+1
On Nov 8, 11:37 am, pdknsk wrote:
> Google announced this in May.
>
> "We have added a few restrictions to the Mail API to improve the
> reliability and reputation of the service for all applications. First,
> emails must be sent from email accounts managed by Google (either
> Gmail, or a dom
Google should have a two tiered approach. If you're on a free app,
this is as good as it gets. You won't get far with 100 mails per day
anyway. For paying customers though (especially with domains
registered through Google Apps), Google should really improve the
service. I'm willing to pay extra to
I'd really appreciate a response from a Googler, as to what the plan
is. I know Google doesn't give ETAs for new features, but just a
general response will do, like so.
We will improve email delivery reliability soon.
We will improve email delivery reliability at some point, but not
soon.
We have
I've had a lot of success with Amazon SES. I switched when I noticed
a lot of GAE email being flagged as spam and google employees on this
very group said they really do intend to become a mass email platform.
I have an extremely high deliverability rate with SES.
On Nov 10, 1:45 pm, voscausa w
I'm disappointed no Googler responded. I'll have to interpret this as
suggested by Jeff then.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this g
> Assume #3. Use a different email provider. There are countless to choose
> from.
Jeff can you recommend one?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To un
If Google announced to drop further support for the mail API, that
would be fine, because developers can make an informed decision then.
I'm mostly interested in DKIM, which has the potential to really
improve reliability and seems (from my basic understanding) almost
trivial to implement. Why? It
+1 with me.
This sort of thing gives GAE a bad name. Better implement it good or
not at all.
But of course people would wonder, "aint email one of Google's
strength? (Gmail)"
On Nov 13, 1:50 am, Adrian Scott wrote:
> > As far as email goes - personally, I'd rather Appengine shut down the
> > em
messagebus.com is in private beta now. Does anyone have any other
suggestions?
I hear you Jeff about GAE ditching the email service but startups have
enough 3rd party services to deal with as it is (analytics, mobile
push, web channel). Having fewer providers to work with is always
better.
On Nov
Sendgrid.com ; built in top of Amazon SES, but it gives you a nice API
through simple web requests, and it helps with statistics, bounces, etc.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https
As we've discussed on the bug report, DKIM could literally be a one
line bug fix.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
I have SES up and running making use of this python 2.6 SES API.
https://github.com/pankratiev/python-amazon-ses-api
As you said, this is working fine. And I'am now able to handle bounced
e-mail messages with Return-Path.
To use this API for GAE Python 2.5 I had to make some changes by overridi
FWIW, we are moving over all the critical emails to sendgrid.com.
Current blackbox nature of email delivery(no reporting) plus the
missed emails to users is impacting our end users. Will switch back
once things change for better.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Why Sendgrid and not AWS SES. I moved to AWS SES and it is looking veyy
good.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/uboeYgkS_1UJ.
To pos
'Cause we like startups!
On Dec 1, 8:19 pm, voscausa wrote:
> Why Sendgrid and not AWS SES. I moved to AWS SES and it is looking veyy
> good.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appe
I had still hoped Google is quiet on this because they wanted to
surprise us and sneak this into 1.6.1 but no such luck.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
I've noticed this in the 1.6.2 release notes. While not DKIM, it might
help.
- Mail Quota for App Engine apps that have signed up for billing will
only be
increased after the first payment for the app is processed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
+1; would be great to see something in the upcoming 1.6.1
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Daniel wrote:
> +1
>
> On Nov 8, 11:37 am, pdknsk wrote:
> > Google announced this in May.
> >
> > "We have added a few restrictions to the Mail API to improve the
> > reliability and reputation of the s
Yes, please!
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3161
and
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1800
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https:
Assume #3. Use a different email provider. There are countless to choose from.
Jeff
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:02 PM, pdknsk wrote:
> I'd really appreciate a response from a Googler, as to what the plan
> is. I know Google doesn't give ETAs for new features, but just a
> general response will d
Can you recommend one? What about : http://mailchimp.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/q9X9UQyODXgJ.
To post to this group, sen
SES, Dynect email, many others to choose from.
On 11 November 2011 07:36, JH wrote:
> I've had a lot of success with Amazon SES. I switched when I noticed
> a lot of GAE email being flagged as spam and google employees on this
> very group said they really do intend to become a mass email platfo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:07 PM, jon wrote:
>> Assume #3. Use a different email provider. There are countless to choose
>> from.
>
> Jeff can you recommend one?
We're about to integrate with messagebus.com but I don't know enough
about their service yet to give the big thumbs up. They're run
> As far as email goes - personally, I'd rather Appengine shut down the
> email API and put those developers to work on something else. Email
>
I agree, completely...
well almost completely... Keep the current basic email to help newbies play
and test, but minimize devoting any further significa
The email needs to be sorted. No email sent to a hotmail account from the app
engine seem to arrive!
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Nov 2011, at 19:36, pdknsk wrote:
> If Google announced to drop further support for the mail API, that
> would be fine, because developers can make an informed decisio
We are sending out about 1.8 million emails per month.
SES or sendgrid would be way to expensive. (~$1000).
We do it from a single server (2ghz, 4gb) hosted somewhere
outside of google. It costs us about $60 per month and we
have a great delivery rate (spif, dkim, dedicated ip and
also very importa
riday, December 02, 2011 12:35 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Cc: Uwe Maurer
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised
reliability improvement for email delivery?
We are sending out about 1.8 million emails per month.
SES or sendgrid would be way to expensive. (~$1000)
27 matches
Mail list logo
