Ludovic Courtès writes:
> That said, I wonder if this would really be more convenient than SSH’ing
> into the target machine and running the commands right there. Perhaps
> I’m missing something about the use case?
The use case is to have a development host where packages are built and
then p
Hi,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:
[...]
> I was following the debate, but maybe I have missed something, so I will put
> forward my use case as well. I have two properties I would like to have from
> a
> "remote deploy" mechanism, and they are not satisfied by SSH-ing to the
> machine
>
On 2023-11-16 16:23:00 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
> > Felix Lechner writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> How about a 'remote-user-profile'?
> >
> > 'guix package' is already the command we use to create profiles; maybe
> > it could accept a '--remote' argument to o
On Thu, Nov 16 2023, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I wonder if this would really be more convenient than SSH’ing
> into the target machine and running the commands right there.
Just from using 'guix deploy' I'll note that 'guix pull' is an expensive
operation, especially when running a custom version-
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> Felix Lechner writes:
[...]
>> How about a 'remote-user-profile'?
>
> 'guix package' is already the command we use to create profiles; maybe
> it could accept a '--remote' argument to operate on a remote machine?
> Or is this not what 'GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=ssh://y
Hi,
Efraim Flashner writes:
[...]
>> 'guix package' is already the command we use to create profiles; maybe
>> it could accept a '--remote' argument to operate on a remote machine?
>> Or is this not what 'GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=ssh://your-target guix package
>> -m manifest.scm' can already accompli
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 09:36:46AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Felix Lechner writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 07 2023, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> >
> >> Then your suggestion to extend 'guix package' to be able to
> >> install a profile from a store profile sounds useful, or per
Hello,
Felix Lechner writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 07 2023, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>
>> Then your suggestion to extend 'guix package' to be able to
>> install a profile from a store profile sounds useful, or perhaps a new
>> 'guix deploy-profile' (or a better name / sub-command?) that would
>> a
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 07 2023, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Then your suggestion to extend 'guix package' to be able to
> install a profile from a store profile sounds useful, or perhaps a new
> 'guix deploy-profile' (or a better name / sub-command?) that would
> automate the copy and installation in one s
Hi Felix,
> On Wed, Nov 01 2023, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>> What do you think about changing “guix package” and/or “guix copy” to
>> better support deployment of remote profiles?
>
> As someone who uses 'guix deploy' all the time. I believe remote
> administration is one of our core strengths an
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, Nov 01 2023, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> What do you think about changing “guix package” and/or “guix copy” to
> better support deployment of remote profiles?
As someone who uses 'guix deploy' all the time. I believe remote
administration is one of our core strengths and selling
Hi Guix,
I build software locally and deploy the result to a remote system with
“guix copy”. This works pretty well but has a few rough edges:
1. “guix build -m manifest.scm” does not generate a profile. It only
builds the list of packages. To build a profile from a manifest file we
need to re
12 matches
Mail list logo
