Emmanuel Briot wrote:
Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is
that it will definitely
25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
And I still believe that the official GNOME
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray
26 mar 2008 kl. 11.10 skrev Murray Cumming:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
but it's not given and GTK+ is not only for GNOME. The GNOME
bindings include (and require) a wider set of library bindings than
GTK
+
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:35 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
26 mar 2008 kl. 11.10 skrev Murray Cumming:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
but it's not given and GTK+ is not only for GNOME. The GNOME
bindings
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
We are not ignoring it, it is a planned change. There are one or two and
we have had quite a few improvement requests since going live - we will
be getting
2008/3/26, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Murray,
I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language
bindings are about other languages which are available for use with
GTK+. This is not GNOME. I really think having a small GNOME foot (or
another icon) for indication
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2008/3/26, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Murray,
I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language
bindings are about other languages which are available for use with
GTK+. This is not GNOME. I really think having a small GNOME foot (or
another
2008/3/26, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2008/3/26, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Murray,
I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language
bindings are about other languages which are available for use with
GTK+. This is not GNOME.
Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is
that it will definitely become out of date unless
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:44 +0100, Emmanuel Briot wrote:
Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2008/3/26, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2008/3/26, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Murray,
I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language
bindings are about other languages which are available for use with
GTK+. This is
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:44 +0100, Emmanuel Briot wrote:
Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
This list is not updated by anyone
While you guys are talking about website stuff again, on a side note I
want to mention the information about IRC stuff on the webpage:
http://www.gtk.org/development.html
This page mentions #gtk-devel as a place where team meetings occur, but
there has been a lot of traffic to this channel
Cody Russell wrote:
While you guys are talking about website stuff again, on a side note I
want to mention the information about IRC stuff on the webpage:
http://www.gtk.org/development.html
This page mentions #gtk-devel as a place where team meetings occur, but
there has been a lot of
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in
a
separate section.
Murray Cumming wrote:
what is most unfortunate is that library.g.o only has glib development
docs, but not gtk development docs.
That's probably because there are no tarball releases of GTK+ from svn
trunk at the moment. library.gnome.org can only use tarballs, I believe.
That is the
Nice!
Having SVG allows to produce nearly all other formats so that's OK.
One possible addition could be some icon sized PNGs (tweaked for small
size). If I have some time I'll try make them and post them on l.g.o.
Christophe
On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:26:33PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
This link will have to be kept up to date, if this is the link to use,
it would be better to have a more permanent link that doesn't change
with new versions of GNOME (which we used to have).
Theoretically,
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Christophe Dehais wrote:
Talking about the logo (which is very nice - simple and cool, like gtk
:)), what about a page where one's could get it in different formats
(svg, png, icon sized, etc.) ?
Hi Christophe!
Sounds like something that should probably
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in
a
separate section.
I see that the site is live already. Please don't just ignore this
regression. I've mentioned it before too.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in
a
separate section.
I see that the site is live already. Please don't just ignore this
regression. I've mentioned it before too.
Hi Murray,
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in
a
separate section.
I see that the site is live already. Please don't just
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 15:46 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
[snip]
what is most unfortunate is that library.g.o only has glib development
docs, but not gtk development docs.
That's probably because there are no tarball releases of GTK+ from svn
trunk at the moment. library.gnome.org can only use
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:30:14PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/download-linux.html
* outdated versions
You disagree? It might not make sense to list unsupported versions here
I agree, but we should
El dom, 27-01-2008 a las 23:37 +, Martyn Russell escribió:
The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has
any issues to take up before then, let me know.
A small correction. In documentation.html
GTK+ 2.0 Tree View
This tutorial covers the GtkTreeView and was
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
El dom, 27-01-2008 a las 23:37 +, Martyn Russell escribió:
The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has
any issues to take up before then, let me know.
A small correction. In documentation.html
GTK+ 2.0 Tree View
This tutorial covers
Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
First off: congratulations with a clean site, good first impressions. I
am not a GTK+ dev, but I happened to see your post and take the liberty
to share my small comments.
Thanks, it has taken long enough :)
Logo: fresh look, I like it. However, it looks
Hi !
On Jan 28, 2008 10:48 AM, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Logo: fresh look, I like it. However, it looks slightly distorted to me,
if it is supposed to resemble a perfect cube. As you know, all parallel
lines in a perspective projection share a common vanishing point. This
Le lundi 28 janvier 2008, à 01:25 +0100, Andreas Nilsson a écrit :
Olav Vitters wrote:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/development.html
* links to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for donation things, shouldn't
that rather use some private email address? IIRC there is a
better one.
Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has any
issues to take up
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 09:26 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
The plan is to upload these
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le lundi 28 janvier 2008, à 01:25 +0100, Andreas Nilsson a écrit :
Olav Vitters wrote:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/development.html
* links to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for donation things, shouldn't
that rather use some private email address? IIRC there is a
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Looks great. Tried to find very small things to note (nothing important):
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/index.html
* LGPL link is the v3 one
Fixed.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:30:14PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/download-linux.html
* outdated versions
You disagree? It might not make sense to list unsupported versions here
I agree, but we should definitely list older versions.
No, I mean
Philippe De Swert wrote:
The new site look great. A few nit picks:
features.html
* Language Bindings
Missing 2.12 column which should contain: gtkmm, pygtk, java-gnome, gtk2perl.
* Foundations
Missing new features from GIO and also GObject
What about GModule, GFoo, GBar, GWhatEverNext :)
Michael L Torrie (sorta) wrote:
I'm always amused by people who have big, hires screens and want to
maximize windows. In my opinion, on a 20 wide screen, I want
layouts to be narrow enough to be in a nice tall window that's narrow
enough to allow easy reading.
It's funny that you use the
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 23:37 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
it's very, very cool. kudos to you and Andreas: you lot did an
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2008, à 23:37 +, Martyn Russell a écrit :
Hi,
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
The plan is to upload these pages on
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2008, à 23:37 +, Martyn Russell a écrit :
Hi,
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
The plan is to upload these
[snip]
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:25:51AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/features.html
* no n810
Latest and greatest should totally be there. Perhaps we should only use
the n810 there. Saying only the N-series would save us from fixing this
Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has any
issues to take up
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/documentation.html
* under API, perhaps s/Library/Component/ or something?
*
45 matches
Mail list logo
