for
you.
Regards,
Richard.
From: Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Richard Davis wrote:
Today
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cameron
Schlehuber
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 7:47 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
While looking forward to Richard's response, let me
Apr 2005 14:36:45 +0800
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Are the documents you referred to at this web-site? The documents were
last revised in 2000, but some of the frameworks were marked as is and
some
-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Molly,
The reference you provide is a much more extensive and detailed presentation
of the subject than my paper. It is, at its title indicates, a view of
Information Architecture. Rich
, 2005 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Let's just say that I've very surprised, if not shocked, at the kinds
of things I've seen in released code. Some code is just old, and things
like creation of subentries through direct sets (including the 0-node
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:43:41 -0400
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
I find this interesting as I am wondering
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
FWIW - I'm not sure if the following is functional but at one time the
underlying software functionality anticipated various patient types and
identifiers.
Check out the following files
: Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Indeed, I've taken the approach of using parser driven tools
Richard Davis wrote:
Today, the core database within VistA does not contain a generalized
business-rule engine as a centralized, high level, tabled driven module
that controls all data storage and retrieval. Classical DHCP applications
and the VistA modules of today are obliged to embed their
for something potentially very
productive.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Self
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 4:29 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
for
you.
Regards,
Richard.
From: Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Richard Davis wrote
2005 18:46:59 -0600
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
While looking forward to Richard's response, let me chime in here with some
primitive examples of efforts along the lines of business rules engine
in VistA
I am new to Vista; have installed Cache and Vista, and it seems to be
running OK. What I'd like to know is how easy it is to configure Vista
tables; for example, we would not need SSN, VA numbers, combat service
location etc for patients but we might need other fields which aren't
present in the
It is not wise to remove tables and fields unless you are really sure
that you have also removed all the references to them. However, unlike
relational databases that have fixed, pre allocated blocks for storage,
Cache does not pre-allocate storage, and if a field is not used, it does
not take
I guess a better question... and one that I am thinking of... is there a
way to set up defaults... so that certain questions aren't even
asked...
Such as Veteran status ... etc.
I may be wrong... (and please correct me..)
Is the proper way to do this:
To create a template in Fileman?
And then
] Configurability of fields in FileMan
I guess a better question... and one that I am thinking of... is there a
way to set up defaults... so that certain questions aren't even
asked...
Such as Veteran status ... etc.
I may be wrong... (and please correct me..)
Is the proper way to do
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
I am new to Vista; have installed Cache and Vista, and it seems to be
running OK. What I'd like to know is how easy it is to configure Vista
tables; for example, we would not need SSN
@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:06:04 +0200
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
I am new to Vista; have installed Cache and Vista, and it seems to be
running OK. What I'd like to know is how easy
5 14:06:04 +0200 To: <HARDHATS-MEMBERS@LISTS.SOURCEFORGE.NET> Subject:
[Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan I am new to Vista; have installed Cache and Vista, and it seems to be running OK. What I'd like to know is how easy it is to configure Vista tables; for exam
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:55:04 -0400
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Could you please address the poison in a little
2005 03:46 pm, Richard G. DAVIS wrote:
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:55:04 -0400
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Could
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:14:13 -0400
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
So I guess that means that one cannot entirely
] Configurability of fields in FileMan
So I guess that means that one cannot entirely rely upon the cross reference
information in the data dictionary to track down the potential interactions
with other packages, hence the desire of many to carefully reengineer VistA
before considering an attempt
Message -
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
So I guess that means that one cannot entirely rely upon the cross
reference
information
Indeed, I've taken the approach of using parser driven tools to solve
problems like this, but the problem is harder than you might think.
Consider that the FDA array and IENS string for a DBS call is set up
ahead of time and is very possibly referenced indirectly. I've seen
nodes of files set in
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Indeed, I've taken the approach of using parser driven tools to solve
in VistA, but it uses
many of the same Fileman fields.
Jim Gray
- Original Message - From: Nancy Anthracite
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
So I guess
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Indeed, I've taken the approach of using parser driven tools to solve
problems like this, but the problem is harder than you might think.
Consider that the FDA array and IENS string for a DBS call is set up
ahead of time
28 matches
Mail list logo
