End this email below is what it looks like when I run the compiler on a
modified Hello sample using the default compiler log level. How is the
signal-to-noise ratio? I think it's not great.
A few areas for improvement:
- Lower the log level for "Creating Split Point Map file for SOYC"; seems
lik
You might find this interesting, kind of related.
Generalized RPC for server-enhanced objects
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors/browse_thread/thread/1264556bab0906b6
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolki
LGTM, pending an LGTM on the other conditional property patch
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56816/diff/1/6
File user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/JUnit.gwt.xml (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56816/diff/1/6#newcode34
Line 34:
Probably want to remove this now?
http://gwt-code-re
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
> @Bruce, does the following work for you?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>{
> return location.search.indexOf('emulatedStack') != -1 ? 'true' :
> 'false';
>}
>
When you say, does it work for me, do you mean do I
Thanks a lot John.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:26 AM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Sami Jaber wrote:
>
>> I would like to have a look at JavaScriptObject$ class which is used for
>> the overlay types.
>> This class is generated by the HostedModeClassRewriter with ASM rou
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Sami Jaber wrote:
> I would like to have a look at JavaScriptObject$ class which is used for
> the overlay types.
> This class is generated by the HostedModeClassRewriter with ASM routines
> ...
> As .gwt-tmp has been removed, the new generated hosted mode classes
Hi,
I would like to have a look at JavaScriptObject$ class which is used for the
overlay types.
This class is generated by the HostedModeClassRewriter with ASM routines ...
As .gwt-tmp has been removed, the new generated hosted mode classes are now
created in the temp folder with a new fancy format
There'll be a future blog post on the subject for sure, the improvement can
be up to 20% reduction in gzip size whe combining this and other techniques.
-Ray
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Matt Mastracci wrote:
>
> Ray,
>
> This is really cool!
>
> On 13-Aug-09, at 1:22 PM, codesite-nore...@g
Okay, now to redo the tests.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56814/diff/1/9
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56814/diff/1/9#newcode455
Line 455: if (splitPoints.size() != 1) {
On 2009/08/13 19:50:17, scottb wrote:
>
Revision: 5965
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Thu Aug 13 14:40:09 2009
Log: Fixes a problem where the compiler did not emit dependency information
for programs with no calls to runAsync.
Review by: kprobst
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5965
Modified:
/trunk/dev
For my last work project, we used Kiyaa!, a GWT library that offers its own
declarative UI system (and data-binding). In addition, we used PureMVC as a
very lightweight MVC-framework. If you're familiar with PureMVC, you'll know
that it's much closer to MVP, as described by Ray Ryan, than it is a
t
Revision: 5964
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Thu Aug 13 14:19:09 2009
Log: Delete obsolete source files.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5964
Deleted:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/rebind/rpc/ClientDataSerializer.java
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/re
Revision: 5963
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Thu Aug 13 14:09:05 2009
Log: Re-introduces c5957, because the build succeeded with it.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5963
Modified:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/core/java/util/LinkedHashMap_C
Ray,
This is really cool!
On 13-Aug-09, at 1:22 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
>
> Revision: 5959
> Author: cromwellian
> Date: Thu Aug 13 12:21:36 2009
> Log: Function Clustering, improves gzip compression by significant
> margin.
> Top-level block restructuring for IE7 is now done p
CodeSplitter LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56814/diff/1/9
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56814/diff/1/9#newcode455
Line 455: if (splitPoints.size() != 1) {
Can splitPoints.size() == 0? If not, testing "siz
Revision: 5961
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Thu Aug 13 12:43:26 2009
Log: Rollback to last green build, 5956
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5961
Deleted:
/trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/JsAbstractTextTransformer.java
/trunk/dev/core/src/com/g
Revision: 5960
Author: cromwellian
Date: Thu Aug 13 12:24:26 2009
Log: Added unary prefix '+' operator to AST to fix, Issue #3942. Modified
Js code-gen to insert spaces in appropriate places to maintain correct
precedence. (e.g. a+ +b should not become a++b)
http://code.google.com/p/googl
Revision: 5959
Author: cromwellian
Date: Thu Aug 13 12:21:36 2009
Log: Function Clustering, improves gzip compression by significant margin.
Top-level block restructuring for IE7 is now done purely via a
text-transformation, while in-method block restructuring is done via the
AST. Block rest
Revision: 5958
Author: cromwellian
Date: Thu Aug 13 12:17:19 2009
Log: Fixed small typo in JSNI method
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5958
Modified:
/trunk/user/super/com/google/gwt/emul/java/util/Date.java
===
--- /trunk/user
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Kelly Norton wrote:
> fwiw, I've never found myself sorting GWT distros but I do find myself
> wanting to uniquely identify them all the time. Why do you think people will
> be so eager to ignore part of the label? I would actually be surprised if
> any form of na
Hi all,
I've been hacking around the lack of a true JavaScriptObject window in
GWT for a while and I was wondering if there was any interest in me
providing a patch for it. While the current
com.google.gwt.user.client.Window works for most cases, you aren't
able to interact with other wi
> -- Example #1 --
> Please sort the following two lists chronlogically as quickly as you can:
> List 1: "1.6.2", "1.6.5", "1.6.0", "1.6.1"
> List 2: "2.0.0-rc2", "2.0.0-ms2", "2.0.0", "2.0.0-rc1"
This should be trivial for anyone familiar with the concepts of
milestone and release candidate buil
fwiw, I've never found myself sorting GWT distros but I do find myself
wanting to uniquely identify them all the time. Why do you think people will
be so eager to ignore part of the label? I would actually be surprised if
any form of naming fixes the few incidences of the conversation you mention.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Scott Blum wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>> Senator Blum,
>>
>> Do you mean "disturbing" as in
>> 1) revolting,
>> 2) distressing, or
>> 3) disordering?
>>
>
> Distressing, I think.
>
> -- Example #1 --
>
> Please sort the follo
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> Senator Blum,
>
> Do you mean "disturbing" as in
> 1) revolting,
> 2) distressing, or
> 3) disordering?
>
Distressing, I think.
-- Example #1 --
Please sort the following two lists chronlogically as quickly as you can:
List 1: "1.6.2", "
Comment by nkreiff:
Crop and scale images in high resolution at compile time is a very useful
feature. Thanks in advance.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ImageResource
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/
Comment by nkreiff:
Compile-time cut and scaling to images is a very interesting and usefull
tool.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ImageResource
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Cont
Reviewers: bruce,
Message:
@Bruce, does the following work for you?
{
return location.search.indexOf('emulatedStack') != -1 ? 'true' :
'false';
}
Description:
This changes how JS stack emulation is enabled to take adv
Thanks a lot, Joel. It seems to be data binding resolution will be the
next big step in GWT.
Regards.
- Andrés
On 13 ago, 11:24, Joel Webber wrote:
> I don't want to speak for Ray here, since he gave the presentation, but my
> view is that they're largely orthogonal. UiBinder makes it easier to
Revision: 5957
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Thu Aug 13 08:05:36 2009
Log: Allow LinkedHashMap to be serialized in the AppEngine environment,
where it is not possible to use reflection to query the accessOrder
field.
Review by: jlabanca
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?
I don't want to speak for Ray here, since he gave the presentation, but my
view is that they're largely orthogonal. UiBinder makes it easier to create
views, but it has nothing in particular to say about how those views get
bound to data. Its main goal is to remove the pain of UI construction, and
@John,
Thanks for the explanation. At this point, it seems like I might as well
write my DTOs and mappings.
@Google Devs
So, I kind of feel unsure about where we're at right now... are there
discussions happening? Has an executive decision been made? I'm don't want
to seem impatient (I know you gu
LGTM.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56815
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
John,
The concern you raise is valid - how should one register sub-classes
for the right event, and should sub-class event handlers still be able
to handle super-class events?
I did run into this as well, and while I think it is a concern, I was
more immediately concerned with the issue at hand
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Nathan Wells wrote:
> I've been experimenting with GWT.isClient() and GWT.isScript(), but to
> no avail. Thus far I've only tried it in hosted mode with 1.7... is
> there something I'm missing?
>
isClient/isScript isn't going to let you include non-translatable c
Thanks (c: It's still early days, but the approach seems to be
working quite well. I'm hoping to get some more detailed
documentation up soonish.
Cheers
On Aug 13, 7:24 pm, Mathias Bogaert wrote:
> One of the coolest things I've seen since UiBinder. Excellent work!
>
> On Aug 13, 9:50 am, And
@Gary,
I've heard about the problems, but haven't experienced them myself. Is
there anything specific I should know about?
@Fred,
I've been experimenting with GWT.isClient() and GWT.isScript(), but to
no avail. Thus far I've only tried it in hosted mode with 1.7... is
there something I'm missin
How the UiBinder fits in the MVP architecture proposed at the google I/
O talks? (http://code.google.com/intl/es-AR/events/io/sessions/
GoogleWebToolkitBestPractices.html)
Regards.
- Andrés
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Con
One of the coolest things I've seen since UiBinder. Excellent work!
On Aug 13, 9:50 am, Andrew Pietsch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just uploaded a new prototype Form/Binding library based on
> PresentationModel/ValueModel pattern. It uses a builder style api
> inspired by Guice.
>
> It also suppo
Hi all,
I've just uploaded a new prototype Form/Binding library based on
PresentationModel/ValueModel pattern. It uses a builder style api
inspired by Guice.
It also support plugins for extending the functionality of the core
framework. Currently there's a metadata plugin and a validation
plug
40 matches
Mail list logo
