let say our code is buggy and there is memory leak. but somehow the
aplication still run well. when instance of server run out of memory.
will appengine auto scale it for more memory ? would be good as
temporary measurement to handle such situation right?
--
You received this message because
The instance will throw an exception and will be killed. The error will be
visible in your logs.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
status 400. HTTPRequest Bad request ?
try without DELETE - do some simple stuff.
Make sure url is accessible.
http://schoolk12.appspot.com/
On Sep 5, 9:40 am, Nischal nischalshett...@gmail.com wrote:
Haven't tried it on production yet, but it isn't working in development...
Let me try and
Hello,
I'm trying to find any example for the OAuth API.
The trunk for http://oauthexample.appspot.com/Welcome seems to be empty.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fjava%2Fdemos%2Foauth
Are there any other examples?
Can google upload the code of
The URL is accessible. It's for the facebook graph api. Like I said, works
when using Apache Http client but I need to make it work on appengine as
well.
This is for face4j https://github.com/nischal/face4j , an open source
facebook graph api java library that I have created and maintain.
--
Here's rest of the code:
public class Memcache {
private static int EXPIRY = 60*60*24*30;
private static final String POSTIDKEY=POSTID_;
private static boolean has(String key) {
return MemcacheServiceFactory.getMemcacheService().contains(key)
get(key).length()0;
}
As it is not related to GAE you should check the GData docs. You'll
find all the good stuff there.
On Sep 11, 1:56 pm, de Witte jcreator.xi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to find any example for the OAuth API.
The trunk forhttp://oauthexample.appspot.com/Welcomeseems to be empty.
...or are you interested in implementing an OAuth provider? Then of
course it is a different story.
On Sep 11, 11:12 pm, Daniel Florey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
As it is not related to GAE you should check the GData docs. You'll
find all the good stuff there.
On Sep 11, 1:56 pm, de Witte
Hi Mauricio, I think I need more information:
What relationships do you have between your entities?
For the Conversation/Comment example above I can derive something like
this:
===
Conversation
--
commentKey: Key
status: String
rank: Integer
In addition to adding urls to your appengine-web.xml, if you intend
app to be your
application default root path, see:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/appconfig.html#Changing_the_Root_Directory
On Sep 9, 12:13 pm, jem...@gmail.com wrote:
Static file are dealt with
Can use low-level datastore and iterate over batches:
binSize = 1000;// or smaller if needed 30 sec timeout
DatastoreService datastore =
DatastoreServiceFactory.getDatastoreService();
Keys only select and delete:
javax.jdo.Query q = pm.newQuery(select key from +
Still happening right now. I can repro pretty easily: schedule ~10
image processing tasks in a queue, and 1 to 3 often fail due to that
re-entrancy bug. Then after they retry automatically and after a few
times usually go through.
5 instances idle / running, no load on the app: only 1 user
At the risk of asking the obvious, you mean other than appcfg.py?
J
On Sep 11, 4:48 pm, Emlyn emlynore...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a python library for uploading code to AppEngine? I'd like to
build an App that can upload code to other apps, has anyone done this
already?
--
Emlyn
Yep. Or, can you consume appcfg.py from inside your app? If you can,
then that's the answer to my question.
yes, in advance, I am a hopeless n00b, sob
On 11 September 2011 15:47, Jan Zawadzki / Hapara
jan.zawad...@hapara.com wrote:
At the risk of asking the obvious, you mean other than
It is just a Python script. Open it up and have a look at what it does.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:37, Emlyn emlynore...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep. Or, can you consume appcfg.py from inside your app? If you can,
then that's the answer to my question.
yes, in advance, I am a hopeless n00b, sob
Thanks Guys for your suggestions.
If I switch to any GAE pricing model, it will not suit me. However, I have
some shared hosting providers which are very cheap. I can switch some sites
of mine which are on GAE. Clients here don't know about HRD, Cloud,
distributed db. Any mysql db + small disk
HI
As robert says it is just python. Also its using the remote_api.
So all definately do-able. I run remote_api stuff inside zope to
transparently access the datastore from within zope.
Rgds
Tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App
On 11 September 2011 16:17, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
It is just a Python script. Open it up and have a look at what it does.
It's not just a python script, it's a fair sized system. I had a quick
look a while back and thought, hmm, this will take work.
So before I get into
My google-fu is failing. Do you have any specific links to more info
on uploading code using remote_api?
On 11 September 2011 16:58, Tim Hoffman zutes...@gmail.com wrote:
HI
As robert says it is just python. Also its using the remote_api.
So all definately do-able. I run remote_api stuff
I'm ok with that.
Your next concern would be the Datastore Reads. I think you should be able
to bring that down a lot by using memcache and/or combining your monitors
into a few entities. I'm not familiar with python, but I believe you can use
pickle to serialize an array of monitors into a
But as always, it is easier say than done. Don't know if this idea can be
implemented.
Considering that is how the previous budget concept works (except on a
daily basis), I doubt additional rocket science would be required.
There may however be plenty of business reasons not to stop people
On 11 September 2011 18:17, Gerald Tan woefulwab...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm ok with that.
cool
Your next concern would be the Datastore Reads. I think you should be able
to bring that down a lot by using memcache and/or combining your monitors
into a few entities. I'm not familiar with python,
Say someone does not like a person behind one of the small/medium sized apps
on app store (lets say 2-3 instances continously each day). For the sake of
argument, say that it is me, but it could just as easily apply to any of you
guys out there.
What will stop a person of ill intend to make
A max-instances setting would, as you say, let you spread your capacity
exceeded failures to some proportion of requests made during the busiest
periods rather than to all requests at some time period at the end of the
day/week/month, but it would also risk failing to serve some requests which,
On Saturday, 10 September 2011 19:30:13 UTC+1, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
Is this really true, that if you burst to 100 instances you won't get
the 15-minute charges? Even if you have it set to automatic? I'd
like to hear an official voice on this matter.
See Jon McAlister's detailed
@ Gerald, You may end up loading a 32mb file from the blobstore. Just use
multiple page entities for a single article entity.
@ Keakon, Those reasons don't apply, seems you misunderstood the pattern,
feel free to ask for more details.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Saturday, September 10, 2011 6:22:05 PM UTC-5, Rob Smith wrote:
Thanks for confirming that I wasn't just imagining it!
I should have clarified someone in a different forum...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To
Please star
thishttp://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5858issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/aUrt2tWUgD8J.
Here is what I noticied
: http://www.d-ro.ch/2011/09/appengine-cloudflare-crawlrate
Anyway you shouldn't block Googlebot that would de-index you form google.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web
Hi
Sorry no specific links.
Have a read of appcfg.py in google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py , specifically
the class
AppVersionUpload.
It uses remote_api rpc calls under the hood
All of the appcfg functions that talk to a remote server do.
If you wanted to build your own wrapper I would be
I have a question about the new scheduler. Before HRD the scheduler
use to tear down instances very aggressively. Now it doesn't appear
to. I have some hobby apps that may get no traffic at all for hours,
however, the scheduler keeps 1 instance alive. It seems to me after
15 minutes of no
It's been pretty conclusively determined on these groups that those extra
instances don't cost you anything, as long as you keep the idle instances
slider over to the left in App Settings. It has also been stated by our google
overlords that these freebie instances are more prevalent in the
I was referring to the earlier messages, which confirmed that my
messages had been there at one point. Thanks for clarifying though.
On Sep 11, 12:56 pm, Gary Frederick g...@jsoft.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 10, 2011 6:22:05 PM UTC-5, Rob Smith wrote:
Thanks for confirming that I wasn't
To add to what Josh said, the billing rule states that front-end instances
won't incur any idle charges after idling for 15 minutes, even if they stay
running.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Joshua Smith joshuaesm...@charter.netwrote:
It's been pretty conclusively determined on these groups
Great to know, sorry I missed those threads.
Thanks,
On Sep 11, 10:07 am, Rishi Arora rishi.ar...@ship-rack.com wrote:
To add to what Josh said, the billing rule states that front-end instances
won't incur any idle charges after idling for 15 minutes, even if they stay
running.
On Sun, Sep
Hi,
Because we are about to launch our app very soon, I increased the number of
idle instances from 1 to 5 yesterday and things looked correct in the Dashboard.
Then this morning, in the Dashboard I see 2 idle instances and this:
The spikes correspond to cron tasks running hourly I assume.
Oops looks like the image was stripped, you can see it here:
http://oi52.tinypic.com/12349hi.jpg
On Sep 11, 9:53 am, Pol-Online i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Hi,
Because we are about to launch our app very soon, I increased the number of
idle instances from 1 to 5 yesterday and things looked
Jens,
Your original calculation is correct - $61/year for 15 GB of blobstore data.
The reason is, as you pointed out, that the data is counted both as
blobstore data and stored data/datastore data.
HTH,
Chris
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Niklas Rosencrantz nikla...@gmail.comwrote:
In
On Sep 10, 4:51 pm, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:38 PM, WeatherPhilip
It is 28 hours :)
http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2011/09/few-adjustments-to-app-en...
Not reflected in the 'billing estimate's yet.
Get 9 hours of backends free too. A
You're describing what's known as a denial of service attack. These attacks
could happen to any Website on any platform. On GAE you're more protected,
out of the box, than most other hosting solutions.
1. GAE automatically blocks IPs that it senses strange activity from. I've
encountered this on
I've done something close in the past where I have a GAE app that pulls
Python script from another location and executes it. Not sure if that helps
you, but here it is. Make sure the script is safe, though, because it'll be
running against your own datastore.
try:
I dont think you understand... The above specifically mentions - among other
things - that
1) there are no programatic apis to the blacklist
2) the mechanisms to limit costs for a small app under a attack are much
worse under the new billing system than under the old one...
hence:
-
After thinking about this for a while I think I would prefer to just have a
min and max instances slider.
I am running different apps on app engine and for the larger ones I'd like
to have a min instances = 10 and max instances = unlimited to be able to
scale up fast once heavy traffic occurs.
No it is not correct. Blobstore is not counted as datastore data. Have
a quick look at your billing history page for confirmation.
On Sep 11, 8:35 pm, Chris Collins xop...@gmail.com wrote:
Jens,
Your original calculation is correct - $61/year for 15 GB of blobstore data.
The reason is, as
I believe you will be able to cap your daily total instance hours. If you
use that and get DOSed, your app will continue to be responsive through the
attack, but you may end up losing service when you reach your quota near the
end of the billing day.
If you cap Active Instance (that's the
Your crawl rate changed because the Headers for serving changed from GAE to
CF In a Week they will be back to normal.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Roch Delsalle
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 5:02 AM
To:
I believe you will be able to cap your daily total instance hours.
-- please tell me how to do this... currently there is only a setting to
control max *idle* instances. During dos they will *not* be idle...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google
Under Billing Settings.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/YKAkWttT-DYJ.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi Fred,
This week we planned to look at something very similar, so
maybe we can share notes.
I notice that if you enable datastore admin, there seems to be an
option to export datastore to another appid.
To be seen how it handles keys, namespaces, etc.
That won't cover export to local
I serve Denied if IP matches X. You don't need Google For this. I do the
same thing if User Agent = X
This is a risk with any solution, from DreamHost to Amazon to RackSpace. I
can ruin your day regardless of platform.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
I have a single app with multiple namespaces defined.
I'd like to set up multiple domains
a.com
b.com
c.com
and have the app detect the domain and write the domain's data into its
respective namespace.
However, on the production admin panel, it only seems to allow you to
configure a single
Google.com/a/YourDomain.com Deploy the App, and assign it to a subdomain
(like www)
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jens Stoltenberg
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 2:02 PM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject:
Ok, I agree that must have had an impact but how do you explain one month
down to almost zero when my headers were sent by gae ?
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
Your crawl rate changed because the Headers for serving changed from GAE to
CF In a Week
It worked. Thanks, man. Much easier than I expected :)
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
Google.com/a/YourDomain.com Deploy the App, and assign it to a subdomain
(like www)
** **
** **
*From:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:
Without the Domain name, I don't. But a trick you can use to get deeper
indexing on your pages is to change the server headers, IP address, and
Expiration every week or so.
But Google bot responds to Change with lets crawl everything when it finds
less change, it reduces the crawl.
Bump #2
On 7 September 2011 13:53, Sergey Schetinin mal...@gmail.com wrote:
Bump
On Sunday, 4 September 2011 14:20:31 UTC+3, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
So when we deploy a new version, let's assume there was one instance
running, it gets shut down, a new one is then started, how many
The GIL (old or new) is not a problem for concurrency unless your
application spends large quantities of time CPU-bound. As soon as you
make an I/O request, some other thread will run. The GIL doesn't
hurt.
Jeff
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Steve unetright.thebas...@xoxy.net wrote:
I (and
Are there any Doc/Examples of using async Memcache calls ? Sounds
interesting
- Added API functionality for making calls to the Memcache API asynchronously.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send
On Sunday, September 11, 2011 3:27:43 PM UTC-7, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
The GIL (old or new) is not a problem for concurrency unless your
application spends large quantities of time CPU-bound. As soon as you
make an I/O request, some other thread will run. The GIL doesn't
hurt.
Jeff
On my
This is the official word:
*You are only charged the 15 minute idle time for the number if idle
instances up to your max idle instances.* So, if you have 200 instances
spin up for 10 minutes and then all traffic stops and your max idle
instances is set to 5. You would be charged for (200 *
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Steve unetright.thebas...@xoxy.net wrote:
On my GET requests, I/O accounts for roughly half of the time to process the
request. When a user POSTs new data, my app does a fair amount of
recalculations and I/O is only about 20% of the request processing time.
The old 2.5/2.7 GIL hurts performance any time there is more than one thread
that is doing python work. Maybe you'd like to read up on how the old GIL
burns cpu time in excess signalling and failed lock acquisition:
http://www.dabeaz.com/python/NewGIL.pdf
--
You received this message because
(apologies for not putting this in the python-specific forum - as far as I
can tell, there isn't one, despite what the welcome message says)
Hey guys,
I have a model defined like so:
class stickletUser(db.Model):
author = db.UserProperty()
email = db.EmailProperty()
has_shared =
I found there are not exceptions thrown even the recipient email
addresses don't exist at all.
In my app, half new users didn't activate their accounts.
I doubt they haven't received the activation mail.
But how do I know if the new users have received the activation mail
or not?
Someone argued
you can use a nifty old trick by placing an ''invisible'' image
somewhere within a message so if a user reads a message, image file on
your server gets accessed
the simplest receipt verification technique though
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Tapir tapir@gmail.com wrote:
I found there are
Hi
The group is google-appengine-python
Rgds
Tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/bmtjKeHqQ9YJ.
To post to this group, send email
Thanks. It doesn't show up in search results for groups, eve when I type in
the exact name...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hey
Your right. Not good .
Here is the link to the group
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/google-appengine-python
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi
That will only tell you they read it, if they have images enabled by
default. I don't for instance in my email.
If they don't read it with images enabled you can't tell if it was not
delivered or just unread.
I wouldn't expect exceptions to be raised from bogus email addresses unless
they
69 matches
Mail list logo
