Any closer to GWT 2.8 release?

How are things proceeding towards an official GWT 2.8 release? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To p

One GWT App - Multiple WAR's

Hi, we've been working on a GWT App with multiple reporting searches for a customer. The application is deployed on a tomcat and communicates with rpc calls. Because our customer is a medical customer, a few searches need to be validated and the other searches are not validated. Validation is

Re: GSS for a instance of Widget

Hi Jens The problem with the example is that 1) you need to programmatically add(change) your style instead of use only one style in uibinder --> i'd like to only programmatically change the variables that are used for eval in GSS and that changes - all widgets in the dom (delete the styleshe

Re: Any closer to GWT 2.8 release?

See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gRPU4Ap3UOPo8nEpr8hprHSp6kiems18LDozfvtKM14/edit On Thursday, 18 February 2016 08:07:31 UTC, steve Zara wrote: > > How are things proceeding towards an official GWT 2.8 release? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group

Re: Use synchronous RPC on browser close ?

Hi Rocco, thank you very much for your support. I am a colleague of Dominic and we managed to get our synchronous call. In addition we added a service for our close tab event, so the manipulated call, proxy etc. is only used on the specified event. That was necessary, because with the entry you

Re: Use synchronous RPC on browser close ?

Hi Connor, nice to hear! Do you have seen that I added a flag to enable the sync calls? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr

Re: Use synchronous RPC on browser close ?

Hi Rocco, yes i have seen the flag and I still need it. I just wanted to seperate the changes from GWT as much as possible, thats why I did the changes regarding the service. Am Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016 13:49:28 UTC+1 schrieb Rocco De Angelis: > > Hi Connor, nice to hear! Do you have seen t

Re: Use synchronous RPC on browser close ?

Hi Connor, okay I unterstand. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

Re: How to protect IP in GWT.

I do not think it is possible. GWT does not translate java code to JS code, it compiles *whole* program from java source to JS. It can not translate a module for example. On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 4:20:09 AM UTC+3, David wrote: > > > > I like to prevent my regular developers from viewing

Re: Any closer to GWT 2.8 release?

Thanks. On 18 February 2016 at 09:40, Seamus McMorrow wrote: > See > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gRPU4Ap3UOPo8nEpr8hprHSp6kiems18LDozfvtKM14/edit > > > On Thursday, 18 February 2016 08:07:31 UTC, steve Zara wrote: >> >> How are things proceeding towards an official GWT 2.8 release? >> >

DataGrid/CellTable with several tbody elements - frustation on trying to implement

Hi there, In my app I need to create a table with several sections, by using several tbody elements. For those how are wondering, yes, that's supported by the W3C spec: a table can have multiple tbody elements (see this question at StackOverflow

Re: How to protect IP in GWT.

I'd never like to work on a company that doesn't trust in me to access the code I need to maintain. The best you can do to protect your company is to make the developers sign a document stating that the code they would access is a property of the company, and they are not allowed to copy or di

Re: DataGrid/CellTable with several tbody elements - frustation on trying to implement

> Why GWT is designed that way, so hard to extend? Is that a reflection of a > desperate need for contributors to the project, by having to "fork the > whole thing"? Or is it to force the developers to use paid frameworks built > on top of GWT? > Why package-scoped classes? > Why private field

Re: One GWT App - Multiple WAR's

In that case I think it would be better to have 2 GWT modules, one for the validated war, and one for the non-validated war. To avoid duplication of code, the non-validated module could import the validated one. Both modules would have their code splinted internally (the fragments wouldn't be s

Re: DataGrid/CellTable with several tbody elements - frustation on trying to implement

I don't agree 100% with that, at least not in GWT. The framework should provide a "good enough" default implementation that covers most of the user cases, but not forbid the developer from extending it - I'm not talking about making everything public, but making everything extensible. The devel

com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.Constants missing in both requestfactory-client and requestfactory-server

Hi everyone, why is com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.Constants missing in both requestfactory-client.jar and requestfactory-server.jar? Is there any particular reason? And why is com.google.gwt.thirdparty.json.* missing in the source jars? Legal reasons? Thank you very much i

Re: GWT CssResource not propagating width:calc(x) property

Oh! Thanks Jens and Gilberto! I'm definitely going to check that out! On Monday, 15 February 2016 14:40:05 UTC+1, Gilberto wrote: > > > Stefan, convert all your CSS files and declarations to GSS and > save yourself from going crazy. With GSS you can use all the CSS (and > CSS3!) goodies withou

GWT Material Design

Hi! Currently I am going for GWT Material Design and I'd like to ask you guys what you think about it? I just started using it and I have to say it feels quite productive - but to be honest I don't really have something to compare. One has to say that the website [1] (snapshot) is not up-to-dat

GWT vs AngularJS

Hi! >From time to time I look at Google Trends to compare AngularJS and GWT [1] trends. I really don't understand why AngularJS appears to be a lot more popular than GWT. The main reason why I want to use GWT is of course that I can do this in Java. Not that Java is my overall favorite progr

Re: GWT vs AngularJS

> ... but how could one chose JavaScript over Java if he has the choice? > Because: 1) beginners have a running web app in JavaScript in 1 minute, whereby they need 1 day to setup development environment for building web apps in Java and even more for GWT 2) beginners don't know that Java is b

Re: GWT Material Design

Hi Stefan, I'm an active contributor to the project, and I only became a contributor after seeing how productive and fun it is to build cool stuff - and of course after seeing that the team is inspired and productive. Currently I'm using GWT Material in two different projects. In one, I'm port

Re: GWT vs AngularJS

Those are actually two good points. It's very unfortunate that there is nothing that can help you to setup a GWT app a little faster. I am still using gwt-maven-archetype and create my modular app(s) by hand. XD On Friday, 19 February 2016 00:50:07 UTC+1, Marko wrote: > > > ... but how could o

Re: GWT vs AngularJS

AngularJS has pure HMTL templating, which is very popular. As it allows html people to do the user design side, and the code just hooks into that. And directive provides a nice component model. UiBinder is xml and unfamiliar to some and cannot be authored by a standard html develop. Projects l

Re: GWT vs AngularJS

Hi again Stefan ;-) In my opinion its just a matter of preference. If you like Java and are productive with it, use GWT, if you like Javascript and are productive with it, use Angular. I'm on the Java side, so it's quite unfair for me to make a list of pros and cons of each language. You can h