Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Hayes Elkins
From: FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: The Hardware List To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure" Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 11:30:58 -0700 no proof, a volcanic eruption can do more damage in a day then cars in 1000

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But you're right. I didn't answer the question. I use a back pack and two > hand held canvas bags. I hardly ever fill them all. P.S. The first thing to go should be the bag on demand. It should be outlawed. Vender will be more than willing to sell you a reusa

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > he pushes the cart home Another gem. I wouldn't need to attack you. You fall down all by yourself. :) But you're right. I didn't answer the question. I use a back pack and two hand held canvas bags. I hardly ever fill them all. Wishing the best for you a

RE: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure"

2006-03-04 Thread FORC5
. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al >Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 1:36 PM >To: The Hardware List >Subject: Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search >for"failure" > > >Thx Gr

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al > Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 1:36 PM > To: The Hardware List > Subject: Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search > for"failure" > > > Thx Greg. > &g

RE: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Christopher Klein
: Saturday, March 04, 2006 1:36 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure" Thx Greg. Back from my daily 2 mile (1 each way) walk to the food store. And yes, I drive when the weather is inclement. A win win win. It's

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no proof, a volcanic eruption can do more damage in a day then cars in 1000 > years, besides, the earth is pretty good at using it's left hand. > need to get off save the planet, the planet is just fine and will always be > just fine, until the next mass extin

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
Thx Greg. Back from my daily 2 mile (1 each way) walk to the food store. And yes, I drive when the weather is inclement. A win win win. It's good for me, I meet and talk to my neighbors, and it's good for the planet. That's all I'm trying to say ppl. If you win the rat race, you still a rat.

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread FORC5
no proof, a volcanic eruption can do more damage in a day then cars in 1000 years, besides, the earth is pretty good at using it's left hand. need to get off save the planet, the planet is just fine and will always be just fine, until the next mass extinction. the earth is not overpopulated, goog

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for"failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Greg Sevart
Bryan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You are all still the same argumentative personal attacking people as when I left. Attack the arguments, not the people. Thx for the sage words. I was thinking I was doing my best to be respectful and personal with my fellow debaters. If i could have do

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
Bryan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are all still the same argumentative personal attacking people as when > I left. Attack the arguments, not the people. Thx for the sage words. I was thinking I was doing my best to be respectful and personal with my fellow debaters. If i could have

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Bryan Seitz
You are all still the same argumentative personal attacking people as when I left. Attack the arguments, not the people. On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:39:37AM -0700, Al wrote: > > "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Are you saying I should spend tens of thousands to buy an inferior ve

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
Ya'know, I would like to respond to this. :) FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so maybe we should wipe our ass with our left hand. I not sure how to interpret this. Is it a slam in Islam? Because they use one hand for eating and one for wiping. Is it a political statement? Like I'm a commi

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
"Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you saying I should spend tens of thousands to buy an inferior vehicle > that I won't like? No, of course not. More later. > That's asinine. I may have "pie in the sky" requirements > before alternative energy cars are appealing to me, yes, b

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Greg Sevart
FROM: "But I'm not about to feel guilty for buying and driving a vehicle I like and can afford." Paraphrase: Of the things to consider, the environment is not a factor. I have the bucks and I want it. After all, it's all about me. "Until then (the pie in the shy perfect electric car), I'm go

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so maybe we should wipe our ass with our left hand. > > get a life, things evolve. Haha, thx. You have a great day too. :) Best, Al

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread FORC5
big v8's keep the cost of fuel down and do not pollute any more then anything else, some may even be better. Basically new cars just do not put that much out the pipe with cats. do not believe me run with the garage door closed and see. At 07:37 AM 3/4/2006, Al Poked the stick with: >P.S. > >Le

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread FORC5
so maybe we should wipe our ass with our left hand. get a life, things evolve. At 07:18 AM 3/4/2006, Al Poked the stick with: >Blind greed capitalism has the Western Culture (double for Americans) >hoodwinked into thinking bigger, faster, more, and the some more after >that is the way to a happy

Re: Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
P.S. Let me say, if one wants to drive a big fat V8, I believe in freedom. Please drive one. But that driver should pay for the extra pollution. It's the pricing system that does not reflect the true cost of driving that big V8. Thx for your time. Al Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Standard of living - was - cars was [H] google search for "failure"

2006-03-04 Thread Al
Hey ppl, Lots of good replies from the group; FROM: "But I'm not about to feel guilty for buying and driving a vehicle I like and can afford." Paraphrase: Of the things to consider, the environment is not a factor. I have the bucks and I want it. After all, it's all about me. "Until then