.
j
On Jun 10, 1:13 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote:
> They look to have been built. The index building processe
What is your application ID, and which entity is being stuck?
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Daniel wrote:
> I have a record in my datastore which cannot be deleted or changed
> either programmatically or via the admin console. I discovered the
> object when it was always returned first in a
Thank you Daniel for the sharp eye. I've made the appropriate
correction in a followup on that thread.
On Jun 10, 11:02 am, dsw wrote:
> There should be a better place for me to post this as it is a comment
> on the recent downtime notification, which is actually a different
> google group.
>
> (
Hi
Depending on the type of application (read or write oriented) and how
aggressive you can cache stuff then I would say
it is fine for small businesses and/or low volume sites just starting
out. However I would look carefully at what you are
trying to do and see if it in fact matches app engines
solved,
turn out appspot demand all django app in parent directory while I put
all my django app inside apps dir
while I add "sys.path.insert(0,
os.path.abspath(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), './apps')))"
inside my manage.py, this doesn't work for appspot but this work in my
local gae inst
37 matches
Mail list logo
