This box is running Vista not Win7 so the score only goes up to 5.9 tops.
On 5/9/2010 11:33 PM, maccrawj wrote:
5.9 sounds like the HDD speed bringing you down. My now aging Q6600
gives me that much, with the rest of the system rating 7.1.
It's been awhile since I've transcoded DVD but 27min
This stuff ought to be here by Wednesday, so I'll test it out and give a
report in terms of performance.
I certainly don't expect it to be a good as Gb Ethernet, but it cost way
less in a house built in 1988. And my experience with wireless has not
be stellar...too many drops on the wireless
I hate to be a hater...but I seriously don't want to get any more apple
stuff over my lifetime. I have too many ipods as it is and I just don't
like how they keep it all locked down. And since they got in bed with
ATT and locked me out of an iPhone upgrade, I'm going to become a loyal
Android
All of the wifi bridges I have seen just support one device on the other
end...and I'm not sure it would really solve the problems with wireless
dropping out (I don't know if it is a tivo problem or a wireless
problem, as the tivo will drop while the wireless PC are still
going)...that's half
1. That's why I run the N in N-only mode and have another b/g WAP in a
non-overlapping channel. Same basic concept as dual radio. Point remains
that you can exceed 100mbit on N gear fairly easily.
2. Yes, compared to the features, robustness, and performance of pfSense,
dd-wrt based appliances are
What's better? pfSENSE or M0n0wall?
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 4:00 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] 1000 Mbps vs 100 Mpbs
1. That's
pfSense was forked from m0n0wall several years ago to provide expanded
features not consistent with m0n0wall's minimalist approach suitable to
smaller, embedded systems. It also uses the (IMO) more robust and less
quirky BSD packet filter (pf) instead of ipfw. They offer a similar
interface and
I see.
Very interesting.
But if I wanted a pfSense box, then that would make my router redundant.
I would have to just use it as an AP right?
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
Sent: Monday,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 01:07:25AM -0500, Greg Sevart wrote:
I've pushed over 240mbit/s on my D-Link DIR-655 N router (which I use as
nothing more than an AP) and an Intel 5300 NIC. You don't have to run dual
frequency, but that was with a double (40MHz) channel.
I know that the dd-wrt
haha I WEI on your face
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:54:46AM -0500, Greg Sevart wrote:
He said Vista. The WEI scale tops out at 5.9 in Vista, and 7.9 in W7.
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of
Yes. You can use pfSense as an access point I think, but that really isn't
its purpose. It is designed to be a firewall and/or router first and
foremost. If you did implement one, you'd probably want to take any existing
device that you have performing routing/firewall/NAT duties and disable
those
I've used a few a scrapped all of them. Very slooow and intermittently glitchy.
I still have a couple sitting at home somewhere.
lopaka
From: Anthony Q. Martin amar...@charter.net
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 6:22:18
You guys have totally polluted my thread. LOL...
I have all the parts here in house right now except for the HD which I
will order today. I'm actually lucky to still have them. My house was
broken into last week. We lost jewelry and my laptop and a few other
little things but the stack of new PC
GPL,
So sorry to hear of your loss.
This now hardens me to even harder security!
Damnit! What is wrong with America?
Best,
Duncan
On 05/10/2010 14:03, GPL wrote:
You guys have totally polluted my thread. LOL...
I have all the parts here in house right now except for the HD which I
will order
Ah man that's big time fraked up! Probably meth heads on a run for stuff that sells
quick. With any luck the jewelry will lead the police to the pawn shop where they
offload it.
The identity theft thing is major good idea as are rotating any passwords that might
be remembered by the laptop
Well for home use this sounds like overkill especially if it needs more than a little
12W embedded device to run. I do see where a larger setup could benefit from it, but
that's apples to oranges.
On 5/10/2010 6:41 AM, Greg Sevart wrote:
Yes. You can use pfSense as an access point I think,
OK, did not know that about WEI not that I rely on it as a benchmark.
Just ripped compressed 50% with DVDFAB7, 14min. Of course if were talking handbrake
I found it drags ass for some reason.
On 5/9/2010 10:54 PM, Greg Sevart wrote:
He said Vista. The WEI scale tops out at 5.9 in Vista, and
I'm still very happy with clearos (was clark). I'm using it on a via epia dual
gigabit board. Stable. Works fine.
Sent via BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: maccrawj maccr...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 14:11:45
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] 1000 Mbps vs 100
Sorry to hear about the break-in. Hope they catch those thieves.
On 5/10/2010 1:03 PM, GPL wrote:
You guys have totally polluted my thread. LOL...
I have all the parts here in house right now except for the HD which I
will order today. I'm actually lucky to still have them. My house was
broken
Same here, I love it. In fact ClearOS looks a lot more polished than CC and
still runs pretty decent on minimal hardware. For example, I upgraded my little
embedded 4 port box (600MHz celeron) from CC4 to ClearOS. I've got 1GB ram.
This little box runs a proxy server with content filtering (for
Lopaka,
UDAMan, Bro!
No. I do not wish to know where you learn all this stuff?
Happy that you did it! Very nice reads.
Best,
Duncan
On 05/10/2010 18:32, Robert Martin Jr. wrote:
Same here, I love it. In fact ClearOS looks a lot more polished than
CC and still runs pretty decent on minimal
ClearOS does look pretty cool, definitely more features and more hand holding
than pfsense but still neat if you need it.
(I use PfSense and it suits me fine, but no kids to censor! :) )
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:32:26PM -0700, Robert Martin Jr. wrote:
Same here, I love it. In fact ClearOS
Yeah... it sucks, but what'ya gunna do?! As far as laptops, I have the
old Inspiron 600m in use. HA, thought it was fully retired. It's lost
its power panel and I see the MB below it. Plus, ITS SLOW, needs a
format new install. But it's got me online. I miss my Inspiron 15.
However, a few months
23 matches
Mail list logo