After changing the TCP/IP SERVICE TYPE of Server A
from MULTI LISTENER to SINGLE LISTENER and restarting the links, PING
worked.
Though I have no idea why it did not work as MULTI
LISTENER..
Regards
Usha
-
Original Message -
From:
Usha
To:
When you say you are viewing a saved routine, how are you viewing the
saved routine and how was the routine saved (ZSAVE vs. GT.M HFS file vs. a
routine save utility to HFS)?
I have not looked at the complete M ANSI standards in awhile. What is the
official definition of line start character? I
I guess M is not a real language as you stated: Just as an example of
how lambda abstractions work in a real language
I believe both syntaxes will be difficult for the average M programmer to
understand. But this statement is conditional. If that programmer has
programmed in other languages,
Kevin --
I am not sure that I fully understand all the questions potentially implied by
your post. If any of the answers here are not adequately responsive, please
ask again.
Dynamically generated code is compiled on demand (just in time in Java
parlance) when there is a need to execute it.
On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:02 AM, Usha wrote:Hi all We want to have connection between two VistA systems, so that they can exchange patient data between themselves. According to the manuals, the first step is to establish a connection between them using the HL7 links.First of all, are you using HLO or
On Dec 6, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Matthew King wrote:If bean counters saw a woman with a post-partum hemorrhage spraying blood like a broken faucet, they would understand.One other thought: In the VA we have a program called "Get to Know" requiring those of us not working at the VAMCs to make visits to
Actually, now 10,000 - 20,000 is mostly assigned also now. I meant to ask
Cameron what the VHA is planning to do about this. The VHA had reserved
10,000 - 20,000 for local VAMC port use. Yet now this port range has mostly
been assigned.
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Woodhouse
On Dec 6, 2005, at 6:38 AM, Bhaskar, KS wrote:
Kevin --
I am not sure that I fully understand all the questions potentially
implied by your post. If any of the answers here are not
adequately responsive, please ask again.
Dynamically generated code is compiled on demand (just in time
For good or bad there is much M code out there outside of XLFDT and Fileman
date handlers that assume the internal Fileman date matches 7N.1..6N.
This code does things like W
$E(DATE,4,5)_/_$E(DATE,6,7)_/_(1700+$E(DATE,1,3)).
Thus I find it difficult to understand how one could have a field that
On Dec 6, 2005, at 12:56 PM, Maury Pepper wrote:
Bhaskar might clarify what GT.M does for indirection, but
recompiling would
not _always_ be necessary. In the case of a DO or GOTO, it might.
If the
executable does not keep a table of entry points, then compling and
linking
would
Comments below.
-- Bhaskar
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 12:05 -0800, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
On Dec 6, 2005, at 6:38 AM, Bhaskar, KS wrote:
Kevin --
I am not sure that I fully understand all the questions potentially
implied by your post. If any of the answers here are not
adequately
Comments below.
-- Bhaskar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Maury Pepper
Sent: Tue 12/6/2005 3:56 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Linking to VistA
- Original Message -
From: Gregory
On Dec 6, 2005, at 2:37 PM, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
[KSB] It is more involved in Java, but there is a way to execute
dynamic
code - I think it's something like taking a serialized class and
loading
it. Caveat: I am not, and never was, a Java programmer.
Well, let's just say that I've
On Dec 6, 2005, at 2:37 PM, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
[KSB] It's implemented in GT.M. (The code is GPL'd, so feel free to
look under the hood and see how it's done!)
Ah...but if I look at the code, I'll be contaminated. If I later
write something of my own, who's to say I'm not (perhaps
I think an argument can be made for GRADUAL CHANGE. Because of cost
and momentum issues, these changes have to be made all at once. I.e.
on go-live-day, suddenly the new system comes into play.
Instead, I believe that parallel systems should exist, and when the
computer proves itself better,
I don't know what you mean by the question of whether the linker
automatically follows this dependency.
Runtime support perhaps?
I think I didn't have the question well thought out. I guess what I
was saying is this: I wrote a c application, and linked it to my M
object code and
On 12/6/05, steven mcphelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you say you are viewing a saved routine, how are you viewing the
saved routine and how was the routine saved (ZSAVE vs. GT.M HFS file vs. a
routine save utility to HFS)?
What I mean is that when I open VistA code in my Kate editor in
Re: Also I've also noticed that the Laboratory Universal Interface
only provides options for HL7 1.5 (non TCP/IP). Is there any way to
configure it to work with 1.6?
No. There is a patch currently being tested (LA*5.2*66) which will
upgrade the Lab UI to use VistA HL v1.6. VA is currently
Are you saying that he that experiences GT.M cannot but be touched? I agree,
8-]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gregory Woodhouse
Sent: Tue 12/6/2005 6:58 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Subject:Re: [Hardhats-members]
You are right. If your application consists of C code and GT.M code, you will
need to move the whole works to the new environment.
-- Bhaskar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kevin Toppenberg
Sent: Tue 12/6/2005 9:22 PM
To:
20 matches
Mail list logo
