[google-appengine] Re: SMS Verfication Troubles

2009-08-24 Thread martyn-dev
Hi Group. I'm trynig to create an application on google app engine website but when I put my mobile phone say that i have en error.I try with Comcel on Colombia. Thanks for any help. Regards. On 25 jul, 17:49, Jonathan Mayhak wrote: > I think that I'm having the same problem. > > When I try

[google-appengine] Re: All Read Please: Geographical Request Latency

2009-08-14 Thread Martyn
ort a sub 100ms response. In your case, your cellular modem may be responsible for a hefty slice. It would be interesting if you could also plug into a decent network and do the same test. - Martyn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subsc

[google-appengine] Re: All Read Please: Geographical Request Latency

2009-08-14 Thread Martyn
Okay, just spoke with a network expert. He suggests that Google are "any-casting" the DNS. So the pet- software ping is not really doing a round-trip to the app-server. Where "perhaps" the appspot.com ping is. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message becau

[google-appengine] Re: All Read Please: Geographical Request Latency

2009-08-14 Thread Martyn
I repeated Hawketts ping results for performance.latest.pet- software.appspot.com and got similar times ~22ms. So can anyone suggest why we experience such diverse request latency if the underlying infrastructure is so good? - Hawkett (Australia) reported avg 440ms with a ping of 22ms and I get 1

[google-appengine] Re: All Read Please: Geographical Request Latency

2009-08-14 Thread Martyn
That's interesting! On Aug 14, 9:41 am, hawkett wrote: > Also from Orange, Australia - > > ping performance.latest.pet-software.appspot.com > PING appspot.l.google.com (66.102.11.141): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 66.102.11.141: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=20.131 ms > 64 bytes from 66.102.11.141: ic

[google-appengine] Re: All Read Please: Geographical Request Latency

2009-08-13 Thread Martyn
Ouch! On Aug 13, 8:58 pm, Jarek Zgoda wrote: > Warsaw, Poland here. Typical ~240ms, ranging from 210ms to 740ms (!). > > On 13 Sie, 12:44, Martyn wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > I am investigating request latency for AppEngine after experiencing > &g

[google-appengine] Re: All Read Please: Geographical Request Latency

2009-08-13 Thread Martyn
I'll start off by reporting that: In South-East England I am seeing typical latency reported at ~170ms, but generally ranging between 160ms and 220ms On Aug 13, 11:44 am, Martyn wrote: > Hi there, > > I am investigating request latency for AppEngine after experiencing > si

[google-appengine] All Read Please: Geographical Request Latency

2009-08-13 Thread Martyn
have created a simple version of an app I am working on, that provides request timings. I would really appreciate it if people could take a minute, try the link out and report back on the results. Here is the link: http://performance.latest.pet-software.appspot.com many thanks in advance - Martyn

[google-appengine] Re: Sluggish Request Latency

2009-08-13 Thread Martyn
a bit. - Martyn On Aug 12, 7:26 pm, "Jeff S (Google)" wrote: > Hi Martyn, > > The network topology between you and the App Engine server could also be a > factor in this latency, so I might start by checking there. I'm also > wondering how frequently you are mak

[google-appengine] Sluggish Request Latency

2009-08-11 Thread Martyn
am using Java, so maybe this is not such a problem for python apps and is related to routing to the JVM, I don't know. Should I be able to plan for significantly reduced request latency in the near future? - Martyn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this messa

[google-appengine] Re: Insertion Performance

2009-08-10 Thread Martyn
Thanks Nick, glad I wasn't going mad. I have reported as issue 1962 - Martyn On Aug 7, 4:28 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)" wrote: > Hi Martyn, > > The Java interface to the Memcache API, unfortunately, is noticeably > slower than the Python version. This is the

[google-appengine] Re: Storing Data using Google App Engine

2009-08-07 Thread Martyn
hope that helps - Martyn On 6 Aug, 16:44, Anna wrote: > Hello, > > http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/overview.html > > After reviewing this document I am a little confused on how google > stores data. > > In the example is the Employee object saved in

[google-appengine] Re: Insertion Performance

2009-08-07 Thread Martyn
to the Java API perhaps? If I batch three memcache puts using putAll, I see 13ms for the three rather than 39ms. On 30 July, 19:47, Martyn wrote: > I am using the low-level Java Datastore interface and writing a > "transactional" store - where each entity stores a number of dat

[google-appengine] Re: Versioning convention - best practice

2009-08-06 Thread Martyn
Do you know if it is possible to access the version string at runtime? On 6 Aug, 13:42, Andi Albrecht wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Jason > > Salas wrote: > > > hi! > > > i was just wondering what the best practice should be for numbering my > > app's versions in GAE.  i just noticed

[google-appengine] Re: Memcache Performance

2009-08-06 Thread Martyn
three times that. On 6 Aug, 10:08, Martyn wrote: > This is from a Google Code resource: > > "Memcache is a distributed RAM cache in which you can store transient > data using a key-value model. Writes to memcache never touch the disk > and are approximately 10 times faster in com

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-06 Thread Martyn
Yes Holger, I think that is right. I am using the web.xml security-constraint declaration, which is almost by definition implicit in the JVM deployment. I confess to remaining confused over the precise method that the UserService uses to access logged in user. My suspicion is that it may use Mem

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-06 Thread Martyn
actually, using different yet similar versions should be an excellent way to test multiple JVM interactions. On 6 Aug, 10:26, Martyn wrote: > ...should def work with VMWare though --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-06 Thread Martyn
...should def work with VMWare though --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, s

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-06 Thread Martyn
I thought so too but I'm pretty sure this didn't work when I tried it before. On 6 Aug, 10:11, Holger wrote: > > > > But it does seem that it would be hard to have different logins in > > > > different browser windows, which I would like for testing. > > I guess you could test simultanous di

[google-appengine] Re: Memcache Performance

2009-08-06 Thread Martyn
This is from a Google Code resource: "Memcache is a distributed RAM cache in which you can store transient data using a key-value model. Writes to memcache never touch the disk and are approximately 10 times faster in comparison to writes to the datastore. Also, direct gets to memcache are approx

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
> Is the user logging out by clicking a 'logout' link you provided them > (using the Users API), or by logging out on some other Google service? > If the latter, it's quite possible that doing so would not log the > user out of all their App Engine apps immediately, yes. If you want a > user to b

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
Actually I guess I can achieve that by using two different app versions ;-) On 5 Aug, 18:29, "Nick Johnson (Google)" wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Martyn wrote: > > > Yes, I was assuming that if the user (in the browser) signed into > > another account

[google-appengine] Memcache Performance

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
uot; + timer.elapsed() + ""); I get ~1380ms for each of the tests, so approx 14ms for each api call. Any suggestions? - Martyn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine&quo

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
s for your feedback today! - Martyn On 5 Aug, 16:12, Holger wrote: > Hi Martyn, > > if you just started maybe you should consider to change to Python. > > Java might be more common outside the appengine world - but within > appengine there exist far better ready made soluti

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
n app sign-out link. But it does seem that it would be hard to have different logins in different browser windows, which I would like for testing. On 5 Aug, 17:09, "Nick Johnson (Google)" wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Martyn wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I am clearly

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
ow RTFL on user authentication and see what I can learn. Sorry if I've been wasting your time. - Martyn On Aug 5, 2:52 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)" wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Martyn wrote: > > > Are you suggesting that I need to do something in my App fo

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
Are you suggesting that I need to do something in my App for each request to ensure the current user returned is valid? I have no control if the user changes their account sign-in in another browser window. My debug code is UserService us = UserServiceFactory.getUserService();

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
Since I sign in as a different user, this cannot be explained by a cookie problem.. plus the timing issue. On Aug 5, 1:12 pm, Holger wrote: > If logout wouldn't work, that would be really important - sure. > > But it needn't to be appengine creating this result, it can be your > own code too. >

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
seems to have made no significant difference. I did test "pre-puts", batching say one-hundred inserts, and then seeing if update of an existing entity was any better - it wasn't. I will get back with some more metrics in a bit. On Aug 5, 1:14 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)&

[google-appengine] Re: User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
I think this is an important issue - why no response? On Aug 5, 9:48 am, Martyn wrote: > Hi there, > > In testing I have noted latency in user identity management when I > sign in and out as different account users. > > 1) I sign in as user A - application recognises me as

[google-appengine] User Identity

2009-08-05 Thread Martyn
eries, Blob of around 1k). - Martyn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group

[google-appengine] Post to discussion forum

2009-07-31 Thread Martyn Cutcher
ew minutes not hours/days. Could the post have been lost? cheers - Martyn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@g

[google-appengine] Insertion Performance

2009-07-31 Thread Martyn
I am using the low-level Java Datastore interface and writing a "transactional" store - where each entity stores a number of data updates in a single Blob. Each transaction requires two updates, one to a Header entity, and one to the new transaction data entity. Keys for each are created explicit