Yep, down for me here in the US, too.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Aayush Anand aayushis...@gmail.com wrote:
hi.. I am an aspirant of GSOC '14.
I did register as student and submitted my proposal. But yesterday when i
tried to login, I found that my access is suspended only to GSOC. I was
redirected to the page saying If
hi.. I am an aspirant of GSOC '14.
I did register as student and submitted my proposal. But yesterday when i tried
to login, I found that my access is suspended only to GSOC. I was redirected to
the page saying If you've been redirected to this page from a particular
product, it means that
Thanks for the quick response guys. It looks like the version approach
should be sufficient to solve my immediate problem.
Regarding granting the service account access to cloud storage. Here's
what I tried:
1) Went to the administration console (also very confusing because there
appear
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Regan krega...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps my expectations are wrong - the storage browser maybe only allows
you to see the buckets defined under taht project but not all buckets you
potentially have access to?
That's correct - the Cloud Console viewer
Use versions for QA. You deploy a new version to GAE, but you don't make it
a default version until the QA is done. Just remember to create a special
user account (or whatever your app uses) for QA so they don't mess up other
users' data.
Also, if you make a new version the default one (after
Running the tests like that won't setup all the paths to the various
modules provided by the appengine SDK. (including webapp2)
I would have a read of the this article on local unit testing, towards the
bottom it tells you how to set up your environment,
Hi Richmond,
Thanks for the update. There is an issue related to ID allocation, but I
can't see the issue details. Should I be woried about it? Does it have any
impact on our data/applications?
Kind regards,
Em quinta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2014 00h33min45s UTC-2, Richmond Manzana
escreveu:
I ran into this problem today too. Have you solved your problem? Hope you
can see this and drop a line about your solution. Thank you!
On Friday, September 6, 2013 1:12:02 AM UTC-4, Andrew Free wrote:
I'm using googles built in tool for connecting to the remote api so I
don't even have info
Try uploading/deploying your code sometimes it just needs to be pushed to
google. I’m not sure how I ended up solving this exactly. I have had lots of
issues with the remote API.
On Dec 16, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Ying Ding yd...@corp.lawyer.com wrote:
I ran into this problem today too. Have you
Hey Dennis,
Did you find a solution to this issue? I'm having the same problem...
On Monday, August 26, 2013 12:11:46 PM UTC-4, Dennis Hafemann wrote:
Hi there,
I am on project using Google App Engine and third party library *PIL*.
Currently I am trying to just create a new image, via
Hey Scott,
actually not... The Python-Version on Google App Engine seems to be
compiled without necessary libraries ... I guess because of memory-leaking
and security issues... I don't know... I tried the hell everthing
To solve my problem I forked PyPNG on GitHub, changed it to make it work
Hmm that's really weird that there is that limitation. Thanks for sharing
your solution, you've saved me a lot of time where I would've been banging
my head against the keyboard!
On Friday, December 6, 2013 2:06:19 PM UTC-5, Dennis Hafemann wrote:
Hey Scott,
actually not... The
Thank you Google for another piece of crap software that does not work.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:32:03 AM UTC-8, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Things have been rolling pretty quick towards the holidays!
We're pleased to announce that we have released the GAE 1.8.8 SDKs.
I have been using GAE for almost a year now but when with 1.8.8 I get
Failed to initialize...ine-java-sdk-1.8.8/ when I try to configure the
new SDK. Is there anyway I can see the stack and try to debug this issue ?
Did not have any problem with earlier updates.
Environment Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
I get Maven error when trying to use your plugin:
The plugin com.google.appengine:appengine-maven-plugin:1.8.8 requires Maven
version 3.1.0
But there is no such thing as Maven 3.1.0. the current one is 3.1.1
What should I do to avoid this error?
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32:03 PM
There's a Maven version 3.1.0 available in the Maven downloads service: go
to http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/ and look for the files
*apache-maven-3.1.0-bin.zip* or *apache-maven-3.1.0-bin.tar.gz* (depending
on your preferred filetype).
-
-Vinny P
Technology Media
I use the deploy built into that app engine launcher that comes with the
SDK on osx. I don't know if that is the same thing. I read about doing a
normal appcfg update to fix this but it doesn't seem to be the problem for
me.
On Friday, October 18, 2013 8:03:13 AM UTC-7, gumptionthomas wrote:
You only need different ports if the underlying protocol is not http,https
based. If you do need to provide a server for some other protocol
then you can't use appengine.
T
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:42:50 PM UTC+8, David Garcia wrote:
Hello, I just made my first application on App
I'm a brand new user. Sorry if this is a dumb question. I recently
installed Google App Engine 1.8.5 for Python on Windows 7. Do I need to
uninstall 1.8.5 before installing 1.8.6?
Thanks in advance for the help.
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 10:57:09 AM UTC-6, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi
It's also possible to create (java, python, php) modules in an app that
that is using a runtime which doesn't currently support modules like:
golang. So the main app is using runtime: go and the module is
using runtime: python27.
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 7:14:54 AM UTC-7, Jay wrote:
Quick
I know this is a little late, but are you using the git-push-to-deploy
feature on your app?
I've found that the builtins defined in app.yaml do not work after a
push-to-deploy (they return 404s) but doing a normal appcfg update makes
them work again.
I experienced these 404 failures after
Ok thanks, I will open a bug on it
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013 10:30:06 AM UTC+3, force wrote:
Hi,
I execute the following simple search using Google App Engine Java Search
Service:
IndexSpec indexSpec = IndexSpec.newBuilder().setName(namespace).build();
Index =
S.O. is a great source for clear solutions - mostly from google hits
However as you mentioned they seriously have some issues, definitely not a
great place for support, I also hate asking a question and explaining the
reasons to a bunch of religious programmers (religious as in illogically
-1 from an 'enthusiast programmer'; SO considers me un-washed despite my
relentless effort to be concise and precise.
On Monday, February 6, 2012 6:14:54 PM UTC-8, Ikai Lan wrote:
*Hi App Engine Developers,
In the last few years, the QA website Stack
This update on OS X broke the following testbed
from google.appengine.ext.cloudstorage import stub_dispatcher
All my test are now breaking complaining _MAX_GET_BUCKET_RESULT inside
stub_dispatcher does not exist.
Please advice.
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 1:04:39 PM UTC-4, Richmond
There's one feature mentioned in the pre-release that unfortunately didn't
make it to the final version. From the pre-release notes:
- The max_concurrent_requests setting is now configurable per
version/engine.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7927
Could that mean
What is the change for the Search API exactly, just the SLA?
- 10K Queries/Minute
- 15K Documents Added to Indexes/Minute
- 15K Other API Calls/Minute
The limits are still the same, as it seems, would be great to see them
disappear
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 8:04:39 PM UTC+3,
Probably the SDK path is invalid. If so try this.
Open the tool,
Edit -- Preferences -- Appengine SDK:* C:\Program Files
(x86)\Google\google_appengine*
and update your application writing this line in *cmd*,
*appcfg.py update your_apps_path*
--
You received this message because you are
I'm on OS X but the path is correct. Again I'm getting logs on the server
side so something is working to a degree. Tried updating/deploying it and
still having the same issue.
On Friday, September 6, 2013 12:49:06 AM UTC-7, Sercan Altundas wrote:
Probably the SDK path is invalid. If so try
I guess --default_partition was removed in the new SDK, doesn't help but at
least explains why that would not work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
I
opened
/Applications/GoogleAppEngineLauncher.app/Contents/Resources/GoogleAppEngine-default.bundle/Contents/Resources/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/devappserver2/application_configuration.py
and edited the line 84 to say
self._application = 's~%s' %
Unable to view cron jobs from SDK admin interface. Works fine after
rollback to 1.8.1
Issue : http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=9665
-Nijin Narayanan
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Jeffery Fernandez
jefferyfernan...@gmail.com wrote:
This is excellent!
On Fri,
You are right, it looks like they broke it with the introduction of modules. I
just starred it.
Scary, no test case for such a key SDK page? In software there is only one
thing you can do wrong, regressing it. Along the lines of the messages Google
sends on production issues postmortems, I
When can we expect the maven plugin to be updated too?
Keen to try out the modules feature but even the example won't run with the
current (1.8.1.1) version.
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 19:55:09 UTC+1, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We're happy to announce that we have released the
Yes! While you are right that this is not explicitly mentioned in the
docs, it is certainly something that is supported.
You could have a PHP Module (with multiple versions) for one part of your
app and a separate Python Module (with its own versions) for another part
of your app.
An example
This is excellent!
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Troy Trimble ttrim...@google.com wrote:
Yes! While you are right that this is not explicitly mentioned in the
docs, it is certainly something that is supported.
You could have a PHP Module (with multiple versions) for one part of your
I'm not a big fan of SO.
Saludos.
Moisés Belchín.
2013/6/25 Hooman Korasani hou...@venuscloud.com
-1
Stackoverflow has a very strict FAQ rules, and questions are easily
closed. I don't think it is a good idea to move support to that platform.
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 02:14:54 UTC,
-1 for SO.
-Aswath
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Moises Belchin moisesbelc...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not a big fan of SO.
Saludos.
Moisés Belchín.
2013/6/25 Hooman Korasani hou...@venuscloud.com
-1
Stackoverflow has a very strict FAQ rules, and questions are easily
closed. I don't
-1 for reviving a 1.5-year-old thread.
Jeff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
Agree...
PK
www.gae123.com
On June 26, 2013 at 7:35:05 AM, Jeff Schnitzer (j...@infohazard.org) wrote:
-1 for reviving a 1.5-year-old thread.
Jeff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
-1
Stackoverflow has a very strict FAQ rules, and questions are easily
closed. I don't think it is a good idea to move support to that platform.
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 02:14:54 UTC, Ikai Lan wrote:
*Hi App Engine Developers,
In the last few years, the QA website Stack
Wasn't worth the wait ...
Added a new search document, reset the SDK, the document was gone ... :(
On Friday, June 14, 2013 4:02:26 AM UTC+3, Kaan Soral wrote:
Is it just me or does Appengine msi installer takes t much time to
install - on every version?
It has been 15 minutes, still
Hi
I found the fix for this problem. Here is the link for the solution.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17076200/php-gae-not-able-to-run-sdk-locally
Hope the same is not present in the other builds.
On Thursday, 13 June 2013 20:59:29 UTC+5:30, Abilash Amar wrote:
Hi
Those this
Hi
Those this update change in how to run php?
I am running a command as below
*D:\google_appengine 1.8.1dev_appserver.py
--php_executable_path=D:\PHP\php-cgi.exe \Testing *
**
and getting the following errors.
*Warning*: require_once(google/appengine/runtime/ApiProxy.php): failed to
Is it just me or does Appengine msi installer takes t much time to
install - on every version?
It has been 15 minutes, still waiting for the 1.8.1 :)
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 6:29:29 PM UTC+3, Abilash Amar wrote:
Hi
Those this update change in how to run php?
I am running a
Hi Richmond,
The SDK file under* docs/appengine-web.xsd *is preventing me to deploy my
app! I'm trying to keep auto-ids as legacy in my Java app until I develop a
proper fix. When deploying, the AppCfg update tool just refuses to
validates my appengine-web.xml against that XSD. I've included
You can use entity groups to model one root entity (e.g. customer) and
multiple dependent child entities (e.g. order,cart items..). All entities
belonging to one entity group (e.g. one single customer) can be retrieved
together using an ancestor query - kind of like a 'join'. But unlike with
I have reported this issue on the bug tracker
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=9387.
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:41:40 PM UTC-6, Jeff Lockhart wrote:
I tested deploying on both 1.7.7 and 1.7.7.1 and received the same error
on each of these versions of the SDK. I
I tested deploying on both 1.7.7 and 1.7.7.1 and received the same error on
each of these versions of the SDK. I reverted back to 1.7.6 (which is what
I upgraded from to 1.8 originally) and it works on this version.
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:04:53 PM UTC-6, Jeff Lockhart wrote:
This is my
I'm getting this error when attempting to deploy my app after updating to
1.8.
java.io.IOException: Jar ...\appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.8.0.jar is too large.
Consider using --enable_jar_splitting.
I ran appcfg from the SDK bin directory. It is the latest 1.8 version and
still get the error.
How can we reproduce this error? So far, we can't so we need more
information about your set up.
Can you share your PATH, env variables?
Do you have another app engine SDK installed?
Which framework do you use from your web app?
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:00:04 AM UTC-7, Jeff Lockhart wrote:
This is my PATH:
%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;%SYSTEMROOT%\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Program
Files (x86)\Common
Files\Acronis\SnapAPI\;%JAVA_HOME%\bin;%ANT_HOME%\bin;%M2%;C:\Program
I observed that this error comes If you are using old version of appcfg
with 1.8 version of jar. Run appcfg from 1.8 SDK bin and it should work.
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 03:02:32 UTC+5:30, Matt Staten wrote:
I'm getting errors regarding the size of the API jar:
Seems to be a different bug but same effect, as the original scenario
(involving JSPs) was solved in 1.8.0...
Can you describe a bit more the web app you have and which frameworks you
are using? (Maven? JDO? JPA? etc)
Once we have a reproducible case, we can address it asap.
Thanks!
On Friday,
I'm getting errors regarding the size of the API jar:
appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.8.0.jar is too large. Consider using
--enable_jar_splitting. I thought this was fixed with 1.7.7.1... did it
get bugged again?
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 4:36:21 PM UTC-7, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi everyone,
From Java Release Notes:
Fixed an issue with the Java SDK jar file being too large for Windows 64
All nice, but I get this:
Deploying frontend
Preparing to deploy:
Created staging directory at:
'C:\Users\Mircea\AppData\Local\Temp\appcfg5275372898107673662.tmp'
This is a very SMALL change for jumping from 1.7.7 to 1.8, what are you
hiding? :)
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:36:21 AM UTC+3, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're happy to announce that we have released the 1.8.0 SDK.
For more details, please read our blog post and release notes.
BTW the link to the dmg file for the mac is wrong, its pointing
to http://googleappengine.googlecode.com/files/oogleAppEngineLauncher-1.8.0.dmg
instead of http://googleappengine.googlecode.com/files/*G*
oogleAppEngineLauncher-1.8.0.dmg
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:36:21 AM UTC+3, Richmond Manzana
Hi,
For the App Engine Maven plugin, if you need it absolutely now, before the
Maven caching system gets updated, you can add this as weel:
pluginRepositories
pluginRepository
idsonatype-google-releases/id
nameSonatype Google Releases/name
Please update GAE plugin version in last archetype. I mean
mvn archetype:generate -DarchetypeGroupId=com.google.appengine.archetypes -
DarchetypeArtifactId=guestbook-archetype
and else must include 1.7.7.1 version instead of 1.7.7
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
After updating to 1.7.7 my server no longer works and all requests fail
with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/Applications/GoogleAppEngineLauncher.app/Contents/Resources/GoogleAppEngine-default.bundle/Contents/Resources/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/dev_appserver.py,
Hi,
is there any progress on releasing an update for 1.7.7? This issue with
jar splitting is stopping us from switching to 1.7.7.
Thanks.
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 19:45:42 UTC+1, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ludovic Champenois
On 4/10/13 2:35 PM, Francois MASUREL wrote:
Yes, without success.
François Masurel
Hi,
The Java App Engine 1.7.7.1 SDK is now available with a fix for this
windows specific issue. The Eclipse SDK plugin, as well as the App
Engine Maven plugin have also been updated.
Happy coding...
Do you mind to share a bit on how you integrated APN ?
Did you write the APN code yourself or use existing code?
I need to implement APN in Python as well.
I was using: https://github.com/samuraisam/pyapns
Now I am thinking modify the code here:
https://github.com/simonwhitaker/PyAPNs
On
Can't help you with python, but this bit of Java code works great for me
(called via the task queue). It uses this library:
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns
Code:
@Singleton
public class PushService {
/** */
ApnsService service = APNS.newService()
Jeff,
I use the same library, but I had to change their source code, specially
the part where it create threads. It should use appengine threadfactory
instead.
Here's my issue comment: https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/101
I will submit a patch soon, but I'm tight on schedule.
I have
Jeff,
I use the same library, but I had to change their source code, specially
the part where it create threads. It should use appengine threadfactory
instead.
Here's my issue comment: https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/101
I will submit a patch soon, but I'm tight on schedule.
I have
FYI, using withNoErrorDetection() it works on GAE out of the box.
But it would probably be nice to have that feature working.
Jeff
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Rafael mufumb...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff,
I use the same library, but I had to change their source code, specially
the part
This would be fine if someone answered questions, I find appengine related
questions on stackoverflow have a pretty high chance to go unanswered if
they are not dead-simple.
El martes, 7 de febrero de 2012 03:14:54 UTC+1, Ikai Lan escribió:
*Hi App Engine Developers,
In the last few years,
aside from going unanswered, there's no way to query about generalized
system status, which happens quite often.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:47 PM, payala ppay...@gmail.com wrote:
This would be fine if someone answered questions, I find appengine related
questions on stackoverflow have a pretty
I have the same problem as Panjie: I can no longer use the api explorer on
the local development server, instead it gets redirected to
https://developers.google.com/apis-explorer/#p/
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 6:44:38 PM UTC-4, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're happy to announce
I have the same problem Panjie, have you found a work around?
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:05:01 PM UTC-4, Panjie Setiawan Wicaksono
wrote:
Hi, with 1.7.7 python SDK i no longer can visit the local endpoint api
explorer.
Before, i'd visit http://localhost:8080/_ah/api/explorer then
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=9167
On Apr 12, 2013 6:21 PM, tz tzclo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same problem as Panjie: I can no longer use the api explorer
on the local development server, instead it gets redirected to
Richmond AppEngine team,
If you're ever in the Chicago area, look me up and I'll buy you a beer.
I've been waiting for outbound sockets for years!
A quick issue though: Can you make it explicitly clear in the Sockets API
Overview
Thanks for this guys.
We have integrated apple's push system and it seems to work great!
Eliminating an external server reduces our app development complexity by a
lot.
thanks!
rafa
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Vinny P vinny...@gmail.com wrote:
Richmond AppEngine team,
If you're ever
Hi,
We are tracking this issue internally...Only on windows, and if your app is
using some JSP right?
It's a combination of 2 things: the api jar becoming too big (we will
compress it soon), and the jspc compiler keeping a lock on the files in the
jspc classpath, making the api jar not
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ludovic Champenois l...@google.comwrote:
Hi,
We are tracking this issue internally...Only on windows, and if your app
is using some JSP right?
It's a combination of 2 things: the api jar becoming too big (we will
compress it soon), and the jspc compiler
Hi, with 1.7.7 python SDK i no longer can visit the local endpoint api
explorer.
Before, i'd visit http://localhost:8080/_ah/api/explorer then redirected to
https://developers.google.com/apis-explorer/?base=http://localhost:8080/_ah/api#p/
and
i can explore my local endpoint api from there.
I see it as 31.398 KB. This is on Windows 7 64 bit. I'm deploying through
Eclipse.
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:38:51 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google)
wrote:
Hi Sekhar,
Weird, I don't have such an error. How big is your
appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.7.7.jar? Which operating system are you
Great job! Watch out though, this is the 2nd time that the
appengine-maven-plugin is not released to Maven Central at the same time as
the rest of your SDK... What's up?
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:44:38 AM UTC+2, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're happy to announce that we have
I'm getting a appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.7.7.jar is too large error when
deploying. Are we expected to split this manually or is there a workaround?
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 3:44:38 PM UTC-7, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're happy to announce that we have released the 1.7.7 SDK.
Hi Stefaan,
Sorry about it, we're going to push it today, and it'll be available
hopefully tomorrow.
In the meantime, you can build the snapshot version from the google code
repo by:
$ git clone https://code.google.com/p/appengine-maven-plugin/
$ cd appengine-maven-plugin
$ mvn install
Then
Hi Sekhar,
Weird, I don't have such an error. How big is your
appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.7.7.jar? Which operating system are you using?
Anyway, a possible workaround is to use --enable_jar_splitting option when
deploying. Can you try that?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Sekhar
I'm also getting the appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.7.7.jar is too large when
trying to deploy. Is that expected and what are you supposed to do?
Den onsdagen den 10:e april 2013 kl. 21:15:04 UTC+2 skrev Sekhar:
I'm getting a appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.7.7.jar is too large error when
deploying. Are we
Getting also the same appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.7.7.jar is too large error.
I'm on Windows 7 x64 with latest GAE and Java 7 SDK and
the appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.7.7.jar is 30.6MB big.
Thanx for your help.
François
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:15:04 PM UTC+2, Sekhar wrote:
I'm getting a
Hi Francois,
Thanks for the report. Have you tried it with --enable_jar_splitting?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Francois Masurel f.masu...@gmail.comwrote:
Getting also the same appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.7.7.**jar is too large
error.
I'm on Windows 7 x64 with latest GAE and Java 7 SDK and
Yes, without success.
François Masurel
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Takashi Matsuo tmat...@google.com wrote:
Hi Francois,
Thanks for the report. Have you tried it with --enable_jar_splitting?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Francois Masurel f.masu...@gmail.comwrote:
Getting also
Go for Windows is currently still at 1.7.5.1 (Filename 32 bit:
go_appengine_sdk_windows_386-1.7.5.1.ziphttp://googleappengine.googlecode.com/files/go_appengine_sdk_windows_386-1.7.5.1.zip),
and the Version File is at 1.7.5.
I assume synchronization will take still some time !
Cheers !
Rusco
There are some good java libraries for creating and consuming soap web
services. I have a java app running on app engine which consumers a soap
web service; all the binding code was auto-generated from the wsdl so it
was really a snap to create. I imagine creating your own end-point
wouldn't
There is no intrinsic reason why SOAP won't work. You haven't said if your
using python or java.
SOAP can have a large overhead, especially if your consuming SOAP services
on appengine and you want to dynamically parse large WSDL definitions. But
it doesn't look like you want to do that
On Saturday, March 9, 2013 12:50:05 AM UTC-5, Chuck Ocheret wrote:
This would be fine with me if someone from Google would actually answer
our questions on Stack Overflow. ;-)
To be fair, even before the change, the majority of answers to technical
questions on the appengine-python list
This would be fine with me if someone from Google would actually answer our
questions on Stack Overflow. ;-)
On Monday, February 6, 2012 9:14:54 PM UTC-5, Ikai Lan wrote:
*Hi App Engine Developers,
In the last few years, the QA website Stack
Overflowhttp://www.stackoverflow.com/has become
Hey, I'm new to these groups and to GAE in general. Does a post like this
mean that 1.7.5 has been deployed to production instances also or is there
a schedule for rolling out that I'm missing somewhere?
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:01:54 PM UTC-8, Richmond Manzana wrote:
Hi everyone,
Yes it has been deployed in production and you can now deploy code that uses
any new APIs. I try to upgrade to use the new SDK ASAP but you can stay on
older versions for a while since they are usually backwards compatible.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
On Feb 19, 2013, at 2:44 AM, Mehul Kar
On Tuesday, February 7, 2012 8:14:54 AM UTC+6, Ikai Lan wrote:
*Hi App Engine Developers,
In the last few years, the QA website Stack
Overflowhttp://www.stackoverflow.com/has become an invaluable tool for
developer communities. We’re pleased to
announce that we are migrating to Stack
On Tuesday, February 7, 2012 8:14:54 AM UTC+6, Ikai Lan wrote:
*Hi App Engine Developers,
In the last few years, the QA website Stack
Overflowhttp://www.stackoverflow.com/has become an invaluable tool for
developer communities. We’re pleased to
announce that we are migrating to Stack
With the kind of issues AppEngine has - high prices, random bad
performance, limited features (no sockets, etc), no support, java instance
startup times, routing new requests to instances that haven't started yet,
incredibly small VMs - I think the humour is probably on Google's side
also.
Hi Alex,
It was mostly in jest - AppEngine really is a great service. Just imagine
how much better it would be (especially for AppEngine-Java) if the sharp
edges could be smoothed a bit?
Ryan
On Friday, February 15, 2013 11:47:00 PM UTC+2, alex wrote:
Ryan,
I hope you actually meant your
High Memory Instances
:)
That's some humor right there.
http://cloud.google.com/pricing/compute-engine
High Memory
13 GB
...
52 GB
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/
High-Memory Instance
17.1 GB
...
64.8 GB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
401 - 500 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
