You'll want to add it to our issues tracker and get as many folks to star it
as possible:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:43 PM, ProfessorMD rkc...@gmail.com wrote:
Does Google App Engine have support for the Java Sound API? If not,
how do we go
Have you tried the appcfg.py vacuum_indexes command yet?
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Satoshi satoshi.nakaj...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an app on Google App Engine, which has evolved over time. As
the result, a model Plan on the server has six indexes even though I
need only four of them.
is inclusive or not. The performance of
continuing the fetch from a cursor should be the same as the performance of
the first entities you got from a query.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Stephen sdea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 8, 7:06 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote
That's a pretty general question, but in general, here are some performance
tips:
- Retrieving entities by key is the fastest way to retrieve data. If you can
avoid complex queries and do this instead where possible, you'll squeeze a
lot of performance out of the datastore.
- Memcache slow data
Datastore viewer issues are likely related to type validation issues. Are
you using specialized types such as PhoneNumber, Email Address or URL fields
in your model? Are these always being set, or are null or invalid values
being set?
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Shai levys...@gmail.com wrote:
, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
I got beaten to this answer. No, there is no traversal to get to the
offset.
BigTable has an underlying mechanism for range queries on keys. Indexes
are
essentially a key comprised of a concatenation of application ID, entity
type, column, value
Any chance you can post all the code? This way we can just load it up in our
development environment of choice and run it.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:21 PM, aswath satrasala aswath.satras...@gmail.com
wrote:
Any help here...
Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:35 PM, aswath satrasala
custom
client application (and not the browser).
Thanks,
Arun
On Jan 28, 4:31 am, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Are there places where this isn't reliably set? In my servlet I am
calling:
int contentLength = request.getContentLength();
This works with the following
the queue with a head/tail
pointer, using the increment call... This works, but if grabTail
worked as advertised, that would be more elegant.
Regards,
Viktor
On Feb 2, 7:28 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
That's interesting. Let me follow up with the team to try to understand
,
Cool!
It might be trivial but, I've filed an issue with SDK 1.3.1 prerelease.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2721
--
Takashi Matsuo
Kay's daddy
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com
wrote:
Hello App Engine
John means you don't have to worry about synchronized, but be aware of
Memcache race conditions if you do frequent reads and saves from Memcache.
You can't lock Memcache.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:06 AM, John Patterson jdpatter...@gmail.comwrote:
You don't need to worry about concurrency in
This article should help:
http://krasserm.blogspot.com/2010/01/accessing-security-enabled-google-app.html
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Guwalani Mahendra
guwalani.mahen...@gmail.com wrote:
How to build a java desktop client for my hosted app engine
application ?
I have tried to write a
Does this only happen if you set a child object for the parent object? It'd
be helpful to figure out what exact operation causes this to happen.
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Sydney sydney.henr...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to use the following model in the datastore but when I make my
data
1. I'm not familiar with page templates, but you should see if JSP does what
you need. There are a ton of JSP/EL/JSTL tutorials on the web:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=introduction+to+jsp
2. String localization is done via ResourceBundles in Java:
We're including helpers for unit testing in 1.3.1. I'm a bit curious as to
whether or not this will solve the issues with tests being
non-deterministic:
https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/ddef6d9fa4aa0ae2?pli=1
The fact that it's non-deterministic seems to
It'll probably be easiest to recreate the entities. The thing about Keys is
that at the lowest layer, every entity's primary key is a Key object. A
risky possibility for daredevils: I *think* but I am not sure that if you
just changed the property to a Key, it would function for the reason I just
Hello App Engine Developers,
As part of our ongoing efforts to improve release quality and
transparency, we will start prereleasing SDKs for early testing. We
hope this gives developers a chance to participate in our release
process by trying out new changes and sending feedback. As of this
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_synchronization
On 8 December 2009 00:31, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
No, you won't be able to download the source. This is something you'll
want to use a source control system like Subversion or Git for.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Jake S. jak...@gmail.com
You can do an IN-like query, but this just translates to multiple key
queries.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/queriesandindexes.html
What exactly are you trying to do? The solution is likely to modify your
persistence model for App Engine's distributed datastore.
On Mon,
. Current namespace should be set and
not empty for the service. For each namespace memcache maintains a
separate LRU list.
Regards,
Viktor
On Feb 1, 9:22 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
I'll raise the issue with some other members of the team, but it seems
like
This issue should have been resolved:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/7fb8a39149de3b55
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/7fb8a39149de3b55Please
let us know if you are continuing to be affected.
Can you post test cases that produce non-deterministic behavior? If this is
reproducible, please create an issue with the entities and test cases in
question and let us know:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Markus Scheidgen
Oy, this is what I get for not running code before posting it. Good looking
out.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, datanucleus andy_jeffer...@yahoo.comwrote:
query.setFilter(aliases == alias);
That is invalid JDOQL syntax; the spec is the spec and JDOQL uses Java
syntax.
If you have a
Yes. Run your server using Debug. Eclipse will automatically compile your
classes on save.
The only exception is certain types of changes to classes that need to be
enhanced after compilation. Eclipse will prompt you to restart.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:04 PM, javaness enesa...@gmail.com wrote:
The explanation for the exception is in the exception text itself. Each
entity's key contains the ancestor information for that entity:
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/storage_breakdown.html
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/storage_breakdown.htmlA path is
a concatenation of
Hi Fred,
We're aware of this issue. You can track the status of our work to resolve
it in this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/7fb8a39149de3b55
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Fred fpar...@gmail.com wrote:
Getting 500 server errors
Hi Geoff,
We had an issue with auth cookies. More details can be found here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/7fb8a39149de3b55
This issue has been resolved.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Geoff gmor...@gmail.com wrote:
If I access
Hi everybody,
This issue is likely related to our issues with our auth cookies. This issue
has been resolved:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/7fb8a39149de3b55
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Brian Papa brian.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Was seeing
Can you give it a shot again? If not, follow the instructions in this thread
to clear your appcfg cookies:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/7fb8a39149de3b55
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:00 AM, ben b...@hilltopbarn.net wrote:
Hi all,
For the
There was an issue with auth cookies. This issue has been resolved:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/7fb8a39149de3b55
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:11 AM, gwstuff gwsa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have the exact same problem across 2 apps of mine -
Hi everybody, I just wanted to let you all know that this issue has been
resolved. Here's the thread on the downtime-notify list:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/7fb8a39149de3b55
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:54 AM, godDLL ycherkas...@gmail.com
Can you post your app-id? Also, can you try accessing http://www.appspot.com
?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:15 PM, robl robert@pumpkinmail.net wrote:
Dispite assurances that this problem is fixed, I am still unable to
reach my dashboard on https://appengine.google.com/. All my browsers
Can you post your app-id and a link to some of your static files returning
errors?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, M.A. miika.aho...@gmail.com wrote:
I use the users API only for very few pages. And I'm actually getting
the 500 error even from static files (e.g. CSS).
--
You received this
On Feb 2, 3:30 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Can you post your app-id? Also, can you try accessinghttp://
www.appspot.com
?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:15 PM, robl robert@pumpkinmail.net
wrote:
Dispite assurances that this problem is fixed, I am still unable
It looks like you are modeling a One-To-Many relationship:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/relationships.html
Set the Position as the root entity and the Application as a child entity.
If an Applicant is applying to multiple Positions, then you will want to
explore
You can do this with deployment descriptions or servlet filters. Here
documentation about configuring web.xml to do this:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/webxml.html
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Scott gocards...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 1 jsp in my app that I want to
I'll raise the issue with some other members of the team, but it seems like
this is working as expected. A memcache namespace is nothing more than a
prefix applied to a memcache key. There's no true partitioning mechanism
within memcache. grabTail simply returns the item that would be expired by
The way to do this is to create a series of tasks that update each entity
one by one.
The question I'd like to ask, however, is why you'd want to do this. It's
typically best practice to store time information as UTC and convert as
needed for display or computation due to weirdness with
Mike,
Yikes, really sorry about that. You're right, it doesn't make any sense to
charge 0.01 (On a positive note, I saw your site linked in another groups
post and it's pretty awesome: http://www.shoesofprey.com). I've raised the
issue so that we can talk about ways we can reduce the chances that
Can you post sample code?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Andrei gml...@gmail.com wrote:
i am trying to set entity property to null,
but it does not persist it to db, it just keeps old string value
how do i set property to null?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are
What about this:
1. Submit the form to your servlet
2. Check to see if the User is logged in or not
3. If the User is not logged in, serialize the form data and cache it in the
session, then redirect the User to a login URL
4. After login, repopulate the form
You may also be able to save
You should be able to. Start looking here:
http://code.google.com/apis/checkout/developer/index.html
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Andrei gml...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way to use google checkout api from GAE?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi Manny,
A few things to first remember - App Engine's datastore is not a database,
but a distributed key value store with additional features. Thus, we should
be careful not to frame our thinking in terms of RDBMS schemas. For this
reason, I like to avoid using database terminology that can
Here's the Java version of implementing hooks for JDO and JPA:
http://gae-java-persistence.blogspot.com/2009/11/case-insensitive-queries.html
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Nick Johnson (Google)
nick.john...@google.com wrote:
Hi J,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:18 PM, J
You should just be able to change the application ID in application-web.xml
and push it.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:23 AM, mjustin michael.jus...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello,
is there a way to copy my GAE application into somebody elses account?
I would like to make it as easy as possible for the
Hi there,
From this page:
http://code.google.com/apis/apps/profiles/developers_guide_protocol.html
http://code.google.com/apis/apps/profiles/developers_guide_protocol.htmlIt
looks like it's possible to use AuthSub or OAuth, which would preclude you
from having to store a username and password.
Can you summarize the technique used?
As far as join table goes, App Engine's datastore isn't relational.
Filtered queries will work differently and were built with scalability
characteristics in mind. Sometimes these characteristics will overlap with
functionality that SQL provides and may even
1. No, the parent will not be updated. You are updating a Child - not a
parent. However - you will want to be very careful with Child entities in a
Collection. I believe there is an outstanding issues where if you only
update the Child entity, the Parent entity will not know the Collection has
It should be 500 characters. We need to fix the documentation:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2519
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Ugorji ugo...@gmail.com wrote:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/datastore/Text.html
It
There's another thread about this topic here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/ebebbacc69688925
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/ebebbacc69688925Typically,
this won't exist in a library - it's just data. You'll need to find
Hi Magnus,
Yes, you're right. This is posted because we still track this quota even
though it is impossible to exceed it (if you enable billing, your quota goes
to a bit over 1 terabyte). If we ever increase the free incoming bandwidth
quota, 4 gigabytes would be the limit of incoming URLFetch
There's no APIs natively for SMS. However, many mobile service providers
have email gateways for SMS. Here's a quick list on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_carriers_providing_SMS_transit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_carriers_providing_SMS_transitMy
experience has been
What does you local indexes file look like? Can you post the indexes listed
in your production admin console?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:24 PM, aswath satrasala
aswath.satras...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello GAE team,
Further observations made while testing the app. I am not able to write
entities
I'm no expert on how to unit test GWT, but in terms of testing the server,
for a unit test it probably is a better idea to simply test the servlet.
I've heard HtmlUnit is pretty good for this. Here's a guide for setting up
JUnit to work with the datastore:
What's Camel? This is the only thing I was able to find on Google:
http://camel.apache.org/python.html
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:40 PM, elwis elwest...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm playing around with the Appengine and thought about using it as an
integration platform with Camel in the
Is this preventing your task from running? This is generally a harmless
exception. Here's another thread on the subject, though your stack trace is
a bit different:
You won't be able to create a thread in App Engine. It's strange that you're
getting a NullPointerException, however. This is documented here:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/overview.html
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Viji Sarathy viji.sara...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am trying
Are there places where this isn't reliably set? In my servlet I am calling:
int contentLength = request.getContentLength();
This works with the following form:
form action=/content_length method=POST enctype=multipart/form-data
input type=file name=somefile /
input type=text
I'm not entirely sure what you're doing with inheritance, but does this open
issue help?
http://code.google.com/p/datanucleus-appengine/issues/detail?id=25
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Will Bunker w...@thebunkers.com wrote:
Realize that I totally misunderstood the @inheritance properties.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:41 PM, asianCoolz second.co...@gmail.com wrote:
DatastoreService dataSvc =...;
Query query = new Query(MessageRecipients)
.addFilter(recipients), FilterOperator.EQUAL,userid)
.addSort(date, SortDirection.DESCENDING)
.setKeysOnly(); // -- Only fetch keys!
There aren't current plans to create yet another API for datastore
operations. That's why we created the datastore API - so folks could build
convenience functions as needed.
I don't see anything wrong with mixing JDO/JPA with another tool for
datastore access, other than adding unnecessary
This actually looks like a Google Web Toolkit question. You'll probably get
better help in that group:
https://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?pli=1
2010/1/26 Andrés Cerezo acerezoguil...@gmail.com
Hello!! i've the problem of the screen of the attach I need to situate
the
Todd,
I think there's actually a misunderstanding here - we don't guarantee
uniqueness of a key name. A String key is encoded into a datastore Key. The
datastore is, at its lowest layer, a key-value store. Uniqueness is
guaranteed because if you save an entity using a Key that is already used in
This shouldn't cause an exploding index. Under the hood, we are embedding
Account's key information into the keys of the Child and creating index
entries for each of the Child classes. Now, creating massive entity groups
may certainly have some performance implications, but that's why we
recommend
It should. What behavior are you seeing in your tests?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Houston startup coder
stephenh...@gmail.com wrote:
The first sentence here is very clear about how calling makePersistent
on an object with relationships automatically saves all the new or
modified
This should be working. There was an issue with application updates around
this time.
Let us know if you're still having this problem.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Thomas Wiradikusuma
wiradikus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I created a new project, tested it in localhost, everything was
I'm wondering if this was a momentary outage or something to do with the way
appengine-web.xml is configured. Can you post this file?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM, jamie jwb.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
hi! I am having problems similar to
Does this issue just occur on the first request coming into your application
or on every request?
This looks like a DeadlineExceededError, which will sometimes occur on a
loading request due to the fact that initializing the Groovy interpreter as
well as Grails can sometimes take many seconds.
...
On Jan 26, 2:28 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
I think there's actually a misunderstanding here - we don't guarantee
uniqueness of a key name. A String key is encoded into a datastore Key.
The
datastore is, at its lowest layer, a key-value store. Uniqueness is
guaranteed because
Yes, you're right. As a new instance is being spun up, there will be some
user that will have to deal with a loading request.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Spines kwste...@gmail.com wrote:
If I could get a definitive answer on this that would be great.
I know that when your Google App
Strange that it would work locally. MultipartFile doesn't sound like
something that is serializable. You'll want to store your data using the
Blob class we provide, anyway.
Are you storing this in the datastore or a session? You'll want to minimize
the amount of data you store in a session.
On
?
On Jan 20, 4:50 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
There should be plenty of examples around, but here is one from Max
Ross's
blog:
http://gae-java-persistence.blogspot.com/2009/10/creating-bidrectiona...
We're looking at expanding the capabilities of the App Engine Cookbook
Yes, that's possible. The Users Service is convenience, especially for those
people using Google App Engine with a Google Apps Domain. You'll need to
create your own User model and maintain the session state yourself, however.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:36 AM, ale aleee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hey everybody,
I just wanted to give an update about this issue. We've changed resource
allocation for our Java developers, which should result in much less app
evictions. Some of you may have already noticed an improvement. I've already
received several encouraging messages from developers who
It'd better to store values in Memcache than in local memory because you are
not guaranteed which application instance a request will go to. Memcache can
be accessed by any instance, not just the originating one. You're not
guaranteed session affinity.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Andrei
Yes, Google App Engine can provide the backend services for your Android
application via HTTP. In fact, there are several iPhone and Android
applications using Google App Engine to provide a shared backend service for
all of their users. Games, for instance, have been known to use GAE to host
Have you seen the instructions for installing the plugin? They are here:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/tools/eclipse.html
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:26 AM, cnu srinu.g.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
i am using ubuntu 9.10
in this Eclipse 3.5.1 (Galileo) is installed
now i need
Hi there!
If you're learning Java, it's probably overkill to create 4 different
projects, even for different layers of the application. It's probably enough
to simply create different packages and sort through them that way.
For development, you can get away with putting the JAR files in your
as I manually copy the
JAR files into the WEB-INF/lib folder. I will go check out the link
you supplied, but if you or any one else can provide some more insight
I would really appreciate it.
Thanks Maurits
On Jan 21, 8:29 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Hi there!
If you're
Hey,
1. Nope, I don't see any problem with discussing it now. We're already
talking about it, so it'd be more confusing if we moved the thread to a
different group.
2. There IS a Netbeans GAE plugin! It's not officially supported, but I've
used this in the past with great success:
PM, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com
wrote:
As far as I know, there isn't a native Restlet API for datastore access.
One
more way to access the datastore is using the low-level API:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/datastore/package-summary.html
is right, it is basically 1 to many owned relationship and as
the number of child entities grows so does the insert operations time.
I can't figure out why! Any idea why???
Thanks,
Lucian
On Jan 15, 8:55 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Brett Slakin on the App Engine team gave
There should be plenty of examples around, but here is one from Max Ross's
blog:
http://gae-java-persistence.blogspot.com/2009/10/creating-bidrectional-owned-one-to-many.html
We're looking at expanding the capabilities of the App Engine Cookbook to
support examples like this contributed by the
No, you won't be able to authenticate the second application once a user is
logged into the first. If you think about the security issues here - and
there are many - this is something that just won't work and won't be
supported in the manner you have described.
One solution to the problem you
as the group gets larger. Also, I have no
custom indexes with two list properties, so I don't think I have an
exploding index problem.
On Jan 20, 11:45 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
How many child entities does a model have? Is it in a transaction? Index
updates are synchronous
by 10 seconds per 1000 entities.
On Jan 21, 12:01 am, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
How much does the CPU time increase by?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Lucian Baciu lucianba...@gmail.com
wrote:
In total my model has about 4000 entities. The shape of my model
Hi Johann,
Sorry for this delay. We'd really like Billing Issues to go through our
issue tracker and not the groups:
http://code.google.com/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=AppEngineBillingSupport
http://code.google.com/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=AppEngineBillingSupportCan
you post
Andrei,
No, this is fundamentally impossible with Memcache. Memcache values are
lazily expired at GET time. When you set an expiration on a Memcache item,
all you are really doing is telling Memcache to look at that timestamp
whenever a read operation takes place, throwing it away if it's past
If you're looking to use hooks but don't want to fuss with the low-level
API, Max Ross posted a great article about hooks at the JDO/JPA layer:
http://gae-java-persistence.blogspot.com/2009/11/case-insensitive-queries.html
Hi there,
1. We've heard some reports related to browser cache. Try using
shift-refresh on your browser or delete your cache.
2. You are not guaranteed that the ID will be sequential (1, 2, 3, 4, etc),
just that it will be unique. A large reason of why this is has to do with
the distributed
Can you post some code? It'd be helpful to see what you're doing.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Sector7B joe.greenaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have some unit tests to test my dao. Just starting out. So I have
simple tests that do crud operations. findbyid, delete, update, etc.
In
Max Ross just posted a blog post about this:
http://gae-java-persistence.blogspot.com/2010/01/querying-with-key-parameters.html
http://gae-java-persistence.blogspot.com/2010/01/querying-with-key-parameters.htmlIt
sounds like you are enforcing the uniqueness constraint by encoding it as a
Key -
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this. I've been suspecting that something is going on
with our Java applications due to just the number of reports of aggressive
cycling. You've already posted in the other thread - but I'd like to invite
any other developers seeing this issue to report their experience
In general the number of keys requested should not cause the query time to
greatly increase, but it depends on the complexity of the query. A true
keys only request should only cause us to traverse an index. Composite
queries will require us to merge-join indexes, but, computationally, this
should
Brett Slakin on the App Engine team gave a great talk about a problem
similar to what you are describing at last year's Google I/O and how to
solve it. You may want to check this video out:
http://code.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/BuildingScalableComplexApps.html
firefox i nubuntu
9.04)
Can anyone help ?
On Dec 11 2009, 10:42 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Are you seeing this error on a new project? Can you provide steps to
reproduce?
2009/12/10 Viðar Svansson vidarsv...@gmail.com
This seems to only happen if you
If you use the loop to continue to addChild() on the Key, your Key will look
something like this:
Page1-IMG_A-IMG_B-IMG_C
What you want are Keys that look like this:
Page1-IMG_A
Page2-IMG_B
If you continue to set children on the same builder object, you will likely
be setting Images to be
My recommendation is to use the datastore mock that ships with the SDK as
well as the version of Jetty that ships with the SDK. This is going to be
the closest thing you'll get to what's in production. You're likely looking
at MySQL because the local datastore does not meet some development need
Can you add yourself to the SMS waitlist?
https://appengine.google.com/waitlist/sms_issues
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:51 PM, 1e0n jazzmo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, administrators,I am sorry I can not receive SMS messages,
please help me!
--
You received this message because you are
Have you taken a look at this page in the docs?
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/howto/unittesting.html
It shows you how to set up a standalone environment for JUnit. It looks like
you're writing your tests using a custom Testing class, but the same
principles should apply.
On Fri,
901 - 1000 of 1290 matches
Mail list logo
