I truly apologize for this one. I have totally NOT kept up with this.
Sorry.
My server now runs Win2000 Server. It is at SP4. But, I suspect that this
level of OS is soon to be no longer supported and/or able to be
WinUpdate-able. SO,...
{When is goes I will miss itIt runs so well.}
W
Correct.
--Original Message--
From: DHSinclair
Sender: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
To: Hardware Group
ReplyTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Jan 21, 2009 11:27 PM
Subject: [H] Stupid Question..perhaps?
I truly apologize for this one. I have totally NOT kept up with this.
Sorry
oup.com
To: Hardware Group
ReplyTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Jan 21, 2009 11:27 PM
Subject: [H] Stupid Question..perhaps?
I truly apologize for this one. I have totally NOT kept up with this.
Sorry.
My server now runs Win2000 Server. It is at SP4. But, I suspect that this
level of OS is
;>--Original Message--
>>From: DHSinclair
>>Sender: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
>>To: Hardware Group
>>ReplyTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
>>Sent: Jan 21, 2009 11:27 PM
>>Subject: [H] Stupid Question..perhaps?
>>
>>I truly apologize f
gs that no one in their right mind would attend if not for the free
stuff)
Sent via BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:26:31 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
To:
Subject: Re: [H] Stupid Question..perhaps?
I am deploying Server 2003 right now,
I had to spend about 70
What kind of server activities does the computer do? Is it a domain
server?
What I'm getting at is, what features of Win server 2k3 or 2k8 do you
need, that's not available in plain windows 2000, or XP?
(and I personally would run windows 2000 until it dies unless there's
some new feature
This is for a busness deal I'm doing.
-Original Message-
>From: tmse...@rlrnews.com
>Sent: Jan 22, 2009 12:32 AM
>To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
>Subject: Re: [H] Stupid Question..perhaps?
>
>For your own use or a client? If these are for your own use, there i
bject: [H] Stupid Question..perhaps?
To: "Hardware Group"
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 9:27 PM
I truly apologize for this one. I have totally NOT kept up with this.
Sorry.
My server now runs Win2000 Server. It is at SP4. But, I suspect that this
level of OS is soon to be no longer s
ith security patches and
extras added into the install, to keep it up to date.
lopaka
--- On Wed, 1/21/09, DHSinclair wrote:
From: DHSinclair
Subject: [H] Stupid Question..perhaps?
To: "Hardware Group"
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 9:27 PM
I truly apologize for this one. I have
From: "DHSinclair"
I do NOT run DHCP, DNS, FileServer, MailServer,
FTPServer, SNMPServer, STMPServer, CommServer, WhatEverServer. I do allow
my server to be my WINS Server on my LAN. I do not run Active Directory.
The server is NOT a domain controller (yet! I am still wrestling with the
pros/c
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:19 PM, Rick Glazier wrote:
Sorry if I sound dumber than dirt...
There is one warning that Win2003Server gives at install time that
tells
you to set something up in 7 days or less or it will not work anymore.
I only saw that once. I never ran it past a day or two.
Any
From: "Scott Sipe"
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:19 PM, Rick Glazier wrote:
Sorry if I sound dumber than dirt...
There is one warning that Win2003Server gives at install time that
tells
you to set something up in 7 days or less or it will not work anymore.
I only saw that once. I never ran it pas
IMHO if your not running at least domain+DHCP+DNS+NTP from 2K* server there is little
point to running "server" editions of windows at all. There are roles for member
servers just running dedicated apps such as SQL, Apache, Samba but then what's the
point to paying top $ to use server stand-alon
Hey, meant to reply earlier sorry I didn't...
completely agree with below...
don't think there's really any need for you to have a home domain
server (adds way more complexity than is needed and desired!) and
without that, any other old edition of windows is just as good, imho.
Ubuntu Linu
Ok, so how would you control access to 5 PCs & numerous resources in a way where if
one child is bad you can lock 'em out or simply limit his access to the games, media
or key application folders across multiple machines? Never mind being in control of
house-wide time/location login restrictions
I'm not sure, but I guess you could do all of that with group policy
editor, and manually copying the policy between computers? A pain--
definitely...
my main problem with domain servers at home would be backups. That is,
if you're primary domain controller goes down, does the rest of your
Well we don't do roaming profiles, too much hassle for too little benefit. Apps are
local installs, my docs get mirrored to server but saved local also so no issues there.
Single DC is an issue but it's easily recovered from regular automated backups. Even
with 2 DC's if one went down you're st
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Wayne Johnson wrote:
At 12:24 AM 1/28/2009, maccrawj typed:
Ok, so how would you control access to 5 PCs & numerous resources in a way
where if one child is bad you can lock 'em out or simply limit his access to
the games, media or key application folders across multiple m
Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Wayne Johnson wrote:
At 12:24 AM 1/28/2009, maccrawj typed:
Ok, so how would you control access to 5 PCs & numerous resources in
a way where if one child is bad you can lock 'em out or simply limit
his access to the games, media or key applicatio
On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:40 AM, maccrawj wrote:
Agreed also, morons still buy "Home" & "Basic" editions of windows
that lock them out of basic security features like file ACLS so it's
a high target. I imagine there is a free linux server replacement
for AD/LDAP that could replace the Window
20 matches
Mail list logo
