Today I tried styled Map too, but its not helping.
I want to specify my needs again. Yeah by styling I can highlight
particular POI say park. so now if I click any Park icon, a
infowindow pops-up with a) name, b) rating and c) more info link. I
want to disable this infowindow OR in other words I
Let me have a shot at this. You're probably going to have real troubles
getting this to work, and the dominant reason is that the canvas on which
users click has no depth. You'll at best get a target direction - but no
idea how far away from here.
A Googler may be able to weigh in with better
https doesn't require authentication - it just secures the session.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/fWO9b0pzvkEJ.
Not sure about the official maps (unofficial listing at
http://mapki.com/wiki/Available_Images ) , but there *is* also
http://mapicons.nicolasmollet.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this discussion
On Oct 27, 7:22 pm, Ashish Aggarwal hotice.vegti...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Larry,
Yeah I am talking about POI infowindows, like if a plane Map is
there(without any marker ) and if we click on any cafe or church on
the map, it shows a pop up with name and a link saying more info.
Will this
And some more listed here:
http://www.visual-case.it/cgi-bin/vc/GMapsIcons.pl
Martin.
On Oct 28, 7:01 am, jufemaiz euphem...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure about the official maps (unofficial listing
athttp://mapki.com/wiki/Available_Images) , but there *is*
I noticed that mouse click and drag do not work properly in Chrome when the
map div is over a streetview div (I neet to have a streetview full page
with a map insert overlay). Using IE, FF and Safari all is working properly.
You can check it modifying code of your example
Hi
It is generally conceded that the procedure below is within TOS
1.Geocode and place marker
2.Get user to to move marker to exact location
3 Save the new location + all the other data provided by user you
require to database
Step 2 ensures that the lat/lng data is not the data Google provides
Any help?
On Sep 28, 11:45 am, eski009 eski...@gmail.com wrote:
Both NW3 (a partial postcode) and NW3 6BN (a full postcode) used to return
the correct location using places autocomplete.
Neither work now
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google
http://climatehotmap.org/
I can confirm I'm looking at this right now in the UK with mostly blue
default markers.
Google use distributed servers, your view may vary around the world.
KmlLayer caches imagery at Google's servers for a time, a 'broken'
view may appear/disappear after a few hours.
How do I remove the link from the bubble? Can I even remove it?
One way would be to examine your own code, and discover how it gets
put there. You could then opt not to put it there.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3
One gentle update, Styled map is working for me.
Following code helped me to achieve the goal.
// Create an array of styles.
var noPOIStyles = [
{
featureType: poi,
stylers: [
{ visibility: off }
]
}
];
// Create a new StyledMapType object, passing it the array of
I've got to determnine if an address is in the channel islands, ireland or
UK so that I can convert the geolocation into an NGR.
I think your bounding-box idea should work more reliably than
analysing returned results text.
Did they forget to mention Isle of Man too?
--
You received this
I'm not at all sure if/how subdomains come into play with all this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Ok, I got fresh new information:
First, I tested this demo on 2 other machines, so here are details
along with mine:
My machine:
- Operating system: Windows 7 Enterprise x64
- AMD Phenom II processor with 8 GB memory
- Results:
- Before update (version 14): worked normally
- After update
Try this code:
http://blog.mridey.com/2010/11/how-to-display-map-inside-streetview.html
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:17 PM, tswadmin
administra...@turismoserviziweb.com wrote:
I noticed that mouse click and drag do not work properly in Chrome when the
map div is over a streetview div (I neet to
Thanks very much for the reply Davie. Seems like this is a bit of a
minefield.
So let's say that I also give the user the option to find a place with
autocomplete, then place the marker based on the location chosen by the
user from the autocomplete (without the user subsequently moving the
On 28 October 2011 12:05, mydoghasworms mydoghaswo...@gmail.com wrote:
The thing is that if you geocode the location to begin with and it is
correct, there is no incentive for the user to move the marker after that.
There is an incentive if it's the marker's moveend event which enables
the OK
I can see the problem with Chrome 15.0.874.106 on Win7 Home premium x64
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
This problem has been previously reported and acknowledged by Google
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-maps-js-api-v3/RVDhzc43To0/discussion
No fix yet other than Larry's suggestion
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API
Thanks Andrew. So it sounds like you just need a technical loophole to
prevent you actually using the data from a geocoded result, and then you
are covered.
I have thought of the following approaches:
1) Add or subtract 1.0E-10 from the long or lat so that it is not
technically the result
I can also confirm the appearance of the blue markers. I'm using FF
7.0.1, Max OS.
On Oct 27, 4:15 pm, geocode...@gmail.com geocode...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 27, 3:35 pm, Lori G lok...@gmail.com wrote:
--- I posted this to the KML group and they suggested I post to this
group since the
When I put the code where I think it needs to go, it automatically adds it
to the bubble. I don't know how else to do it, that's why I'm asking for
help.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this discussion
On 28 October 2011 13:41, Am am2...@gmail.com wrote:
When I put the code where I think it needs to go, it automatically adds it
to the bubble. I don't know how else to do it, that's why I'm asking for
help.
Looks fine to me. The link in the sidebar opens the infoWindow, and
the infoWindow
1) Add or subtract 1.0E-10 from the long or lat so that it is not
technically the result from the geocode.
But it is still directly derived from Google data, derived work, not
good enough? (no lawyer)
You could display the geocode with offset to the user, so forcing/
encouraging them to drag
I had to change infoWindow.setContent(html); to
infoWindow.setContent(bubble);, and duplicate my variable with the name
bubble instead of html, and remove the link from it.
var html = a href='javascript:myclick( + (markers.length-0) + )'span
style='font-weight:bold' + street + \/a/span /p; //
I had to change infoWindow.setContent(html); to
infoWindow.setContent(bubble);, and duplicate my variable with the name
bubble instead of html, and remove the link from it.
Okaydokey, you found where the link was added and altered what
happens.
I would recommend that you define 'bubble'
Same results, the google map insert is not draggable or clickable in
Chrome, it is ok in IE,FF,Safari.
Any other suggestions??
Thanks
Marco
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this discussion on the web
Thank you for the advice. I believe I have it defined:
function createMarker(googlemap_ltgooglemap_ln, street) {
var marker = new google.maps.Marker({
map: map,
position: googlemap_ltgooglemap_ln
});
google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'click',
Thanks Rossko, you bring up an interesting point:
To me, caching means a temporary storage (e.g. for performance) that does
not live beyond the session, which is different from some persistent
storage, like a database, for example, where the value is associated with
other data. But maybe my
google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'click', function() {
infoWindow.setContent(bubble);
Here 'bubble' is referenced
var bubble = span style='font-weight:bold' + street +
Here 'bubble' is defined.
It would be good practice to define 'bubble' _before_ referencing it.
Hi
The geocoder only places a marker on the map to the coordinates
supplied by Google
If the user then moves the marker to a new position the coordinates
is not Google generated data.Otherwise Google has the copyright to all
lat lng coordinates in the world???
As long as you dont store any data
Hi
Googling multiple travelling salesman with time window provides many
ideas
Regards Davie
On Oct 27, 10:02 pm, Miguel.camba miguel.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I've reached a dead end on a problem. I've implemented easily a
feature that optimizes a route given start and end points. Pretty
If the user then moves the marker to a new position the coordinates
is not Google generated data.Otherwise Google has the copyright to all
lat lng coordinates in the world???
But there is an argument that any coordinate taken from a Google map
is 'derived data'. If you went out and surveyed
The scale parameter being supported is one of the new
features coming in my GeoXmlV3 parser.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi
I'm really sorry if this has been answered - I can't find a clear answer,
and am struggling to figure it out from the documentation...
I have a map with known dimensions, and one side of the map will be
obscured by a DIV which will have a variable width, leaving a visible
portion of the
Just use the fromDivPixelToLatLng() function :)
(passing in the pixel coordinates you have calculated as per the image)
I know I strugged, to find a good example, of its use, from one of my
sites...
var overlay = null;
function update_map() {
if (overlay == null) {
If the variable-width div is always going to be visible, why not adjust the
width of your map to be the 200px - Zpx?
Jeremy R. Geerdes
Generally Cool Guy
Des Moines, IA
For more information or a project quote:
jrgeer...@gmail.com
If you're in the Des Moines, IA, area, check out Debra Heights
Thanks for the reply Jeremy. I don't want to resize the map when
the variable-width DIV is resized, because (as far as I know) to resize a
map's canvas means completely reloading it (i.e., instantiating a new
google.maps.Map object, passing in the resized DIV). For my purposes, the
dimensions
Thanks for the reply Barry. I'm not quite sure I completely understand - do
you mean something like this (which doesn't appear to work)?:
overlay = new google.maps.OverlayView();
overlay.draw = function() {};
overlay.setMap(map);
var x = (200 - divwidth) / 2;
var y = 50;
var latLng =
I think its time for a link.
We dont know what context you are calling that. Is the Map definitly
existing when that code is called?
All be weary of calling that many times in a row. If you create the
overlay each time, you going to end up with lots of invisible overlays
added to the map -
I get the problem with chrome 15 on win7 and on my cr 48
On Oct 28, 7:16 am, MymsMan bobbux...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see the problem with Chrome 15.0.874.106 on Win7 Home premium x64
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3
I have the same problem with the Google Maps API v3 and Chrome
15.0.874.106.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
Hi :),
I want to create website what use google map to search location or service.
Is Google Map API 'free' or i must pay money to use it.
Please help me :).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this
I seem to be having the same issue.
Earlier this year the same issue occured, and at that point of time, this
could be resolved by getting the 3.2 api instead by using the 'v'
('v=3.2') parameter in the script tag.
The issue that arose today, seems to be somewhat different, as I am still
This is work-in-progress, but...
http://www.pinksy.co.uk/newsquare/index.php/tidysquare
The DIV on the right is resizeable, exposing more or less of the map
underneath as you resize it. As you resize it, the map is panned left or
right by the same amount, so that the center of the visible area
In addition to my previous reply, I wish to add that after testing the code
provided by *Marc Ridey* in the previous post;
*Quote:*
Try this code:
http://blog.mridey.com/2010/11/how-to-display-map-inside-streetview.html
Also shows the exact same behaviour, in which the streetview element
After some minimal research, the issue seems to be relating to
anti-aliasing or smoothing.
In the previously working version, the streetnames in Streetview, aswell as
the arrows, did not seem to be anti-aliased, nor smoothed.
Now, they seem to be anti-aliased, and seem to be taking the whole
Hello everyone,
Ok, I'm trying to get a project done using a GPS device that sends
every X time a message with its current position. (That works
perfectly)
This message is uploaded to my hosting space as a .txt file which is
read on my web page in orden to get the position and draw it on the
map.
Does this limitation apply to using Google Maps from Android Apps?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/yOehSsjbY5UJ.
To
I can confirm I'm looking at this right now in the UK with mostly blue
default markers.
Thanks to everyone for testing... it's helpful to get global feedback!
Google use distributed servers, your view may vary around the world.
KmlLayer caches imagery at Google's servers for a time, a
I am having the same issue on my site in Chrome 15.0.874.106.
For a demo site, see for example http://112alarm.net/detail.php?id=1094014 and
drop the little streetview man on any street.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3
I have multiple markers stacked up and mouseover, should do actions for the
top most marker. but sometimes it does go to mouseover event handler for
the underlying ones. how to prevent that.?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript
Hi All ,
This is the first time im coding using the Google Maps Javascript API V3 ,
Can i check do anybody has a sample script which meets the following
criterias , or if anybody could help me with this
I have managed to configure a web form which would automatically store the
name ,
I want mouseover event for the topmost marker when the multiple markers are
in same location stacked up. how do i prevent mouse over event of the
bottom markers in this case?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To
to replicate the problem;
Use Chrome 15
1. open http://www.artflow.ro/tibi/maps.html
2. click on the lower marker.
3. drag the map left or right (until the infowindow is near/off the
page).
No such problem in IE or FF.
My bad investigations have shown it probably an issue with the DOM in
You're going to have a hard time doing this given the TOS for the Maps API.
Namely, since you mention that this map is for the administrator front, the
TOS require that maps be freely available to the general public. Assuming that
your administrative front is not available to the general
Ok, so I just put the script in my code...
And it works!! This is amazing!!
I first had to completely change the way I interacted with my server to get
the polyline data, but now it's much easier.
I will now also have to start writing a php function [as I get all my data
from php] which picks
Thanks Davie and Rossko for your replies.
Rossko makes a good point: The fact that you are using Google's tools for
determining the data could mean that they own the data even though a user
placed the marker on the map.
Whether they own that or not, the question then is whether and how they
Without you having to read all the above, what I found in another thread
was someone telling how Google had sent them some FAQs indicating that it
would be OK to use the geocoding results if it was going to be used on
Google Maps again (which is what I intend to do), but this is not specified
In the FAQs received by this person from Google, it says: Bulk geocoding
and caching is allowed, with the understanding that the geocodes are for
use with a Google Map at some time.
Yes, see terms 10.1.3(b), that's why I said the purpose was relevant.
In my case, the points will be
Here is a simplified example of the question:
http://www.pinksy.co.uk/newsquare/overlaytest.html
The map is 600px wide, 300px high. An overlay is created as suggested
above. A click event is added. On click, it adds a marker at the LatLng at
300px,150px (i.e., what I expect to be the center of
I think Enoch is using Windows XP or other OS cause I didn't encounter
the problem on Windows XP.
I tested another 2 machines running Windows 7 Enterprise x32 and
result was as expected, so that brings us to a total of 6 problematic
machines.
I'll also make some little investigations now in the
There's a bit of insight into how KML tile-based display works here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3/browse_thread/thread/d7a3e542c09200aa/51ae45bfed902d36
we might guess that different browsers on differently loaded PCs could
construct different URLs for the same tile image,
the error console keeps telling me that var poly is undefined.
As in your thread in the other group, your inline code calls your
addRuta() function while the webpage is loading. That fails, because
no map or poly objects are yet intialized. That initializing takes
place later, triggered by the
Actually there is an intermediate way as well, requiring less of a re-
think:
You could have your php write variable assignments - not function
calls - into the page body. Easiest way to manage that is probably as
elements of an array.
Then add javascript to run after map initialization that will
Hi
As the irish man said when asked directions I wouldn't start from
here
Most applications that meet your requirements are based on a PHP/MySQL
back end feeding XML or JSON to the web page.
There are very few applications using Microsoft products for the back
end.
Before you go much further I
To confirm the appearance CHM Markers: IE 8, Safari 5. , FF 7.
Nice map!
on differently loaded PCs could
construct different URLs for the same tile image, the IDs could
possibly be in a different order depending on the order in which the
API completes multiple almost-simultaneous KmlLayer
My test page works fine on Chrome Mac so I'm guessing you're using Chrome
Windows. I'll have to dig out a Windows machine and test.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Jasper Goes jas...@jaspergoes.nl wrote:
After some minimal research, the issue seems to be relating to
anti-aliasing or
69 matches
Mail list logo
