[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine 1.7.5 SDK now available!

2013-02-14 Thread Kaan Soral
I think a Log Viewer is an extremely needed feature, as far as I know it doesn't exit, I've also feature requested it on devappserver2 but I saw that there is a --persist_logs option in SDK Notes, and it creates a log sqlite file too, however I don't see any viewer for that file, have I've

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine 1.7.5 SDK now available!

2013-02-14 Thread Sameer Lodha
Couldn't agree more with the humour part. But seriously, there's real need for reasonably priced (actual) high memory instances. On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:17 AM, pdknsk pdk...@gmail.com wrote: High Memory Instances :) That's some humor right there.

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-14 Thread Aleksei Rovenski
pre release notes stated that channels will work even if created from different versions/backends, but not mentioned here - did it make to this release? w/o this apps that use channels can not use traffic splitting пятница, 14 декабря 2012 г., 3:09:31 UTC+2 пользователь Johan Euphrosine

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-14 Thread Johan Euphrosine
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Aleksei Rovenski aleksei.roven...@gmail.com wrote: pre release notes stated that channels will work even if created from different versions/backends, but not mentioned here - did it make to this release? w/o this apps that use channels can not use traffic

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-14 Thread Aleksei Rovenski
Hello Johan, Thanks for the update. Looking forward for this one! cheers, Aleksei пятница, 14 декабря 2012 г., 11:51:55 UTC+2 пользователь Johan Euphrosine (Google) написал: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Aleksei Rovenski aleksei@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: pre release notes

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-14 Thread Greg Jones
Hi, It doesn't look like the 'distinct' functionality can be accessed via NDB, is that correct? Greg On Friday, 14 December 2012 09:51:55 UTC, Johan Euphrosine (Google) wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Aleksei Rovenski aleksei@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: pre release notes

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-14 Thread Johan Euphrosine
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Greg Jones greg.jo...@psycle.com wrote: Hi, It doesn't look like the 'distinct' functionality can be accessed via NDB, is that correct? Hi Greg, Thanks for the report, can you fill a bug on ndb issue tracker?

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-14 Thread Greg Jones
If anyone else would like to star it: https://code.google.com/p/appengine-ndb-experiment/issues/detail?id=229 Greg On Friday, 14 December 2012 20:15:06 UTC, Johan Euphrosine (Google) wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Greg Jones greg@psycle.comjavascript: wrote: Hi, It

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-13 Thread stephenp
Hi, Sorry for being 'that guy', but is there any kind of ETA for the search API becoming non-experimental? Early next year maybe? :) Thanks, Stephen On Thursday, December 13, 2012 7:09:31 PM UTC-6, Johan Euphrosine (Google) wrote: Hi everyone, We're happy to announce that we released

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-13 Thread vivpuri
I am getting the following error message on Max OSx 10.8.2 when i launch the AppEngine app - https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-jBl3jIGrPdQ/UMqejVW0T3I/AXc/_VktQu-udVU/s1600/Screen+Shot+2012-12-14+at+9.05.20+AM.png On Friday, December 14, 2012 6:39:31 AM UTC+5:30, Johan

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-13 Thread pdknsk
What happened to the mail related changes that were included in the pre-release release notes? In particular the new mail quota (which wasn't detailed) and the fix for not getting bounced emails messages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-13 Thread pdknsk
What happened to the mail related changes that were included in the pre-release release notes? In particular the new mail quota (which wasn't detailed) and the fix for not getting bounced emails messages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-13 Thread Johan Euphrosine
Hi Stephen, We don't have any ETA to share atm, but please continue to report Full Text Search bugs and feature requests during the experimental phase: https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list?can=2q=Component%3DFullTextSearch The engineering team is actively monitoring new issues

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-13 Thread Douglas Drumond
Open Finder, locate GoogleAppEngineLauncher app, ctrl-click it and choose open. It will ask for confirmation. Confirm and you're set. Or (worse option): go to system preferences, security and allow applications from anywhere (default should be from mac app store and identified developers) --

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.4 is out

2012-12-13 Thread Johan Euphrosine
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:53 PM, pdknsk pdk...@gmail.com wrote: What happened to the mail related changes that were included in the pre-release release notes? In particular the new mail quota (which wasn't detailed) and the fix for not getting bounced emails messages. Hi pdknsk, Thanks you

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine pre-release SDK 1.7.4

2012-12-08 Thread Aleksei Rovenski
Very excited about channels can be used across different versions. The means we will finally be able to use traffic splitting feature... пятница, 7 декабря 2012 г., 18:30:26 UTC+2 пользователь pdknsk написал: I don't know why Google hasn't posted about it yet, but here we are.

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine and lock-in

2012-11-23 Thread Francois Masurel
Sounds interesting... Any idea about the costs ? François On Thursday, November 22, 2012 9:12:44 PM UTC+1, Ales Justin wrote: Wrt lock-in, at JBoss/RedHat we're working on this new project: * http://www.jboss.org/capedwarf I'm just about to do initial Beta1 release in the next few days.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google app engine and lock-in

2012-11-23 Thread Ales Justin
Sounds interesting... Any idea about the costs ? Deployment and setup wise there are no costs, as it's all open source, hence you can build and maintain it yourself. Not that I suggest that -- we make our $ out of support. :-) But obviously if you need any serious environment, you'll need some

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine and lock-in

2012-11-22 Thread Ales Justin
Wrt lock-in, at JBoss/RedHat we're working on this new project: * http://www.jboss.org/capedwarf I'm just about to do initial Beta1 release in the next few days. Perhaps give it a spin and let us know any feedback. -Ales On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 5:26:11 AM UTC+1, Emmanuel Mayssat wrote:

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine and lock-in

2012-11-21 Thread Woody Rollins
Emmanual - Barry is correct. We support most open source datastores. We are interested to know what you are working on and how we can help. Let us know. On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:26:11 PM UTC-8, Emmanuel Mayssat wrote: I am aware of AppScale http://appscale.cs.ucsb.edu/ But is the

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine site indexing issue

2012-11-12 Thread Polevi
Thanks, it seems as exactly I am looking for. On Monday, November 12, 2012 8:33:51 PM UTC+4, Polevi wrote: Hi, I have an issue with indexing my GAE site by Yandex. Almost half a year it can't index the pages. Yeasterday I have got an answer regarding this from Yandex - there are to much

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine - Create a Engine not working

2012-11-05 Thread Julie Smith
*Hi Deex,* * * *Which editor did you use to edit the app.yaml file? Only standard ASCII text (or UTF-8 without BOM) should be used. * * * *Cheers,* * * *Julie* On 5 November 2012 14:54, Deborah Ryan caringdeb1...@yahoo.com wrote: I am receiving the special characters are not allowed message

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine - Create a Engine not working

2012-11-05 Thread Shilendra Sharma
Hi, Joel use this link https://appengine.google.com/ Regards Thanks Shilendra Sharma +919891343808 shilendra...@googlemail.com On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Julie Smith julie.smith.1...@gmail.comwrote: *Hi Deex,* * * *Which editor did you use to edit the app.yaml file? Only standard

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine - Create a Engine not working

2012-11-04 Thread Deborah Ryan
I am receiving the special characters are not allowed message when trying to run the GAE...here is my response after choosing Deploy below. Anyone know the resolve for this? Thks 2012-11-04 21:18:33 Running command: ['C:\\Python27\\pythonw.exe', '-u', 'C:\\Program

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine TemplateDoesNotExist

2012-10-12 Thread Daniel Baktiar
Try to create a sample test.py file, with content: import os print('first:') print( __file__ ) print('second:') print(os.path.dirname(__file__)) print('third:') print(os.path.dirname('/some/dir/test.py')) Run it, python test.py: first: test.py second: ( ... blank ...) third: /some/dir So you can

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-09-27 Thread Phil
Thanks Emmanuel. Am I able to consume other web services with Force.Com or only the one of SaleForce? I'm little bit confused of what is possible with Force.com. By the way, Could you tell me if you know how to globally change the timeout of URL fetching in Google App Engine? Thanks a lot.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-09-27 Thread Emanuele Ziglioli
On Thursday, 27 September 2012 18:56:09 UTC+12, Phil wrote: Thanks Emmanuel. Am I able to consume other web services with Force.Com or only the one of SaleForce? Sure you can, any WSDL I'm little bit confused of what is possible with Force.com. It's very much like jaxws, just simpler

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-09-26 Thread Phil
Emmanuele, Could you more describe your solution? I've a lot of problem with timeout exception and Jax-ws. I'm looking for new solution for substituing Jax-RS for calling web services. Thanks Le jeudi 26 juillet 2012 07:26:55 UTC+2, Emanuele Ziglioli a écrit : Hi everyone, After a lot of

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-09-26 Thread Emanuele Ziglioli
Ok, have you managed to generate any code with the SalesForce tool? As I wrote, I did get an error but most of the code generated anyway. I'll post the command line options I used if I can find them. The generated code contains three packages: com.sforce.ws.transport GaeHttpTransport.java

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.2 is out

2012-09-23 Thread Per
Thanks Takashi and everyone on the GAE team. It's great to see how many bugfixes you squeezed in, and I'd like to applaud the effort! Keep it up. Shiny new toys get people more excited and are probably harder to justify to certain stakeholders, but as a customer I can sleep a lot better at

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.2 is out

2012-09-23 Thread alex
Totally agree. Awesome release. I'm really happy to see so many bugs fixed in a single release. Keep it coming! -- alex On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Per per.fragem...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Takashi and everyone on the GAE team. It's great to see how many bugfixes you squeezed in, and

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.2 is out

2012-09-23 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
Here here! It's really great to see a lot of these longstanding issues closed. Kudos to the team -- new features are great, but making the old features work better is best! Jeff On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:42 AM, alex a...@cloudware.it wrote: Totally agree. Awesome release. I'm really happy to

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.2 is out

2012-09-23 Thread ruble Surab
Thanks On 9/23/12, alex a...@cloudware.it wrote: Totally agree. Awesome release. I'm really happy to see so many bugs fixed in a single release. Keep it coming! -- alex On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Per per.fragem...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Takashi and everyone on the GAE team.

[google-appengine] Re: google app engine python validation

2012-09-14 Thread Jakob Holmelund
Use wtforms Den fredag den 14. september 2012 07.53.47 UTC+2 skrev Python: Hello everyone , i am new to goolge app engine and python. I am creating on sample form having 5 fields like name , email , mobile number , address. When user clicks on SAVE button the data should store in to the

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Master/Slave Datastore Deprecation

2012-08-28 Thread Craig Mitchell
Seems odd there isn't a button that will just do the migration for us. Maybe there is a technical reason. Personally, I'll be staying on M/S as the migration tool just looks painful (duplicating and aliasing your appspot!?!). On Saturday, 25 August 2012 00:52:15 UTC+10, barryhunter wrote:

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Master/Slave Datastore Deprecation

2012-08-24 Thread Joshua Smith
Yeah, yeah, I know that many of my old M/S applications are running on the officially deprecated database. And I know that they might suffer a little more downtime as a result. But I also know that they are working just fine, and I'm not particularly interested in going through the pain of

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Master/Slave Datastore Deprecation

2012-08-24 Thread Barry Hunter
While it appears M/S should be around until April 20, 2015 - guessing Google are just trying to push people over. The less time they can spend applying band-aids to the M/S serving infestructure (and also many new features still have to be be tested against M/S - the code common to the two

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Master/Slave Datastore Deprecation

2012-08-24 Thread Sargis Dallakyan
Thanks for the discussion. Now I understand this from Google's perspective, but it's no clear what happens if I do not migrate. Will all my data be lost? Thanks. On Friday, August 24, 2012 7:00:58 AM UTC-7, barryhunter wrote: While it appears M/S should be around until April 20, 2015 -

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Master/Slave Datastore Deprecation

2012-08-24 Thread Barry Hunter
Its probably not decided yet. The ideal for Google would be to get down to nobody using M/S - ie 0 active applications. Then it can just be turned off and nobody will even notice. This avoids the issue completely. Thats unrealistic, so the more people they can beg to move - the easier the tough

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine using Python- Emails having the same instance not being delivered.

2012-08-04 Thread hyperflame
Using the same instance is fine, the second email was most likely spam- filtered (emails from GAE get incorrectly caught in spam filters a lot). You're better off using a email service like Amazon SES. On Aug 4, 11:18 am, Tribblehunter tribblehunter2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. Using app engine

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine, rogue crawlers, and PageSpeed Insights

2012-07-27 Thread hyperflame
Alternately, you could institute a rate limiting mechanism. If a user asks for more than X pages over a specified time period, serve up a HTTP 429 error code (stands for Too Many Requests). Legitimate bots such as GoogleBot will slow down their requests, while poorly-written bots will most likely

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine, rogue crawlers, and PageSpeed Insights

2012-07-26 Thread jswap
Sorry for posting this thread again (I didn't think the first try was successful, but I see it now). Is there a way to delete this post? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-07-25 Thread Thiago Catoto
Hi, I'm pretty sure Appengine has the limit of 10s for UrlFetch ( https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/urlfetch/overview). You may need to change the request to Task Queue if you have the need of longer requests, but it would get more complicated to handling the response to the SOAP

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-07-25 Thread Takashi Matsuo
For clarification, it used to be 10 secs, but now the maximum deadline of the urlfetch is 60 seconds for online requests, 600 seconds for offline requests(taskqueue and cron). -- Takashi On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Thiago Catoto tcat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm pretty sure Appengine

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-07-25 Thread Thiago Catoto
Thanks Takashi! And sorry about the wrong info Emanuele... On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Takashi Matsuo tmat...@google.com wrote: For clarification, it used to be 10 secs, but now the maximum deadline of the urlfetch is 60 seconds for online requests, 600 seconds for offline

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-07-25 Thread Deepak Singh
Hi Takashi, How can we increase the deadline in case of SOAP client ? Thanks Deepak On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Thiago Catoto tcat...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Takashi! And sorry about the wrong info Emanuele... On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Takashi Matsuo tmat...@google.comwrote:

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine File Upload Canceled. Where is the HTTP 32MB size limit?

2012-07-25 Thread André Pankraz
hmm don't know GWT and your form code doesn't seem to be related to the following stuff, but I have seen the mentioned 5 seconds in a similar context. at least with the URLFetch service there is a default timeout of 5 seconds and there you have to do something like: // default is 5

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-07-25 Thread Emanuele Ziglioli
Yes! +1 is there a way to do it? I'm also experiencing a different problem on the production server: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11643218/error-in-javax-xml-ws-service-initialization-on-app-engine Deepak, it sounds you found a workaround for issue 4910, it that's the case, could you

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-07-25 Thread Emanuele Ziglioli
Hi everyone, After a lot of digging I've given up on GAE's implementation of jaxws. Their implementation can't be found by the Factory classloader, period. So I've picked the Force.com Web Services Connector and managed to make it work. There were bugs in the code generation process, in the

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-07-24 Thread Emanuele Ziglioli
It times out for me at times on the local server. Haven't found a way to increase the socket timeout. Have tried: System.setProperty(sun.net.client.defaultConnectTimeout, 1); System.setProperty(sun.net.client.defaultReadTimeout, 1); It makes no difference. Then have tried:

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-07-13 Thread josh cole
i go with steve On Monday, February 6, 2012 8:14:54 PM UTC-6, Ikai Lan wrote: *Hi App Engine Developers, In the last few years, the QA website Stack Overflowhttp://www.stackoverflow.com/has become an invaluable tool for developer communities. We’re pleased to announce that we are

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine 100 URLMap entries limitation

2012-07-03 Thread Kaan Soral
You can do some of the mapping in java/python, for example you can just add 1 url map, * to main.py and do all of the mapping in main.py -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Golden RAM

2012-06-29 Thread pdknsk
You are not comparing like for like. I'm well aware of this and don't expect parity (or close), but clearly the RAM difference shouldn't be so dramatic. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Golden RAM

2012-06-29 Thread Kaan Soral
Google was, capitalistically, trying to milk us/gae so that they can earn money, logical-ish Since GAE is not for everyone, they had to increase the prices to these levels. But, hopefully, if compute engine becomes successful, and steal some of Amazon's fame and fortune, I think Google might

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-06-21 Thread Michel Jonker
Yes I have the same issue, I cannot find a way to increase the connect timeout through JAX-WS that is allowed by Google... On Friday, June 1, 2012 11:32:20 AM UTC+2, Deepak Singh wrote: Hi Aljaz, I am still facing the same problem and app is running with problem. Let us do something

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Boilerplate 2.0RC1 now available

2012-06-13 Thread Jason Collins
For reasons of testability, we work hard to keep our view (your web) layer very, very thin. It is only responsible to authenticate a request (though this is usually done with middleware), validate and convert incoming args, call the domain with the converted args (hopefully just a single domain

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Boilerplate 2.0RC1 now available

2012-06-13 Thread Lee Li
http://appengine.protoboard.cl/ I can't access this. It shows 404 Error. 2012/6/14 Jason Collins jason.a.coll...@gmail.com For reasons of testability, we work hard to keep our view (your web) layer very, very thin. It is only responsible to authenticate a request (though this is usually done

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Boilerplate 2.0RC1 now available

2012-06-13 Thread Rodrigo Augosto C.
Sorry, the new URL is http://appengine.beecoss.com Protoboard domain is migrating there ;) -- Rodrigo @coto On Jun 13, 2012 9:49 PM, Lee Li liminjun2...@gmail.com wrote: http://appengine.protoboard.cl/ I can't access this. It shows 404 Error. 2012/6/14 Jason Collins jason.a.coll...@gmail.com

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Boilerplate 2.0RC1 now available

2012-06-12 Thread Jason Collins
I like the idea and the initiative! But please move your logic out of your view layer and in to a domain layer for the sake of testability! j On Jun 10, 6:59 pm, coto rodrigo.augo...@gmail.com wrote: I am very happy to announce that the second release of Google App Engine Boilerplate is now

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SOAP call SocketTimeoutException

2012-06-01 Thread Deepak Singh
Hi Aljaz, I am still facing the same problem and app is running with problem. Let us do something out of the box so that google puts an attention over the issue. Thanks Deepak On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Aljaz Delakorda delako...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Deepak, Sorry to contact you in this

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine dashboard display not correctly!

2012-04-22 Thread alex
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7382 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/psMEiU8HcHUJ. To post to this group,

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine dashboard display not correctly!

2012-04-21 Thread James Gilliam
My Dashboard graph been blank for two days. I figure the guys at GAE will eventually figure it out. On Apr 20, 1:47 am, Lucemia luce...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone face the same issue before? In one of my app engine dashboard, the request per sec shows really weird

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Java Framework

2012-04-03 Thread Paul
I can certainly recommend Wicket. I really like how you create your project in that. Play framework is nice too, if you liked it, you should like Wicket. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-04-03 Thread Gary Frederick
I just asked a quesition on stackoverflow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9992726/how-do-we-get-app-engine-to-email-an-invite-to-be-a-developer and found the answer and tried to add it as an answer rather than a comment. and got this Oops! Your answer couldn't be submitted because: -

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Java Framework

2012-04-02 Thread Alexandre Jacquet
Thanks!!!im thinking in use VRaptor. On Mar 30, 2012 6:45 PM, Ronoaldo José de Lana Pereira rpere...@beneficiofacil.com.br wrote: Hello Alexandre, This page listshttp://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/WillItPlayInJavathe frameworks and libraries known to work or partially work on

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-03-30 Thread Daniel Florey
Too late On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 11:02:21 PM UTC+2, j wrote: -1 for moving to stackoverflow. Why do we need another site? I have been using Google groups for years, no issues so far. What do we get by moving to stakoverflow? Does it work on Android tablet or something else that we

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-03-30 Thread R kamalakkannan
what is sq125? it is how to convert user understand format ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/XNPCeQAfK2gJ. To post to this group,

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Java Framework

2012-03-30 Thread Ronoaldo José de Lana Pereira
Hello Alexandre, This page listshttp://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/WillItPlayInJavathe frameworks and libraries known to work or partially work on GAE-J. Hope this helps, - Ronoaldo Em quarta-feira, 28 de março de 2012 11h38min23s UTC-3, Alexandre Jacquet escreveu: Hello Guys,

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-03-28 Thread j
-1 for moving to stackoverflow. Why do we need another site? I have been using Google groups for years, no issues so far. What do we get by moving to stakoverflow? Does it work on Android tablet or something else that we need to know that is so special about it? On Monday, February 13, 2012

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-03-24 Thread quincy....@gmail.com
On Monday, February 6, 2012 6:14:54 PM UTC-8, Ikai Lan wrote: *Hi App Engine Developers, In the last few years, the QA website Stack Overflowhttp://www.stackoverflow.com/has become an invaluable tool for developer communities. We’re pleased to announce that we are migrating to Stack

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine as Jabber Server

2012-03-20 Thread Fábio Uechi
As documented here; http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/xmpp/overview.html#XMPP_Addresses Your app can use XMPP address in the following format: *anything*@*your_app_id*.appspotchat.com cheers Fábio On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:32:24 PM UTC-3, Markus Unger wrote: Hey! Is there a

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine as Jabber Server

2012-03-20 Thread Markus Unger
Hey! This is not an option. I need no accounts on the backend. I need it as client.. so that I can use it in native clients like trillian or psi. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Down?

2012-03-10 Thread Jonathan
I've exactly the same problem, after the first 100 recipients the mail delivery is blocked. After 24hours there is a reset , and so on. I have 10$/day budget but it does not help. app-id: or-point On Tuesday, March 6, 2012 11:13:13 PM UTC+2, Holly Orr wrote: We are paying for the service, and

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-03-10 Thread BigMouth Li
Ikai Lan於 2012年2月7日星期二UTC+8上午10時14分54秒寫道: *Hi App Engine Developers, In the last few years, the QA website Stack Overflowhttp://www.stackoverflow.com/has become an invaluable tool for developer communities. We’re pleased to announce that we are migrating to Stack Overflow as the

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-26 Thread Switch
AdWords communities (6 languages) also just moved to a 3rd party platform: www.en.adwords-community.com www.de.adwords-community.com etc. Switch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-26 Thread Purmou
All right! Start rolling in the herds. Stack Overflow is an excellent community of highly dedicated programmers. You are very likely to get an answer to most of your questions *within a few hours*. There is such a powerful sense of friendliness on the site, which I think is valuable

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-26 Thread Brandon Wirtz
AdWords communities (6 languages) also just moved to a 3rd party platform: That's an SEO play. Adwords is tired of all the trash talked about them in their forum ranking so highly because it is hosted on a Google Domain. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-13 Thread Johan Euphrosine
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your feedback, I understand your concerns about finding the right support channel when your project overlap more than one Google Technology and I agree that's something that should be improved. Until now we relied on silo'ed Google groups (per language, per technologies)

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-13 Thread Mos
+111 absolute agreement; I would like to hear an official statement from Google regarding long time commitment to GAE ( incl. plans regarding adequate support options). Google, has the best developers in the world. It has so much money to burn. It has the best internet-infrastructure on this

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-13 Thread Andrin von Rechenberg
About Google using StackOverflow and not building it itself: If you are working at Google Scale, you don't build StackOverflow in 3 months. If you are a StartUp, you build a primitive version of StackOverflow in a day and launch. If you are working at Google it will take you at least 12 month to

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-13 Thread Mos
What's wrong with using well established, well working 3rd party software? Check this thread for arguments. Summary: - People need to check 2 different places/systems to find the official GAE support-groups (confusing; especially for newcomers) - Getting answers from Google stuff directly

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-13 Thread Gregory D'alesandre
Hi Mos, Google is absolutely committed to App Engine and part of the reason we are moving the Java/Python groups to StackOverflow is to have better, more consolidated answers to questions. While it might be possible for Google to build its own tool tailed to questions and answers, we really like

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-13 Thread Ikai Lan (Google)
Supercobra, I share your concerns about streamlining the user experience. As it stands, the user experience isn't great: you have groups, StackOverflow, billing issues forms, abuse forms, the public issues tracker, Google Groups, Reddit ... I could probably go on. The move to StackOverflow isn't

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-13 Thread Brandon Wirtz
Ikai, Supercobra I want to be in the meeting where you present to your manager the reaction to the news of the move to StackOverflow. Well, over all I think the most of the community is behind it, but Supercobra, and Brandon, the guy in the mermaid costume, have expressed some concerns

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-13 Thread supercobra
“Well, over all I think the most of the community is behind it, but Supercobra, and Brandon, the guy in the mermaid costume, have expressed some concerns” “Really? Did you ask G.I. Joe and Batman what they think?“ supercobra's opinion is more important than batman's, because batman can't

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-12 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi, I've been thinking about the decision to move to SO for some more time and I'd like to give a more general feedback. We are developing apps for the Google ecosystem using the Google dev stack (gwt, gae, galgwt, gdata api, google apps marketplace, chrome webstore etc.) See:

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-11 Thread Rick Mangi
Ive gotten my head bit off on stack-overflow for answering a question in a way that the reader didn't agree with, but then again, at least people answer questions there. I've yet to have a question asked in the GAE-java google group get answered. Most of them are just ignored. On Feb 7, 3:32 pm,

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-11 Thread Supercobra Thatbytes
I think this is a terrible idea because it makes people check 2 places and subscribe to 2 boards. Newcomers to this discussion will have a hard time knowing about this. App Engine team does put enough resources for community and customer support. I have a paid app and I cannot get my simple

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Daniel Florey
Am I the only one using the new Groups interface?? Right now everything is perfect for me as I can see at first sight how many new topics have been discussed in all my ~20 Google related groups. Is there a similar view in SO? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread MLTrim
I'm a Stack Overflow user and I really appreciate this move; thank you for this. For the reluctant of this change, fiddle with Stack Overflow for a couple of weeks and you'll be addicted. Michele [Systempuntoout] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Andrin von Rechenberg
Hey guys *Short version:* Problem solved, just subscribe to: google-appengine-stackoverf...@googlegroups.com You will receive every new question answer in your favorite email client. *Long version:* I like stackoverflow when I'm googling, but I prefer gmail in my workflow for being part of the

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Andrin von Rechenberg
Oh one more thing: You are on the bleeding edge if you subscribe. There are no unittests. I'm adding in-reply-to references headers now. However in AppEngine I dont know the Message-ID, so I'm just going to use the stackoverflow id. Will that help? Does anyone know? On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:46

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Andreas
andrin this looks and sounds amazing! thx On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Andrin von Rechenberg wrote: Oh one more thing: You are on the bleeding edge if you subscribe. There are no unittests. I'm adding in-reply-to references headers now. However in AppEngine I dont know the Message-ID,

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Andrin von Rechenberg
Thanks. I know that sometimes the message order is screwed up. The problem is that if a reply is posted to a question that the tool hasnt seen so far, it sends the question and the reply at the same time and the reply arrives before the question in the google groups. Typical race condition, but

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Francois Masurel
Great work Andrin, I just joined the group. I noticed that lots of messages are not directly related to GAE but are rather about applications running on App Engine. Time will tell if SO was the right solution for GAE languages groups. May be you could create specialized groups like

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Andrin von Rechenberg
If there is a tag for that you can create a mail forward for it on stack-over-mail.appspot.com :) Its generic... Cheers, -Andrin On Feb 10, 2012 11:28 PM, Francois Masurel f.masu...@gmail.com wrote: Great work Andrin, I just joined the group. I noticed that lots of messages are not directly

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Robert Kluin
Awesome! You stole what was going to be an evening project this weekend. ;) Looking forwards to checking this out. Robert On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:46, Andrin von Rechenberg and...@miumeet.com wrote: Hey guys Short version: Problem solved, just subscribe to: 

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-09 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
What's a good workflow for dealing with stackoverflow that doesn't involve going and checking on the actual website? If it doesn't show up in my inbox or RSS reader (or sometimes hackernews) it might as well not exist to me. So far getting an email digest for the google-app-engine just does not

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-09 Thread Johan Euphrosine
Hi Jeff, You can also check this Chrome extension which tracks pending questions for a list of tags: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/bnnkhapbhkejookmhgpgaikfdoegkmdp Currently the lowest level of granularly for email is a digest every 15 min, monitoring tag RSS feeds with an email

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-09 Thread Brandon Wirtz
Is RSS the way to go? Any special tricks? I have my personal assistant read all the messages and flag the important ones, and occasionally post my canned response if I have posted the same thing more than once. Probably getting your PA to do the same would be good, at least until he/she can

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >