rance barriers. But that
> is a different, and probably more complicated (?) issue…
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
> *From:* grass-dev *On Behalf Of *Vaclav
> Petras
> *Sent:* onsdag 10. februar 2021 04:10
> *To:* Markus Neteler
> *Cc:* GRASS developers
different, and probably more complicated (?) issue...
Cheers
Stefan
From: grass-dev On Behalf Of Vaclav Petras
Sent: onsdag 10. februar 2021 04:10
To: Markus Neteler
Cc: GRASS developers list
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] Should we use GitHub Discussions?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:59 PM Mark
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:59 PM Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:50 PM Vaclav Petras wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:01 AM Markus Neteler wrote:
> >>
> > If we had a presence on StackExchange like QGIS has, we wouldn't be
> having a discussion about GitHub Discussions in the
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:50 PM Vaclav Petras wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:01 AM Markus Neteler wrote:
>>
> If we had a presence on StackExchange like QGIS has, we wouldn't be having a
> discussion about GitHub Discussions in the first place.
Try this:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:01 AM Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:40 AM Vaclav Petras wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:49 PM Luca Delucchi
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano
> >> wrote:
> >> > ‘’’
> >> > I think emails (and mailing lists) are
On 9/02/21 10:00, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:40 AM Vaclav Petras wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:49 PM Luca Delucchi wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano
wrote:
‘’’
I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists are
increasingly
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:40 AM Vaclav Petras wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:49 PM Luca Delucchi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano
>> wrote:
>> > ‘’’
>> > I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists are
>> > increasingly seen as archaic and
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:49 PM Luca Delucchi wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano
> wrote:
> >
> > ‘’’
> > I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists are
> increasingly seen as archaic and not accessible
> > ‘’’
> >
> > What about migrating our
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano
wrote:
>
> ‘’’
> I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists are
> increasingly seen as archaic and not accessible
> ‘’’
>
> What about migrating our mailing list to mailman3?
> The postorius interface looks modern and when
I hear your arguments, Vaclav, and understand that new generations have other
approaches to communication on the net, and use other tools. I have been
confronted with students to whom I suggested to ask their questions on a
mailing list only to realize a bit later that they had no idea what a
Hi,
Whatever platform we keep or migrate to, please just remember the
unknown number of GRASS-interested people out there, like myself, who
will not make the time to regularly login to a website to see if there
happens to be anything interesting.
Likewise as bad as having to login "to see" ,
‘’’
I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists are
increasingly seen as archaic and not accessible
‘’’
What about migrating our mailing list to mailman3?
The postorius interface looks modern and when integrated with hyper kitty,
allows an easy access to the list archives
Let me finally write some arguments for GitHub Discussions.
First of all, I think it is a tradeoff, so I agree that the issues here are
valid, at least to a point. My question now is if it is worth enabling
GitHub Discussions anyway.
As I mentioned earlier, people are asking for a web-based
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 6:35 PM Brendan wrote:
>
> Could posts on the mailing list automatically be posted on GitHub Discussions
> and vice versa? That's how the GRASS Nabble forums work right? Those look
> great.
If that would work, perhaps yes.
Otherwise I'm with Moritz and the others who
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 15:27, Stefan Blumentrath
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
Dear al,,
> In general, I do agree with Moritz on this.
>
> In addition to the risk of more fragmented communication, I do appreciate the
> fact that ML-discussion is archived. Furthermore, GitHub discussion seems to
> be
be OSGeo admins know?...
>
> Cheers
> Stefan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: grass-dev
> grass-dev-bounces@.osgeo
> On Behalf Of Moritz Lennert
> Sent: søndag 17. januar 2021 13:51
> To:
> grass-dev@.osgeo
> ; Vaclav Petras
> wenzeslaus@
> ;
--
> From: grass-dev
> On Behalf Of Moritz Lennert
> Sent: søndag 17. januar 2021 13:51
> To: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org; Vaclav Petras
> ; grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] Should we use GitHub Discussions?
>
>
>
> Am 17. Januar 2021 06:31:22
-dev@lists.osgeo.org; Vaclav Petras ;
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] Should we use GitHub Discussions?
Am 17. Januar 2021 06:31:22 MEZ schrieb Vaclav Petras :
Dear all,
What about enabling GitHub Discussions [1] on grass repo? Enabling is
easy [2], so the question really
: søndag 17. januar 2021 13:51
To: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org; Vaclav Petras ;
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] Should we use GitHub Discussions?
Am 17. Januar 2021 06:31:22 MEZ schrieb Vaclav Petras :
>Dear all,
>
>What about enabling GitHub Discussions [1] on grass repo?
Am 17. Januar 2021 06:31:22 MEZ schrieb Vaclav Petras :
>Dear all,
>
>What about enabling GitHub Discussions [1] on grass repo? Enabling is easy
>[2], so the question really is, do we want them? They are for open ended
>discussions, questions, etc. Right, like mailing list, but on GitHub. We do
Dear all,
What about enabling GitHub Discussions [1] on grass repo? Enabling is easy
[2], so the question really is, do we want them? They are for open ended
discussions, questions, etc. Right, like mailing list, but on GitHub. We do
get asked periodically for a web-based (as opposed to
21 matches
Mail list logo
