implementation
Some points / questions:
- Is JBoss Errai still in development?
- Is it possible to use some components of Errai separately?
- Is "descriptive" and "2 ways data binding" (observer pattern) the way
to go in UI development?
- Is there any way to &qu
Jeff Larsen larsenje@... writes:
From 2.1 on it has databinding added. Check out the editor framework.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/Editors
I suggest you try HexaBinding, which is non invasive and only focused on
data binding. Here is the link :
https
Hi. Has anyone had any experience in using SuggestBox for data binding
Objects or Enums?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
Use ValueListBox, not ListBox.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/x4ATANz8NcgJ.
To post to this group, send email to
the library dependencies are
not available on the client-side. I have read thru some posts in this
group and on google and it seems that it is the same problem also for
other data binding framework like Jaxb, Xmlbeans, JiBX, etc.
For what I have seen, one way to solve it is to include the dependent
You will use these data binding frameworks only on server side. They dont
have any role to play on client side.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:04 PM, laolaoyu laola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have some XML data on my web server side (which is received from
some web service). At the moment I used
I need to forward the data to the client. If not using the data types
generated by these frameworks, what else can I use?
On Jul 7, 12:06 am, Deepak Singh deepaksingh...@gmail.com wrote:
You will use these data binding frameworks only on server side. They dont
have any role to play on client
to the client. If not using the data types
generated by these frameworks, what else can I use?
On Jul 7, 12:06 am, Deepak Singh deepaksingh...@gmail.com wrote:
You will use these data binding frameworks only on server side. They dont
have any role to play on client side.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011
and it seems that it is the same problem also for
other data binding framework like Jaxb, Xmlbeans, JiBX, etc.
For what I have seen, one way to solve it is to include the dependent
libraries as super-source on the client-side so GWT compiler to find
them during Java to JavaScript compilation
the data binding objects
generated by Axis2 to the web browser or the client side through GWT-
RPC, as there's no GWT-translated code for all the library
dependencies like javax.xml.*, org.apache.axis2.databinding.ADBBean,
etc on the client side.
Currently, the solutions I can think of is:
1. Manually
I'm novice in GWT, help pls with my problem.
I try to bind complex data to UI via GWT Editor mechanism. It works
perfectly when binding String fields to TextBox widgets, but I cannot
understand how to bind any field to ListBox widget.
Look at following example, pls
Bean class:
public class
We are using Editors a lot. And they are coll (at least much cooler
than it was before). But they are still far way from full data binding
as shown in Knockout.js (or as it's done in Silverlight). I'm not a
fan of Silverlight and hope that GWT would remove all this plug-ins
soon, but watching GWT
Take a look at Editors in GWT:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiEditors.html
On Apr 30, 9:35 am, Artem Nikulchenko a...@cloudwk.com wrote:
I've recently seen Knockout.js presentation at MIX 11 and it looks
amazing. It removes all boilerplate code around data-binding
I've recently seen Knockout.js presentation at MIX 11 and it looks
amazing. It removes all boilerplate code around data-binding and looks
really amazing!!! We do have a lot of development in both GWT and
Silverlight, and Silverlight data-binding is probably the only
advantage left (and we really
From 2.1 on it has databinding added. Check out the editor framework.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/Editors
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
I think gwt-ent may do the work for reflection , data binding .
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ent/
On Feb 28, 10:09 am, Sai dhana@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have a requirement to build GWT based User Interface and looking for
a very good data binding feature, meaning binding a java
Hi,
I found something interesting called GWT Editor Framework for data binding.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiEditors.html
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiEditors.htmlI think
it looks good. Can you share your thoughts on the same for using
Hi All,
I have a requirement to build GWT based User Interface and looking for
a very good data binding feature, meaning binding a java object model
to a UI form.
like Struts Form bean/JSF backing bean feature. I went through GWT
docs but didn't find anything on data binding, If you guys have
Thank you Jeff, how could it help me with data binding of UI
components?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
.
The basic gist is, you make a form with UI designer, assign ui:field
to the name of the properties of your java bean.
Then in the java file you
On Nov 6, 5:48 am, csaffi csaff...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Jeff, how could it help me with data binding of UI
components?
--
You received
Hi everybody,
I happily discovered that Google has released GWT Designer free for
use, and I immediately downloaded it for testing. Unfortunately I
realized that it lacks data binding features to bind data with UI
components... Maybe it will be introduced in future versions, but for
now remains
. Unfortunately I
realized that it lacks data binding features to bind data with UI
components... Maybe it will be introduced in future versions, but for
now remains a great lack.
Do you know any way to overcome this problem?
Thank you very much in advance!
--
You received this message because
Hi, Guys
GWTENT - A Reflection, HTML template, Data Binding, Validate, AOP
framework for GWT.
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ent/
Please have a look the showcase video.
Part1:
http://www.screencast.com/users/JamesLuo.au/folders/Jing/media/d4ff284b-14ab-4fbc-a1c5-1717028209b5
Part2
I've written a new blog post regarding Data Binding in GWT.
http://www.gdevelop.com/w/blog/2010/03/06/data-binding-in-gwt/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool
Hi,
I was reading http://blog.zenika.com/public/Billet_0006/tutorial-binding-en.pdf
that shows how to make data binding using generators (gwt.create()).
This is one area that a generator can really be used. If one use gwt's
generator for this the many pieces of the app are going to need
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ValueStoreAndRequestFactory
--
I wish this were a Wave
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I've updated the document on PresentationModel thoughts with
experiences from an initial prototype. On the whole the guice style
builder approach has been very nice and significantly reduces the
effort in learning and remembering the api.
You can read it at:
Howdy,
The main issue I have with your proposal is that I have to define a
second definition of my model (the bean).
While that's a pain it's also deliberate since I'm binding to DTO's
and other domain level objects and these don't (and shouldn't IMHO)
define form based state (such as
On Jun 23, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Andrew Pietsch wrote:
Hi there,
Like many others I'm looking forward to see what you guys come up with
in the databinding area. But I miss some of the PresentationModel/
ValueModel style frameworks I've come to like in Swing and thought I'd
put in my 2c
Hi there,
Like many others I'm looking forward to see what you guys come up with
in the databinding area. But I miss some of the PresentationModel/
ValueModel style frameworks I've come to like in Swing and thought I'd
put in my 2c worth on a basic approach/API that would make me a happy
We're actually using the GWT Beans Binding library and it seems to work.
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-beans-binding/
The GWT team is suppose to come out with a solution for this sometime
in the future.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:28 AM, abbymisra.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I've tried returning a Number type from JavaScript but GWT doesn't
allow me to cast it to an Integer.
It sees it as a generic Object (I guess, that's how JavaScript works):
public final native T T get( String property ) /*-{
if( typeof(this[property]) ==
Mmm, it seems that in JavaScript it's a bit tricky to find the subtype
of an object, since typeof() returns Object for any given String,
Number, Boolean.
But, as suggested here
http://www.planetpdf.com/developer/article.asp?ContentID=testing_for_object_types_in_ja
one could use the constructor
Hi,
thanks for your ideas. Definitely wrapping would be needed.
A tough problem wih databinding is the lack of reflection in order to
generate getters and setters. That currently wouldn't work with
overlay types.
But I've had a simple idea: we could have a generic get(property) and
set(property)
Hi again,
I've done some tests and it seems promising. The problem I have is
that the get method sometimes returns primitive types (integers)
rather than numbers, an old Java problem...
I bet others have run into this problem
On Jun 5, 11:18 am, ziglionz zigli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks
I've done some tests and it seems promising. The problem I have is
that the get method sometimes returns primitive types (integers)
rather than numbers, an old Java problem...
oops, sorry: I meant rather than Objects.
That causes an exception:
[ERROR] Uncaught exception escaped
I've tried with generic methods, no luck, same exception:
public final native T T get( String property ) /*-{ return this
[property]; }-*/;
public final native T void set( String property, T val ) /*-{ this
[property] = val; }-*/;
Would normal Java perform autoboxing of a
I've found a bug describing this issue:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2972
I don't like the work around they've justed: it works only if you know
that the native method should return an int, it doesn't work for any
type.
So I guess I'll have to add getters and
I've been down this path a few times, and it's the reason I have
posted on this group more than once about Not using domain objects in
the UI...
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/c3c7706728c5bf97/73113b1a647ab2e9?lnk=gstq=SDO+Dean#73113b1a647ab2e9
I can see
Hi Dean,
I'm not familiar with the concept of SDO but if I understand your
point, you would like to create a generic object model on the UI side
and the build reusable widgets on top.
In fact, I already got a solution working based on a simplified JSON-
RP:
http://ffxml.net/gwt-json-rpc.html
Gwittir will do what you need.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Hi,
Im looking for possible options available for data binding. I
have a model lets says User which has a list of addresses. will any of
the binding(gwtx or gxt or Gwittir) support this kind of binding
senario?
Regards
Ben
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
Hi ziglionz,
The ability to cast an overlay type to an interface like Binding would
require the interface itself to also be an overlay type (via the
JavaScriptObject.cast() method call). Since the interface itself isn't an
overlay type, and a custom overlay type can't implement it because it does
Hi,
I've been looking for a databinding framework for GWT and the two most
active ones appear to be the Gwittir and the UFacekit projects.
My question is: can they work at all with overlay types?
I suspect no, due to the limitations of JavaScriptObject
I am not using UIbinder.bcz my requirement is little bit tricky.
I am using builder pattern to build my application.
Here i am giving an example. take a loan application, I have
LoanApplication object it contains one or more barrowers objects, one
or more house objects.
In my application left
Hi
I have generating the UI from an XML file, the xml file contains field
name,type, listeners... when i run application by reading XML file UI
is generated. In the model i have a book class which has corresponding
fields in UI like author, book name, book price, etc... This book
Object has name
Are you using UIBinder? that's the gwt-incubator. You may want to use
their mailing list instead.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:03 PM, rohan subbu.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have generating the UI from an XML file, the xml file contains field
name,type, listeners... when i run application by
Hello Rahul,
Here's some of the projects:
gwt-data-binding: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-data-binding/
gwt-validation: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation/
I'm working on visibility logic as we speak, I'll make a post when I
get the chance.
I am also wondering what the status of the GWT
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Arthur Kalmenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hello Rahul,
Here's some of the projects:
gwt-data-binding: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-data-binding/
gwt-validation http://code.google.com/p/gwt-data-binding/gwt-validation:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation
Have you guys seen the recent UFaceKit proposal? I didn't see mention
of it in this thread or any of the other threads listed.
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/ufacekit/
-Ben
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I don't expect to require HasData, I just expect to have some kind of
generic implementation for both Editor and Viewer that wrap a HasData
instance so that, given a HasData instance, you don't have to do any
work to integrate with the data binding library.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up
, or just the current version?
Does it track file moves like standard svn?
As for build tools, I'm using Ant myself. Right now, my private copy
of the data binding library is one piece of a big project so the build
script is external to the data binding piece. I intend to get my
revision history
and then start using it as a read-write
repo? Does svnsync copy all the history, or just the current version?
Does it track file moves like standard svn?
As for build tools, I'm using Ant myself. Right now, my private copy
of the data binding library is one piece of a big project so the build
script
expect to have some kind of
generic implementation for both Editor and Viewer that wrap a HasData
instance so that, given a HasData instance, you don't have to do any
work to integrate with the data binding library.
Overall it looks good. I like the new API idea.
I think that settles it--I like
Hi Ray,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something struck me about the way you are approaching things, that
is, letting the BoundField's return widgets. With the new HasData
stuff being proposed, why not let the programmer create the widget,
and bind the
, Ray Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We all seem to be talking about data binding and validation a lot, and some
of us are even implementing code about it. We on the GWT team hear the need
and feel it ourselves.
We have some notions of how we'd like to tackle this in a way that blends
seamlessly
There appears to be the following overlapping/complimentary items
being worked on by various people:
1) compile time UI Template markup language proposal (status?)
2) JSR 303 Bean validation annotation stuff
3) HasData/HasValue consistent interface proposal for GWT widgets
4) Data Binding
*: Provides a way for the meta data system controllers to add
callbacks to react to widget changes.
-Ray
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Ray Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We all seem to be talking about data binding and validation a lot, and
some
of us are even implementing code about it. We
to be talking about data binding and validation a lot, and
some
of us are even implementing code about it. We on the GWT team hear the
need
and feel it ourselves.
We have some notions of how we'd like to tackle this in a way that blends
seamlessly with the rest of GWT
widgets.
*EventHandlers*: Provides a way for the meta data system controllers to
add callbacks to react to widget changes.
-Ray
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Ray Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We all seem to be talking about data binding and validation a lot, and
some
of us are even
Would you normally have a UI widget as specific as a person picker? That
seems like the model (a person) and the widget displaying the person might
be a bit too closely bound, and we'd rather that binding took place using
some sort of data binding solution.
The reason for this distinction
widget as specific as a person picker? That
seems like the model (a person) and the widget displaying the person
might
be a bit too closely bound, and we'd rather that binding took place using
some sort of data binding solution.
The reason for this distinction is to make it clear
We all seem to be talking about data binding and validation a lot, and some
of us are even implementing code about it. We on the GWT team hear the need
and feel it ourselves.
We have some notions of how we'd like to tackle this in a way that blends
seamlessly with the rest of GWT, and are looking
Hi Ian,
I *think* validation
could be tied into the data binding framework in a pretty
straightforward way by extending EditorT and ViewerT to be
validation-aware.
I agree, it shouldn't be too hard to tie validation into data binding,
but...
I think data binding and validation probably
Hi Ray,
I can't answer you fully right now because I'm supposed to be leaving,
but I'll think about your suggestion and get back to you. As it is,
BoundFieldImpl constructs its editor lazily so perhaps a BoundField
could be given an editor rather than constructing one itself.
Also, regarding
Hello Ian,
I had a coworker take a look at the data binding framework. It looks
really good so far, but we had a couple of questions:
- Is it possible to run the binding on demand instead of automatically
with the attached listeners? Say I want to only run the binding after
the user pressed
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Arthur Kalmenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm looking to avoid updating the bean automatically. I want to
specify when the bean should be updated.
I see. I hadn't thought of that use case. As it stands, no, you
can't do that. BoundFieldImplB, P has a
reading the Bean Validation JSR yet, and I haven't
looked at Chris Ruffalo's code, but I have dipped my toe into using
Hibernate validation in my own server-side code. I *think* validation
could be tied into the data binding framework in a pretty
straightforward way by extending EditorT and ViewerT
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Ian Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just realized I should work up an example project that uses the
library. I'll get to that and post it shortly.
I've started a pretty thorough example, but the office is closing and
I don't have a key so I have leave now.
69 matches
Mail list logo
