In case you hadn't seen this, I'm sure you'll be happy to know that SSL is
now in Trusted Tester:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/d7fb200cbe9d2010#
I DID say we were going to release this as soon as possible and, well, here
we are :)
Greg
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011
+1
On Oct 14, 8:07 pm, Louis Le Coeur wrote:
> 1.5.5 SDK release and still no mention of SSL whatsoever...
>
> It seems now certain that we won't have it by the end of the year. And it's
> starting to get really frustrating, at a time where browser support is
> ubiquitous enough for an SNI-only s
1.5.5 SDK release and still no mention of SSL whatsoever...
It seems now certain that we won't have it by the end of the year. And it's
starting to get really frustrating, at a time where browser support is
ubiquitous enough for an SNI-only solution.
When I see all of their other announcements,
That's a great list that actually doesn't prove what you think, but it does
turn out to prove one of CloudFlare's value propositions. If you look down
the list you'll find that a majority are *.blogspot.com domains. By
definition, since blogspot.com users can't subdeligate the DNS of
blogspot.c
ne@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Wirtz
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:39 PM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [google-appengine] Re: calling out the app engine team on ssl
for custom domains
I have said multiple times our customers don't align at all, and we st
ce
cream San Francisco" goes away.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Prince
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 8:16 PM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: calling out the app
away.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Prince
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 8:16 PM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: calling out the app engine team on ssl
for custom domains
Thank you for taking the time to explain the details.
Jeff
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Matthew Prince wrote:
> Brandon is both right and wrong. I'd suggest you take his comments with a
> bit of a grain of salt since he starting a fledging CloudFlare-like service
> called CDN In A Box. The s
I work at CloudFlare, to make my biases crystal clear.
Our service is not harmful to SEO. Here's two blog posts on the topic:
http://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-and-seo
http://blog.cloudflare.com/losing-seo-link-juice-to-traditional-cdns
Brandon, I'm surprised by your assertions, which don't r
Take Brandon's comments with a bit of a grain of salt given that he's trying
to launch a CloudFlare-like competitor called CDN in a Box. Here's info on
CloudFlare and SEO addressing his speculated concerns:
http://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-and-seo
Short summary: we actually markedly improv
Brandon is both right and wrong. I'd suggest you take his comments with a
bit of a grain of salt since he starting a fledging CloudFlare-like service
called CDN In A Box. The short answer is: CloudFlare today will not hurt
your SEO (and in fact usually helps it fairly significantly) and provides
ngine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Sherrie
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 11:51 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: calling out the app engine team on ssl
for custom domains
I too wonder about the availability of cloud fare. I'd like to find out how
i
11 11:51 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: calling out the app engine team on ssl
for custom domains
I too wonder about the availability of cloud fare. I'd like to find out how
it goes for you if you end up using it.
Steve
On 11-09-24 02:48 PM, j
I too wonder about the availability of cloud fare. I'd like to find out
how it goes for you if you end up using it.
Steve
On 11-09-24 02:48 PM, johnP wrote:
Jeff - thanks for the link to Cloudflare. It certainly seems like an
interesting option. The risk with implementing them is that it's o
Jeff - thanks for the link to Cloudflare. It certainly seems like an
interesting option. The risk with implementing them is that it's one
more layer that can fail. Does anyone else have feedback about how
well it works?Also, does anyone have thoughts on whether the other
benefits of Cloudflar
15 matches
Mail list logo
